Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

Similar documents
Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

Brad Caco Group M8X 2X9. Mr. Caco: Gradient. for mitigation

March 25, Katherine Grechuta MCIP, RPP, LEED AP Planner FoTenn Planning & Urban Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON, K2P 0Z8. Dear Ms.

Computer-Based Pedestrian Level Wind Study Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Greystone Village 10 Oblats Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 409 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment, Phase 1. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 350 Sparks Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 83 East Street. Oakville, Ontario

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Château Laurier Hotel Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 398, 402, 406 Roosevelt Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 12 Stirling Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Elmvale Acres Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

Wind Microclimate Assessment

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL.

Re: Wind Impact Assessment Marina del Rey Tower Marina del Rey, California RWDI Reference No Description of Proposed Development

Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

RE: 100 VARLEY LANE TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

May 5, 2009 File:

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

Comments The Plan for Port Whitby

Design Features to Change and/or Ameliorate Pedestrian Wind Conditions. Leighton Cochran 1 PhD CPEng

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

UDB. Urban Design Brief (Continued - Section 6) 137 and 141 George Street, 321 Dalhousie Street May 2013

Strolling down the Avenue

1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, Ontario, K1J 7T2 P: l F: l

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

Co-ordinator Transportation Committee. Director, Mobility Services and Corporate Fleet Services Environment and Transportation Department

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

Assembly Committee Document 7.5

Garden City State Street Corridor Existing Conditions October 2012

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

MARLWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB WASAGA BEACH, ONTARIO

AIRFLOW AROUND CONIC TENSILE MEMBRANE STRUCTURES

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design

Your views are important. Please fill in a form before you leave. Or alternatively

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

June 11, RE: Comments on the ENF for The Boston Garden project, MEPA # Dear Mr. Sullivan:

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Pier 8 Wave Overtopping Analysis (65 Guise Street East) Our File:

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

2.0 Ballpark District

Guthriesville Village Manual of Written & Graphic Design Guidelines

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

300 George Street, Brisbane Pedestrian Level Winds - Wind Tunnel Test

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

Transcription:

December 11, 2015 Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Dear Ms. Maw: Re: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.: 15-120-DTPLW 1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by LineBox Studio Inc. to undertake a qualitative pedestrian level wind assessment for St-Charles Market, a proposed mixed-use redevelopment project located at 135 Barrette Street in Ottawa, Ontario. This report provides a qualitative assessment of pedestrian level wind comfort for the noted site based on architectural drawings provided by LineBox Studio Inc. in November 2015, consideration of existing and approved future surrounding buildings and statistical knowledge of the Ottawa wind climate, as well as experience with similar projects in Ottawa. In the early stages of design development, a qualitative pedestrian wind assessment is useful to identify any significant massing features or design elements which may adversely impact pedestrian activities within the study area, and to provide initial recommendations for mitigation strategies as may be required. 127 Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613) 836-0934 www.gradientwind.com

2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this qualitative wind assessment is St-Charles Market, a proposed mixed-use redevelopment located approximately two kilometres northeast of the Ottawa downtown core. The study site is bordered to the southwest by St. Charles Street, to the northwest by Beechwood Avenue, to the northeast by a lowrise building and parking lot, and to the southeast by Barrette Street. Upon completion, the proposed development will comprise an eight-storey plus mechanical penthouse building rising to a total height of approximately 22.5 metres above local grade. Above a two level underground parking garage, the ground floor will contain a restaurant unit at the southwest corner of the building with access from St. Charles Street. Near the centre of the site, the southwest portion of the existing church will contain the St-Charles Market. Along the southeast side of the building, there will be residential units and access to the residential lobby from Barrette Street. The west side of the site will contain a patio for the St-Charles Market and a City of Ottawa park, while an outdoor market and patio will be located at the southwest side of the site. An additional patio will be located between the existing church structure and the new building. The study building consists of the existing church and a new L-shaped addition along the southeast side of the development site. At the northwest corner of the building, an outdoor pathway is located between the residential units and the St-Charles church. From the third to seventh levels, the new building rises with a uniform floor plate. At the eighth level, the floor plate reduces at the southwest corner, providing a residential amenity terrace. Above the eighth level, the building contains a mechanical penthouse. Regarding wind exposures, the near-field surroundings of the development (defined as an area falling within a 200 metre radius from the subject site) are characterized by a medium-density concentration of existing low- and medium-rise residential buildings in all directions. Regarding the far-field surroundings (defined as the area beyond the near field and within a two kilometre radius), the region from west clockwise to east comprises a low density concentration of primarily low- and medium-rise developments, while the remaining compass directions comprise a medium-density concentration of primarily low- and medium-rise developments with a few isolated high-rise developments. The ground floor and seventh level terrace plans, including letter tags identifying wind sensitive pedestrian locations considered in this assessment, are illustrated in Figure 1. Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 2

3. METHODOLOGY The main aspects of a qualitative pedestrian level wind assessment include: (i) consideration of the statistical properties of the local wind climate; (ii) knowledge of wind flow behaviour in typical urban, suburban, and open environments; and (iii) an understanding of how common wind conditions relate to typical pedestrian activity types. 3.1. Ottawa Wind Climate The statistical model of the Ottawa wind climate, which indicates the directional character of local winds on a seasonal basis, is illustrated on the following page. The plots illustrate seasonal distribution of measured wind speeds and directions in metres per second. Probabilities of occurrence of different wind speeds are represented as stacked polar bars in sixteen azimuth divisions. The radial direction represents the percentage of time for various wind speed ranges per wind direction during a 40-year measurement period. The preferred wind speeds and directions can be identified by the longer length of the bars. For Ottawa, the most common winds concerning pedestrian comfort occur for west and east quadrants; and the most common wind speeds are below 10 metres per second. However, it is noted that the most prominent wind direction for higher wind speeds originates from the west quadrant. The directional preference and relative magnitude of wind speed changes somewhat from season to season, with the summer months displaying the calmest winds relative to the remaining seasonal periods. Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 3

SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF WINDS FOR VARIOUS PROBABILITIES OTTAWA MACDONALD-CARTIER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, OTTAWA, ONTARIO Notes: 1. Radial distances indicate percentage of time of wind events. 2. Wind speeds represent mean hourly wind speeds measured at 10 metres above the ground. 3.2. Massing vs. Climate Geometric Effects Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 4

The physical features of a development site that are most influential to the local wind conditions include the massing and relative spacing of surrounding buildings, the geometry and orientation of the study building, and the alignment of the study building with respect to statistically prominent wind directions. Wind flow characteristics which combine to determine how conditions will develop include phenomena known as downwash, channelling coupled with acceleration, and shielding, as illustrated in the image below. Downwash 1 relates to the effect of winds against a tall building, whereby much of the impinging flow on the windward side of the building, nominally below two-thirds of the total height, is directed to lower levels. Taller buildings with smooth façades and no podiums produce the strongest downwash effects at grade, while the presence of protruding balconies and a tower setback from the podium edge mitigates downwash effects at the ground level. Channelling 2 refers to acceleration of wind through gaps between buildings, while acceleration of wind 3 occurs around building corners. Shielding 4 relates to calm zones on the leeward side of buildings, protected from prevailing winds. 2 4 1 3 3 3.3. Pedestrian Wind Comfort Guidelines Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 5

The pedestrian wind comfort guidelines used by GWE, which correspond to industry-accepted standards, are based on the correlation between a variety of pedestrian activity types and acceptable wind speed ranges for those activities. More specifically: Wind conditions are considered to be comfortable for sitting when gust wind speeds less than or equal to 14 kilometers per hour occur at least 80% of the time. The corresponding equivalent mean wind speed is approximately 10 km/h; Wind conditions are considered to be comfortable for standing when gust wind speeds less than or equal to 20 kilometers per hour occur at least 80% of the time. The corresponding equivalent mean wind speed is approximately 14 km/h; Wind conditions are considered to be comfortable for strolling when gust wind speeds less than or equal to 25 kilometers per hour occur at least 80% of the time. The corresponding equivalent mean wind speed is approximately 17 km/h; and Wind conditions are considered to be comfortable for walking when gust wind speeds less than or equal to 30 kilometers per hour occur at least 80% of the time. The corresponding equivalent mean wind speed is approximately 20 km/h. Gust speeds are used in the guidelines because people tend to be more sensitive to wind gusts than to steady winds for lower wind speed ranges. The guidelines are applied to the intended use of an outdoor area. For example, an entrance to a building not served by a vestibule or revolving door should be suitable for standing, but need not be suitable for sitting, while a public sidewalk need only be suitable for walking in most circumstances. 4. ANTICIPATED PEDESTRIAN COMFORT Based on consideration of the proposed development at 135 Barrette Street, surrounding building massing, and the relationship to the local wind climate, the following statements summarize our opinion of how these influences will affect pedestrian comfort at key areas. Sidewalk and Bus Shelter along Beechwood Avenue (Tags A & B): Wind conditions on the sidewalk (Tag A) and bus shelter (Tag B) along Beechwood Avenue are not expected to be influenced by the future building at the southeast side of the site. As such, wind comfort along the sidewalk and at the bus shelter are expected to be suitable for strolling, or better, throughout the year. The noted conditions are considered acceptable for the intended uses of the space. Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 6

Sidewalk and Building Entrances along St. Charles Street (Tags C & D): The sidewalk along the southwest side of the study site (Tag C) will be protected from grade-level winds by the surrounding building massing. Overall, wind conditions along the sidewalk are expected to be suitable for sitting during the summer months, and for standing throughout the rest of the year. The building entrances on the southwest side of the building (Tag D) will experience similar and somewhat calmer conditions than the adjacent sidewalk due to the added protection provided by the building façade. Conditions at the building entrances are expected to be suitable for sitting during the spring, summer, and autumn months, and standing during the winter, which is acceptable. Sidewalk, Building Entrance, and Loading Area along Barrette Street (Tags E & F): The sidewalk along Barrette Street (Tag E) will be protected from direct oncoming westerly and easterly winds by the surrounding building massing. Accordingly, wind conditions are likely to be suitable for standing, or better, during the spring, summer, and autumn months, and for walking during the winter. The building entrance and parking garage entrance, as well as the loading area along the southeast side of the building (Tag F), will experience similar and somewhat calmer conditions than the adjacent sidewalk due to the added protection provided by the building façade. Wind conditions at these locations are expected to be suitable for standing, or better, throughout the year. Pathway and Building Entrances at Centre of Study Site (Tag G): The pathway and building entrances between the existing church structure and the proposed building addition (Tag G) is well-protected by the surrounding building massing. As such, wind conditions are expected to be suitable for sitting throughout the year. City of Ottawa Park and St-Charles Market Patio (Tags H & I): The wind conditions within the City of Ottawa Park and parkette (Tag H) and the St-Charles Market patio (Tag I) along the northwest side of the site are expected to be somewhat calmer than the conditions along the Beechwood Avenue sidewalk, since it will be set back from the roadway corridor. As such, wind conditions within the park are expected to be comfortable for sitting during the summer months, and for standing during the remaining seasons, which is acceptable. Outdoor Patios (Tags J, & K): The outdoor market and patio, as well as the entrance to the indoor market at the southwest side of the existing church structure (Tag J), will be well-protected from oncoming winds by the surrounding building massing. Overall, wind conditions over the patio and at the entrance to the Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 7

indoor market are expected to be suitable for sitting during the typical use period, defined as the late spring through the early autumn, and suitable for standing the remainder of the year. The restaurant patio between the existing church structure and the proposed addition (Tag K) will be wellsheltered, and as such, conditions are expected to be suitable for sitting throughout the year. Level 7 Terrace (Tag L): The amenity terrace at the west side of the seventh level is sheltered from easterly winds by the study building. In order to minimize the influence of westerly winds over the terrace space, it is recommended that a solid vertical wind screen measuring at least 1.6 metres above the walking surface be installed along the full perimeter of the terrace. Provided that the aforementioned wind screen is included in the terrace design, wind conditions on the terrace are expected to be calm and suitable for sitting or more sedentary activities during the typical use period. Existing vs. Future Wind Conditions: The introduction of the proposed development at 135 Barrette Street is not expected to significantly influence pedestrian wind comfort over neighbouring areas at grade. In particular, although modest changes to wind speeds may occur beyond the study site upon introduction of the proposed development, nearby building entrances, sidewalks, and other pedestrian areas will continue to experience wind conditions similar to those that presently exist without the proposed building in place. Within the context of typical weather patterns, excluding anomalous local storm events, such as thunderstorms, tornadoes and downbursts, no dangerous or consistently strong wind conditions are expected anywhere over the subject site on an annual basis. During such events, wind conditions are influenced by specific local meteorological conditions and building geometries that cannot be predicted through a qualitative analysis. Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 8

5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on a qualitative analysis of architectural drawings, surrounding building massing, and the Ottawa wind climate, the following general statements summarize our prediction of future wind conditions for the proposed development at 135 Barrette Street in Ottawa, Ontario. 1. Wind comfort at all grade-level pedestrian-sensitive locations across study site is expected to be suitable for the anticipated uses without mitigation. These areas include nearby sidewalks, pathways, building access points, patio spaces, and the City of Ottawa park. 2. A perimeter wind screen measuring 1.6 metres tall is recommended for the seventh level amenity terrace to mitigate westerly winds, and allow for conditions appropriate for sitting during the warmer months. 3. The presence of the proposed development may result in moderate increases or decreases to local wind speeds over grade-level areas, as compared to existing conditions. However, despite potential changes, the current uses and comfort levels of the majority of pedestrian areas, including nearby building entrances and sidewalks, will not be significantly affected. The foregoing analysis and statements are based on knowledge and experience of wind flow patterns for the study site and in similar settings. As such, this assessment is intended to ensure adequate pedestrian safety relating to wind, and to provide general guidance relating to pedestrian comfort over the full study site. Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 9

This concludes our qualitative assessment of pedestrian wind comfort. Please advise the undersigned of any questions or comments. Sincerely, Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. Steven Hall, M.A.Sc., EIT Microclimate Specialist Vincent Ferraro, M.Eng., P.Eng. Principal Andrew Sliasas, M.A.Sc. Project Manager GWE15-120-DTPLW Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment 10