Evaluation Criteria. Record of Decision (ROD) 7/04-8/05 8/05-9/05 TBD TBD TBD. Final EIS (FEIS) Community Outreach

Similar documents
CHAPTER 4: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

CORRIDOR-WIDE MEETING SUMMARY

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Metro!Denver!MTD!Governance!Committee! October!23,!2013!!9:00!AM!to!10:00!AM! Denver!Regional!Council!of!Governments!

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

APPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES

Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio

I-290 Phase 1 Study Alternatives Tool Box.

Comprehensive Collection of Stakeholder Alternatives by Mode

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

CHAPTER 3.0: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Freeway System Considerations

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

the New Transit Systems in the Tappan Zee Bridge/I287 Corridor

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

County of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

I-80 Corridor Overhaul

2017 General Obligation Bond

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

C C C

RTA 2013 Leadership Briefing and Tour Report

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Initial Alternatives Identification and Evaluation Report. November 2011 APPENDIX B. Summary of Stakeholder Single Mode Suggestions

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study. San Francisco Bay ITE November 2016

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

FY 2005 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

FY 2004 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

FI-2 I-66 Between Route 29, Lee Highway and Route 15, James Madison Highway

The following notes describe comments received that were written/drawn on maps by workshop participants.

Project Data Sheets. Friday, February 18, 2011

Creating the Future Bruce B Downs Blvd

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

FI N A N C I A L RESOURCER S REVIEW AND UPDATE M I A M I-DADE LO N G R A N G E TRANSPORT T ATION PLAN UPDATE TO THE YE

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Long List of Level 1 Alternatives

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

Chapter 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT RELATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NORTHERN VIRGINIA HIGHLIGHTS for the Dulles Area Transportation Association

Broadway Complete Streets Project

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Public Hearings

Using Simulation to Evaluate Traffic Signal Preemption at Railway-Highway Grade Crossings

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

Fitting Light Rail through Well-established Communities

Welcome to the Sellwood Bridge Project Open House!

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

Staunton. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DRAFT NEED AND PURPOSE

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Fairlington Citizens Association September 12, 2016

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181

1. What is the Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project (Project)?

I-395 Express Lanes Northern Extension Project Crystal City Civic Association September 21, 2016

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

TRAFFIC CONDITIONS REPORT FOR INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 225 (I-225) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGES (PEL) STUDY

5. MODIFICATIONS AT JEANNE D ARC BOULEVARD/REGIONAL ROAD 174 INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION - PUBLIC HEARING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

STH 57 & STH 100 Intersection Village of Brown Deer Milwaukee County November 2015

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

3.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - HARMONY ROAD (SH68)

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

STUDY PROCESS & SCHEDULE

Project Fact Sheet. August 1,

Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)

Alternatives Considered 2.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

US 20 Feasibility Study. Village Board Meeting. Shales Parkway to IL Route 390 IL Route 390 Extension (North Ave to US 20)

Transcription:

EIS Process We are here 1 2 3 4 5 Scoping Purpose and Need Evaluation Criteria Alternative Development Alternative 7/03-12/03 12/03-2/04 12/03-2/04 1/04-5/04 3/04-8/04 6 7 8 9 10 Draft EIS (DEIS) Evaluation Formal Public Comment on DEIS Final EIS (FEIS) Formal Public Comment on FEIS Record of Decision (ROD) 7/04-8/05 8/05-9/05 TBD TBD TBD Community Outreach A cooperative effort between FHWA, FTA, CDOT, RTD, and Denver

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Interstate Alignment Section 1 I-25 to Brighton Boulevard IA1 Existing I-70 vertical alignment IA2 Existing I-70 horizontal alignment IA3 Lower I-70 below existing ground IA4 Add a level to the viaduct IA5 Enclose I-70 IA6 Put I-70 at-grade IA7 Triple level section of I-70 (below ground) IA8 I-70 tunnel IA9 I-70 above and below with at ground level Section 2 Brighton Boulevard to Colorado Boulevard IA10 Existing I-70 vertical alignment IA11 Existing I-70 horizontal alignment IA12 Lower I-70 below existing ground IA13 Add a level to the viaduct IA14 Enclose I-70 IA15 Put I-70 at-grade IA16 Triple level section of I-70 (below ground) IA17 I-70 tunnel IA18 I-70 above and below with at ground level Section 3 Colorado Boulevard to I-270 IA19 Existing I-70 vertical alignment IA20 Existing I-70 horizontal alignment Section 4 I-270 to I-225 IA21 Existing I-70 vertical alignment IA22 Existing I-70 horizontal alignment Section 5 I-225 to Peña Boulevard IA23 Existing I-70 vertical alignment IA24 Existing I-70 horizontal alignment Other IA25 Improve I-270 and reclassify I-70 IA26 Realign the I-70 westbound lanes north IA27 Realign the I-70 eastbound lanes to Smith Road IA28 Move I-70 north of Elyria/Swansea (along rail alignment) IA29 Move I-70 north of Elyria/Swansea (along 52nd Avenue) IA30 Move I-70 north of Elyria/Swansea (along I-270/rail alignment) Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Interstate Alignment

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Interchanges I1 I-25 I2 Washington Street I3 Brighton Boulevard I4 York Street I5 Steele Street/Vasquez Boulevard I6 Colorado Boulevard I7 Dahlia Street I8 Holly Street I9 Monaco Street I10 Quebec Street I11 I-270 I12 Havana Street I13 Peoria Street I14 I-225 I15 Chambers Boulevard I16 Peña Boulevard I17 Airport Boulevard I18 Tower Road 1 I19 Picadilly Road I20 Central Park Boulevard I21 Additional access to Globeville area I22 I-270/Quebec Street improvements I23 Eliminate accesses I24 Combine accesses 1 1. Does not address purpose and need. Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Interchanges

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Interstate Lane Types IL1 Dedicated lane for commuters IL2 Dedicated lane for DIA travelers IL3 Reversible expressway lane IL4 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane IL5 Toll lane IL6 General purpose lane IL7 Dedicated bus lane IL8 Dedicated truck lane IL9 Collector distributor (C-D) roads IL10 Emergency lane IL11 Frontage roads IL12 Auxiliary lanes IL13 Truck only ramps at Steele Street/Vasquez Boulevard IL14 Braided ramps IL15 Dual divided highway IL16 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Interstate Lane Types

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Transit Alignment On-street Downtown Transit Alignments TA19 Brighton Boulevard TA4 Broadway Street TA5 Washington Street TA29 California Street TA30 Welton Street/Downing Street Off-street East-West Transit Alignments TA1 Along I-70 (in the ROW) TA2 Existing Union Pacific tracks/smith Road TA31 BNSF Denver Market Lead On-street East-West Transit Alignments TA3 35th Avenue TA6 Martin Luther King Boulevard TA9 Bruce Randolph/35th Avenue TA10 38th Avenue 1 TA11 Montview Boulevard TA7 Colfax Avenue TA13 Havana Street TA14 56th Avenue/North of 56th Avenue TA15 64th Avenue median Off-street Airport Transit Alignments TA8 Tower Road TA12 Peña Boulevard 1 TA16 Run Further East of DIA TA17 Picadilly Road TA18 E-470 Other Transit Alignments 2 TA20 Connection to North Front Range Area TA21 30th Avenue/Downing Street to 40th Ave/40th Street TA22 Downtown Brighton to National Western Complex TA23 US 36/ I-70 connection before Denver Union Station TA24 From Montbello to downtown Denver to DIA TA25 Connection to 40th/40th should be provided TA26 Connection between I-225 and I-70 transit alternatives TA27 Depressed alignment TA28 Elevated alignment 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1. Does not address purpose and need. 2. Providing a connection to the North Front Range Area is currently being evaluated in the North I-25 EIS. Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Transit Alignment

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Station Locations S1 Denver Union Station S2 Five Points Area S3 Blake Street S4 33rd and Downing S5 31st Street S6 Cole Area S7 40th Avenue/40th Street S8 National Western Complex (47th/Brighton Boulevard) S9 Globeville Area S10 Brighton Boulevard S11 Swansea/Globeville Area S12 47th /Brighton Boulevard S13 Swansea Area S14 York Street S15 Steele Street S16 Clayton Area S17 Northeast Denver S18 40th Avenue/Colorado Boulevard S19 Colorado Boulevard S20 Dahlia Street S21 Northeast Park Hill S22 Holly Street S23 Quebec Street S24 Former Stapleton S25 Within Stapleton Development S26 Havana Street S27 Smith Road and Peoria Street 3 S28 Fitzsimons S29 Gateway S30 Peña Boulevard/Tower Road S31 40th Avenue/Peña Boulevard S32 Airport Boulevard/Smith Road S33 68th/Tower Road S34 56th/Tower Road S35 48th/Tower Road S36 45th/Tower Road S37 Smith Road/Tower Road S38 Denver International Airport (DIA) S39 One to two miles apart with Park-n-Rides S40 Ballpark Area S41 Monaco Parkway 3 3. A station location near Fitzsimons will be evaluated in the RTD Corridor Scoping Study on I-225 and is not a part of this study. Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Stations

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Transit Technology TT1 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) TT2 Commuter rail TT3 Heavy rail TT4 High speed rail (Bullet train) TT5 Light rail TT6 Magnetic levitation (MagLev) TT7 Monorail TT8 Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) TT9 Sky tram TT10 Street car/trolley TT11 Alternative fueled transit vehicles TT12 Bus feeder system TT13 Call-n-Ride service TT14 Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) TT15 Double decker buses TT16 Electric trains TT17 Express buses TT18 Local and express trains Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Transit Technology

Draft Pre- and Comparative Analysis Results Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Transportation Demand Management/ Transportation System Management (TDM/TSM) DS1 Improved pedestrian facilities DS2 Improved bicycle facilities DS3 Enhanced bus service DS4 Ride sharing DS5 Vary business work schedules (Flex time) DS6 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) DS7 Freight transport management DS8 Road pricing/congestion pricing Pre- Comparative Detailed DEIS Full Evaluation Local System Improvements LS1 Connect I-76 to DIA LS2 Improve 56th Avenue LS3 Improve Smith Road 1 LS4 Improve 6th Avenue LS5 Improve intersections where the railroad crosses 4 LS6 Extend Smith Road LS7 Connect tolling options to E-470 LS8 Remove through trucks from I-70 LS9 At-grade crossings LS10 Outer Loop LS11 Improve I-270 1 1 1. Does not address purpose and need. 4. Extending Smith Road is included in local plans. 1 4 Note: Removal of local system improvements from the screening process does not eliminate the merit of improvements to the system to address local needs. These improvement alternatives do not meet the purpose and need of the I-70 East Corridor EIS. Alternative will be carried forward to detailed screening Alternative will not be not carried forward Not considered a stand alone alternative, may be combined with other alternatives as necessary to improve overall system operations. Will not be evaluated as a stand alone alternative in the remaining screening levels. Transportation Demand Management Transportation System Management Local System Improvements

IA3 Westbound Existing Ground Eastbound Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Lower I-70 Below Existing Ground

IA4 I-70 Lanes I-70 Lanes I-70 Lanes Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Add a Level to the Viaduct

IA5 Cover (roof) over I-70 Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Eastbound Eastbound Existing Ground Enclose I-70

Existing Ground Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Put I-70 At-Grade IA6

IA7 Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Triple Level Section of I-70 (Below Ground)

IA8 Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 I-70 Tunnel

IA9 Eastbound I-70 Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Westbound I-70 I-70 Above and Below with 46th Avenue at Ground

Cover (roof) over I-70 Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Enclose I-70 IA14

Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Westbound I-70 Eastbound I-70 Triple Level Section of I-70 (Below Ground) IA16

IA18 Eastbound I-70 Westbound Eastbound Existing Ground Westbound I-70 I-70 Above and Below with at Ground Level

High Speed Rail TT4

Magnetic Levitation TT6

Personal Rapid Transit TT8

Heavy Rail TT3

Monorail TT7