United States Patent (19) Olmr

Similar documents
(21) Appl. No.: 808, Filed: Dec. 16, ) Int. Cl... A63D 3/ U.S. Cl /38; 273/39; 3,039,772 6/1962 Simjian...

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,641,487 B1

. United States Patent (19) Oonuma et al.

[11] Patent Number: 4,962,932

Feb. 27, 1973 R. L. CRNDORFF, JR 3,717,943 MUD RESISTANT ELASTOMERS INVENTOR. Roy L.ORNDORFF, JR. ATTY.

United States Patent (19) Herro

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,424 B2

USOO6O76829A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,076,829 Oblack (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 20, 2000

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

III IIII - USOO550545OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,505,450 Stuff (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 9, 1996

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

Hannes et al. 45 Date of Patent: Mar. 3, 1992 (54) BICYCLE RACK FOR PICK-UP TRUCK OTHER PUBLICATIONS

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,601,826 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,598,234 B1

United States Patent (19)

III III IIII. United States Patent (19) Dolan et al. Appl. No.: 311,676 Filed: Sep. 23, 1994

United States Patent (19) Curtis

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

exercising facility (14), when the arms of the person are to

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,880,421 B2. Watanabe et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 19, 2005

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

United States Patent (19) Jackson

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

Wang 45 Date of Patent: Sep. 23, 1997

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,393,587 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

III IIHIII. United States Patent (19) 5,575,725 Nov. 19, Olsavsky. 11 Patent Number: 45 Date of Patent:

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Miettinen

N3% (12) United States Patent. NNéré. (10) Patent No.: US 7, B2. Rossiter (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 20, 2007

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,235,267 B2

Device for atomizing a liquid

Ice skate blade alignment mechanism

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,984,723 B2

United States Patent (19) Easton

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Lotta

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

United States Patent (19) Neuhalfen

III. United States Patent (19) Land. 11) Patent Number: 5,110,136 45) Date of Patent: May 5, 1992

Jan. 12, 1965 E. F. RES 3,165,112 WALKER OR WALKER AID. Filed July 20, 196l. INVENTOR. El-Mear F Rt as. 62. (Pavel. A440/wey

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,460,868 B2

E2IB (7/02 ( ) (52) U.S. Cl /19: 464/155 (58) Field of Classification Search / , 175/325.6

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,311,857 B1

4,886,274 Dec. 12, 1989

United States Patent (19) Widecrantz et al.

United States Patent (19)

June 18, 1968 W. A. WOODS 3,388,909 BASKETBALL COURT WITH BARRIER MEANS INVENTOR, WILLIAM A. WOODS 34.4%

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,517,267 B2

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19) Berube

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,676,193 B1

United States Patent (19) Aakre et al.

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,055,842 B1. Lin (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 6, (54) FOLDING ELECTRIC BICYCLE 6,883,817 B1 4/2005 Chu...

Egg...","...7. Primary Examiner-Dean Kramer

Feb. 6, 1968 T. D. GASS 3,367,062

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,834,776 B1

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) Casebolt

United States Patent 19

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,893,786 Stevens 45 Date of Patent: Apr. 13, 1999

(12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,273,329 B2 Spratt et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 25, 2007

(12) United States Patent Wagner et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,780,559 B2

Nov. 27, H. N. BARNUM 1,982,491

I

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

14 / 44. United States Patent (19) Allam ADM2/A. 11 Patent Number: 4,461,154 45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 1984 SAZX A6 AIAW/ 10/ /02 A/?

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

Ulllted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 5,863,267. Ch0i [45] Date of Patent: Jan. 26, 1999

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,530,355 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1. Tucker (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 3, 2015

United States Patent (19) Mills

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,488,161 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,757,647 B1

United States Patent (19)

Sept. 21, O, EB, FETTERMAN 2,329,708 PUSH RAKE. Filed Feb. l4, l942 3 Sheets-Shee l. INNR VVVVVVVVVVV 7/// ****** e) E AS SA E E F E ES E E E S

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent

Feb. 24, 1953 H., R. WILSON 2,629,609 WHEELED GOLF BAG

Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l lll l l ll l

United States Patent (19) Häberle

7%averzazz az72eways. AZafaa 77/owa soy. /v/a/y7 Oa. July 7, 1964 W. A. THOMPSON 3,139,732 BOAT STABILIZING AND LIFTING DEVICE.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,901,619 B1

(10) Patent No.: US 7,331,117 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,368,227 B1

United States Patent (19) Salandre

United States Patent (19)

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) Olmr 54 SAFETY SAW CHAIN 75 Inventor: Jaroslav J. Olmr, Columbia, S.C. 73 Assignee: Textron Inc., Providence, R.I. 21 Appl. No.: 216,150 22 Filed: Dec. 15, 1980 51) Int. Cl.... B27B 33/14 52 U.S. Cl.... 83/833; 83/834; 83/830 58 Field of Search... 83/830, 833, 834 56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 3,951,027 4/1976 Arff... 83/834 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS 619823 5/1961 Canada... 83/834 196274 5/1967 U.S.S.R.... 83/833 11) 4,348,927 (45) Sep. 14, 1982 Primary Examiner-Donald R. Schran Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Webb, Burden, Robinson & Webb 57 ABSTRACT An improved, endless safety saw chain includes a pair of side links, one of the side links being a cutter link and the other of the side links being a noncutting link and having a depth gauge in substantial alignment with a depth gauge on the cutter link. A preceding center drive link may include an upward and rearward sloping surface positioned to extend between the depth gauges of the side links. The sloping surface is preferably di mensioned so as to be in substantial alignment with the depth gauges as the saw chain articulates about the nose of the chain saw bar. 9 Claims, 9 Drawing Figures

U.S. Patent Sep. 14, 1982 Sheet 1 of 4 4,348,927

U.S. Patent Sep. 14, 1982 Sheet 2 of 4 4,348,927

U.S. Patent Sep. 14, 1982 Sheet 3 of 4 4,348,927 8O 7O 6O 5O 4O 3O 2O O IOO 9 O - 8O 7O 3O C 2O N. O Dis. -O'o -2Oo -3OO - 4Oo ANGULAR DEVATION Fig.8

U.S. Patent Sep. 14, 1982 Sheet 4 of 4 4,348,927

1. SAFETY SAW CHAN FIELD OF THE INVENTION My invention relates to saw chains and, more particu larly, to safety saw chains utilizing a plurality of inter acting, sloped surfaces to increase the facial area of the depth gauge and reduce kickback while maintaining the chain's ability to bore and otherwise cut. DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART It has been recognized heretofore that the depth gauge contour can be a factor in causing kickback of the saw chain during operation. For many years loggers have filed the depth gauges to assure a rearwardly slop ing surface to provide a smoother action as the cutter link passes through the wood. It has also been recog nized that depth gauge setting is a factor effecting kick back with the greater the cutting bite the greater the chance of kickback. Attempts have been made to con trol the contour of the depth gauge and patents such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,548,897 and 3,929,049 so recognize this feature. It has also been recognized that a drive link preceding the cutter link can include a rearward sloping surface to protect the depth gauge by providing a ramped surface for engagement with twigs and branches. Exemplary of the patents which include protective surfaces on the drive link for one reason or another are U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,180,378, 4,133,239, 3,910,148, 2,963,055 and 3,951,027. Others have attempted to use various combinations of links with a noncutting side link including the depth gauge, U.S. Pat. No. 2,989,096. Despite the previous attempts to reduce kickback, the problem remains and is of increasing importance as more inexperienced and nonprofessional users purchase chain saws. The addition of protective links in a chain saw not only can affect the cutting efficiency, but can drastically affect the boring performance of a saw chain, which performance is necessary under certain cutting conditions. Safety is likewise a problem to the professional users and a reduction in kickback is a de sired result. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION I have developed a new safety chain having an in creased facial area on the depth gauge resulting in greatly reduced kickback. The reduction in kickback energy has been accomplished without any sacrifice in the boring capability of the chain. Other cutting criteria such as cutting efficiency have not been sacrificed. Further, my new safety chain operates on a regular sprocket nose bar whereas many of the specially de signed safety chains must run on specially built, small radius nose bars. My safety saw chain includes center links pivotally joined to pairs of side links with certain of the pairs of side links being cutter pairs. The cutter pairs include a noncutting tie link on one side of the chain and a cutter link on the other side of the chain. Both the noncutting tie link and the cutter link include depth gauges of com parable profile positioned in side by side relationship. A center link, preferably a drive link, preceding the cutter pair may include an upwardly and rearwardly sloping surface positioned to extend between the depth gauges of the noncutting tie link and the cutter link when the chain is in a flat position. The sloping surface preferably assumes the profile of the other two depth gauges as the 4,348,927 10 15 20 25 30 35 45 50 55 60 65 2 saw chain articulates about the nose of the saw bar. A gullet is provided below the peak of the upwardly and rearwardly sloping surface to align with the gullets formed adjacent the depth gauges to permit sharpening of the cutter link. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a side elevation of a section of saw chain including my invention; FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the interaction of the cutting pair and preceding drive link; FIG. 3 is side elevation of the cutting link; FIG. 4 is a side elevation of the noncutting tie link; FIG. 5 is a side elevation of a drive link without the sloping surface; FIG. 6 is a side elevation of a drive link with the sloping surface; FIG. 7 is an exploded view of the saw chain compo nents illustrated in FIG. 2; FIG. 8 is a graph showing kickback results with my saw chain; and FIG. 9 is a perspective view of dual depth gauges without a sloping center drive link. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS My saw chain, generally designated 10, provides a depth gauge means having an increased facial area which minimizes or prevents the depth gauge from burrowing into the wood being cut. This facial area is the portion or surface of the depth gauge that engages the wood to control the depth of cut of the cutter link. The general arrangement of the saw chain includes a cutter pair 12 pivotally connected to a drive link 18 having an upwardly and rearwardly sloped surface, a pair of tie straps 14 pivotally connected to the drive link 18, a standard drive link 16 pivotally connected to the tie straps 14 and a preceding cutter pair 12 pivotally connected thereto with the cutter link of the preceding cutter pair being in allochiral relationship to the first described cutter pair, i.e. one cutter link being a left handed cutter and the next cutter link being a right handed cutter in alternating sequence, FIG. 1. In the preferred embodiment, I have provided a plu rality of depth gauges in side by side relationship result ing in a facial area substantially equal to the width W of the saw chain, FIG. 2. While a single depth gauge could be configured to extend the width of the chain, I found that employing a plurality of depth gauges permits the use of more conventional type chain links. The cutter pair 12 comprises a cutter link 20 assembled in side by side relationship with a cutter tie strap 22, FIGS. 2 and 7. Cutter link 20 includes two rivet holes 36 in a base portion thereof, FIG. 3. A cutting portion 26 formed by a top plate 27 and a leading cutting edge 29 extend upward from the base portion of the cutter link 20. Forward of the cutting portion 26 and spaced therefrom by gullet 34 in depth gauge 28, FIGS. 3 and 7. Depth gauge 28 has an upwardly and rearwardly sloped con tour not unlike known depth gauge contours. Test re sults discussed in more detail at the conclusion of the specification evidence that increased facial area of the nonrearwardly sloping depth gauges likewise provides a substantial reduction in kickback. The cutter tie strap 22, which also makes up a part of the cutter pair 12 includes two rivet holes 38 and a depth gauge 28 along its forward end, FIG. 4. Rear

4,348,927 3 ward of the depth gauge 28 is a gullet 40. The depth gauges 30 and 28 and gullets 40 and 34 of the cutter tie strap 22 and the cutter link 20, respectively, are dimen sioned to provide a common profile in the assembled position. The forward rivet holes of the cutter tie strap 22 and the cutter link 20 are in alignment with the rear rivet hole 46 of center drive link 18 so that the center drive link spaces the cutter tie strap 22 from cutter link 20, FIGS. 2 and 7. Drive link 18 includes a drive tang 50 for sliding engagement with a groove in a chain bar and for mating engagement with an appropriate socket drive means (not shown), FIG. 6. Drive link 18 includes along its upper surface a rearwardly and upwardly sloping surface 32 terminating in a peak 52. Positioned below peak 52 a gullet 48 is formed to align with gullets 30 and 40 and accommodate a sharpening tool such as a file in the assembled position. Sloping surface 32 initiates at approximately the ver tical center line 54 of the drive link 18, FIG. 6. In the assembled position, the peak 52 of sloped surface 32 is slightly below the peak of the depth gauges 30 and 28 when the chain is running on the flat portion of the bar, FIG.2. In the same position, the slope of the surface 32 is slightly more gradual than the slope of depth gauges 30 and 28. The peak 52 and the slope of surface 32 are dimensioned so that when the chain is going around the nose of the bar the profile of the surface 32 of the drive link 18 assumes a profile similar to that of the depth gauges 30 and 28. This provides the most favorable interaction of the depth gauges in the upper quadrant of the nose of the bar where the potential for kickback is the greatest. The drive link 16, without an upwardly and rear wardly sloping surface, FIG. 5, pivotally connects through the rear rivet holes of the cutter tie strap 22 and cutter link 20 and is of the standard type having two rivet holes 44 and a drive tang 42. Rivets 24 retain the various links of the chain in assembled relationship. A series of comparative kickback tests have been performed with my chain and with a standard low pro file inch pitch chain in present use on consumer chain saws. The low profile inch pitch chain has a single depth gauge on the cutter link and no other elements are present to act as or to protect the depth gauge. These kickback results are illustrated in FIG. 8. The tests were conducted on a kickback machine of the type developed by the Chain Saw Manufacturers Association and re cently adopted by the Consumer Product Safety Com mission. Such a machine presently exists in the National Bureau of Standards. The various chains were operated at 10,000 rpm with a depth gauge setting of 0.020 inch. The absicca of the curve represents the angular devi ation of the chain and the bar with O' representing the horizontal position. The ordinate of the curve repre sents the inch pounds of energy or more accurately the inch pounds of energy measured from the rebound of the bar and chain. Curve A represents the kickback from the low profile inch pitch chain run on a standard sprocket nose bar. Curve B represents a standard low profile inch chain run on a small nose bar. Curve C represents the kick back of a chain made in accordance with my invention and run on a small nose bar whereas curve D represents the kickback results of my chain run on a standard sprocket nose bar. It can be seen that the kickback is substantially less and virtually eliminated on my saw chain in comparison with the standard low profile chain O 5 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 4. irrespective of the nose bar employed. In addition, field tests with my chain have demonstrated an improved stability and smoother operation. Field tests have also demonstrated that cutting efficiency is generally con parable to the standard low profile inch pitch chain. Finally, a substantial advantage results during the bor ing operation where boring can be performed with my new chain whereas the standard safety chain including a protective link cannot effectively and safely be em ployed for boring. A saw chain having a dual depth gauge without the specially configured center drive link also reduces kick back over the standard chain. Such a chain section is illustrated in FIG. 9. The cutter tie strap 22 and the cutter link 20 are identical with the embodiment illus trated in FIG. 2. The only difference in the chain is that the center drive link which precedes the cutter pair is a conventional center drive link 16 instead of the spe cially configured link 18. Tests have been conducted on a standard inch pitch chain (no safety link) having a single depth gauge with out a ramped surface. The maximum kickback was on the order of 410 to 440 inch pounds. A cutter tie strap having a similar depth gauge was added as in FIG. 9 and the chain had a maximum kickback of 210 inch pounds. A center drive link with a third depth gauge was added and the kickback was reduced to a maximum of 110 inch pounds. w Finally, a cutter link with a ramped depth gauge was tested and compared with a chain having the same cut ter link and a mating tie link with a comparable depth gauge. The chain was tested at a kickback of 260 inch pounds with the single depth gauge and 105 inch pounds with the dual depth gauges. It, therefore, can be seen from all of the above results that increasing the facial area through dual depth gauges reduces kickback and adding a third depth gauge via a center drive link reduces kickback even more. I claim: 1. In an endless safety saw chain for cutting wood including a plurality of center links and a plurality of pairs of side links pivotally joining said center links and defining a saw chain width with certain of said side links being cutter links, the improvement comprising a depth gauge means associated with said cutter links having a coincident facial area for engaging the wood substan tially equal to the saw chain width. 2. In an endless safety saw chain including a plurality of center links and a plurality of pairs of side links pivot ally joining said center links, certain of said pairs of side links being cutter pairs comprising a noncutting tie link on one side and a cutter link on the other side of the center link, the improvement comprising the noncutting tie link, the cutter link and the center link each includ ing a depth gauge, the center link depth gauge defined by an upwardly and rearwardly sloping surface posi tioned to extend between the depth gauges of the non cutting tie link and cutter link when the chain is in a flat position so as to position said three depth gauges in side by side relationship. 3. The improvement of claim 1, said sloping surface terminating at a peak slightly less than the height of the peak of said depth gauges when the chain is in the flat position. 4. The improvement of claim 4, said sloping surface having a slope more gradual than a slope of the depth gauges when the chain is in the flat position.

5 5. The improvement of claim 5, said sloping surface starting at a position forward of the cutter pairs at sub stantially a vertical center line of the center link. 6. The improvement of claim 2 each of the depth gauges including a gullet positioned to form a coinci dent opening to permit sharpening of the cutter link. 7. The improvement of claim 3 wherein the center link is a drive link. 8. An endless safety saw chain for operation about a chain saw bar comprising in sequence: A. a pair of side links, one of side links being a cutter link having a cutter portion and a sloping depth gauge and the other of said side links being a non cutting link and having a sloping depth gauge in substantial alignment with said cutter link depth gauge; 4,348,927 15 20 6 B. a center drive link pivotally connected to the pair of side links and including an upwardly and rear wardly sloping surface positioned to extend be tween said depth gauges of said pair of side links. C. a pair of side links comprising tie straps pivotally connected to the center drive links; D. a center drive link pivotally connected to said pair of tie straps and to another pair of said side links including a cutter link. 9. The saw chain of claim 8 wherein the sloping sur face of the center drive link has a more gradual slope than that of the depth gauges and terminates in a peak having a height slightly less than the height of the depth gauges when the chain is in the flat position so that the center drive link sloping surface assumes the same pro file as the depth gauges as the chain articulates about a nose of the chain saw bar. sk ck k : k 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT NO. : 4,348,927 DATED September 14, 1982 INVENTOR(S3 : Jaroslav Jiri Olmir It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby Corrected as shown below: Column 1 Lines 37 & 38 'chain saw" should read -- saw chain--. Claim 4 - Column 4 Line 66 'Claim 4' should read -- Claim 3--. Claim 5 - Column 5 Line l 'Claim 5' should read -- Claim 4--. signed and sealed this Twenty-eighth D 2 y of December 1982 SEAL Attest: Attesting Officer GERALD J. MOSSINGHOFF Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks