MANAGING ARC FLASH RISKS: A Strategic Approach Steve Williams Rockwell Automation TechED 2016 23 March 2016, Auckland 1
ARC FLASH RELEVANCE? Higher Safety Awareness & OHS Legislation Statistics Less Electrocutions; More Burns Larger Systems & Higher Fault Currents Ageing Switchgear & Still expected to function Demand for Production > Live Work Less Maintenance Staff (trained) Increased Litigation & Insurance Costs Software Technology Advancements 2
ARC FLASH CHARACTERISTICS Arcing Electrical Fault a.k.a. Arc Flash or Fireball An Arc Flash consists of: Radiant heat and light Plasma cloud (super-heated ionised gas) Copper & Aluminium is vaporised (Cu expands 44,000 times!) Pressure waves shear bolts, destroy panels (& burst ear drums!) Molten metal & shrapnel conductors, steel, insulation Ignition of clothing several meters away A 10kA arc blast at 480 volts is equivalent to approx. 8 sticks of dynamite HV behaves differently to LV! 3
BOLTED FAULT vs. ARC FAULT LV Bolted faults: Low impedance and high current Energy is contained by the conductor (bus or cable) Cleared quickly by circuit breakers or fuses (Inst. trip) Arcing is confined within the circuit breaker or fuse Relatively low safety risk to personnel LV Arcing faults: High impedance (air) results in lower current (~30%) Energy released into surrounding air Persist longer (Inverse Time) Propagate along bus High release of heat and blast energy Are very destructive and dangerous to personnel 4
CAUSES OF ARC FLASH Accidental contact Dropped tools Faulty / Inappropriate test equipment Incorrect device removal / operation Corrosion / Conductive dust particles Deteriorating or poor insulation Misalignment of moving contacts Entry of foreign body (rodent, snake) Equipment operating beyond its limits or lifespan 5
CAUSES OF ARC FLASH Accidental contact Dropped tools Faulty / Inappropriate Test Equipment Incorrect Removal / Operation / Modification Corrosion / Conductive dust particles Deteriorating or poor insulation Misalignment of moving contacts Entry of foreign body (rodent, snake) Equipment operating beyond its limits or lifespan 6
CAUSES OF ARC FLASH Accidental contact Dropped tools Faulty / Inappropriate Test Equipment Incorrect device removal / operation Corrosion / Conductive dust particles Deteriorating or poor insulation Misalignment of moving contacts Entry of foreign body (rodent, snake) Equipment operating beyond its limits or lifespan 7
EXAMPLE - 415V ARC FLASH 8
EXAMPLE - 415V ARC FLASH 9
EXAMPLE - 690V ARC FLASH 10
EXAMPLE - 690V ARC FLASH 11
EXAMPLE - 690V ARC FLASH 12
MISCONCEPTION #1 Arc Flash Management = Arc Fault Containment Arc Fault Containment: Is the tested ability of a switchboard to safely contain an arcing fault, to avoid damage to adjacent switchgear and/or injury to an operator, while in its designed operational state. i.e. with the doors and panels closed and secured! Arc Flash Management: Is the combination of measures applied to an installation to minimise the risk of an arcing fault injury to an electrician who is carrying out a task on a switchboard.. with the doors or panels opened! 13
MISCONCEPTION #2 Need to wear calculated PPE when switching (i.e. doors closed and secured) NFPA 70E (2015) standard is now clear: Normal operation of electric equipment is permitted with no extra PPE when all of the following conditions are satisfied: The equipment is properly installed; The equipment is properly maintained; All equipment doors are closed and secured; All equipment covers are in place and secured; and There is no evidence of impending failure. 14
MISCONCEPTION #3 HV Arc Flash risks are higher than LV High Voltage: Low fault impedance faster clearing times Switching procedures normally required Larger working distance to conductors Low Voltage: Higher fault impedance - slower clearing times Worker complacency it s only 415V! Lack of procedures Closer proximity to conductors 15
TERMINOLOGY Arc Flash Incident Energy The amount of energy a surface (or person) is exposed to at a set distance from an arc, typically the working distance. Units used are cal/cm 2 (!?) Arc Flash Boundary This is the distance from electrical equipment at which the incident energy equals 5 J/cm 2 (1.2 cal/cm 2 ). Within this distance, a person may experience second degree burns. Arc Flash Hazard Category A number (from 0 to 4) that aligns with defined Incident Energy ratings and identifies a corresponding level of PPE 16
ARC FLASH PPE CATEGORY 17
SO WHAT S THE PROBLEM? Just do a study and buy some PPE? Very few plants are static. Equipment Modifications Plant power system changes Utility changes Staff changes Arc Flash Risks will therefore change with time...you need a long term Arc Flash Strategy! 18
WHERE DO YOU START? Understand your current Risks: Get a full Arc Flash study done! Need accurate SLD, cables, transformer data, large motors, protection devices & settings. Complex mathematics Computer modelling preferred. essential Data Collection is biggest issue Fault level study & protection coordination check. Examine the results critically. 19
INTERPRET YOUR STUDY Be careful. common issues: Confusion Conflict Misunderstanding Over-reaction Result: Bad decisions Most common mistakes? Jumping straight to a PPE selection process Broad brush approach for the whole site 20
EVALUATE THE RISKS Assess the REAL Risks Use Risk Management Principles Use standard Risk Assessment Matrix AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009- Risk Management Document your outcomes 21
IDENTIFY BEST CONTROLS Use Hierarchy of Controls Individual reviews required Use a standard process But Keep It Simple! PPE only as last choice 22
MITIGATION OPTIONS Options vary in: Effectiveness Capital cost Production interference Worker acceptance Preferably use multi-layer approach Most effective options: Reduce fault levels & clearing times Reduce likelihood of occurrence Document your outcomes & reasons 23
MITIGATION OPTIONS Substitution Options: Minimal cost at initial design stage Isolate elsewhere (that has lower risk) Replacement of older switchboards with improved segregation, better insulated busbars, etc Replace older OCBs with VCBs or SF6 Replace older protection relays with modern faster acting units, and more setting adjustments Replace manual racking with motorised racking Replace MCCBs with fuses (& MCCBs have limitations) Provide better (safer) Test-for-Dead equipment 24
MITIGATION OPTIONS Engineering Solutions: Reduce fault levels by changing network configuration Reduce fault clearance times by installing enhanced relay protection (cable diff; transformer diff) Select more sensitive relay settings, or dual settings Install arc fault detection relays Install arc quenching schemes (new switchboards) Remove operator from risk: Remote switching control Remote circuit breaker racking schemes 25
MITIGATION OPTIONS Administrative Options: Improve maintenance and switching procedures Establish S.O.P.s for common tasks Improve operator training and awareness programmes Train & encourage electrical personnel to use self risk assessments in typical situations Limit access to switch rooms and switchgear Eliminate live work on exposed conductors 26
MITIGATION OPTIONS Employee Training Defining and Evaluating Competencies Course Content and Facilitation Existing Electrical Employees & Contractors New Electrical Employees & Contractors Non Electrical Personnel (even management?) Risk Assessment Techniques Refresher Courses & Toolbox Meetings 27
MITIGATION OPTIONS Long Term Engineering Issues Accuracy & validity of Electrical Drawings Equipment identification & labelling one system! Specifications & selection of New Equipment Arc Flash Change Management Procedures Equipment additions & modifications Upgrading older Equipment Fault studies & protection settings Updates to Arc Flash Studies Technical Support Arrangements 28
RISK ASSESSMENT EXAMPLE 1 415V MCC 4000A incomer; 12 years old, modern 2500kVA transformer with >40kA Fault Level Rackable design; openings Arc Fault Containment issues Frequency -> Likelihood Switching tested & reset monthly Maintaining isolated; inspected annually Consequence -> Risk? What are Mitigation Options? 29
RISK ASSESSMENT EXAMPLE 2 Dragline Sub, >15 years old 6.6kV Vac Breaker Push In Arc Fault Containment? No on-board 66kV Breaker Frequency -> Likelihood Insertion & removal while live Switching tested & reset monthly Consequence -> Risk? What are Mitigation Options? 30
WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS. PPE Solutions: Review remaining unmitigated risks Select appropriate PPE Categories Clothing trials & selection Clothing replacement programme Switchroom kits Contract staff(?) 31
ARC FLASH PPE STANDARDS International (USA): IEEE 1584 Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations NFPA 70E - 2015 Edition Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace Australia & New Zealand: AS/NZS 4836:2011 - Safe working on or near low-voltage electrical installations and equipment (Aust) ENA NENS 09-2014 Guideline for Selection, Use and Maintenance of PPE for Electrical Arc Hazards. None are legislated (except mining) But OH&S Duty of Care applies! 32
IEEE 1584-2002 Provides well-accepted method for calculating Incident Energy and Flash Protection Boundary. Applies up to 15kV, 106kA. Used by multiple software programs. Equations based on extensive practical experiments, using technology of the time (1980 s). Recent $6 million research in USA Results have now discredited old physics analysis! Early reports old calculations are optimistic!!! Results being validated; New revision due 2017 33
NFPA70E US Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace Very USA-centric Specifies compulsory (in the USA) Arc Flash mitigation steps below: Electrical safety procedures Arc Flash Safety procedures Definitions of Risk Categories Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 2009 & 2012 Editions well known 2015 recently released 34
EXAMPLES OF PPE PPE Categories 1 & 2 PPE Categories 3 & 4 35
AS/NZS 4836:2011 Safe working on or near LV installations Revised in May 2011 to include Arc Flash Safety Emphasises Risk Assessment & Risk Management Competent person must identify risk for work within 3m of exposed energised conductors Assess and reduce risk, e.g. Establish Policy & Procedures, Switch off, Isolate/Tag, Erect Barriers, etc Lists suitable Safety Equipment and Tools (but FR not AR) PPE is not first line of defence, but to be used as a precautionary measure Does not utilise Incident Energies to select HRC & PPE 36
AS/NZS 4836:2011 TABLE 9.2 GUIDE TO THE SELECTION OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TASK CURRENTS UP TO AND INCLUDING 100 A CURRENT EXCEEDING 100 A AND UP TO AND INCLUDING 400 A CURRENTS EXCEEDING 400 A Work (isolated and verified) Footwear Protective clothing (if required) Eye protection (if required) Gloves (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing (if required) Eye protection (if required) Gloves (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing (if required) Eye protection (if required) Gloves (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Switching, isolating, removing fuses or links Footwear Protective clothing Eye protection Gloves (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing Eye protection Gloves Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing Eye protection Gloves Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Isolation verification, testing or fault finding Footwear Protective clothing Eye protection Gloves Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing* Eye protection Gloves Arc flash suit and hood (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Face shield (if required) Footwear Protective clothing* Eye protection Gloves Face shield Arc flash suit and hood (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Live electrical work Footwear Protective clothing* Eye protection Insulating gloves Arc flash suit and hood (if required) Flame-resistant gloves (if required) Face shield (if required) Safety helmet (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing * Eye protection Safety helmet Insulating gloves Arc flash suit and hood (if required) Flameresistant gloves (if required) Face shield (if required) Hearing protection (if required) Respiratory protection (if required) Footwear Protective clothing * Eye protection Insulating gloves Flame-resistant gloves Arc flash suit and hood Hearing protection Respiratory protection (if required) 37
ENA NENS 09-2014 National Guideline for Selection, Use and Maintenance of PPE for Electrical Arc Hazards Published by Energy Networks Association, Aust. Great improvement over previous version Uses Risk Assessment process Compares two calculation methods: IEEE 1584 NENS 09 (based on 2013 Ausgrid research) Very focussed on the PPE garments, fabrics and properties 38
ARC FLASH MANAGEMENT PLAN Formal Management Plan: Official Company Document Integrated with safety documentation Integration with other technical documentation Sign off by management (and OH&S) Reviewed annually Protection against litigation (?) Justification for upgrades & improvements 39
ONGOING CONTROVERSIES: Quantifying the Australian/NZ Arc Flash issue. Statistics, statistics, statistics IEEE 1584 calculations are flawed. Change is coming, but don't wait What Standards should you use? Read & seek advice Standards keep on changing. But do nothing, and you will achieve nothing Workers dislike & avoid the PPE. Involve your workers in the process 40
IN CONCLUSION... To Manage your Arc Flash Risks.. Understand the REAL results of your studies. Mitigate the Risks where possible. Use PPE as a last resort be smart! Select suitable PPE where you have to. Train workers & contractors. Keep your studies & records up to date. Awareness will reduce injuries from this. 41
THANK YOU Questions? 42