Western native Trout Status report

Similar documents
states and is considered an important asset to conservation and management actions.

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the

[FWS R1 ES 2015 N076; FXES FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Status of the Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout:

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

THE WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE PLAN FOR STRATEGIC ACTIONS November GOALS, OBJECTIVES, and KEY STRATEGIC ACTIONS

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

Species Status review:

Project Name: Distribution and Abundance of the Migratory Bull Trout Population in the Castle River Drainage (Year 4 of 4)

Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Distribution:

2012 Bring Back the Natives Awarded Projects

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Distribution: Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout are native to the Rio Grande and Pecos River drainages of

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout

David K. Hering and Mark W. Buktenica, Crater Lake National Park

Salmon Recovery Planning in Washington

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

Three point plan to addressing land use and habitat loss impacts on Chesapeake Bay tidal fish and shellfish

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

Bull Trout Recovery Plan Implementation

Endangered Species Act and FERC Hydroelectric Projects. Jeff Murphy & Julie Crocker NHA New England Meeting November 16, 2010

Funding Habitat Restoration Projects for Salmon Recovery in the Snake River Region SRFB Grant Round Version: 2/19/16

[FWS R5 ES 2015 N021; FXES FF05E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for the Gulf

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

July 24, Kalispel Tribe of Indians Update on Efforts to Suppress Northern Pike and Policy Implications

THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2010 ANNUAL REPORT

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

Statement of Dr. Jack Williams Senior Scientist, Trout Unlimited. Before the

PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund

State of TU in the West 2017

April 26, Chairman Rockefeller and members of the Fish and Wildlife Committee. Briefing from Mid-Columbia Regional Fish Enhancement Group (RFEG)

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

Ecology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams

Wild Virginia and Heartwood first raised this issue at the May 19, 2014 public meeting.

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

RIVER HERRING PROGRAM

1.What is a bull trout? 2.What is a metapopulation? 3.How do they go together?

PROTECTING LAND & RESTORING RIVERS FOR SALMON & STEELHEAD

March 15, Dear Interested Party:

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

First Nations Fish Habitat Program Discussion Workbook

September 4, Update on Columbia basin Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Planning

October 2, SUBJECT: Presentation on Invasive Northern Pike and Lessons from the Pend Oreille

Mountain Columbia Province

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Completed Project Report Form

Fisheries Management Plan

August 2, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Bull trout ESA litigation update

Throughout the Pacific Northwest, salmon and steelhead have been listed under the Endangered Species Act because their existence is either threatened

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife American Shad Habitat Plan for the Pawcatuck River

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

A Comparison of Western Watershed Councils. Presentation Prepared by Jeff Salt, Great Salt Lakekeeper

Removal of natural obstructions to improve Atlantic Salmon and Brook Trout habitat in western NL. 26/02/2015 Version 2.0

DOWNLOAD OR READ : TROUT STREAMS OF WESTERN NEW YORK PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Past, Present and Future Activities Being Conducted in the Klamath River Basin Related to the Protection and Recovery of Fish and Their Habitat

Mountain Snake Province

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

Pat DeHaan and Brice Adams. Sam Brenkman and Pat Crain

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Union Pacific Railroad

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

MEMORANDUM. July 2, Council members. Tony Grover, Fish and Wildlife Division Director SUBJECT:

January 4, Addresses water quality within the Council program.

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Fisheries Management Plan Idaho Department of Fish and Game

middle deschutes progress in restoration

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL REGULATORY ENERGY COMMISSION

145 FERC 62,070 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

MCCAW REACH RESTORATION

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

Memorandum of Understanding concerning. Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica tatarica)

1.Warm Springs Creek (Anaconda) Watershed Description and Land Use

Culvert Replacement and Stream Restoration in Wolfden Run, Garrett County, Maryland

Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No Bull Trout Management Plan and Incidental Take Annual Report

Transcription:

Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Data: Draft Recovery Plan, USFWS, 2002; FR Final Critical Habitat Rule - 2005 Partners: ID, MT, OR, WA, NV, FWS, FS, BLM, NPS, Tribes, AK, Canada Species Status review: Thebulltrout (Salvelinusconfluentus)iscurrentlylistedas Threatenedunder the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The original listing rule in 1998, described distinctpopulationsegmentsinthecolumbia, Klamath,andJarbidgeRiverbasins(63FR 31647,63FR42757,64FR17110).A November1,1999updatedrulelistedthe as Threatened throughoutthe coterminousunitedstates,whichincluded additionaldistinctpopulationsegmentsin Washington scoastal PugetSoundareaand Montana sst.mary BellyRiverbasins(64FR 58910).EffectiveOctober26,2005theFWS designated critical habitat for the Klamath River, Columbia River, Jarbidge River, Coastal- Puget Sound, and Saint Mary-Belly River populations of bull trout in the coterminous United States pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). This final designation totals approximately 3,828 miles (mi) (6,161 kilometers (km) ) of streams, 143,218 acres (ac) (57,958 hectares (ha) of lakes in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington, and 985 mi (1,585 km) of shoreline paralleling marine habitat in Washington. In 2004, the USFWS (Service) initiated a fiveyear review of the bull trout listing status. The review process solicited status assessment information from cooperators in the states within which bull trout reside (Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon and Washington), but a final review determination has not been completed by the Service. The FWS is expected to determine final population management descriptions in concert with the state management agencies. SportfishingStatusofBullTrout:Thebull trouthasconsiderablesportfishingimportance andinterestinthenorthwest.although listed as a threatened in the lower 48, there are areas with robust populations that support limited bull trout sport fishing opportunities. In areas with vulnerable bull trout populations, the States of Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington have largely controlled angling impacts through fishing closures and special angling regulations. Bull trout may occur in the same waters as other popular game fish, and due to their aggressive nature bull trout can be caught incidental to other targeted sport fish. Regulations for handling and the immediate release of bull trout minimize the impacts on these fish. However, given the large sizes of adult bull trout and their tendency to spawn in small streams, there can be high incidence of illegal take in some areas. Maintaining the sportfish status can create angler support for bull trout protective and recovery actions. HistoricDistributionofBullTrout:Bull troutarenativetothepacificnorthwestand westerncanada.thehistoricalrangeofbull troutinthelower48statesincludesmost majorriverbasinsinthepacificnorthwest. Bulltrouthistoricallyoccurredfromthe southernlimitsinthemccloudriverin northerncaliforniaandthejarbidgeriverin NevadatotheheadwatersoftheYukonRiver inthenorthwestterritories.inalaska,afew bulltrouthavebeenidentifiedinthetaku River. Current Distribution of Bull Trout The current distribution of bull trout populations in the lower 48 states outside of SE Alaska and Canada is highly fragmented, occupyingonly portionsofthehistoricallyoccupied watersheds.innon coastalareas,they typicallyremainonlyinthecoldest tributaries.likemostnativesalmonidsin thewest,bulltroutdistribution,abundance, andhabitatquality havedeclinedrange wide. Forexample,inIdaho,NevadaandMontana, Western native Trout Status report

aboutone thirdofthecurrentlyoccupied habitatsupports populations at or near habitat capacity, while two-thirds support populations significantly below potential. Figure 1. Current distribution of Bull Trout Unitscurrentlydescribedinthecoterminous UnitedStates.Finally,byincorporating informationofseparateevolutionarylineages (availableonlyinrecentyearsthroughrangewidegeneticsurveys),bulltroutfromthe27 RecoveryUnitsinthelower48Statescanbe logicallyaggregatedintofourmajor population(genetic)groupings(whiteselet al.2004).thesefourlineagegroups, representingtheklamath,coastal,mid Columbia/Snake,andUpperColumbiacould logicallybeconsideredgeneticmanagement Units(GMU s),althoughtheyhavenotbeen formallydesignated. Map of Bull Trout Genetic Lineage Groups in the lower 48 States Range-wide, population strongholds exist in limited areas. Forthepurposesofconservationandrecovery, bulltroutpopulationsinthecoterminous UnitedStateshavebeenpartitionedintoa hierarchicalclassificationsystem.atthe smallestscale, LocalPopulations havebeen defined(draftbulltroutrecoveryplan,2002) asagroupofspawningfishwithhighfidelityto aspecificstreamorreach,andcharacterized byamountofinterbreeding.abasinorbasins whereoneormorelocalpopulationsmay sharecommonforaging,spawning,migrating, orover winteringhabitatandfunctionasa meta populationaretermed CoreAreas. CoreAreascanbefurtheraggregatedinto RecoveryUnits.Thereareover600Local Populations,119CoreAreas,and27Recovery HabitatRequirementsofBullTrout:Bull trouthavenarrowerhabitatrequirements thanmostothersalmonidsandexhibit a number of life history strategies. Most bull trout are highly migratory, spawning in tributary streams where juvenile fish usually rear from 1 to 4 years before migrating to either a larger river (fluvial), lake (adfluvial), or ocean (anadromous) where they spend their adult life, typically returning to the natal tributary stream to spawn. Resident bull trout may complete

their entire life cycle in the tributary streams where they spawn and rear. Resident and migratory forms of bull trout may be found together, and it is generally believed the lifehistory form of individuals is more a product of the environment than of any specific genetic combination. Habitatcomponentsthatinfluencebulltrout distributionandabundanceincludewater temperature,cover,channelformandstability, andsuitabilityofsubstrateforspawningand rearing.bulltroutareoftenassociatedwith areasofgroundwaterinfiltration,and/orthe coldeststreamsinawatershed,withloose, cleangravelrelativelyfreeoffinesediments. Becausebulltroutspawnduringthefallincold waterhabitats,incubationanddevelopment occursoverthewinter,andeggsandalevins aresubjectedtolongdevelopmentalperiods withinthegravel(greaterthan200days).asa result,eggsandyoungbulltroutarevulnerable tohighmortalityratesfromdisturbancetothe substrateincludingfinesedimentdeposition, channelincisionsandscouringfromhighflow events. Throughouttheirlives,bulltroutrequire complexformsofcover,includinglargewoody debris,undercutbanks,boulders,andpools. Alterationsinchannelformandreductionsin channelstabilityresultinhabitatdegradation andreducedsurvivalofbulltroutembryosand juveniles.bulltroutusemigratorycorridorsto movefromspawningandrearinghabitatsto foragingandover winteringhabitatsandback. Differenthabitatsprovidebulltroutwith diverseresources,andmigratorycorridors allowlocalpopulationstoconnect,whichmay increasethepotentialforgeneflowand supportforre foundingofpopulations. Concerns, Issues, or Obstacles Relative to the Conservation and Improvement of the Status of Bull Trout: Population Viability Concerns: Althoughbulltroutarewidelydistributedover alargegeographicarea,theeffectsofhuman activitiesoverthepastcenturyhavereduced theiroveralldistributionandparticularlytheir abundance.increasedhabitatfragmentation fromdams,diversions,landandwater managementpractices,andhuman developmenthasreducedtheamountof availableconnectedhabitat.increased isolationoflocalpopulationsanddecreased connectivitybetweenbulltroutcoreareasis resultinginalossofthemigratorylifeformsof bulltroutandisamajorconcernforpopulation viability.bulltrouttendtobemoremigratory thanotherwesternnativetrout. Fishpassagealongmigrationroutesthat connectforaging,migrating,andoverwinteringhabitatwithspawningtributaries arecrucialtobulltroutlifehistoryand maintainingsufficientgeneticvariability. Fragmentation,isolation,andtheresulting inabilityforlocalpopulationsandcoreareas toexchangeindividualsandgeneticsremains apotentialobstacletopopulationviability. GeneticsConcerns: Wherebrooktrout(Salvelinusfontinalis)and bulltroutco exist,interbreedingcanoccur, oftenresultinginsterilehybridsthatreduce thereproductiveoutputofbulltroutthe geneticsdistributionsinthefourgenetic ManagementUnitsindicatethatthevarious groupshavenotbeencompromisedbycross basinandhatcherystocking. HabitatConcerns Lossofhabitatqualityhasbeenrecognizedas oneofthetwomajorhumaninfluencesinthe lossofbulltroutpopulationsacrossthewest.

Majorhabitatconcernstypicallyrelateto: Modification and fragmentation of habitat from barriers to fish passage, entrainment, and thermal barriers due to dams and water diversions Aquatic habitat degradation and alteration from mining, forestry and agricultural land use practices that result in sediment loading, loss of instream habitat complexity and changes in water quality. Flow depletion and water quality degradation due to water uses for hydropower, and municipal and agricultural diversions. Secondary impacts of dams from reservoir pools in large river systems (i.e. hydropower entrainment, gas supersaturation, modification of flow patterns, creation of nonnative fish habitat, and changes in release water temperatures). Conversion of forested to residential land in core bull trout population areas results in loss of riparian habitat alteration of in-channel habitat, changes to instream flows and diminished water quality. Increasedpressureonbulltrouthabitats fromenergyexplorationinthenearfuture. Thepotentialfordevelopmentismost likelytooccurinnorthwestmontana,with habitatdegradationandlossofwaterthe greatestconcern. Theaccumulationofthesedetrimentalhabitat influencesovertimehasleadtoisolationand fragmentationofhabitat,andadversely impactsthestabilityofbulltroutpopulations. Nonnative or Introduced Species Concerns Introductionsofnonnativehave occurredacrosstherangeofbulltrout.these introductionshavecontributedtodeclinesin abundance,localextirpations,and hybridizationofbulltrout.amongthese,the non nativecausingthegreatest concernarethetwointroducedcharinthe samegenusasbulltrout:1)brooktrout,and 2)laketrout(Salvelinusnamaycush). Itiswelldocumentedthatintroduced populationsofbrooktroutandlaketrout oftenbecomeestablishedandthreatenbull trout,likelythroughtheprimarymechanisms ofcompetitionandpredation.inthecaseof brooktrout,hybridizationisalsoanadded factor.hybridizationbetweenbrooktrout andbulltroutresultsinoffspringthatare frequentlysterile(learyetal.1993), althoughinsomepopulationssecond generationandlaterhybridshavebeen detected(kandaetal2002).brooktrout matureatanearlierageandhaveahigher reproductiveratethanbulltrout.laketrout havehighlongevity(upto40years),high fecundity,andtheirin lakelifecyclemay provideacompetitiveadvantageover adfluvialbulltrout,particularlyinsituations whereinstreamspawningandrearing habitatiscompromised.theselifehistory differencestypicallyfavorbrooktroutand laketroutoverbulltroutwhentheyoccur together,oftenleadingtoreplacementofbull troutwiththeotherintroducedsalvelinus spp. Otherintroducedpredaceoussportfish suchasbrowntrout,northernpike, largemouthandsmallmouthbass,and walleyemayalsobeproblematic.theyhave beenknowntocompeteforfood,space,and reproductivehabitats,aswellaspreyingon bulltrout. OpportunitiesforImprovingBull TroutStatus: Theobjectiveofbulltroutconservationand restorationistoensurethelong term persistenceofself sustainingpopulations acrossthe'nativerange.tomeetthis objective,managerswillneedtomaintain

multipleinter connectedpopulationsofbull troutacrossthediversehabitatsoftheirnative range,andpreservethediversityoftheirlifehistorystrategies(e.g.,residentandmigratory forms).specificconservation measures to improve the status of bull trout can be grouped into several major categories, including: Protect,restore,andmaintainsuitable passageandhabitatconditionsforbull trout. Preventandreducenegativeeffectsof nonnativefishesandothernonnativetaxa onbulltrout. Establishfisheriesmanagementgoalsand objectivescompatiblewithbulltrout conservationandimplementpracticesto achievethosegoals. Characterize,conserve,andmonitor geneticdiversityandgeneflowamonglocal populationsofbulltrout. Conductresearchandmonitoringto implementandevaluaterestoration activities,consistentwithanadaptive managementapproach. Useallavailableconservationprograms andregulationstoprotectandconserve bulltroutandbulltrouthabitats. Development of Watershed-based Bull Trout Restoration, Conservation, and Fishery Management Plans Atpresent,therearemultipleState,Federal, Tribal,private,andCanadianprogramsand conservationeffortstoimprovethestatusof bulltroutinthenorthwesternunitedstates andcanada.projectimplementationhas generallyfollowedasite specificand opportunity basedapproach,ratherthana watershed basedapproach,withvariedresults andaccomplishments.withtwonations,five States,multiplefederalagencies,and numeroustribalnationsinvolved,ithasbeen difficulttodiscernacoordinatedorprioritized basisforbulltroutrestorationandhabitat status. Basedonthe2002DraftRecoveryPlan, recoveryactivitiesweretobecoordinatedat thelevelofthe27recoveryunits. Participationintherecoveryplanning processwasgenerallyextendedtoanyand allexpertswithexpertiseinfisheriesor relateddisciplinesfromlocal,state,tribal andfederalentities,stakeholder,interest andusergroups.recentfederalemphasis hasbeenondesignatingcriticalhabitatand completionofthefive YearReview.Eachof thestates,andsometribeshavebulltrout conservationplanningdocumentsthatreflect andarecomplimentarytothedraftfederal recoveryplan Key Actions Will Include: Statesandfederalagenciesshouldfinalize andcompleteappropriatebulltroutplanning documentsthatspecifyimplementation strategies ImplementationofState,Federal,andTribal RecoveryandConservationStrategiesbased onanagreed uponwatershedorbasinbasis. Bull Trout Population Surveys, genetic analyses, and fish population manipulation: Changing climatic conditions and current levels of drought and forest fire impacts on localized habitats point to a need to maintain assessment of the status of bull trout populations. Competition and impacts of non-native fish on bull trout also need to be monitored. Key actions will include: Maintain the connectivity and genetic integrity o bull trout populations Improve the connectivity and genetic integrity of bull trout populations where needed Maintaincurrentdistributionofbulltrout

withincoreareasasdescribedinrecovery orconservationplans Restoredistributionofbulltroutwhere recommendedinrecoveryorconservation plans Characterize,conserve,andmonitorgenetic diversityandgeneflowamonglocal populationsofbulltrout Controloreradicatenonnative(i.e. brookandlaketrout)wherefeasibleand appropriate Developandimplementconsistentmethods forfishdistribution,populationstatusand trendanalyses Bull Trout Habitat Restoration or Enhancement: Specificlandandwatermanagementactivities thatcontinuetodepressbulltroutpopulations anddegradehabitatincludedamsandother diversionstructures,forestmanagement practices,livestockgrazing,agriculture,road constructionandmaintenance,mining,andurban andruraldevelopment. Key Habitat Actions to be addressed: Protect and maintain key functioning bull trout core habitats and populations Enhance connectivity within and among watersheds Enhance fish passage where barriers to migration have been identified on a watershed basis Restore and enhance water flow and water quality Implement Best Management Practices to prote habitat during land management activities Restore habitat necessary for sustaining critical life history stages including spawning, rearing, and migration Regulatory Actions to Enhance Bull Trout Status: In a few areas, combined impacts of high angling pressure on other and vulnerability of bull trout to most angling methods may create additional needs for more creative angling regulations and enforcement so that impacts to bull trout can be minimized or avoided. The use of special angling regulations to protect bull trout, especially in staging and spawning areas, will be an important component of maintaining the health of bull trout populations. In addition, working with others to maintain appropriate regulations for prevention of disease, water quality impairment, habitat disturbance, and the spread of non-native are important considerations. Key Regulatory Actions to be addressed: Enhance and enforce regulatory actions to prevent destruction of habitat Enforce regulatory mechanisms that prevent impacts associated with recreational angling Enhance and maintain regulatory mechanisms that prevent diseases or illegal introduction of nuisance Federal land management agencies should continue implementation of comprehensive aquatic conservation strategies ( for example, PACFISH, INFISH, and NWPlan) RecommendedActionstoImprove thestatusofthebulltrout: The following high priority actions are common to all Genetic Management Units: A. The FWS and the States, with key Partners, need to conclude the 5-year Status review and develop a bull trout Memorandum of Agreement that describes the key components of the Recovery Plan that need to be addressed over the next 5 Years.

B. Form Management Teams for each GMU to prioritize key actions for improving the status of bull trout, and to seek funding through the various Partnerships being developed. C. Protect and maintain key functioning Bull Trout core habitats and populations. D. Improve the connectivity and genetic integrity of bull trout populations where needed. The following high priority actions are specific to the Bull Trout genetic management units: 1. Coastal Puget Sound GMU a. Restore and enhance water flow and water quality b. Developandimplementconsistent methodsforfishdistribution, populationstatusandtrend analyses 2. Upper Klamath GMU a. Restore and enhance water flow and water quality b. Controloreradicatenonnative 3. Mid-Columbia/Snake GMU a. Restore and enhance water flow and water quality b. Controloreradicatenonnative 4. Upper Columbia River GMU a. Controloreradicatenonnative b. Improveconnectivityofstream corridorsbyremovingbarriersto fishpassage c. Restoreriparianandphysical habitats d. Improvein streamflowsandwater quality e. Protectkeywatershedareasfrom developmentorlandmanagement impactsthroughtheuseof conservationeasementsorland purchases f. Preventfurtherintroductionof invasive,nuisance,andnon native Current or Likely Future Bull Trout Joint- Ventures: BonnevillePowerAdministration (Mitigation) NorthwestPowerandConservationCouncil Sub basinplanning CanadianSpeciesAtRiskAct(SARA) NFWFNorthwesternHabitatProject U.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers U.S.BureauofReclamation TribalPartnerships References 1. BullTroutRecoveryPlan 2. DunhamandRiemann.1999 3. Whiteseletal.2004 4. Learyetal.1993 5. Landaetal.2002 This publication was funded (or partially funded) by Federal Aid to Sportfish Restoration Funds through the Multistate Conservation Grant Program (Grant WY M-8-P), a program supported with funds from the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and jointly managed with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 2006-9.