Nanortalik A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements rev 1

Similar documents
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009

Wind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine

WIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

WIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District

WIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

FIVE YEARS OF OPERATION OF THE FIRST OFFSHORE WIND RESEARCH PLATFORM IN THE GERMAN BIGHT FINO1

The OWEZ Meteorological Mast

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

WIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks

WIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Quincy DPW, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report

Meteorological Conditions at Lillgrund. Lillgrund Pilot Project

Buckland Wind Resource Report

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

WCA Wind Research Project Report

Validation of long-range scanning lidars deployed around the Høvsøre Test Station

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

Validation Study of the Lufft Ventus Wind Sensor

MICROPHONE WIND SPEED LIMITS DURING WIND FARM NOISE MEASUREMENTS

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

A Study of the Normal Turbulence Model in IEC

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

Full Classification acc. to IEC for SoDAR AQ510 Wind Finder. Vincent Camier, Managing Director, Ammonit Measurement GmbH

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

Wind Assessment Basics

Mast Inspection. Client: Location: Date: Inspected by: Verified by:

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report

1.1 The Facilitator began the 7th meeting by reviewing the SLG Team s actions from the 6th SLG meeting on 1 st February 2013.

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

Can Lidars Measure Turbulence? Comparison Between ZephIR 300 and an IEC Compliant Anemometer Mast

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen

EWTW Meteorological database

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

P.O.Box 43 Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway Tel.: , Fax: Statkraft,Postboks 200 Lilleaker, 0216 Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Valerijs Bezrukovs, Vladislavs Bezrukovs Ventspils University College Latvia. WREF2012 Denver, CO May 13-17, 2012

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

Shaktoolik, Alaska Wind Resource Report

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind resource assessment. 17 January 2017 Anthony Crockford

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

FINAL WIND DATA REPORT. Mattapoisett Mattapoisett, Massachusetts

CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Introduction EU-Norsewind

Atqasuk Wind Resource Report

Remote sensing standards: their current status and significance for offshore projects

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Analysis of Extreme Wind Characteristics from Two Tall Meteorological Towers in Central Iowa

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Agreement n.: FP7-ENERGY / n Duration January 2012 to June DTU Wind Energy, Risø Campus, Denmark

Wind Resource Assessment for KING SALMON, ALASKA

Wind Speed and Energy at Different Heights on the Latvian Coast of the Baltic Sea

Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA

FINO1 Mast Correction

Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA

Site Description: Tower Site

Preliminary layout report

MANUAL KPS Pressure Control Valve

LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ

TESTING AND CALIBRATION OF VARIOUS LiDAR REMOTE SENSING DEVICES FOR A 2 YEAR OFFSHORE WIND MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

Nitrogen subtraction on reported CO 2 emission using ultrasonic flare gas meter

LIDAR Correlation to Extreme Flapwise Moment : Gust Impact Prediction Time and Feedforward Control

Windar Photonics Wind Sensor. Great at Control

Service Calibration are you doing it properly?

Wind assessment network at North of Yucatan Peninsula

Meso- and Micro-scale modelling in China: Wind measurements at 12 meteorological stations in NE China (Dongbei)

COMPARISON OF ZEPHIR MEASUREMENTS AGAINST CUP ANEMOMETRY AND POWER CURVE ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

Nanortalik A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements rev 1 Introduction Note pr 14.08.2009 Tove Risberg, Kjeller Vindteknikk AS A 50 m met mast has been measuring the wind speed at Nanortalik Heliport for two years. The measuring project at Nanortalik is a part of the Vest-Norden project. The Vest-Norden project aims to introduce renewable energy sources in combination with hydrogen for energy storage for distant settlements. The mast has been operative since July 1 st 2007. This note will summarize the measurements per August 2 nd 2009, two years of measurements. The site will be referred to as 6101 Nanortalik. Sensors The mast is equipped with the sensors listed in Table 1. The different anemometers have different characteristics regarding precision. The measurements by the Risø P2546A sensor are given an uncertainty of less than 1%. The measuring range is 0.3-70 m/s. The NRG #40 has an accuracy of 0.1m/s within the range 5-25m/s. The measuring range is from 0.35 m/s. 6101 Nanortalik is equipped with heated sensors that can be valuable in case of icing episodes which can stop or slow down the unheated anemometers. However the precision of the heated anemometer is lower then for the others. The uncertainty of the NRG Icefree III is 4-5%. The measuring range starts at 1 m/s for this anemometer. The icefree anemometer is not calibrated, but an offset value can be calculated by comparing the icefree anemometer to the other anemometers for a period without icing. Table 1 Sensors mounted at 6101 Nanortalik Parameter Type Height [m] Wind Speed NRG #40 48.8 Wind Speed NRG #40 30.0 Wind Speed NRG #40 10.0 Wind Speed Risø P2546A 48.8 Wind Speed NRG Icefree lll 47.5 Wind Direction NRG Icefree lll 47.2 Wind Direction NRG #200P 41.4 Temperature NRG 110S A picture of the mast is shown in Figure 1. The sensors are mounted on booms with a distance of 2150 mm from the mast-centre. This is done to minimize the influence of the mast itself on the measurements. The top boom is mounted 1500 mm from the mast centre. The sensors are also mounted 640 mm higher than the boom itself to minimize the influence of the boom on the measurements. The predominant wind directions have to some degree been analysed upfront of the installation of the mast so that any influence from the mast, boom and lightning rod on the measurements will be at the sectors with the least frequent winds. Although these precautions have been made to minimize external influence on the measurements it can not be totally A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 1

avoided. All sensors except those at the top of the mast will be influenced by the mast itself for certain wind directions. The logger has been set up to transfer all data on a daily basis. The data is sent by email by a telephone modem included in the logger. The data returned are 10 minute averages, maximum value, minimum value and standard deviation. Figure 1 the 50m met mast 6101 Nanortalik Summary of measurements The data coverage is good for the measurement period. Icing events has been found for a total of 105 hours during the measuring period. Icing is not found to be a problem at this site. Table 2 shows the annual mean wind speed for the different sensors. The icefree sensor gives a higher value that the other sensors at this height. The data from the ice free sensors need to be calibrated toward one of the other sensors (on-site calibration) in order to use the data for further analysis. This is a common methodology used for the data from the ice free anemometer. Since icing on the instruments is a minor problem at this site it is only consider the data from the unheated anemometers, excluding the hours where icing is identified, for better precision. The two anemometers at 48.8 meters differ by 0.2 m/s. The annual mean for the Risø anemometer is found to be 6.3 m/s, while for the NRG anemometer it is 6.1 m/s. The NRG anemometer at 30m also gives 6.1 m/s as the annual mean; one would expect the mean value to be higher at 50m than at 30m. It is likely that the annual mean found for the NRG anemometer at 48.8m height is somewhat lower then the actual value. The value of 6.3 m/s for the Risø anemometer is a more significant estimate of the annual mean wind speed at 48.8m height than the NRG sensor. A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 2

The annual mean wind speed for the Risø anemometer after one year of measurements was 6.4 m/s. After two years of measurements the annual mean wind speed has decreased to 6.3 m/s, which is around 1.6 %. The annual wind speed has also decreased with around 0.1 m/s for the other sensors. For all instruments the 99 percentile value is less than 21 m/s. A wind speed of 25 m/s is a typical cut-out wind speed for turbines. For higher values than the cut-out wind speed there will be no power production. The maximum measured value is higher than 25m/s, but as the 99 percentile is lower than 25 m/s, the power production losses due to high wind speed will be quite low. However the maximum measured wind speed has increased with around 3 m/s after two years of measurements. Table 2 Annual mean wind speed, 99 percentile value and maximum measured value for July 1 2007 June 30 2009 Sensor annual mean 99 percentile maximum wind speed NRG #40 48.8 m 6.1 m/s 19.4 m/s 29.3 m/s NRG #40 30.0 m 6.1 m/s 18.7 m/s 28.3 m/s NRG #40 10.0 m 5.4 m/s 16.7 m/s 25.8 m/s Risø P2546A -48.8 m 6.3 m/s 19.7 m/s 30.0 m/s NRG Icefree lll - 47.5 m 7.0 m/s 20.9 m/s 31.0 m/s Table 3 Monthly means for the Risø anemometer at 48.8 m height based on data for the period July 1 2007 June 30 2009. Month mean wind speed [m/s] January 7.1 February 7.5 March 6.9 April 6.1 May 4.9 June 4.2 July 4.1 August 5.2 September 6.4 October 6.6 November 7.4 December 9.0 Annual 6.3 A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 3

Figure 2 Wind rose for 6101 Nanortalik based on data for July 1 2007 August 2 2009. The wind rose is plotted using the Risø anemometer at 48.8 m and NRG #200P wind wane at 41.4 m height. Table 3 shows the monthly variation in wind speed. The highest wind speeds are found for the winter season (September-March), while the mean wind speed is clearly lower for the summer months (May-August). The total mean wind speed has decreased about 0.1 m/s compared to the previous note in August 2008, but the several monthly mean has increased in some months and decreased in some months. The wind rose at 6101 Nanortalik is shown in Figure 2. Still the dominant wind direction is from sector 2 (N-NE) with a frequency of approximately 27%, but the wind from this sector is related to low wind speed. The sector 12 (N-NW) and sector 1(N) are generally related to higher wind speed and may thus be more relevant for wind power production. The frequency in these two sectors has fairly increased compared to last year. The distribution for each sector is shown in Figure 3, the estimated weibull distribution is also shown. There are some clear discrepancies between the estimated weibull distribution and the measurements, especially in sector 9. There is large frequency of measurements in the range 3-6 m/s. This is typically a range with little power production. By using the weibull distribution to estimate the power production the measured frequency distribution is less optimal for wind power production than the estimated weibull-function. One should keep this in mind if estimating power production by using the annual mean value. The distribution for all sectors is shown in Figure 4 A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 4

Figure 3 Distribution of wind speed for 12 sectors, and estimated weibull distribution for each sector. Sector 1 is north (345-15 ), each sector covers 30 in clockwise direction. The distribution is calculated using the Risø anemometer at 48.8 m and NRG #200P wind wane at 41.4 m height. A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 5

Figure 4 Distribution of wind speed and calculated weibull distribution for 6101 Nanortalik. The distribution is calculated using the Risø anemometer at 48.8 m and NRG #200P wind wane at 41.4 m height. Possible reference data Possible reference data for this site can be the WMO met station also located at Nanortalik Heliport. These data can give valuable information about the long term expected wind climate at Nanortalik. There is not made any further attempts to get these data, but it should be considered for the main report for this site. Data from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis has been evaluated for this site, but not found to be representative for Nanortalik. Summary Icing seems to be a minor problem at this site during 2 year of observations. Annual mean wind speed has been measured to 6.3 m/s at 50m height. The annual mean wind speed has decreased about 0.1 m/s compared to one year of measurements. The main wind direction is from sector 2, with large members also from sectors 1 and 12. The distribution of the wind speed measurements appears to be less optimal for wind power production than the estimated weibull distribution. This must be considered when estimating power production using the mean value with a weibull distribution. A preliminary analysis of the wind measurements at Nanortalik rev1 6