The Effect Analysis of Rudder between X-Form and Cross-Form

Similar documents
u = Open Access Reliability Analysis and Optimization of the Ship Ballast Water System Tang Ming 1, Zhu Fa-xin 2,* and Li Yu-le 2 " ) x # m," > 0

Research on Small Wind Power System Based on H-type Vertical Wind Turbine Rong-Qiang GUAN a, Jing YU b

Research on Goods and the Ship Interaction Based on ADAMS

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2016, 8(6): Research Article. Walking Robot Stability Based on Inverted Pendulum Model

Chapter 2 Hydrostatics and Control

Research on Key Technologies of Small Underwater Robots

A Distributed Control System using CAN bus for an AUV

Hydrostatics and Stability Dr. Hari V Warrior Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Study of Passing Ship Effects along a Bank by Delft3D-FLOW and XBeach1

Conventional Ship Testing

Numerical Simulation And Aerodynamic Performance Comparison Between Seagull Aerofoil and NACA 4412 Aerofoil under Low-Reynolds 1

Structural Design and Analysis of the New Mobile Refuge Chamber

ANALYSIS OF THE POSITIVE FORCES EXHIBITING ON THE MOORING LINE OF COMPOSITE-TYPE SEA CAGE

The influence of the high-speed Trimaran to Flow Field. Yi-fan Wang 1, Teng Zhao 2

A STUDY OF THE LOSSES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BOW THRUSTERS AND A CATAMARAN HULL

PREDICTION THE EFFECT OF TIP SPEED RATIO ON WIND TURBINE GENERATOR OUTPUT PARAMETER

Constant pressure air charging cascade control system based on fuzzy PID controller. Jun Zhao & Zheng Zhang

Development of TEU Type Mega Container Carrier

Analysis of wind resistance of high-rise building structures based on computational fluid dynamics simulation technology

1. A tendency to roll or heel when turning (a known and typically constant disturbance) 2. Motion induced by surface waves of certain frequencies.

An Investigation into the Capsizing Accident of a Pusher Tug Boat

An Indian Journal FULL PAPER ABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Trade Science Inc.

Study on the shape parameters of bulbous bow of. tuna longline fishing vessel

A Scale Model Test on Hydraulic Resistance of Tunnel Elements during Floating Transportation

The Relationship between the Depth Embedded Pipe Pile and the Force of Clamping Jaw

Basketball field goal percentage prediction model research and application based on BP neural network

A NOVEL FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE CONCEPT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS

Numerical Simulation of the Basketball Flight Trajectory based on FLUENT Fluid Solid Coupling Mechanics Yanhong Pan

Computer Aided Drafting, Design and Manufacturing Volume 26, Number 2, June 2016, Page 53. The design of exoskeleton lower limbs rehabilitation robot

STABILITY OF MULTIHULLS Author: Jean Sans

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STATIC INTERFERENCE EFFECTS FOR SINGLE BUILDINGS GROUP

APPLICATION OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE PREDICATION OF COMPLEX LARGE-SPAN STEEL STRUCTURES

Analysis of the Impact of Rotor Rigidity on the Aerodynamic Performance of Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

J. Szantyr Lecture No. 21 Aerodynamics of the lifting foils Lifting foils are important parts of many products of contemporary technology.

THE AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT Issue /07/12

The Study on the Influence of Gust Wind on Vehicle Stability Chen Wang a, Haibo Huang b*, Shaofang Xu c

Integrated control system for ship motion in inland navigation

Numerical simulation and analysis of aerodynamic drag on a subsonic train in evacuated tube transportation

Figure 1 Figure 1 shows the involved forces that must be taken into consideration for rudder design. Among the most widely known profiles, the most su

ROTORS for WIND POWER

V393.R46. NalupwL UNITED STATES EXPERIMENTAL MODEL BASIN NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, D.C. BILGE KEEL CAVITATION J. G. THEWS SEPTEMBER REPORT NO.

Exercise load research on common technical method in taekwondo training courses

67. Sectional normalization and recognization on the PV-Diagram of reciprocating compressor

Failure Detection in an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Power efficiency and aerodynamic forces measurements on the Dettwiler-wind turbine

Coupling and Analysis of 981 Deep Water Semi-submersible. Drilling Platform and the Mooring System

ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK

Aerodynamic Analyses of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine By Different Blade Airfoil Using Computer Program

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON COEFFICIENT OF WAVE TRANSMISSION THROUGH IMMERSED VERTICAL BARRIER OF OPEN-TYPE BREAKWATER

Maneuverability characteristics of ships with a single-cpp and their control

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Model of ferry captain s manoeuvres decision

Research of Sail Height Adjustment on Sail-Assisted Ship in Different Loading and Wind Conditions

6.6 Gradually Varied Flow

Simulation Research of a type of Pressure Vessel under Complex Loading Part 1 Component Load of the Numerical Analysis

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

Note to Shipbuilders, shipowners, ship Managers and Masters. Summary

Friction properties of the face of a hand-held tennis racket

Flight Corridor. The speed-altitude band where flight sustained by aerodynamic forces is technically possible is called the flight corridor.

Analysis and realization of synchronized swimming in URWPGSim2D

The Mechanism Study of Vortex Tools Drainage Gas Recovery of Gas Well

SHIP FORM DEFINITION The Shape of a Ship

STUDY OF MODEL DEFORMATION AND STING INTERFERENCE TO THE AERODYNAMIC ESTIMATIONS OF THE CAE-AVM MODEL

Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of vertical-axis wind turbine

Prognosis of Rudder Cavitation Risk in Ship Operation

Marine Kit 4 Marine Kit 4 Sail Smooth, Sail Safe

CHAPTER IV FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE KNEE JOINT WITHOUT A MEDICAL IMPLANT

Modal Analysis of Propulsion Shafting of a 48,000 tons Bulk Carrier

S0300-A6-MAN-010 CHAPTER 2 STABILITY

HEELING MOMENT ACTING ON A RIVER CRUISER IN MANOEUVRING MOTION

Finite Element Modal Analysis of Twin Ball Screw Driving Linear Guide Feed Unit Table

SECOND ENGINEER REG III/2 NAVAL ARCHITECTURE

3 1 PRESSURE. This is illustrated in Fig. 3 3.

Hunting for the Sweet Spot by a Seesaw Model

A STUDY ON FACTORS RELATED TO THE CAPSIZING ACCIDENT OF A FISHING VESSEL RYUHO MARU No.5

Density of Individual Airborne Wind Energy Systems in AWES Farms

Development of Fish type Robot based on the Analysis of Swimming Motion of Bluefin Tuna Comparison between Tuna-type Fin and Rectangular Fin -

Hydrodynamic analysis of submersible robot

Aerodynamically Efficient Wind Turbine Blade S Arunvinthan 1, Niladri Shekhar Das 2, E Giriprasad 3 (Avionics, AISST- Amity University, India)

A Method Quantitatively Evaluating on Technical Progress of Students in Ship Handling Simulator Training ABSTRACT

ACTIVITY 1: Buoyancy Problems. OBJECTIVE: Practice and Reinforce concepts related to Fluid Pressure, primarily Buoyancy

Aerodynamic Performance of Trains with Different Longitudinal Section Lines under Crosswind

The risk assessment of ships manoeuvring on the waterways based on generalised simulation data

DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK

INCLINOMETER DEVICE FOR SHIP STABILITY EVALUATION

Special Considerations for Structural design and Fabrication for. tankers or similar vessels with Large Size (150m or more in length) in.

Preventing Damage to Harbour Facilities and. Ship Handling in Harbours PART 2 INDEX

EVALUATION OF WIND AND WAVE ENVIRONMENT ADAPTABILITY OF SHIPS

Optimizing the shape and speed performance of the boats

Volume 8, ISSN (Online), Published at:

Principal component factor analysis-based NBA player comprehensive ability evaluation research

Baseball best hitting point model research based on momentum medium theorem

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 84 (2014 )

3D Torque Roll Introduction

Efficiency Improvement of a New Vertical Axis Wind Turbine by Individual Active Control of Blade Motion

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA LIBERIA MARITIME AUTHORITY

Analysis of Steady-state Characteristics of Aerodynamic Bearing Based on FLUENT JIA Chenhui 1,a, Du Caifeng 2,b and QIU Ming 3,c

An experimental validation of a robust controller on the VAIMOS autonomous sailboat. Fabrice LE BARS

Optimization of Blades of Horizontal Wind Turbines by Choosing an Appropriate Airfoil and Computer Simulation

Transcription:

217 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Communications (ICCSC 217) The Effect Analysis of Rudder between X-Form and Cross-Form HAN Zhao-Lin1, a, ZHANG Zhong-Zheng2,b, WANG Long- Jin3, c 1,2,3 College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, China a michaelhann@163.com, bzhongzheng9@163.com, cwljwlj1984@126.com Keywords: Cross-form rudder, X-form rudder, Simulation, Contrast Abstract. According to existing submarine model with cross-form rudder, achieving the model transformation from cross-form rudder to X-form rudder combining with the submarine maneuverability principle. This article mainly analyzes the rudder effects of control surface between the former cross-form rudder and the later X-form rudder, which shows the advantages of X-form rudder. Finally using the Matlab software to simulate the rudder effects so that could verify this assumption. 1 Introduction After the First World War, the submarine has been used widely, which play a dominant role in navy equipment in many countries. The stern and control surface of modern submarines are almost arranged as sharp stern and single propeller. The basic form of control surface is cross-form rudder and X-form rudder[1], and on the basis of that, there are some different rudder types, such as differential cross-form rudder, H-form rudder, and low rudder[2]. The stern rudder of submarine which has the assistant wings is still at the experimental research about its principle, and which will also be applied to submarine control[3]. In the last century, cross-form rudder submarine was always as the basic form of modern submarine. This is mainly because cross control surface is symmetrical, the horizontal rudder and vertical rudder are orthogonal, and the area is approximately equal. Besides, the horizontal rudder and vertical rudder are more convenient for pilot to control submarine directly. X-form rudder is a separate stern rudder which refers to the four stern rudders are arranged as X-form with orthogonal layout and the rudder axes is at an angle with the submarine central longitudinal section (the angle is usually at 45). Compared with the cross rudder, X-form rudder has the following advantages: Firstly, X-form rudder has the higher rudder efficiency and its manipulate surface area is smaller about 1% than cross rudder, so that submarine could avoid the collision problem when it is landing. Secondly, X-form rudder reduces the serious consequences by rudder-blocked and improves the security and the underwater dynamic unsinkability. Besides, X-form rudder reduces the heeling moment, weight and stern heaviness when cross-rudder submarine turning, and having an advantage Published by CSP 217 the Authors 13

to sail steadily when it is attacked. Finally, X-form rudder reduces interaction between propeller and rudder, and reduces the noise [4]. 2 The model of two type rudders Cross-form rudder control surface has two rudder blades, which appears orthogonal with the horizontal and vertical, and X-form rudder control surface consists of four rudder blades, which are distributed with the X-from, just as shown in figure 1. Cross-form rudder blades has two sets of control system, which consist of the horizontal control system and the elevator control system. And the X-form rudder blades need 4 sets of control system respectively [5]. Submarine cross-form rudder blades are named as the rudder and the elevator, which corresponding rudder Angle are δ r and δ s, and comparing with cross-form rudder, X-form rudder blades are named as Num.1 rudder, Num.2 rudder, Num.3 rudder and Num.4 rudder, which corresponding rudder Angle are δ 1, δ 2, δ 3 and δ 4. Fig.1 The control surface of two types rudder Firstly establishing submarine coordinate system in cross-form rudder control surfaces, among that, the y axis points to the starboard side of the submarine, the z axis points to the center of the earth. In order to analyze expediently, we might have cross-form rudder force is proportional to the corresponding rudder Angle, namely the rudder steering force (torque) is proportional to the rudder Angler, and the elevator force (torque) is proportional to the elevator Angle. Setting the coefficient of cross-form rudder effect as Y δr and Z δs, get the force (torque) formula expressions of cross-form rudder : Fy ( Y r,) r (1) Fz (, Z s) s In the same way, establishing submarine coordinate system in X-form rudder control surfaces, Each rudder blade of X-form rudder control is at an angle of 45 with longitudinal or vertical surface. 14

Therefore, a blade could produce a space force and a torque, unlike the cross-form rudder which makes a single force. For the rudder force (torque) effect of X-form rudder, represented in table 1: Table 1 The effects of X-form rudder control surface Rudder Angle δ i Plus Or Minus Movements δ 1 δ 2 δ 3 δ 4 > Turn right, Diving, Heel left < Turn left, Floating, Heel right > Turn right, Floating, Heel right < Turn left, Diving, Heel left > Turn right, Diving, Heel right < Turn left, Floating, Heel left > Turn right, Floating, Heel left < Turn left, Diving, Heel right We could get the formula expressions of X-form rudder effect: F1 ( Y1 1 cos / 4, Y1 1 sin / 4) F3 ( Y3 3 cos / 4, Y3 3 sin / 4) F2 ( Z 2 2 sin / 4, Z 2 2 cos / 4) F4 ( Z 4 4 sin / 4, Z 4 4 cos / 4) Among that, Y 1 =Y 3 =.5Y r,z 2 =Z 4 =.5Z s. As the δ 1 =δ 3 =(-δ 2 )=(-δ 4 ) and δ 1 =δ 3 =δ 2 =δ 4, X-form rudder effect in y-axis and z-axis: F y =Y 1 δ 1 cos45 +Y 3 δ 3 cos45 +Z 2 δ 2 sin45 +Z 4 δ 4 sin45 =1.414Y r δ r (3) F z =Y 1 δ 1 sin45 +Y 3 δ 3 sin45 +Z 2 δ 2 cos45 +Z 4 δ 4 cos45 =1.414Z s δ s (4) It is not difficult to find that rudder effect improve obvious when the cross-form rudder equivalently transform X-form rudder. (2) 3 Simulation and discussion Then, use the Matlab to simulate theory mentioned. What is shown in figure 2-a is cross-form rudder control model diagram, the five input in left side are: the rudder angle, elevator Angle, bow rudder Angle, main engine speed, buoy(water volume to balance), and the right in model diagram is output, the Pos1 is the submarine line that is simulated. As shown in figure 2-b is X-form rudder control model diagram, and seven input are: Num.1 rudder Angle, Num.2 rudder Angle, Num.3 rudder Angle, Num.4 rudder Angle, bow rudder Angle, main engine speed, buoy(water volume to balance). 15

Fig.2-a The control model of cross-form rudder Fig.2-b The control model of X-form rudder Simulation of rotational movement. As the cross-form rudder model, the rudder Angle δ r is 1, elevator rudder Angle δ s and bow rudder Angle δ b are zero, the engine speed is, and the buoy is, then have the 3s movement simulation, so get result in the figure 3-a. Also, as the X-form rudder control surface model, δ 1 =δ 3 =1, δ 2 =δ 4 =(-1 ), δ b =, the remaining is same with cross-rudder s, get the simulation in the figure 3-b. 5 Cross-form rudder location curve in horizontal 5 X-form rudder location curve in horizontal 4 4 3 3 lateral distance : y lateral distance : y - - - 3 4 - - - 3 4 Fig.3-a Rotational movement of cross-form rudder Fig.3-b Rotational movement of X-form rudder 16

Stern rudder coefficient(except the rudder Angle) are no different. Through the simulation we can see that cross-form rudder radius of gyration is about 21 meters, and completed the 36 rotation movement in the 3s. X-form rudder radius of gyration is about 17 meters, and completed the 45 rotation movement in the 3s. It is easy to conclude that X-form rudder, compared to cross-form rudder, has smaller radius of gyration, better rotating effect. Simulation of diving movement. In the cross-form rudder model, the rudder Angle δ r and bow rudder Angle δ b are zero, the elevator rudder Angle δ s is 5, engine speed is, and the buoy is, then have the s movement simulation, get the result in figure 4-a. Also, as the X-form rudder control surface model, δ 1 =δ 3 =5, δ 2 =δ 4 =5, δ b =, the rest is same with cross-rudder s, get the simulation in the figure 4-b. 4 cross-form rudder location curve in vertical 4 X-form rudder location curve in vertical 35 35 3 3 vertical distance : z 25 15 vertical distance : z 25 15 5 5 4 6 8 1 4 6 8 1 Fig.4-a Diving movement of cross-form rudder Fig.4-b Diving movement of X-form rudder Through simulation we can see that in the seconds of diving, cross-form rudder from the original 5 meters underwater dived to the 25 meters underwater, and X-form rudder from 5 meters underwater dived to more than 3 meters underwater. It can be concluded that X-form rudder has better effect than cross-form rudder. 4 Conclusions (1) Two types stern rudder transition is based on the existing cross-form rudder control model, combined with the submarine maneuvering and submarine hydrodynamics principle, established a new control model of X-form rudder. Two types stern rudder only have difference on rudder and rudder Angle after transition. (2) Analyze the submarine stern rudder control surfaces abstractly, which is concluded that X-form rudder has higher effect than cross-form rudder, that is about 1.414 times. (3) Through the Matlab simulation, the analysis results was verified, and found that X-form rudder had a smaller radius of gyration. 17

Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by Qingdao Application Foundation Research Project (14-2-4-116-jch). References [1] Shi Sheng-da. Submarine manoeuvrability [M]. Beijing: National Defend Industry Press, 1995.(in Chinese) [2] Kurt J H. Automatic Control of a Submersible [D].Miami University.AD-A14479. [3] T.D. Enguian, S. Gowing, D. Boqinzki. The application in ships navigation of adjusting shim control surfaces [C]. Sixth international submarine translation corpus. Chinese Ship Scientific Research Center, 1.(in Chinese) [4] Li Jie. Submarine stern rudder: select the cross or X [N]. China national defense. 21.12.7,15.(in Chinese) [5] Lin Jun-jie, Dai Yu-liang, Zhang Tao. equivalent rudder Angle research of X-form rudder and cross-form rudder control force [J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 4, (5).(in Chinese) 18