City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Similar documents
City of Homewood Transportation Plan

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Classification Criteria

Land Use and Transportation Investments: Coordinate transportation investments with land use objectives to encourage development at key nodes.

Chapter 6: Transportation

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Appendix A. Functional Classification

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Transportation Analysis and Plan

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

TOWN OF HALTON HILLS TRAFFIC CALMING PROTOCOL. Page 1 of 25

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Guidelines

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Defining Purpose and Need

5.0 Roadway System Plan

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

Citizens Handbook for Requesting Traffic Calming Devices

3.0 Future Conditions

Lee s Summit, Missouri Thoroughfare Master Plan

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy City of Port St. Lucie Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy Adopted June 26, 2017

Roadway Design Manual

4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF DEFICIENCIES

Town of Clarkstown Traffic Calming Program. Table of Contents

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

9.1 FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEMS IN URBANIZED AREAS Principal Arterial Interstate Principal Arterial Non-Interstate

Geometric Design Tables

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Project Update May 2018

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Mobility and Congestion

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

HILLSIDE DISTRICT PLAN White Paper

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA. Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program A Policy for Use of Traffic Calming on Local (Residential) Streets

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Bridges and Arizona Crossings

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN. Analysis of Future Conditions Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7.

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDELINES

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

Introduction and Authority

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

JCE 4600 Transportation Engineering. Traffic Control

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Traffic Calming Policy Manual

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

City of Hanover TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook

Freeway System Considerations

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Policy Number: Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Adopted July 9, 2012

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

CHAPTER 7: TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table A-1: Roadway Functional Classifications Criteria Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Place Connections Interconnects metro centers and regional business concentrations Spacing Developed areas: 2-3 miles Developing areas: 3-6 miles Roadway Connections To interstates, principal arterials and selected minor arterials and collectors Interconnects major trip generators Developed areas: ½-1 mile Developing areas: 1-2 miles To interstates, principal arterials, other minor arterials, collectors and some local streets Interconnects neighborhoods and minor business concentrations Developed areas: ¼-3/4 mile Developing areas: ½-1 mile To minor arterials, other collectors and local streets Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct property access Limited access to property Access to properties is common Interconnects blocks within neighborhoods and land parcels within commercial areas As needed to access land uses To collectors, other local streets and a few minor arterials Unrestricted property access Percent of Mileage 5-10% 15-25% 5-10% 65-80% Percent of Vehicle 40-65% 15-40% 5-10% 10-30% Miles Traveled Intersections Grade separated or highcapacity intersection controls Traffic signals and cross-street stops All-way stops and some traffic signals As required for safe operation Parking None Restricted as necessary Restricted as necessary Usually unrestricted Large Trucks No restrictions No restrictions Restricted as necessary Permitted as necessary Typical Average 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 1,000-15,000 Less than 1,000 Daily Traffic Posted Speed Limits 45-65 mph 35-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 mph Right-of-way Width 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Transit Accommodations Priority access for transit in peak periods Preferential treatment where needed Designed for use by regular route buses Normally used as bus routes only in non-residential areas Source: Metropolitan Council, Transportation Development Guide Chapter/Policy Plan, 2007 Appendix A Page 1

The intent of the functional classification system is to create a hierarchy of roads that collect and distribute traffic from neighborhoods to the metropolitan highway system. Roadways with a higher functional classification (arterials) generally provide for longer trips, have more mobility, have limited access and connect larger centers. Roadways with a lower functional classification (collectors and local streets) generally provide for shorter trips, have lower mobility, have more access and connect to higher functioning roadways. A balance of all functions of roadways is important to any transportation network. Figure A-1 depicts the relationship of the various functional classifications to access and mobility. Figure A-1 Access/Mobility Relationship A1.1. Principal Arterials Principal arterials are part of the Metropolitan Highway System and provide high-speed mobility between the Twin Cities and important locations outside the metropolitan area. They are also intended to connect the central business districts of the two central cities with each other and with other regional business concentrations in the metropolitan area. These roadways, which are typically spaced from three to five miles apart, are generally constructed as limited access freeways in the urban area, but may also be constructed as multiple-lane divided highways. The City of Wayzata is served by one principal arterial, TH 12. A1.2. Minor Arterials Minor arterials also emphasize mobility over land access, serving to connect cities with adjacent communities and the metropolitan highway system. Major business concentrations and other important traffic generators are usually located on minor arterial roadways. In urbanized areas, one to two mile spacing of minor arterials is considered appropriate. A minor arterials are defined by the Metropolitan Council as roadways of regional significance because they relieve, expand or complement the principal arterial system. A minor arterials are categorized into four types, consistent with Metropolitan Council guidelines: Appendix A Page 2

Relievers Minor arterials that provide direct relief for metropolitan highway traffic (e.g., Wayzata Boulevard). Expanders Routes that provide connections between urban areas outside the I-494/I-694 beltway (e.g., Central Avenue (CSAH 101), Bushaway Road (CSAH 101) and CSAH 15 west of TH 12). Connectors Roads that provide good, safe connections to and among communities at the edge of the urbanized area and in rural areas. Augmenters Roadways that augment principal arterials within the I-494/I-694 beltway (not applicable to Wayzata). A well-planned and adequately designed system of principal and A minor arterials will allow the City s overall street system to function the way it is intended and will discourage through traffic from using residential streets. Volumes on principal and minor arterial roadways are expected to be higher than on collector or local roadways. Providing the capacity for these higher volumes will keep volumes on other city streets lower. B minor arterials provide a citywide function, serving medium to long distance trips. The City of Wayzata does not currently have any roadway with this roadway designation. A1.3. Collectors Collectors are designed to serve shorter trips that occur within the City and to provide access from neighborhoods to other collector roadways and the arterial system. They are expected to carry less traffic than arterial roads and to provide access to some properties. Collectors are typically categorized as Major and Minor. Major collectors can link both local streets and minor collectors to minor arterials while Minor collectors connect local streets to other collectors or minor arterials. There are several collector routes within the City. Examples of roadway segments designated as collectors in the City of Wayzata include Lake Street and Superior Boulevard. A1.4. Local Streets Local streets provide access to adjacent properties and neighborhoods. Local streets are generally low-speed, and designed to discourage through traffic. All of the remaining roadways in the city that were not listed under the previous functional classifications above fall under the local road designation. A2. 2030 Traffic Forecasts The pattern and intensity of travel within any city is directly related to the distribution and magnitude of households, population and employment within that community, in neighboring communities and in the region as a whole. Land use, travel patterns, population and employment change over time and affect the efficiency and adequacy of the transportation network. This section outlines expected changes in the City s land use pattern, households, population and employment, which will then be the basis for estimating future travel demand within the City. A2.2. Land Use The City of Wayzata is a developed community located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Existing land use within the City of Wayzata is shown in Chapter 3. Appendix A Page 3

As the metropolitan area moves forward with a greater focus on multi-modal transportation, new development and redevelopment in Wayzata will be constrained by the existing and future transportation system. The transportation plan is designed to assist the City in developing a transportation system that supports land use and provides safe and efficient movement of people and goods. A2.3. Socio-Economic Data Using the land use guide plan and development objectives, and Metropolitan Council forecasts as guidance, the City has estimated existing and future population, employment and households for subareas of the City called Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). Estimates for the years 2005 and 2030 are shown in Table A-2. The boundaries of the TAZs are illustrated in Map A.1. A3. Existing and Anticipated Capacity Deficiencies Congestion on the roadway system begins to develop when the ratio of traffic volumes to roadway capacity (v/c ratio) approaches or exceeds 1.0. The ratio of volume to capacity provides a measure of congestion along a stretch of roadway and can help determine where roadway improvements, access management, transit services, or demand management strategies need to be implemented. It does not, however, provide a basis for determining the need for specific intersection improvements. Appendix A Page 4

Table A-2: High Growth Scenario for the City of Wayzata, by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Hennepin 2005 2030 County TAZ Population Households Retail Employment Non-Retail Employment Population Households Retail Employment Non-Retail Employment 618 126 61 0 0 143 81 0 0 619 50 24 0 0 128 63 0 0 649 236 114 22 256 220 119 35 253 650 699 338 163 950 809 393 176 1,006 651 273 132 0 0 289 140 0 0 819 277 134 80 1,550 289 140 105 1,550 1500 474 229 15 155 496 240 35 190 1501 290 140 36 156 326 158 45 153 1502 225 109 503 417 247 120 545 414 1503 447 216 388 600 1569 622 420 600 1504 362 175 225 494 372 180 244 494 1506 105 51 0 0 133 65 0 0 1507 407 197 0 10 423 205 0 15 1508 108 52 0 5 114 55 0 10 1768 101 49 0 0 113 55 0 0 1779 21 10 29 214 29 14 52 258 Total 4,201 2,031 1,461 4,807 5,700 2,650 1,657 4,943 Appendix A Page 5

Table A-3 provides a method to evaluate roadway capacity. For each facility type, the typical planning level average daily traffic (ADT) capacity ranges and maximum ADT capacity volume are listed. These volume ranges are based upon guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual, discussions with the Metropolitan Council, and professional engineering judgment. A range is used since the maximum capacity of any roadway design (v/c = 1) is a theoretical measure that can be affected by its functional classification, traffic peaking characteristics, access spacing, speed, and other roadway characteristics. Further, to define a facility s daily capacity, it is recommended that the top of each facility type s volume range be used. This allows for capacity improvements that can be achieved by roadway performance enhancements. Table A-3: Planning-Level Roadway Capacities by Facility Type Planning Level Daily Capacity Ranges Wayzata Facility Type (ADT) Daily Capacity (ADT) Two-lane undivided urban 8,000-10,000 10,000 Two-lane undivided rural 14,000-15,000 15,000 Three-lane urban (two-lane divided with turn lanes) 14,000-17,000 17,000 Four-lane undivided urban 18,000-22,000 22,000 Five-lane urban (four-lane divided with turn lanes) 28,000-32,000 32,000 Four-lane divided rural 35,000-38,000 38,000 Four-lane freeway 60,000-80,000 80,000 Six-lane freeway 90,000-120,000 120,000 Note: The terms urban and rural describe typical section design (i.e., curb and gutter for urban and ditch drainage for rural). They do not imply geographic areas. Appendix A Page 6

A4. Access Management A4.1. Access to Principal Arterials The City of Wayzata is served by one principal arterial, TH 12. Mn/DOT has developed a policy on access management and guidelines for access spacing. Mn/DOT s Highway Access Category System and Spacing Guidelines can be found at http://www.oim.dot.state.mn.us/access/pdfs/mndotaccessguidelines.pdf. In general, the guidelines recommend limiting interchange spacing to one mile within urbanized areas. These guidelines also recommend limiting cross-street access to one-half mile within urbanized areas and no new driveway access permitted on principal arterials. The City of Wayzata will follow metropolitan guidelines for access to TH 12. A4.2. Access to Minor Arterials The City will follow Hennepin County guidelines for access to the minor arterial system. These guidelines generally call for one-quarter mile spacing of all access points (cross streets and driveways). Wayzata will work with Hennepin County to minimize the number of driveways directly accessing minor arterials in the City. A5. Traffic Calming Traffic calming programs usually focus on the 3 E s education, enforcement, and engineering. Although most people tend to focus only on the engineering solutions; education and enforcement techniques, if properly employed, can also be effective especially in reducing speeds. If the techniques are not effective in solving the problem, physical changes to the roadway may be considered. Some traffic calming techniques that may be considered by the City of Wayzata include: Widening sidewalks/narrowing streets and travel lanes. Full roadway closures (cul-de-sac streets) Closing a street either at one end or the other, or at a mid-block location to eliminate unwanted through traffic. Roundabouts. Partial roadway closures (diverters) Partial diverters include narrowing of a two-way street at an intersection to eliminate one direction of travel and thereby reducing traffic volumes. A full diverter may include a raised barrier placed diagonally across an intersection to physically divide the intersection. Curb Extensions (Chokers) A physical narrowing of the street, either at an intersection or mid-block, to constrain the pavement width. Chokers may improve pedestrian safety by improving visibility and reducing the width at crossing points. Chicanes - A series of staggered curb extensions, forming s-shaped curves to slow vehicle speeds and reduce volumes. Traffic Circles A circular raised island in the center of an intersection, which drivers need to navigate around. A typical circle would be approximately 20 feet in diameter. Speeds near the treated area are reduced as vehicles navigate around the circle. However, mid-block speeds may increase. Appendix A Page 7

Center Median Islands A raised median used primarily to prevent left turns from a major roadway to a minor roadway. As through traffic in a residential neighborhood is reduced or eliminated, a reduction in speeds may follow. Speed Humps Design features which rise above the roadway surface and extend across the width of the roadway. They are typically 12 feet long by 3 inches high. To be effective, they are typically installed in a series. Speed humps may reduce the amount of cut-through traffic on a roadway, but are primarily used to reduce speeds. Speed Tables Raised, flat-topped pavement that is long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top. Speed tables are typically 3 4 inches high by 22 feet long, consisting of 6-foot ramps at each end and a 10-foot flat top. They are usually constructed with tapers at each side to allow unimpeded drainage in the curb gutter. Their primary purpose is to reduce speeds (design speed 25-30 mph). Raised Intersections/Crosswalks Similar to a speed hump but with a level section on top. They are generally 20 feet long by 3 inches high. They are typically used to reduce speeds and increase visibility of the crossing. Neighborhood Entry Treatments Typically a center median with a change in roadway pavement/texture. These treatments are used to indicate to drivers that they are entering a residential area and should adjust their speeds accordingly. Curvilinear Reconstruction Reconstruction of a roadway introducing curvatures on a previously straight alignment to slow vehicle speeds and reduce volumes. Appendix A Page 8

Source: SRF Consulting Prepared By: City of Wayzata Planning Department 3/13/2009 2008 Update Wayzata Comprehensive Plan Traffic Analysis Zones Map A.1 µ