Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Similar documents
SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Deer Management Unit 152

By: Stephanie Ray and Sarah Phipps

021 Deer Management Unit

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 249

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

Deer Management Unit 127

DMU 038 Jackson County

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 122

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Deer Management Unit 255

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

2017 DEER HUNTING FORECAST

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Hunt ID: TX-WDeerHogRamExotic-All-ALESGONZ-HRH-AULP

Furbearer Management Newsletter

AN ASSESSMENT OF NEW JERSEY DEER HUNTER OPINION ON EXPANDING ANTLER POINT RESTRICTION (APR) REGULATIONS IN DEER MANAGEMENT ZONES 28, 30, 31, 34 AND 47

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Deer Management Unit 349

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

YO LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION (YOLA) WILDLIFE REGULATIONS

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

WHITE-TAILED DEER SPOTLIGHT SURVEY IN LAKEWAY, TEXAS

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Implementing a Successful Deer Management Program. Kip Adams Certified Wildlife Biologist Dir. of Ed. & Outreach Quality Deer Management Association

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Agency Determination [150B- 21.3A(c)(1)a] Implements or Conforms to Federal Regulation [150B-21.3A(e)] Necessary with substantive public interest

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. October 1, 2017

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

White-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest

Kansas Deer Report Seasons

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

J FLY LOOSE RANCH ACRES LAVACA COUNTY, SPEAKS, TX. JEFF BOSWELL Partner/Broker REPUBLICRANCHES.

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

Kootenay (Region 4) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Bowhunter Observation Survey

NEW BRUNSWICK FURBEARER HARVEST REPORT

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Deer Census - How to Use It to Calculate Harvest

Deer Season Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

7D Ranch & Cattle Companuy 2,544 ACRES FOR SALE IN SAN SABA COUNTY $10,216,000

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

COOKE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

Spring 2012 Wild Turkey Harvest Report

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

Early History, Prehistory

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Transcription:

July 26, 2018 YO Ranchlands Landowner Association 1323 Whispering Pines Houston, TX 77055 To the Wildlife Committee: Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records. Overall, the numbers of native and exotic deer on the YO Ranchlands show a slight decline from 2017: the 3-4- year trend is stable; and 5-8 year trends show only a slight decrease. The decline is primarily attributable to unusually low axis estimates. This may be a one-year anomaly resulting from shifts in axis distributions across the property, which can occur in changing range conditions, or it could be related to the axis hunt that occurred the night prior to the first survey. All other populations appear fairly stable. Blackbuck populations reflect a slight increase which, when considered with the decline in axis estimates, also make up a larger percentage of the total population estimate. Fallow estimates have shown a one-year decrease. Sika estimates remain low but stable over the past three years. There seems to be a slight shift in distribution to the western half of the YO Ranchlands, possibly a result of prior drought-kill and recent juniper clearing in the west that may be stimulating new shrub growth desirable for browse. The current estimate is lower than expected based on harvests that were below recommended levels. Harvest recommendations are slightly lower than last year, but still higher than the actual harvest from the 2017-2018 year. Lower than expected fawn production may be attributable to the current drought. More favorable conditions for 2019 fawn production may result following El Nino s expected return this year. Range conditions remain very good. Thank you to all who collaborated with us during the 2018 surveys, including spotlight volunteers. A special thank you goes to Gary Liefer, Chris Conrad, Sandra and Bryon Sadler for providing accommodations, and Mike Sample for coordinating volunteers. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. We appreciate your continued trust and confidence in Plateau Land & Wildlife Management. Please let us know whenever we can be of service. Sincerely, Sarah Kahlich, AWB Senior Wildlife Biologist Plateau Land and Wildlife Management Enclosures

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY WRITTEN BY: SARAH KAHLICH, AWB SHANE KIEFER, CWB PLATEAU LAND & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT JULY 26, 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Survey Goal Estimate the total number of native and exotic deer on the YO Ranchlands. Odd year surveys (2015/2017/2019) are meant to adjust Ranchlands-wide estimates from more extensive surveys in even years (2016/2018). Management Goal Optimize the numbers and diversity of the hunting opportunities for YO Ranchlands landowners of all exotic and native game animals of average to good quality or better, with an emphasis on diversity of exotic ungulates. Results A spotlight survey was conducted over 3 nights in June and July 2018. Survey methodology used was the same as in prior years. Results were analyzed by section (East/West), though all species were pooled to model sighting distributions for species with low observation numbers. Deer Population by Ranchland Section Section Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck TOTAL West 188 273 25 54 168 708 East 102 228 20 49 119 518 TOTAL 290 501 45 103 287 1226 Species Composition (%) by Ranchland Section Section Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck TOTAL West 27% 39% 4% 8% 24% 100% East 20% 44% 4% 9% 23% 100% TOTAL 24% 41% 4% 8% 23% 100% Overall estimates are down from 2017. Population estimates are stable on 3-4 year trends and slightly down on 5-8 year trends. White-tailed deer and Axis population estimates are lower than last year, with the largest change in Axis estimates. The Blackbuck population appears to be rising again this year, while Fallow estimates have decreased slightly. Sika estimates remain low but are stable over the last 3 years. Limited observations of Sika and Fallow make these observation estimates least reliable, and expected gains in these animals have not materialized. Fawn observations were down overall from last year, possibly due to the earlier start date or lower production resulting from current drought conditions. Careful attention to fawn production by the landowners is recommended to help determine if predation or other factors may be limiting growth. Harvest should focus on managing white-tailed deer numbers. Overall recommended harvest is lower this year, though still well above actual harvest from 2017-2018. YOLA Harvest Recommendations 2018/2019 Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck Total Grand Total Buck 20 30 3 10 20 83 Doe 20 100 0 0 20 140 223 2

Deer Survey Analysis & Harvest Recommendations YO Ranchlands - General Introduction This report details the results of a deer survey carried out on the 10,400-acre YO Ranchlands in Kerr County, Texas, on the evenings of June 26 th, July 2 nd, and July 10 th 2018. The survey was conducted by two teams of Plateau Land & Wildlife Management staff and YOLA volunteers using Distance Sampling methodology. The two teams surveyed opposite ends of the property covering an average of 26 miles/night. Assistance from YOLA volunteers was essential and greatly appreciated. Survey Methods. The surveys were conducted using the Distance Sampling technique, which involves calculating a perpendicular distance from the animal to the driveline through GIS using the distance, bearing, and GPS position recorded for each animal. The data is analyzed in Distance 6.2 software to determine the actual area surveyed and the density and total number of deer. This is achieved by fitting a detection model to the observations made, which permits an estimate of the animals missed during the survey. The Distance Sampling method has been shown many times to be far more accurate than the traditional Strip Transect method of deer surveys. The more traditional method cannot properly estimate species that occur in large groups, overestimates the number of deer by underestimating the average sightable distance, and incorrectly assumes that all deer within that area are observed. Even small errors in estimating the average sightable distance can produce large errors in calculating the total number of deer. Plateau is glad to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the Distance Sampling method upon request. Survey Results Estimates of Axis, Sika, Fallow, Blackbuck, and White-tailed Deer were made and compared to historical estimates and harvest data provided by YOLA. Harvest data was provided for the property as a whole. Population estimates are stable over the last 3-4 years and down slightly on a 5-8 year trend. Overall estimates are down slightly from last year, primarily due to substantially lower Axis estimates. White-tailed deer are the most abundant species due to the decline in Axis estimates. Sika and Fallow estimates are not increasing as expected. It may be possible their populations are growing, but remain small enough that the surveys are having trouble detecting them. Blackbuck estimates have increased since the previous year. The decline in estimates is unexpected, given the moderate range conditions and lower than expected harvest in 2017-2018. Overall population estimates were compared to a harvest/net-production estimate using last year s population and reported harvest data. The overall estimates are lower than expected for all species except Blackbuck. Axis estimates have been volatile in the past, especially under changing range conditions. Current population levels are well balanced with the habitat and leave room for growth, if desired. 3

SURVEY RESULTS & OVERALL SPECIES COMPOSITION All Deer Section # of Deer % of Deer Ac / Deer West 708 58% 8.7 East 518 42% 8.2 TOTAL 1,226 100% 8.5 Deer Population by Ranchland Section Section Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck TOTAL West 188 273 25 54 168 708 East 102 228 20 49 119 518 TOTAL 290 501 45 103 287 1226 Species Composition (%) by Ranchland Section Section Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck TOTAL West 27% 39% 4% 8% 24% 100% East 20% 44% 4% 9% 23% 100% TOTAL 24% 41% 4% 8% 23% 100% Sex Ratios Buck : Doe Species Current Ideal Axis 1:2 1 : 2 White-tailed 1:2.5 1 : 1.5 Sika 1:2 1 : 2 Fallow 1:2 1 : 2 Blackbuck 1:2 1 : 4 Survey Lengths and Acreages Survey Date Total Line Length (miles) 6/25/2018 26.4 7/2/2018 26.3 7/10/2018 26.3 Total 79.0 Average 26.3 4

ANALYSIS Harvest Recommendations Overall Deer Density The current year s estimates are lower than the projected 2018 population of approximately 1,495 animals. This expected population was calculated from the 2017 survey estimates and harvest recommendations in last year s report. However, based on the reported harvest and estimated fawn production, the expected population should have been even higher overall. Observed fawn production is lower than expected, though the earlier start date for the surveys likely influenced that along with current drought conditions. The overall density of deer on YO Ranchlands is at a very healthy and sustainable level and has resulted in continually visible improvements in habitat for all species, including wild turkey and non-game animals. Rainfall during the first half of 2018 has resulted in moderate July conditions in western Kerr County, which is currently in moderate to severe drought. Maintaining lower ungulate densities has allowed range conditions to stay healthy despite lower rainfall, though there was a noticeable decrease in herbaceous cover compared to last year s lush conditions. Overall harvest was 46% of recommended levels (as of 7/6/18). The suggested goal since 2012 has been to level the population trend-line and maintain overall numbers while adjusting species composition. The total animal population has hovered around 1,400 since 2012 with the most notable changes being a decrease in Sika and an increase in Blackbuck. The population estimate is lower than last year but well within the margin of error for these types of surveys. Sika and fallow estimates have not increased despite harvest restrictions. Axis deer now account for approximately 24% of the total deer on the YO Ranchlands, and white-tailed deer at 41%. Blackbuck account for 23%. Overall population levels should have been higher than this year s estimates, especially considering reported harvest levels. Given the quality range conditions, fawn production/survival may be a concern. 5

A recent axis harvest immediately prior to the start of the surveys this year could have affected animal distribution on the Ranchlands, concentrating them away from the survey route and, consequently, negatively impacting the estimates. The shift in animals from East to West may be a result of prior drought kill of juniper and recent brush management on the West Section that may be resulting in new shrub growth, drawing animals from the East. The overall combined deer density on the YO Ranchlands is 8.5 acres / deer, down from the 2017 estimate of 7.1 acres/deer. The property is currently well positioned to produce high-quality deer while providing strong habitat conditions for other wildlife. The most pronounced change was the decrease in Axis estimates. There is capacity for an increase in deer numbers if greater harvest opportunities are desired. The target density for summer of 2018 was 7 acres / deer with room for population increases if fawn production improves. Unless community-wide goals change, the long-term target should be to maintain current overall densities while encouraging growth in the less common species. These harvest recommendations will maintain stable numbers while allowing for population increases if fawn production and recruitment improve. Species Composition Axis deer, which currently comprise 24% of the population, are below the previously desired 30-40% of the total deer population. Their population is likely underestimated. Axis are the most aggressive of the YO Ranchlands species and can quickly rebound. However, harvest recommendations are more conservative this year given the estimates. The white-tailed deer population estimate is lower than last year s but remains stable over the long term and is not a cause for concern. White-tailed deer should comprise the majority of the harvest for the coming year. Sika estimates remain low but stable, while Fallow estimates are lower than last year. A limited number of these animals can be harvested in the coming year. Actual Blackbuck harvest was substantially below recommendations last year and a more liberal harvest is recommended for the coming year. Sex Ratios Sex ratios are near ideal levels for all species except Blackbuck, which show an overabundance of bucks, which are typically more desirable for harvest. Stand counts and incidental observations conducted by volunteer landowners would be most helpful in estimating sex ratios and fawn production, providing greater confidence in population growth and harvest recommendations. 6

HARVEST RECOMMENDATIONS & PROJECTED 2018 POPULATION YOLA Harvest Recommendations 2018/2019 Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck Grand Total Total Buck 20 Doe 20 Buck 30 Doe 100 Buck 3 Doe 0 Buck 10 Doe 0 Buck 20 Doe 20 Buck 83 Doe 140 Total 223 YOLA Projected 2019 Population Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck Grand Total Total Buck 91 Doe 188 Buck 179 Doe 324 Buck 15 Doe 33 Buck 31 Doe 76 Buck 96 Doe 191 Buck 412 Doe 812 Total 1,224 % of All Deer 23% 41% 4% 9% 24% 100% 2017/2018 HARVEST SUMMARY COMPARED TO RECOMMENDATIONS (As of July 6, 2018) YOLA Actual Harvest 2017/2018 Total Actual 2017/2018 Recommendation Difference Axis White-tailed Sika Fallow Blackbuck Grand Total Buck 14 25-11 Doe 23 30-7 Buck 31 35-4 Doe 34 100-66 Buck 0 5-5 Doe 0 0 0 Buck 3 10-7 Doe 0 0 0 Buck 4 15-11 Doe 1 20-19 Buck 60 90-38 Doe 66 150-92 Total 126 240-130 7

DEER SURVEY ANALYSIS & HARVEST RECOMMENDATIONS YO Ranchlands Additional Information Other Species of Interest Other Species Identified During 2018 Surveys: Feral Hogs Cottontail Black-tailed Jackrabbit Northern Raccoon Gray Fox Nine-banded Armadillo Striped Skunk Barn Owl Bobcat Coyotes (heard) Ringtail 8

FIGURES

10

11

Observed Deer Locations by Species Axis 12

White-tailed Deer 13

Sika 14

Fallow 15

Blackbuck 16

Contact Information Plateau Land & Wildlife Management, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 1251 Dripping Springs, Texas 78620 Phone: (512) 894-3479 Fax: (512) 858-2652 Toll Free: (888) 289-9409 www.plateauwildlife.com Dusty Alexander, Account Manager Hill Country South Region Mobile: 830-515-5888 dalexander@plateauwildlife.com Sarah Kahlich, AWB Senior Wildlife Biologist Mobile: 979-777-8715 skahlich@plateauwildlife.com Shane Kiefer, CWB Director of Ecological Services Office: 512-894-3479 skiefer@plateauwildlife.com