Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Similar documents
Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Living Streets Policy

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

This page intentionally left blank.

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

San Jose Transportation Policy

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

This page intentionally left blank.

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Make Lincoln Highway an economically vibrant corridor that is safe, efficient, and beautiful for local residents and visitors.


Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox (Excerpt from Figure 3.1)

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

PRIORITIES RESULTS YOUR PRIORITIES FOR BRIDGEPORT 5% 4% 13% RESIDENTIAL CHOICES TRAILS & PARKS

Ocean Park Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

2.0 Existing Conditions

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

summary of issues and opportunities

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

North Coast Corridor:

UNIVERSITY AVENUE CORRIDOR REDESIGN. January 8, 2017 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

Lincoln Highway Streetscape Plan Concept Plan

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

Austin Avenue Bridges Project. Public Meeting Summary

Status February Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Richmond Connects Visioning Update

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

Corridor Recommendations and Implementation

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Cross Street Corridor Non-Motorized Enhancement Project Project Description

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Transcription:

Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township, generally between US to the west and just west of Old Lincoln Highway to the east. The project was supported by grant funding from the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) and East Whiteland Township. The project is a follow-up to recommendations in the Township s Comprehensive Plan to promote Route as a main street with a mix of land uses, improved multimodal transportation options, and reduced congestion. The plan includes the evaluation of transportation improvement alternatives and development of land use policies to achieve the Township s vision and attract appropriate growth and redevelopment to the corridor. Key Issues Land Use The properties along the Route corridor are a peculiar mix of old and new, pristine and unkempt, planned and improvised. The overall effect is often described as a hodge-podge by community members. Disparate uses, an auto-oriented environment, lack of street trees and landscaping, parking lots that seemingly spill into the roadway, and an abundance of signage all contribute to a lackluster appearance that is of great concern to residents and business owners. From a land use perspective, key issues fall into three broad categories: vitality and viability, lack of community identity, and overall appearance. Transportation The Route corridor in East Whiteland is often referred to as a bottleneck. The road narrows from two travel lanes in each direction to one travel lane in each direction between Malin Road and U. S.. This narrowing, limited roadway connectivity in the area, and a high number of closely spaced driveways contribute to the congestion and safety issues along the corridor. Multimodal connectivity is also an issue along Route. Bicycle, pedestrian, and transit supportive facilities along and connecting to Route are extremely limited, not continuous, and not connected. Vision Goals Route is a dynamic, pedestrian friendly corridor anchored by a new Frazer train station, lively mixed use areas, iconic local businesses, and inviting open spaces. Enhance Local Identity Enhance the Streetscape Mixed Use Centers Diverse Housing Opportunities Thriving Local Businesses Redevelopment Open Space Improve Safety and Traffic Flow Accommodate All Users New Train Station i

Preferred Alternative Based on stakeholder and community input, the transportation plan for Route includes a consistent 5- lane cross section with two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane or median, along with bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides. The preferred alternative also includes improvements and additional turning lanes at key intersections, streetscape enhancements, bus stop improvements, and access management strategies. The goal is to provide a consistent roadway cross section along Route between U.S. and PA with a sidewalk connection extending beyond PA to Old Lincoln Highway. Concept Plan For the segment of Route between U.S. and Malin Road, a detailed concept plan was developed showing how this segment can be widened from three lanes to five lanes with the goal of minimizing impacts to existing buildings along the corridor while coordinating with potential redevelopment opportunities. The concept plan is a blueprint for how the vision for Route can be achieved. Implementation of these recommended transportation improvements will likely occur through a combination of capital improvement projects and through the land development process. The concept plan can be used to provide guidance during the land development process and for East Whiteland Township to advance specific capital improvement projects. Preferred Alternative Cross Section 83 Preferred Alternative Overview Map 5 Sidewalk 5 Bike 11 Travel Lane 11 Travel Lane 11 Turn Lane or 11 Travel Lane 11 Travel Lane 5 Bike 5 Sidewalk Median Lane 4 Buffer Southbound Church Rd Two travel lanes in each direction with a center turn-lane/median Bike Lanes Sidewalks Eastbound Route + Left Turn Lane + Left Turn Lane Southbound Conestoga Rd See Chapter 5 Concept Plan For Route between US and Malin Road Eastbound Route ii

Concept Plan Elements Streetscape Enhancements Proposed streetscape enhancements along Route are envisioned to improve the environment for walking and biking, calm or slow traffic, enhance safety, and create a more attractive corridor. The proposed streetscape elements for Route include sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, high visibility crosswalks, bike lanes, vegetative buffers, landscaping elements, and amenities. Access Management Strategies Access management strategies are used to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, reduce congestion, improve bus operation, and create a better environment for walking and biking. The concept plan for Route includes several access management strategies, such as consolidating driveways, converting select driveways to right-in/right-out only operations, providing cross access easements, and providing a center left-turn lane or center medians. Bus Stop Improvements Bus stop improvements are intended to provide safe and convenient access to bus service along Route. To improve the transit user experience, the concept plan includes ADA landing pads, improved pedestrian access, and bus shelters in some locations. Other amenities, such as trash cans or benches, can also be located near bus stops for the convenience and use by riders. Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections Making Route a dynamic and pedestrian friendly corridor requires looking beyond Route itself and identifying bicycle and pedestrian connections for people to walk and bike to and from the corridor to other destinations. There was a focus on providing north-south connections to the Chester Valley Trail, established residential areas, institutions, and employment centers. A variety of off-road and on-road facilities were identified, including sidewalks, multi-use trails, and on-road bicycle facilities. New Roadway Connections Natural and man-made constraints in the Frazer area have limited the connectivity of roads that feed into Route, thus contributing to the congestion on the corridor. Today, there are only three roads that provide connections to the south and very few alternative east-west routes to Route. To address this issue, the following three new roadway connections were identified: Route to King Road (Planebrook Road Extension) Three Tun Road to Malin Road Pa to PA (Brennan Boulevard Extension) The potential benefits of providing these new roadway connections including improving safety, reducing congestion, better emergency services response, and support for walking and biking. Implementation of any of these new roadway connections will require further evaluation and engineering for the specific roadway design. Developing n Official Map is a key next step for the township to advance planning for new roadway connections Frazer Regional Rail Station The concept of a new train station in Frazer, located south of Route between the existing Malvern and Exton stations on SEPTA s Paoli Thorndale regional rail line received strong community support during the planning process. Based on coordination with SEPTA, two general potential locations for a station were identified: one close to the Three Tun Road corridor and one close to Ravine Road and Immaculata University s campus. The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission will be initiating a study in 2018 to further evaluate potential train locations and the demand or ridership for a new station. The Feasibility Study will be important next step in advancing the idea of Frazer Regional Rail Station. Route Connections Overview Map New Roadway Connection New Roadway Connection Potential Train Station Location Potential Train Station Location iii

Land Use Plan To implement the vision set forth in East Whiteland Township s Comprehensive Plan, a two-pronged approach which enables the development of Mixed Use Centers and enhances the remaining portions of the corridor with a functional and attractive streetscape should be utilized. The recommendations aim to address issues related to economic development, residential uses, affordable housing, and historic resources. Mixed Use Center East Development Strategy Plan Mixed Use Centers The intent of the Mixed Use Centers is to provide an opportunity for residential, retail, office, open space, entertainment, and civic uses to be located within a walkable area that has the infrastructure sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, and connectivity between them to create a hub of activity, not just during the day, but also during evening and off-work hours. There are two designated Mixed Use Centers (MUCs): MUC West, focusing on the intersection of Planebrook Road and Route ; and MUC East, focusing on the triangular area surrounding Malin Road/PA, and Route. Conceptual Development Strategy Plans were developed for each MUC to depict the preferred building locations, preferred parking locations, opportunities for residential mixed-use, and opportunities for open space. Design Guidelines When adopted as part of the township s ordinances, design guidelines can better illustrate the intended spirit of the ordinance language. Design guidelines for Route, which can be incorporated into East Whiteland Township s Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, were developed as part of the Route Corridor Master Plan. Zoning Building Location Building Massing Building Height Parking Location Uses Subdivision and Land Development Amenities Landscaping and Buffers Pedestrian Orientation Sidewalks and Crosswalks Gateways and Banners Mixed Use Center West Development Strategy Plan Enhanced Streetscape Rendering iv

Achieving the Vision Achieving the vision of making Route a more dynamic, pedestrian friendly corridor will not happen overnight. Rather, it will happen in a phased approach and will be dependent upon available funding and resources. It will require commitment and dedication by all stakeholders to make incremental changes in the near term in order to achieve the long term vision. Action items for the plan are presented in two separate categories: Capital Improvement Projects, Policies and Programs. Capital Improvement Projects Capital improvements along Route will likely be implemented over time through a combination of public infrastructure investments and land development projects. For the implementation plan, the Route corridor was divided into nine segments or intersections that can advance to design and construction as separate projects or adjacent segments can be combined for implementation. Intersection improvements at Route and PA was identified as the top priority capital improvement in the Route Corridor Master Plan. The proposed improvements will address significant congestion and safety concerns at the intersection. Additionally, PA is centrally located and further implementation can logically progress to the east towards Church Road intersection and to the west towards the Capital Improvements Route Corridor High Priority Projects Planebrook Road intersection. Intersection improvements at Old Lincoln Highway were also identified as a high priority to provide the Patriots Path connection that will link East Whiteland Township and Malvern Borough. For capital improvement projects, especially the high priority projects, the next steps include identifying funding and advancing design and construction. Programming and implementing improvements along Route will require building community support and cultivating partnerships. Policies and Programs Updates to East Whiteland Township s policies and programs can help guide the type and design of future development along Route to create the character that the community desires. Depending on the nature of the policy changes, some can be implemented in a short time frame, while others may require a longer time to build community support. However, these action items are usually achieved at a much lower cost and shorter timeframe compared to capital improvement projects. The three priority action items related to policies and programs include: Develop and adopt Zoning Map and Ordinance Amendments that support the creation of Mixed Use Centers and an Enhanced Suburban Corridor. Incorporate the proposed Design Guidelines into the Zoning and Subdivision and Land Development Ordinances through adoption. Develop and adopt a Township Official Map. A B C D E F G H I Project Engineering & Permitting Right-of-Way Construction & Inspection Total (2018 $) Priority B Planebrook Road to Route (Sproul Road) $ 782,100 $ 710,200 $ 4,881,200 $ 6,373,500 High C Route (Sproul Road) Intersection $ 739,100 $ 455,0 $ 3,696,400 $ 4,890,800 High D Church Road Intersection $ 491,800 $ 344,600 $ 3,058,900 $ 3,895,0 High I Old Lincoln Highway Intersection and Patriots Path Connection $ 387,000 $ 249,200 $ 1,868,200 $ 2,504,400 High TOTAL (Improvements A - I shown on map) $ 5,7,200 $ 4,398,400 $ 39,408,500 $ 49,537,100 Note: Cost estimates do not include inflation or the cost of relocating or resetting existing utilities. v