Taking a Step back, can we make crossing the street less chancy? Kerry Wilcoxon City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department

Similar documents
Designing for Pedestrian Safety

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Today s presentation

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

AGENDA ITEM F-5 Public Works

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

2009 MUTCD New Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Housekeeping

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

(This page left intentionally blank)

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue

STREET CROSSINGS. Module 4. Part 2: Countermeasures

Meeting Agenda Marking Technical Committee National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices January 19-20, 2011 Arlington, VA

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Traffic Control Devices

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & HIGHWAY SAFETY BULLETIN Controlled Approaches. Uncontrolled Approaches. Midblock Locations

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

PART 10. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

This page intentionally left blank.

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TRAFFIC AND PARKING COMMISSION

Transportation Planning Division

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

Military Road Safety Improvements

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

MUTCD (HAWK) 2016 & Adapting the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) to Facilitate Bicycle Use. ITE-IMSA March, 2014

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Proposed Language as approved by the NCUTCD on June 23, 2011, for new section on Pedestrian Channelizing Devices

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Public Information Centre

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 8 Maintenance of Pedestrian Facilities and Alternate Pedestrian Access Routes in Work Zones

Transportation Planning Division

SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Chapter #4 Traffic Control Devices and Laws

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

STREET and UTILITY REPAIRS WORK AREA PROTECTION GUIDE

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

Sharing the Road. with Pedestrians Edition. A guide for drivers and pedestrians published by the Arizona Department of Transportation

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY Various Crosswalk Locations Oberlin, Ohio

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

Transcription:

Taking a Step back, can we make crossing the street less chancy? Kerry Wilcoxon City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department

What are the realities? Pedestrian Source - Neighborhood - Bus Stop - Business Conflict Pedestrian Attractor - School - Shopping Center

Annual crash totals 5-Year Pedestrian Crash Trends 700 600 629 629 615 615 660 660 612 612 580 580 500 12% Decline 400 300 588 Injuries 61 Fatalities 580 Injuries 51 Fatalities 648 Injuries 41 Fatalities 572 Injuries 49 Fatalities 540 Injuries 51 Fatalities 200 100 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Basic approach The 5 E s Encouragement Education Enforcement Engineering Evaluation

Encouragement

Education

Enforcement Photo Speed Radar at Schools Laws Specific to Pedestrians Target Locations

Evaluation 5 Traffic pattern evaluation Crash trend analysis Pedestrian audits 8/29/05 4:00 pm PED - Female, 10 Fault Unknown Hit & Run 5 5

Engineering Rules Inform or Separate Applications

What are the rules? Section 3B.17 Crosswalk Markings Support: Crosswalk markings provide guidance for pedestrians who are crossing roadways by defining and delineating paths on approaches to and within signalized intersections, and on approaches to other intersections where traffic stops. Crosswalk markings also serve to alert road users of a pedestrian crossing point across roadways not controlled by highway traffic Crosswalk signals or STOP markings signs. provide guidance for pedestrians At nonintersection locations, crosswalk markings legally establish the crosswalk. Standard: When crosswalk lines are used, they shall consist of solid white lines that mark the crosswalk. They shall be not less than 150 mm (6 in) nor greater than 600 mm (24 in) in width. Guidance: If transverse lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft). If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk should not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft) wide. Crosswalk lines, if used on both sides of the crosswalk, should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks (see Figures 3B-15 and 3B-16). Figure 3B-16 Examples of Crosswalk Markings Crosswalk markings also serve to alert road users of a pedestrian Crosswalks should be marked at all intersections where there is substantial conflict between vehicular and pedestrian movements. Marked crosswalks also should be provided at other appropriate points of pedestrian concentration, such as at loading islands, crossing midblock pedestrian crossings, or where pedestrians could not otherwise recognize the proper place to cross. Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before they are installed at locations away from highway traffic signals or STOP signs. Because nonintersection pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Section 2C.41) should be installed and adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions. Support: Section 3B.16 contains information regarding placement of stop line markings near crosswalk markings. Option: For added visibility, the area of the crosswalk may be marked with white diagonal lines at a 45-degree angle to the line of the crosswalk or with white longitudinal lines parallel to traffic flow as shown in Figure 3B-16. When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted. This type of marking may be used at locations where substantial numbers of pedestrians cross without any other traffic control device, at locations where physical conditions are such that added visibility of the crosswalk is desired, or at places where a pedestrian crosswalk might not be expected. Guidance: If used, the diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 300 to 600 mm (12 to 24 in) wide and spaced 300 to 1500 mm (12 to 60 in) apart. The marking design should avoid the wheel paths, and the spacing should not exceed 2.5 times the line width. Option: When an exclusive pedestrian phase that permits diagonal crossing is provided at a traffic control signal, a marking as Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before they are installed at locations away from highway traffic signals or STOP signs. shown in Figure 3B-17 may be used for the crosswalk.

Where are pedestrians being hit? In 2006 Signalized crossings 33% of all pedestrian crashes 33% of all pedestrian injuries 16% of all pedestrian fatalities Un-signalized crossings 55% of all crashes occurred mid-block 75% of all pedestrian fatalities occurred mid-block

What is being done? Signalized Typically major intersections with high volumes of vehicular traffic Non-signalized Typically mid-block or minor intersections with high volumes of pedestrian traffic

Signalized crossings

Signalized crossings How are they made safer? Lighting Street lights LED Lamps Pedestrian signals Planning

Signalized crossings 15 Foot Wide Crosswalks Arterial 10 FT (Collectors) Multiple 12 LED Signal Heads

Pedestrian signals Steady Walk indication Flashing hand and count down to yellow

Installing new signals Annual Signal Warrant or SIGWAR Warrants: Traffic volume (major & minor streets) Hourly traffic volume Correctable crashes Angle Pedestrian (certain types) Pedestrian volume Spacing relative to other signals

Un-signalized crossings Standard style Ladder style Indian School & 20 th Ave

Un-signalized crossings How are they made safer? Markings and signage Street lighting Special structures Two-stage islands Bridges/tunnels Alternative pathways

Markings Advanced crossing stencils Setback Stop Bar High visibility ladder crosswalk

Signage Object markers Pedestrian guidance signs Overhead warning signs

Street lighting High pressure sodium lighting Both sides of street Staggered

Special Structures Marked Crosswalks

Two-stage crosswalks Off-set ladder crosswalk Buckeye Rd Raised center island 13 th St N Two-stage crosswalk at Carl Hayden Community Center

Two-stage crosswalk Two-stage crosswalk at Thunderbird High School

Pedestrian bridges Isaac Pedestrian Bridge

Isaac Middle School Pedestrian Bridge

Isaac Middle School Pedestrian Bridge Bridge crosses street directly to campus Pick-up/drop-off parking lot minimizes conflict with traffic Pedestrian walkway from Lynwood eliminates contact with McDowell

Driver feedback signs Radar unit with digital speed display

In-pavement crosswalk lighting Pedestrian activated in-ground lighting system

Special Pathways Palomino School Pathway

Palomino School Safe Walking Pathway

Special pathways Pedestrian barriers Pedestrian signs

What s in the future? Increased pedestrian timing Signal timing based on slower pedestrian walking speed Pedestrian activate signals High Intensity Activated Crosswalk or HAWK Signals

Pedestrian timing Current MUTCD Standards Signal clearance based on 4.0 ft/sec walking speed Slower walking speeds should be considered where appropriate New MUTCD Standards Signal clearance based on 3.5 ft/sec walking speed Total WALK plus flashing DON T WALK phase based on 3.0 ft/sec Crossing distance - length of the crosswalk plus one curb ramp

HAWK signal HAWK (High Intensity Activated Crosswalk)

HAWK signal operation At rest, blank Flashing then steady yellow Steady red Wig-wag red

LRT audible crossing signal At pedestrian light-rail crossings with flashing light signals or traffic control signals, using audible devices has been changed from an option to a requirement

Questions? Kerry Wilcoxon 602-262-4613 kerry.wilcoxon@phoenix.gov