SECTION 8.0 HIGHWAY SETBACK LINES & ROADSIDE REGULATIONS

Similar documents
INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

Access Management Standards

EAGLE MOUNTAIN CITY Residential Fencing Guidelines

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

Making Great Urban Streets Confessions of a Highway Engineer. Timothy R. Neuman.. P.E. Chief Highway Engineer CH2M HILL

Non-required Fences Update

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Staff Report Text Amendment Case #: TA

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I MOVE TO PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 556, TO REMOVE NE 173RD STREET FROM THE DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED STREETS.

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

Geometric Design Tables

Section Fences, Walls and Screens

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

ACCESS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS FOR COUNTY ROADS ON THE THOROUGHFARE RIGHT OF WAY IDENTIFICATION MAP

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

APPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR

MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FOLSOM AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING SWIMMING POOLS, SPAS AND HOT TUBS

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Railroad Inspection Procedure Manual

General Design Factors

PART 5. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LOW-VOLUME ROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

REAR YARDS - There shall be a rear yard no less than forty (40) feet.

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

Town of Siler City - Unified Development Ordinance ARTICLE XIV - Streets and Sidewalks

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Right-of-Way Standards

La Crescent Township Zoning Ordinance

Determining Minimum Sightlines at Grade Crossings: A Guide for Road Authorities and Railway Companies

Background on the Revisions to VDOT s Access Management Spacing Standards

REMOVE BARRIERS TO, ENCOURAGE CREATION OF AND PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR SAFE ROUTES (ALL DISTRICTS)

(This page left intentionally blank)

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

INTER- AND INTRA-CONNECTIVITY INTERPRETIVE GUIDELINES

Statement of Rebuttal Evidence of Anthony Thomas Penny on Behalf of Danne Mora Holdings (#1134)

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Transportation Analysis and Plan

ENGINEERING STANDARD FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS AND STREETS ORIGINAL EDITION MAR. 1996

Roadway Design Manual

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Driveway Design Criteria

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

A5.1 Permitted activities

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

Right-of-Way Standards

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Road Usage Permit Application Form

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

City of Turlock Traffic Calming Program

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

City of Norwalk Connecticut Department of Public Works

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

APPENDIX B(1) SUBDIVISION STREET DESIGN GUIDE. SECTION B(1) 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction... B(1)-1

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Purpose: Financial Implications and Impact Statement: It is estimated that the cost to implement:

Geometric designs for Safe Highways. Dr. Manoj M. Asst. Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Delhi

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

0 CITY OF SANTA ANA 0

Chapter 11 Highway and Rural Driving

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2732 SUMMARY

D-1. Urban Street Overview.

Article II. Traffic-Control Devices. 1

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

ARTICLE V - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN ESTATE RESIDENTIAL - A- SER

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

10 SHERFORD Town Code

Transcription:

SECTION 8.0 HIGHWAY SETBACK LINES & ROADSIDE REGULATIONS 8.1 Classification and Setbacks For the purpose of determining the distance buildings and other structures are set back, the roads and highways of the township are hereby divided into the following classifications according to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation Functional Classification System or a locally adopted Transportation Plan. (1) Arterial Highways (A) (B) (C) The setback line for arterial highways shall be 150 feet from the centerline of the highway or 100 feet from the right-of-way line, whichever is greater. Frontage roads to arterial highways shall be considered as local roads for the purpose of determining the setback along said service roads. Minimum road right-of-way width shall be 100 feet. (2) Collector Roads The setback for collector roads shall be 90 feet from the centerline or 50 feet from the right-of-way line, whichever is greater. Minimum road right-of-way width shall be 80 feet. (3) Local Roads All local roads shall have a minimum setback of 85 feet from the centerline or 50 feet from the right-of-way line, whichever is greater. Minimum road right-of-way width shall be 70 feet. (4) Lesser Setbacks Lesser setbacks may be permitted by the Planning & Zoning Committee in cases of unusual topography, existing patterns of lesser setbacks of buildings on nearby properties, or varying alignment of highway right-of-way lines. (5) Special Width Road Rights-of-Way Road rights-of-way which are indicated as Special Width Roads in adopted transportation plans shall be used to establish minimum setback requirements. Sec. 8 Pg. 1

8.2 Vision Clearance at Intersections In each quadrant of every public street, road, or railroad intersection, there shall be designated a clear vision triangle, bounded by the street or road centerline and a line connecting points on said centerline at a specified distance from their point of intersection, in the manner illustrated on the following page and titled Basic Illustration of Clear Vision Triangles. The use of the term triangle in this section shall not be construed to preclude reasonable modifications of a triangular shaped area, including modifications occasioned by the existence of curving streets or roads. The term centerline in this section shall be interpreted as follows: (1) Where there is an undivided pavement within a right-of-way, the centerline shall be the centerline of that pavement, irrespective of whether that coincides with the centerline of the right-of-way. (2) Where there is a divided pavement within a right-of-way, the centerline shall be the centerline of the median strip between the pavements, except as specified in subsection (3) below. (3) Where there is a divided pavement within a right-of-way, and the distance between the centerline of the pavements, measured along the centerline of the intersecting street or road, is 60 feet or greater, the centerline of the pavements shall be used separately, in the manner illustrated on the following page and entitled Illustration of Designation of Centerline for Clear Vision Triangles, to designate the clear vision triangles. The distance specified from the point of intersection of the centerline to the aforesaid points on the centerline shall be as specified in the table as follows: Classification Arterial Collector Local Railroad Crossing Triangle Side Distance 300 ft. 200 ft. 150 ft. 330 ft. Within the clear vision triangle, no object shall be allowed above a height of 2 ½ feet above the average elevation of the streets at the aforesaid points on the respective centerlines if such object substantially obstructs the view across the triangle. Sec. 8 Pg. 2

In situations where trees of large diameter, large numbers of trees, or some combination of these are present, this provision shall be construed to mean that a sufficient number of trees shall be removed so as to render an object such as a motor vehicle clearly visible across the clear vision triangle from one street or road to another, the intent being to provide for the public safety. However, it shall not necessarily be construed to mean that every tree in the clear vision triangle must be removed. Likewise, this restriction shall not apply to posts and wire fences, provided that they do not obstruct visibility across the clear vision triangle. 8.3 Objects Permitted Within Setback Lines and Vision Triangles (1) Open fences. (2) Telephone, telegraph, and power transmission poles, lines, and portable equipment that is readily removable in its entirety. (3) The planting and harvesting of field crops, shrubberies, and trees, except that no trees or shrubberies shall be planted within a vision clearance triangle so as to obstruct the view in the vision triangle. 8.4 Access Control Town Roads Driveway access is limited to one driveway access per lot in any residential district, provided that on lots containing a duplex, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Committee, two separate driveways may be constructed if the design of the building or the physical characteristics of the lot reasonably require a second driveway. Common driveways may be required to provide access to any new lots or lots that do not currently have an existing driveway. Common driveways shall be built on the common property line and to the standards of a single driveway. All new driveways shall have a minimum site distance of 150 feet in each direction and be located a minimum of 6 feet from a common property line. (Amended by Ordinance 030303B) Sec. 8 Pg. 3

BASIC ILLUSTRATION OF CLEAR VISION TRIANGLES Sec. 8 Pg. 4

ILLUSTRATION OF DESIGNATION OF CENTERLINE FOR CLEAR VISION TRIANGLES Sec. 8 Pg. 5

(This page intentionally left blank.) Sec. 8 Pg. 6