Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Similar documents
South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW VOLUME ROADS

(This page left intentionally blank)

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

October 30, Subject: Solicitation Number: ITB Printing of Florida Class E Driver License Handbook

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Traffic Signs and Signals

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Ohio Share the Road Driver s s Education Unit

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, WATERWAYS AND RAIL DIVISION CHAPTER RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING STANDARDS

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018

Bicyclist Signing Guidelines

REVISION 2 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. Ginger Quinn & Paul Kelley April 11, 2018

Signs. signs, signals and road markings. in this chapter

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

2004 Traffic and Safety Notes. Cross Reference between the Old Note Number and the New Note Number

As Amended by Senate Committee. [As Amended by House Committee of the Whole] As Amended by House Committee. HOUSE BILL No. 2192

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

Who is Toole Design Group?

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

900 BICYCLE FACILITIES Traffic Engineering Manual

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Updated August 1, 2016

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Speed Control & Limits

Traffic Calming Policy

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

On-Street Bicycle Facilities

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2732 SUMMARY

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Special education/504 students shall be adjudged on an individual basis, in accordance with their Individual Education Plans (IEPs)/504 Plans.

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

General Design Factors

December 6, Mayor West, Vice Mayor de Triquet and Members of the City Council

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

Florida Class E Knowledge Exam Road Rules Practice Questions

SECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Attached for your reference please find project updates on ongoing VDOT construction projects in Southampton County.

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES Section 2B.01 Application of Regulatory Signs Standard:

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Santa Clara County Expressways Complete Streets & Design Challenges

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

AASHTO Use Only Establishment of a U.S. (Interstate) Route IH 69 Action taken by SCOH: Extension of a U.S. (Interstate)Route

Route 117 Review of Ownership Transfer October 2014

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Transcription:

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways) Attached is a revised application process to permit Pedalcycle travel on the shoulders of freeways within the Commonwealth. This process has been developed by the Bureau of Highway Safety and Traffic Engineering in accordance with the provisions of Title 75, Section 3511(b) (2). Section 3511 was added to the Vehicle code by Act 47 in June 1992. The Act banned pedalcycles on state-designated freeways but allowed for exceptions through the establishment of a permit process. Briefly, the process establishes that the District will make a field view of the requested route and any possible alternates and make a recommendation to the Central Office Bicycle/ Pedestrian Coordinator. A final recommendation will then be made by the Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering for approval by the Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration. Notice of approval will then be placed in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. An approved freeway section is open to any qualified pedalcyclist in accordance with the provisions of Section 3511. Attached are six items: Attachment A Section 3511 of Title 75 (Vehicle Code) Attachment B Sample Notification of the Exception Process to be placed in the Pennsylvania Bulletin Attachment C Sample Application form for Operating Pedalcycles on Freeways Attachment D - Department Response Process and Application Evaluation Criteria Attachment E Other Considerations Attachment F Freeway Signing for Bicycles

Attachment A Section 3511 of Titles 75 (Vehicle Code) 3511. Pedalcycles prohibited on freeways. (a) General rule. No person shall ride a pedalcycle on a freeway. (b) Exceptions.-- (1) The department and local authorities, on highways under their respective jurisdictions, may issue permits for a procession or event prohibited under subsection (a) upon a determination that: (i) The pedalcycle procession or event is of a national, State or regional interest; and (ii) The results of an engineering and traffic study indicate that the procession or event can be conducted with safety. (2) On State-designated freeways, pedalcycles may be authorized under the following limitations: (i) the pedalcycler is 16 years of age or older or is accompanied by a pedalcycler 18 years of age or older. (ii) A written request for review of the freeway route based on the potential unavailability of a reasonable alternate route is mad to the department. (iii) The department determines that no reasonable (iv) alternate route exists. The department publishes a notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin authorizing pedalcycle access to the freeway. The notice shall constitute approval for the persons authorized under subparagraph (i) to ride a pedalcycle on the State-designated freeway. (c) Action by local authorities. Action taken by local authorities regarding permission to use pedalcycles on freeways under their jurisdiction shall be: (3) by ordinance of the local governing body; or (4) by a commission of public official authorized to act on specified matters. (d) Operation on shoulder. If the department authorizes pedalcycle access to a freeway, the pedalcycle shall be operated upon the shoulder of that freeway whenever practicable (June 11,1992, P.L.266, No.47, eff 60 days; Dec. 15, 1995, P.L.655, No 72, eff. 60 days) 1995 Amendment. Act 72 added subsec. (d). 1992 Amendment. Act 47 added section 3511.

Attachment B Sample Notice for the Pennsylvania Bulletin Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering; Notice of Exception Process for permitting Pedalcycles on Pennsylvania freeways under Title 75 (Vehicle Code), Chapter 35, Subchapter A, Section 3511. In June of 1992, the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Senate Bill 559 (later known as Act 47) amending Title 75, Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to include Section 3511. The general rule of Section 3511 established a statutory ban of pedalcycles on state-designated freeways within the Commonwealth. The Section also stipulates that pedalcycles may be authorized on freeways provided the Department of Transportation establishes an application review process to administer requests for exceptions. In compliance with the above-referenced statutes, the Department has established the following process: 1. The applicant prepares a form containing the following information: n n A description of the proposed route, referenced by interchange names and/or numbers; state route and section numbers (obtainable from the District Office) may also be used. A justification of the route request and a statement as to why an alternate route is not practical or possible; plans, contour maps, photographs, and other documentation may be included. 2. The form is submitted to Central office Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator for initial processing. 3. The form is sent to the District Office for review and recommendation. The recommendation is made to the Central Office Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator. 4. The final decision is made by the Central Office Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator. 5. The signature of the Secretary of Transportation or Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration is obtained. 6. The applicant is notified in writing after a decision is rendered. If the application is approved, the applicant is informed that riding may be permitted sunrise to sunset only. 7. If the application is approved, notification is placed in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. Applications shall be filed with the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering, Office of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator, P. O. Box 2047, Harrisburg, PA 17105-2047. Interested persons may direct their request for applications of inquiries to David C. Bachman, Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator, Bureau of Highway Safety & Traffic Engineering, P. O. Box 2047. Harrisburg, PA 17105-2047.

HS-1 (4-06) Attachment C Request For Permission To Operate A Pedalcycle On A Pennsylvania Freeway Under Section 3511 Of The Vehicle Code Name Organization Address Daytime Phone Number ( ) Section of Freeway Requested For Use (Reference by Interchange name or number on Freeway or Intersecting route number): From To Reasons Why Any Alternate Route is Not Suitable (Consider length and safety considerations of alternate route. Use continuation sheets, if necessary. Attach maps, photographs, and other documentation, if appropriate):

Attachment D Department Response Process And Application Evaluation Criteria 1. The application package is submitted to the Central Office Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator and redistributed to the District Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator(s) for review. 2. The District Office should determine that the road in question is indeed a freeway as per the definition provided in Title 75. 3. Field View The District Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator and representatives from the District Traffic and Maintenance Units (Plans Unit optional) should then field view the roads in question and provide conditions and recommendations to the Central Office Bicycle/ Pedestrian Coordinator. At a minimum, the field view should determine: Alternates--length, condition, geometrics, etc. Freeway section---condition, shoulder type, width, shoulder condition (pavement integrity). 4. The District will make one of the following recommendations within 45 days of receipt of the original application: Approve - No other reasonable route available based on length or safety - Safe access available (shoulder can be used as a designated bikeway) Approve in part - Section of requested route may meet criteria, alternate routes may satisfy the remainder. Disapprove - Requested route cannot safely accommodate bicycles (for example, the shoulder may be too narrow or its condition may be of such poor quality that it cannot accommodate bicycles). - Reasonable, safe alternate available Insufficient information - Additional information must be provided before a decision can be rendered.

The following should be considered in evaluating an alternate route: - Length of detour - ADT (less than 500 is favorable) - Speed limit (lower than 35 MPH is favorable) - The presence/absence of potentially hazardous conditions, including, but not limited to, the following: - pavement condition - driveways - intersections - narrow shoulders, paved or unpaved - no paved shoulders - narrow motor vehicle lanes - pedestrian traffic - railroad tracks, especially skewed crossings - narrow bridges - poor sight distance - rough road surface - parked vehicles - turning trucks - percent truck, bus, and recreational vehicle traffic - The following should be considered when evaluating the freeway for acceptability for bicycles: - Paved shoulder of sufficient width and acceptable riding surface to accommodate a designated bike route. - Presence of milled rumble strips. 5. The District office submits the recommendation to Central Office for final approval.

Attachment E Other Considerations 1. PennDOT will make every reasonable attempt to work with an applicant to solicit all pertinent information so that the Department can make a well-informed decision. Each application will be judged on merit on a case-by-case basis. However, an applicant may appeal a final decision. The applicant must submit a request in writing within 20 days to the Administrative Docket Clerk. Room 521 T&S Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120. A minimum fee of $100.00 will be charged to the applicant. 2. The applicant will be notified that in the future, should conditions change, re-application may be permitted. 3. Central Office and District Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinators will each keep a map showing those sections of freeways which are opened and make the map available upon request. 4. Signs must be erected at both the ramp entrance and exit points to: (1) grant bicyclist permission to use the route and (2) notify motorists of the presence of bicyclist. See Attachment F.

Attachment F Bicycle Signs - Justifications 1. R5-3-1A (Motor Vehicles and Bicycles Only) The Motor Vehicles and Bicycles Only sign (R5-3-1A) shall be used at all freeway entrance ramps for those sections of freeway where bicycles as well as motor vehicles are permitted. It should be placed at the beginning of the ramp where bicyclist can see it and before motorists are involved with the actual merge movement onto the freeway proper. 2. R5-3-1B (Bicyclist Must Use Shoulder) The Bicyclist Must Use Shoulder sign (R5-3-1B) shall be used only on freeway segments where bicyclist are permitted. They shall be placed along the roadway so they can be viewed by both bicyclist and motorists. The purpose of the sign is to direct bicyclist to the proper position on the highway and to alert motorists of the presence of bicyclist on the freeway. 3. R5-3-1C (All Bicyclist Must Exit) The All Bicyclist Must Exit sign (R5-3-1C) shall be used at a freeway interchange exit ramp beyond which bicycles are not permitted. 4. R5-3-1D (Bicycle Restrictions) The Bicycle Restrictions sign (R5-3-1D) shall indicate the age restrictions for bicyclist on freeways. The R5-3-1D shall be mounted below the Motor Vehicles and Bicycles Only Sign (R5-3-1A).