Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

Similar documents
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Fairhaven Creek 2000

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. St. Francis River 2004

Thunder Bay River Assessment Appendix. Appendix 2

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

SUMMARY REPORT FOR LAKE ST. MALO FISHERIES ASSESSMENT. Prepared for the St. Malo and District Wildlife Association

Preakness Brook - FIBI098

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

Biological Survey of Allagash Stream

Tahquamenon River Assessment Appendix

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F EUREKA COUNTY Small Lakes and Reservoirs

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report

Warm Stream. A Brief Ecological Description of this Michigan River Type

HUBBARD LAKE Alcona County (T27N, R7E; T28N, R7E) Surveyed May and September Tim A. Cwalinski

Geomorphic Stream Classification A Classification of Natural Rivers, Rosgen, D.L.

Beaver Brook - FIBI047 Hope

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Cool (or Warm-transitional) Stream

Trip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

F I B I ST 519 OP 57. [ Excellent [ Fair. [ Poor. U p p e r D e l a w a r e W M A 1. C e n t r a l D e l a w a r e W M A 1 1.

6TH PELLETIER BROOK LAKE T15 R9, Aroostook Co. U.S.G.S. Gardner Pond, Maine (7 1/2 )

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIBI098

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Cold-transitional Small River

Conewago Creek Initiative. Fish Survey Report for the Conewago Creek

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Little Flat Brook - FIBI065

LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Pequannock River - FIBI077

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lanesboro Area Fisheries Office FAQ sheet

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Big Bend Lake Population Survey

Quemahoning Reservoir

Bode Lake - South Population Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

American Eels in Virginia Mountain Streams

Proposed Reclassification of Cherry Creek, North Platte River Basin, Wyoming. October 25, 2010

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIBI054

Methods for Evaluating Shallow Water Habitat Restoration in the St. Clair River

Cold-transitional Stream

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Gamefish Assessment Report

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Stream Assessment. Date. Data Collected by. Location. Name of Stream and River Basin. Stream Order. Streambank Materials. Streambank Vegetation

(/ North Branch Raritan River - FIBI031 % FIBI031

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Conewago Creek Initiative

APPENDIX A. Stream Electrofishing Survey Data (2015)

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

APPENDIX 3. Distribution Maps of Fish Species

Jason Blackburn, Paul Hvenegaard, Dave Jackson, Tyler Johns, Chad Judd, Scott Seward and Juanna Thompson

Level II Stream Survey for the Timberline Express Proposal

Finescale Dace. Appendix A: Fish. Chrosomus neogaeus. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Fish-60

Proposed Reclassification of Deer Creek, North Platte River Basin, Wyoming

TABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

TABLE 1. Riverscape surveys completed in the upper Chehalis River, Newaukum, and Satsop rivers.

MISSISSIPPI MAKEOVER A Plan for Restoration, Just Around the Bend

Fish faunal changes in Otsego Lake s Shadow Brook watershed following application of best management practices

FY 2010 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: FR- 115

Penny Road Pond Population Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Chapter 5: Survey Reports

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Communities: Vulnerabilities to Climate Change and Response to Adaptation Strategies

Management of headwater streams in the White Mountain National Forest

Va n Saun Mill Brook. FIBI062a !(208!( 4 !( 20. !( FIBI062a !( 7 !( 67 !( 3 !( 5 !( 21 !(120 !(495 !(139 !(440. !( Good. !( Poor.

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

LAKE TANEYCOMO 2011 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Lake Superior. Ontonagon River Assessment. Ontonagon. Rockland. Victoria Dam. Bergland. Bergland. Dam. Bruce Crossing Agate Falls. Kenton Lower.

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Advancing Fish Passage in the Menomonee River Watershed

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM

[ Excellent [ Fair. Millbrook FIBI039. Calno. Upper Delaware WMA 1. Pahaquarry. Stream Order 1st, 2nd & 3rd Order. FIBI Rating.

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Mikkwa River Arctic Grayling Population Assessment

Transcription:

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Three Mile Creek 2011 By Joseph D. Stewig Montrose Area Fisheries Office

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES... 3 LIST OF FIGURES... 3 SUMMARY... 4 STUDY AREA... 5 METHODS... 5 RESULTS... 6 DISCUSSION... 7 Management Implications... 9 REFERENCES... 9 2

LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) watershed estimated land use 2011.... 10 Table 2. Summary of Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) temperature data (recorded hourly) from two locations between May 1 and September 30, 2010.... 10 Table 3. Results of Rosgen classification sites for Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) sampled during Fall 2011.... 10 Table 4. Electrofishing station information and physical data sampled from Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) on September 16 19, 2011.... 11 Table 5. Species sampled by backpack electrofishing from Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) on September 16 19, 2011.... 11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of Three Mile Creek (M-71-2), Stearns County, Minnesota.... 12 Figure 2. Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) watershed land use estimates based on 2001 National Land Cover Data.... 13 Figure 3. Location of electrofishing, temp logger, and Rosgen classification sites on Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) 2011.... 14 Figure 4. Mean daily temperatures ( F) recorded by a Hobo Pendant temperature monitor located at two sites in Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) from May 1 through September 30, 2010.... 15 3

SUMMARY Three Mile Creek is a designated trout stream with its headwater located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the city of Fairhaven in southeastern Stearns County, Minnesota. It flows 8.7 miles into Otter Lake and eventually into the Clearwater River and then the Mississippi River. The stream has an agricultural watershed of 9,673 acres. An initial survey was conducted in 1977 and this was the first survey since 1999. Rosgen stream classification in 2011 classified the upper reach as a C5 channel, which is very susceptible to shifts in both lateral and vertical stability caused by direct channel disturbance and changes in the flow and sediment regimes of the contributing watershed. The lower reach was classified as an E4 channel, which is stable unless the stream banks are disturbed, and significant changes in sediment supply and/or streamflow occur. Stream temperatures sampled in 2010 were favorable for trout survival in the upper reach, with less than 1% of the readings above 68 F. However, the lower reach was less favorable for brook trout survival, with 9% of the readings above 68 F and 34% above 64 F. The relatively high percentage of readings above 68 F combined with the extreme temperature changes indicates that conditions are unstable and not favorable for brook trout survival throughout the lower reach of the stream. Sixteen fish species were captured in 2011 via backpack electrofishing, dominated in number by brassy minnow (30%), fathead minnow (17.5%), central mudminnow (9.4%) and Johnny darter (9%). Northern pike (27%) dominated the sample by weight, followed by creek chub (23.2%), brassy minnow (15.4%), central mudminnow (7.2%) and white sucker (6.4%). 4

STUDY AREA Three Mile Creek is a designated trout stream with its headwater located approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the city of Fairhaven in southeastern Stearns County. The stream flows 8.7 miles and empties into Otter Lake (Figure 1). Three Mile Creek has a gradient of 14.7 ft/mi and a sinuosity of 2.12. The stream has a watershed of 9,673 acres with estimated land uses of 62.1% agriculture (crops/pasture), 23.2% forest, 5.4% wetland, 4.6% shrub grassland, 3.1% developed, and 1.6% open water (Table 1; Figure 2). Three Mile Creek was designated as a trout stream in 1951 and was stocked annually with 150 300 yearling brook trout from 1951 1979. No stocking has occurred since 1979 primarily due to the lack of angler easements and access. An initial survey was conducted in 1977 with subsequent fish surveys conducted in 1983, 1984 and 1999. Temperature profiles were conducted in 1980, 1999, 2001, and 2010. Through all of these surveys only one brook trout has ever been sampled in Three Mile Creek. METHODS Analysis of land use and map production was performed using ArcMap 10 and the 2001 international land use/land cover data. Rosgen stream classification (Rosgen 1996) was performed at two sites within the stream (Figure 3). Stream classification measurements included the calculation of slope, sinuosity, entrenchment ratio (flood prone width relative to stream channel width), and pebble count. Elevations were recorded using a Trimble Spectra Precision Laser (model LL200-4) level. RiverMorph 4.3 software was used to analyze the data and calculate stream classifications (Stream Restoration Software (2001-2011). Water temperatures were measured using a Hobo Pendant temperature data logger model UA-001-08 at two sites within the stream (Figure 3). The data loggers were set to collect temperatures hourly. Data was used to evaluate minimum, maximum and daily fluctuation in temperature between May 1, 2011 and September 30, 2011. 5

Fish were sampled using both Halltech HT 2000 and Smith Root BP-15D backpack electrofishing units, using pulsed direct current, at three sampling stations established during the 1999 survey (Figure 3). All fish were enumerated, identified and bulk-weighed by species. RESULTS Temperature monitors were deployed to collect hourly readings from May 1 through September 30, 2011. Unfortunately, problems occurred and no data was collected in 2011. The upper temperature logger had a fatal error and did not record any temperature data and the lower monitor was never found. High water during the spring and early summer likely washed the lower logger downstream. It was not recovered. Due to the lack of 2011 data, this report summarizes the temperature data collected during the 2010 season for these same two sites. At the upper site, a total of 3,672 readings were taken between May 1 and September 30, 2010 with 4.3% and 0.1% of the readings above 64 F and 68 F, respectively (Figure 4). Hourly temperatures in the upper site ranged from 41.8 F to 68.1 F with an average temperature of 56.1 F (Table 2). At the lower site, 3,612 readings were taken between May 1 and September 30, 2010 with 34% and 9% of the readings above 64 F and 68 F, respectively (Figure 4). Hourly temperatures in the lower site ranged from 41.1 F to 75.0 F with an average temperature of 60.4 F (Table 2). There were also extreme temperature changes (10 15 F daily) that took place during a typical summer day in this reach. Rosgen stream classification was performed at two stations along the length of the stream (Figure 3). The upper station was located upstream of the County Road 7 road crossing, approximately 1.5 miles downstream of the headwaters. This station was slightly entrenched (2.3), had a high width/depth ratio (15.6) and high sinuosity (2.12). The substrate within this cross section had a D 50 particle size classified as fine sand (0.25 mm). Fines (sands or silts) made up 86.2% of the cross sectional pebble count. The station was classified as a C5 stream type (Table 3). This stream type is very susceptible to shifts in both lateral and vertical 6

stability caused by direct channel disturbance and changes in the flow and sediment regimes of the contributing watershed (Rosgen 1996). The lower station was located upstream of the CR 45 road crossing (Figure 3), approximately three miles downstream of the headwaters. This station was slightly entrenched (6.6), had a very low width/depth ratio (8.2), and had very high sinuosity (2.12). The substrate within this cross section had a D 50 particle size classified as medium gravel (8.5 mm). Fines made up 15.7% of the cross sectional pebble count. The station was classified as an E4 stream type (Table 3). This stream type is a hydraulically efficient channel form and maintains a high sediment transport capability. E4 channels are very stable unless the stream banks are disturbed and significant changes in sediment supply and/or streamflow occur (Rosgen 1996). Fish sampling using backpack electrofishing collected sixteen species in 1.23 hours of electrofishing. Less than 5% of the total length of the stream was electrofished (Table 4). Numbers were dominated by brassy minnow (30%), fathead minnow (17.5%), central mudminnow (9.4%), and Johnny darter (9%; Table 5). Total weight was dominated by northern pike (27%), creek chub (23.2%), brassy minnow (15.4%), central mudminnow (7.2%) and white sucker (6.4%; Table 5). Intolerant species only made up 11% of the sample while tolerant species made up 37% of the sample (Table 5). Other species sampled included: blacknose shiner, brook stickleback, green sunfish, Iowa darter, largemouth bass, northern redbelly dace, pumpkinseed, sand shiner, and yellow perch. DISCUSSION Land use practices within the Three Mile Creek watershed have remained largely agricultural from 1977 to 2011. Previous surveys (MNDNR 1977, 1984) indicated that agriculture (row crops and pasture) was the dominant land use and that held true in 2011. Temperature data at the upper site indicate that favorable conditions exist for brook trout in this upper reach. Favorable conditions for brook trout include a stable temperature profile 7

with areas that allow refuge from temperatures above 68 F (Scott and Crossman 1979). Relatively few readings above 68 F indicate that favorable conditions exist for brook trout in this upper reach. Less than 1% of the readings in this area were above 68 F and less than 5% of the readings were above 64 F. However, this covers less than one fifth of the entire stream length. Water temperatures at the lower site indicate that water temperatures routinely exceed 68 F during the summer. This area also experiences extreme daily temperature fluctuations. These conditions indicate that water temperatures are too unstable for brook trout survival in this area and throughout most of the remaining stream. Stream classification in 2011 indicated that the upper station (C5 stream type) is very susceptible to shifts in both lateral and vertical stability caused by direct channel disturbance and changes in the flow and sediment regimes of the contributing watershed (Rosgen 1996). The lower station (E4 stream type) indicates that this area is relatively stable; however, this area is just upstream of a large cow pasture which has disturbed much of the stream bank and has created some braided channels just downstream of the site. Rosgen (1996) indicated that this channel type is very stable unless the stream banks are disturbed, and significant changes in sediment supply and/or streamflow occur. This area will likely become more unstable over time with continued cattle grazing. Since the initial survey in 1977, 22 different fish species have been documented within Three Mile Creek. Electrofishing in 2011 sampled 16 species, of which six were classified as tolerant and two as intolerant. All species sampled in 2011 were also sampled in 1984. Brook trout were annually stocked from 1951 1979; however, only one brook trout has ever been sampled in Three Mile Creek and that was collected in 1983. 8

Management Implications The 1977 survey recommended that trout stocking be discontinued due to lack of habitat as well as lack of angler easements and access. In 1984, a casual inquiry was made of riparian land owners to purchase angler easements and met with little interest. Based on water temperature data, the only area suitable for brook trout survival exists in the upper two miles of Three Mile Creek. Limiting factors for the stream continue to be channelization, marginal water temperatures throughout most of its length, and seasonal populations of other piscivores, especially in the lower part of the stream. Based on temperature data and the lack of interest by landowners to sell angler easements, it is still recommended that neither brook trout nor brown trout be stocked into Three Mile Creek. REFERENCES RiverMorph, LLC. (2011) RiverMorph (stream restoration software professional edition), version 4.1.1 www.rivermorph.com. Copyright 2001 20111 RiverMorph LLC, Louisville, KY. Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado. Scott, W. B. and E. J. Crossman. 1979. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Scientific Information and Publications Branch. Ottowa, Canada. Three Mile Creek Survey. 1977, 1983, 1984, 1999. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Section of Fisheries, St. Paul. 9

Table 1. Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) watershed estimated land use. Land Use Percent * Cultivated Crops 50.7 Pasture 11.4 Forest 23.2 Developed 3.1 Grassland Shrub 4.6 Wetland 5.4 Open Water 1.6 * Based on 2001 National Land Cover Data Table 2. Summary of Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) temperature data (recorded hourly) from two locations between May 1 and September 30, 2010. Station Min Avg Max Readings N 1 > 64 F N 1 > 68 F Upper 41.8 56.1 68.1 3,672 157 3 Lower 41.1 60.4 75.0 3,612 1,212 315 1 Number of hourly observations recorded above 64 F and 68 F, respectively. Table 3. Results of Rosgen classification sites for Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) sampled during Fall 2011. Parameter Upper station Lower Station Bankfull width (ft) 16.89 12.01 Mean depth@ bankfull (ft) 1.08 1.46 Cross sectional area (ft 2 ) 18.22 17.53 Max depth @ bankfull (ft) 1.61 2.57 Flood prone width (ft) 38.79 78.82 Width/depth ratio 15.64 8.23 Entrenchment ratio 2.3 6.6 Water surface slope (ft/ft) 0.003 0.002 Sinuosity 2.12 2.12 Pebble count D 50 (mm) 0.25 8.47 % fines 86.2 15.7 Stream type C5 E4 10

Table 4. Electrofishing station information and physical data sampled from Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) on September 16 19, 2011. Station Length Length Effort Water Temp Dissolved Conductivity (m) (ft) (sec) ( F) Oxygen EF 1 185 608 1,324 51.0 9.45 631 EF 2 171 562 1,934 EF 3 161 527 1,177 54.2 8.66 602 Total 517 1,697 4,435 Table 5. Species sampled by backpack electrofishing from Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) on September 16 19, 2011. Site Site Site CPUE Bulk Weight Length Range Total Species 1 2 3 (#/hr) (g) (mm) Blacknose shiner 1 14 25 39 31.7 29 44 54 Brassy minnow 217 217 176.4 480 55 70 Brook stickleback 2 6 9 15 12.2 15 35 58 Central mudminnow 2 12 23 33 68 55.3 225 34 107 Creek chub 2 3 9 5 17 13.8 724 64 200 Fathead minnow 2 31 96 127 103.3 123 46 72 Green sunfish 2 1 1 0.8 11 82 Iowa darter 1 14 26 40 32.5 52 35 56 Johnny darter 27 38 65 52.8 146 52 75 Largemouth bass 12 11 5 28 22.8 116 54 88 Northern pike 17 17 13.8 840 169 248 Northern redbelly dace 8 1 21 30 24.4 51 41 62 Pumpkinseed 5 5 4.1 64 79 95 Sand shiner 1 1 0.8 1 64 White sucker 2 1 2 37 40 32.5 199 64 149 Yellow perch 12 2 14 11.4 38 54 102 Total 115 133 476 724 588.6 3,114 1 Intolerant species 2 Tolerant species 11

Figure 1. Location of Three Mile Creek (M-71-2), Stearns County, Minnesota. 12

Figure 2. Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) watershed land use estimates based on 2001 National Land Cover Data. 13

Figure 3. Location of electrofishing, temp logger, and Rosgen classification sites on Three Mile Creek (M-71-2), 2011. 14

Water Temp ( F) 80 70 60 50 40 Upstream Site 68 F Brook Trout thermal threshold 30 Date Min Average Max Water Temp ( F) 80 70 60 50 40 Downstream Site 68 F Brook Trout thermal threshold 30 Date Min Average Max Figure 4. Mean daily temperatures ( F) recorded by a Hobo Pendant temperature monitor located at two sites in Three Mile Creek (M-71-2) from May 1 through September 30, 2010. 15

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Stream Survey Report Three Mile Creek 2011 By Joseph D. Stewig Montrose Area Fisheries Office Author Date Area Fisheries Supervisor Date Regional Fisheries Supervisor Date 16