HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee. June 22, 2018

Similar documents
Cobb Community Transit

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

APPENDIX C Arlington Transit On-Board Survey Technical Memorandum

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

TriMet Attitude & Awareness Survey. November 2016

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Aurora Corridor to E Line

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

FARE IMPACT STUDY. Prepared by the. Pioneer Valley Planning Commission

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

DKS & WASHINGTON COUNTY Washington County Transportation Survey

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Kennedy Plaza and Providence Downtown Transit Connector PUBLIC MEETING. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

Seattle Transit Master Plan

ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

TriMet Title VI and Transit Equity Impacts Assessment Recommended Service Changes Line 47 Baseline/Evergreen and 48 Cornell

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Planning for Bus Rapid Transit in the Milwaukee Region

Where We Live and Work Today

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

WELCOME BUS RAPID TRANSIT PUBLIC MEETING. MEETING TIME: 5 p.m. - 8 p.m.

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Dear City Council Members,

An Evaluation of Comprehensive Transit Improvements TriMet s Streamline Program

Rehabilitating First- and Last- Mile Connections

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Fresno Council of Governments Community Workshop. Tuesday, April 25, 2017 Hoover High School Fresno, California

The Vine: Mill Plain Bus Rapid Transit Project Open House Summary August 2018

HOW WOULD YOU MAKE TRANSIT BETTER?

Understanding the Market of Metro Transit's Ridership and Services and How Technology Can Help Kevin J. Krizek Ahmed M. El-Geneidy

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

2014 Metro Transit Customer Survey Highlights

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

ABOUT MUNI FORWARD. Muni Forward is the SFMTA s initiative to make transit safer and more reliable.

The New Orleans Downtown Transit Center Study

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

Sun Metro Fixed Route Rider Survey

US 19 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFE ACCESS

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

Alternatives Public Workshop

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

North Coast Corridor:

US 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting

Free Ride Transit System 2014 On Board Passenger Survey

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. February 12, 2015

Physical activity has a number of benefits

Overview of Pulse BRT and transit network redesign

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Regional Bus Priority

Aditi Misra Dr. Kari E. Watkins Dr. Christopher A. Le Dantec

Transcription:

HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee June 22, 2018

Meeting Agenda Agenda & Public Comment Timeline Program Appeals: Streetcar, Demand Response, Fares, Electric Bus, Enhanced Transit Corridors Online Survey Results Public Workshop Results Top Priorities & Investment Proposal Meeting Adjourns 8:00 a.m. 8:15 a.m. 8:20 a.m. 9:35 a.m. 9:50 a.m. 10:25 a.m. 11:00 a.m.

Public Comment

4 HB2017 Planning Timeline We are here Important dates

Program Appeals

6 Online Survey Results Launched: May 15, 2018 Closed: June 14, 2018 English and Spanish Number of Responses: 5,339 Promotional Efforts: Partnerships with community groups/jurisdictions Online Promotions TriMet Riders Club TriMet email notifications Social media posts

7 Online Survey

8 Online Survey

9 Online Survey

10 Online Survey

11 Online Survey

12 Online Survey Results Gender Identity Age 1% 45% 51% Female Transgender Self Identify Other Male 13% 9% 14% 14% 22% 27% Under 18 years 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65 and older 1% 2% 1%

13 Online Survey Results People of Color/Caucasian Above/Below Federal Poverty Level 20% 80% People of Color Caucasian 65% 35% Above FPL Below FPL

14 Online Survey Results 3% Race/Ethnicity Asian/Pacific Islander Income 4% 5% 2% 4% 1% 1% Bi-racial/Multi-racial Black/African American Hispanic/Latinx 14% 8% 20% Less than $25,000 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 80% Middle Eastern/North African Native American/American Indian White 12% 19% 13% 14% $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 or more Other

15 Online Survey Results SEP Map 37% 16% 12% 18% Out of District: 4% 13%

16 Online Survey Results By Demographic Group

17 Online Survey Results Top Improvements Among All Groups Out of $100.00 Choice Category Cost Out of 11 Groups Get Buses Through Traffic Reliability $5.00 11 of 11 groups More Frequent Service Service $20.00 11 of 11 groups More Digital Arrival Displays Capital $5.00 10 of 11 groups More Early/Late Service Service $10.00 10 of 11 groups More Weekend Service Service $10.00 10 of 11 groups Expand Service Coverage Service $30.00 10 of 11 groups Physical Improvements at TCs Safety/Security $5.00 10 of 11 groups More On-Street Amenities Capital $5.00 10 of 11 groups Additional Security Staff Safety/Security $10.00 8 of 11 groups Total $100.00 100%

18 Online Survey Results Other Priorities Additional Rankings Choice Category Cost Out of 11 Groups Increase School Partnerships Fares $5.00 2 of 11 groups Reduce Fares for All HC & Youth Fares $30.00 1 of 11 groups Faster Trips with Fewer Stops Reliability $30.00 1 of 11 groups Electric Buses Capital $40.00 1 of 11 groups Reduce fares for low income HC & Youth Fares $15.00 0 of 11 groups Bus Rapid Transit Reliability $45.00 0 of 11 groups Larger Buses Reliability $35.00 0 of 11 groups Additional On-Street Customer Service Safety/ Security $5.00 0 of 11 groups

19 Online Survey Results Top Improvements by Category Improvements by Category Reliability: Get Buses Through Capital: Traffic Digital Displays 5% On-Street Amenities 10% Safety/Security: TC Improvements More Security Staff 16% 69% Service: More Frequent Service More Early/Late Service More Weekend Service Expand the Service Area Service Safety & Security Capital Reliability

Transit Improvements (Clackamas County)

Transit Improvements (North Portland)

Transit Improvements (East Multnomah #1)

Transit Improvements (Washington County)

Transit Improvements (East Multnomah #2)

Overall Transit Improvements

44 Top Tier Priorities: Within $100 Survey and Top 2 Service Improvements or Top 8 Non- Service Improvements from Workshops Top Priorities 2 nd Tier Priorities: Within $100 Survey or Top 8 Non-Service Improvements from Workshops 3 rd Tier Priorities: Not within $100 Survey nor Top 8 Non-Service Improvements from Workshops Expand Service Coverage More Weekend Service Bus Rapid Transit More Frequent Service More Early/Late Service Fewer Stops Get Buses Through Traffic Larger Buses Customer Service On-Street Amenities Electric Buses School Partnerships Physical Improvements at TCs Additional Security Staff Digital Displays Reduce Fares - Low Inc. Youth/HC Reduce Fares for All Youth/HC Additional Opportunities: More Streetcar Service More On-Demand Service for Seniors and People with Disabilities

School Transportation $550,000 (1%) Regional Coordination $3 mil (5%) Investment Allocation Proposal Unallocated Funds $6.45 mil (12%) Low Income Fare $12 mil (22%) 1 Time Only Funds Service FY19-FY23 $33 mil (60%) Includes buses & system capital: More Frequency More Coverage Later/Earlier Service Weekend Service Examples: Larger Buses Transit Priority E-Bus Charging Infrastructure Digital Displays TC Security Improvements

Next Meeting: July 27 th Agenda Review Plan Proposals: Service Scenarios Ridership Based Scenario Coverage Based Scenario Balanced Scenario Other Allocation Scenarios