Economic Impact Study: NFL International Series London, 28 October 2012

Similar documents
TOUR DE FRANCE GRAND DÉPART YORKSHIRE

CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL

INTERNATIONAL GOLF TRAVEL MARKET 2017

The economic benefits of LFC an independent report

LONDON FOUR YEARS ON A GLOBAL HOST FOR SPORT

TRENDS IN TENNIS PLAYING UKTIA - TENNIS SUMMIT THE QUEEN S CLUB - APRIL 2015

ANNEX1 The investment required to achieve the Government s ambition to double cycling activity by 2025

APPENDIX 2 PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT FOR POOLE (DOLPHIN) LEISURE CENTRE FINAL SPECIFICATION

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

GOLF TOURISM IN NORTHERN IRELAND Results Presentation February 2017

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES

What did the World Student Games do for Sheffield? The 1991 Games as the catalyst for the regeneration of Sheffield

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

DOE Climate Change Proposals

The University of Georgia

Economic Impacts from 2006 Detroit Tigers Game Attendance

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

BRITISH UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SPORT SURFING STRATEGY

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Request for Proposal Naming Rights for the Stadium (The Ball Park at Jackson)

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF THE 2018 NCAA DIVISION I MEN S FINAL FOUR BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

CASWELL PARK REG I O N AL SPORTS COMPLE X ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Key words: Economic multiplier, community tourism, walking street, Chiang Mai

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

British Universities & Colleges Sport International Strategy

Golf Travel Insights 2012

PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR850. Optimisation of water flow depth for SCRIM. S Brittain, P Sanders and H Viner

Report to COUNCIL for decision

2017 Triathlon Ireland Super Series Bid Document

The Economic Impact of Colonial Downs in Virginia

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

An exciting and rewarding opportunity now exists to become part of the Sussex Cricket s sponsorship programme for the 2018 season.

London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games. 14 June 2010

Likely Economic Impact to Ireland from the 2006 Ryder Cup

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

Progress with the Road Investment Strategy

INTERNATIONAL SKATING UNION

London Safety Camera Partnership

TAB.COM.AU INTER DOMINION 2015

A Measure of the Economic Impact of Keeneland Racing and Sales on Lexington-Fayette County. Prepared by the Center for Business and Economic Research

Tall Ships deliver a multi-million pound economic boost

TAEKWONDO EVENTS LIMITED

STRATEGY / PLANNING / RESEARCH

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE INTERNATIONAL SPORTS FEDERATIONS REQUESTING IOC RECOGNITION. Recognition Procedure

Active Travel Strategy Dumfries and Galloway

SPORTCAL GSI EVENT STUDIES

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

The Economic Dimension Of Sport

A strategic review of the FEI World Equestrian Games. Consultation report: Executive Summary. November

UEFA EURO Technical Services & Overlay / Tender Process. Supplier for Temporary TV Broadcasting Power Phase 1 - Invitation to Express Interest

Blue Mile, Blue Sound and Stepping Stones to Nature: An Exploration of their Impact. Final Report. October 2010 SERIO

YORKSHIRE DALES NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ITEM 13 VISITOR MANAGEMENT AND THE THREE PEAKS ROUTE

Qualification Purpose Statement: 1st4sport Level 3 Certificate in Coaching Judo (QCF)

Glasgow 2018 European Championships. Perthshire Tourism Partnership 7 February 2018

195 engaging and releasing club. 479 only releasing club. 166 all sides. 8,025 only player 10,282

London March Donna Taylor Head of Accommodation. 13th

ANNUAL REVIEW 2017/18

PART 1: INFRASTRUCTURE OPPORTUNITIES

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

Hydraulic and Economic Analysis of Real Time Control

PROPOSAL TO CHANGE GOLF QUEENSLAND VOTING RIGHTS. Background

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

ITU WORLD CUP HOST CITY BID INFORMATION

2018 MLB SPRING TRAINING ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY


Experience from another sport by Mr. Derek McGRATH, Managing Director, European Rugby Cup

WESTERN AUSTRALIAN RACING INDUSTRY

15, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau

Ontario Cycling Events & Tourism Impact Project - Cross Event Report -

* denotes a required field.

European Athletics Health and Well-Being Conference January 2014, Marseille (FRA)

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism

POINTS BASED SYSTEM. Application for a Governing Body Endorsement for a Player

2 WAREGEM HORSE WEEK 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS _ LOCATION VISION & MISSION INTRODUCTION EVENTS MEDIA STRATEGY SPONSORSHIP PACKAGES HOSPITALITY VISIBILITY

CYCLING SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CHARITY NO.SCO29760 CYCLE FRIENDLY EMPLOYER AWARD HANDBOOK

Affiliated Club Membership Survey 2014 Insights (England)

BRC/Springboard Footfall Monitor September 2014 Covering the five weeks 31 August October 2014

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SKI AREAS ON THE ECONOMY OF NORTH CAROLINA SEASON. Final Report

London 2012 Stewarding Update. 1 st March 2012 Eileen Williams City Operations Manager Olympic Park

Still on the road to recovery

Residential Jurisdistions of Attendees 1998 Breeders Cup Races in Louisville

Qualification Purpose Statement: 1st4sport Level 3 Certificate in Coaching Mountain Biking (QCF)

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF TOURISM SUBPROJECTS

Fiscal Impact of SunTrust Park and The Battery Atlanta on Cobb County Executive Summary Sept. 18, 2018

School Games EXECUTIVE SUMMARY YEAR 1 August 2012

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study

Invitation to express interest

Transcription:

LONDON & PARTNERS Economic Impact Study: NFL International Series London, 28 October 2012 December 2012

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 2 Content» Background» Summary: 2012 Direct Economic Impact» Methodology» Detailed Findings Full Economic Impact Calculations 1) Game Spectators 2) Game Attendees Contact Frank Saez SMG Insight / YouGov 50 Featherstone Street London EC1Y 8RT T: 020 7012 6103 M: 07973 134771 F: 020 7012 6001 E-mail: fsaez@smg-insight.com 3) NFL Fan Rally Event Calculations» Appendix Total Economic Impact: Multiplier Effect» About SMG / YouGov

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 3 Background London & Partners is the official promotional agency for London, attracting and delivering value to business, students and visitors The NFL International Series game was held for the sixth time at Wembley Stadium on 28th October 2012 London & Partners would like to obtain robust figures relating to the direct economic impact of the event in the host economy, Greater London

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 4 Event Background» The event programme for the weekend was not limited solely to the NFL game (see NFL Event Programme) NFL Event Programme» The economic impact figure calculated covers both events combined Saturday 27th October NFL Fan Rally, Trafalgar Square Chance for fans to cheer on the two teams before Sunday s game in an iconic London setting This event is also free to attend (43,579 attendees) Sunday 28th October New England Patriots vs. St.Louis Rams, Wembley Stadium A crowd of 84,004 packed into the Wembley Stadium to watch the 6th International Series game to be held in London

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 5 Background» Economic impact assessments provide an indication of the economic benefits for a specified region generated from staging an event» In addition to the spectators present at the game and the NFL Fan Rally, the 2012 event featured around 1600 attendees present in other roles, e.g. volunteers, officials, media, participants, coaches etc» Economic impact assessments aim to quantify the direct contribution to the host economy of each of these 2 groups spectators and attendees, the key two areas being spend on accommodation and non-accommodation items» In addition the total spend by the event organiser in the host economy is sourced and added to the contributions of the different groups of people above to arrive at a total Direct Economic Impact figure

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 6 Summary: 2012 Direct Economic Impact

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 7 Summary: 2012 Direct Economic Impact» Total direct economic impact was 23.26m» 2011 figure was 22.87m, an increase of 2%» Total economic impact (including indirect impact see Appendix A) estimated to be 46.52m using a economic multiplier figure of 2» Spectators at the game contributed:» 9,874,467 to the non-accommodation sector» 2011 figure was 9.14m, an increase of 8%» 1,587,928 to the accommodation sector» 2011 figure was 1.95m, a decrease of -20%**» Organiser spend in the host economy was 10.90m*» Additional spend from the other event (Fan Rally) from those people who did not also go to the game was 291,443» Game attendees contributed:» 122,064 to the non-accommodation sector» 2011 figure was 116k, an increase of 5%» 486,864 to the accommodation sector» 2011 figure was 464k, an increase of 5% * Organiser spend was the same in 2011. ** A decrease of 20% in the accomodation sector was seen due to a decrease in 2012 in three criterias; Commercial stayers 20,774 (vs 21,750 in 2011); Average nights spent in London 1.91 (vs 2.02); Average cost per bed per night per person 40.02 (vs 44.48)

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 8 Summary: 2012 Direct Economic Impact Game Spectators Game Attendees 84,004 1,586 Unique, non-casual, non-london residents 66,279 Non-London Residents 828 Day Visitors 38.455 Non-Commercial Stayers 2,875 Commercial Stayers 20,774 Day Visitors 0 Non-Commercial Stayers 0 Commercial Stayers 828 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Day visitors, Non-Commercial stayers, and Commercial Stayers 9,874,467 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 1,587,928 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Day visitors, Non-Commercial stayers, and Commercial Stayers 122,544 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 486,864 + Revenue from those attending the other events only 291,443 + Organisers spend in host economy 10.90m = Total Direct Economic Impact 23.26m

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 9 Methodology

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 10 Methodology» The three broad areas used to calculate the total Direct Economic Impact figure are: 1) Total Spectator spending on accommodation and non-accommodation items 2) Total Attendee* spending on accommodation and non-accommodation items 3) Direct spending (organiser spend in host economy) 1) The Spectator figure above is derived from an online questionnaire completed by NFL UK members, over half of whom were spectators at the game 2) The Attendee figure is calculated by using the exact number of attendees present at the game and adjusting the spectator spend figures above by making various assumptions» Note: all spectator and attendee expenditure made in Greater London that would have been made irrespective of the event was excluded. For this reason:» All spend of London residents (spectators and attendees) at the event is excluded» All spend of casual** non-london resident spectators at the event is excluded» Economic impact assessments provide an indication of the economic benefits for a specified region generated from staging an event» There is no industry standard software for calculating total direct economic impact however for this study, eventimpacts, the event evaluation framework previously developed for UK Sport and its partners is used *Attendees are those attending the event who are not spectators, e.g. participants, volunteers, officials, media, coaches etc ** Casual spectators are those whose primary reason for visiting London was not to attend the NFL game 3) The Direct spending figure above is provided directly by the event organisers» Finally, specifically for this report, spectator spend from the NFL Fan Rally event is also estimated and added to the 3 figures above to arrive at total direct economic impact Note that the direct impact figure calculated for the other event covers only the relatively small number of people who exclusively attended the other event (i.e. did not attend the game). The reason is it is impossible to apportion somebody s spend across each event so somebody attending the game plus othe other event will have ALL of their spend included in the game EIA figure hence the figure for the other event may be significantly smaller than expected

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 11 Questionnaire Methodology The questionnaire collected the following for game spectators: Average number of days attended % resident in host economy % of non-locals who are casuals (spectators only) Commercial stayers Non-commercial stayers Day visitors Average number of nights spent in host economy Average cost per bed per night (per person) Average daily spend on non-accommodation items Combined with the spectator attendance figure and assumptions around spend levels of attendees, the following were derived: Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Spectators Total revenue to accommodation sector from Spectators Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Attendees Total revenue to accommodation sector from Attendees Finally the Organiser Spend in Host Economy and Revenue from those attending the other event only is added to get: Total Direct Economic Impact

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 12 Detailed Findings Full Economic Impact Calculations

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 13 1 Direct Economic Impact: Game Spectators Game Spectators 84,004 Unique spectators 84,004 Average days attended 1 Casual spectators 4,176 Non-residents 66,279 Non-casual spectators 62,103 London residents 17,725 Average daily spend on non-accommodation items 159.02 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Commercial stayers, Non-commercial stayers and Day visitors 9,874,467 Non-commercial stayers 2,875 Commercial stayers 20,774 Day visitors 38,455 Average nights spent in London 1.91 Average cost per bed per night per person 40.02 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 1,587,928

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 14 2 Direct Economic Impact: Game Attendees Estimating accommodation spend of game attendees» Estimating number of commercial stayers :» It is assumed that all USA residents (639) plus all UK residents living outside of the host economy (189) stayed commercially in London so there was an estimated 828 commercial stayers» Estimating average cost per night:» Whilst the majority of the 828 commercial stayers are assumed to have stayed in relatively modest accommodation, players from the 2 teams are assumed to have stayed in more expensive accommodation ; on average the commercial cost per bed night for all attendees staying in the host economy is estimated to be 105* per person per night» A total of 1586 attendees* were present at the game» Based on the exact numbers of attendees in each role that were provided, the following estimates were made:» 947 were UK residents of whom 80% (758) are estimated to live in host economy, London» 639 were USA residents» Estimating average number of nights stayed:» Average number of nights spent in the host economy by USA residents is estimated to be 7, with average of only 1 night for UK residents from outside the host economy hence overall average bed nights for all attendees= 5.6 nights Total accommodation spend from attendees is 828 * 105 * 5.6 = 486,864 * These were media, catering, promotional, rigging, security, cheerleaders, operational staff, players, branders, officials and coaches ** Adjusted from 100 in 2011

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 15 2 Direct Economic Impact: Game Attendees Estimating non-accommodation spend of game attendees» 3 distinct groups are used here in order to take account of expected significant differences in spend across different types of attendee who are from outside of the host economy (828 people)» Team Affiliated personnel from the USA (499 people) which includes players, coaches, cheerleaders etc are assumed to have an estimated average daily spend of 210 per person» Event Affiliated personnel from the USA (140 people) which includes promotional staff, TV production crew, officials etc are assumed to have an estimated average daily spend of 53 per person» UK Non Host Economy individuals (189 people) which include technicians, catering staff, events staff etc are also assumed to have an estimated average daily spend of 53 per person Average daily spend for all attendees = 148 so total attendee non-accommodation spend is 148 * 828 = 122,544

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 16 2 Direct Economic Impact: Game Attendees Attendees 1,586 Average days attended 1 Non-residents 828 London residents 758 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Commercial stayers, Non-commercial stayers 0 Commercial stayers 828 Day visitors 0 Average daily spend on non-accommodation items 147.42 Non-commercial stayers and Day visitors 122,544 Average nights spent in London 5.6 Average cost per bed per night per person 105 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 486,864

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 17 3 Direct Economic Impact: Other Event Calculations Event Attendance Breakdown Estimating accommodation spend of spectators» In 2012 the online survey was sent to ticket holders of the game (in 2011 the survey was sent to all NFL members), there were 1,192 respondents who were spectators at the game» In 2011, 93% of visitors who went to the NFL Fan Rally also attended the game. 7% therefore only attended the event, using this year s overall event attendence figure of 43,579, would project 3,051 people that only attended the NFL Fan Rally» Estimating number of commercial stayers :» 25% of game spectators stayed commercially in London so the same proportion will be assumed here ; hence the estimated commercial stayers is 763 (25% of 3,051)» Estimating average cost per night:» Average cost per night of game spectators staying commercially in London was 40.02 so the same will be assumed here» Estimating average number of nights stayed:» Average nights stayed by game spectators was 1.91 ; however for spectators who went exclusively to the NFL Fan Rally and did not attend the game an average of 1.5 will be assumed Total accommodation spend from these spectators is 763 * 40.02 * 1.5 = 45,803

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 18 3 Direct Economic Impact: Other Event Calculations Estimating non-accommodation spend of spectators» Estimating number of spectators from outside of London:» 79% of game spectators were from outside London. It is estimated the equivalent number at the Fan Rally was slightly less at around 70%. Total estimated to be 2136» Estimating number of days present:» Using 2011 estimates, 15% of people went to both events so it is assumed the average days attended is 1.15» Estimating average spend per day:» Average spend per day of game spectators was 159. Fans to the rally expected to spend 100 per day so overall average spend per person per day is 100 Total spectator non-accommodation spend is 100 * 2136 * 1.15 = 245,640 Therefore total spectator spend on accommodation and non-accommodation is = 291,443

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 19 Overall

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 20 Summary: 2012 Direct Economic Impact Game Spectators Game Attendees 84,004 1,586 Unique, non-casual, non-london residents 66,279 Non-London Residents 828 Day Visitors 38.455 Non-Commercial Stayers 2,875 Commercial Stayers 20,774 Day Visitors 0 Non-Commercial Stayers 0 Commercial Stayers 828 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Day visitors, Non-Commercial stayers, and Commercial Stayers 9,874,467 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 1,587,928 Total revenue to non-accommodation sector from Day visitors, Non-Commercial stayers, and Commercial Stayers 122,544 Total revenue to accommodation sector from Commercial stayers 486,864 + Revenue from those attending the other events only 291,443 + Organisers spend in host economy 10.90m = Total Direct Economic Impact 23.26m

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 21 Appendix Event Multiplier Effect» An event multiplier turns the Direct Economic Impact from an event into a figure that represents the Total Economic Impact» Multipliers are used to assess the extent to which increased spending in the host economy produces subsequent benefits for that economy (indirect impact)» Regardless of its type, the value of any multiplier is dependent on the size of the economy being considered. In simple terms, the smaller the host economy, the higher the chance of leakage and the lower the value of the multiplier» Previous multiplier figures used for other sporting events in the UK include» A figure of 1.5 used for a economic study into the 2010 Ryder Cup» A figure of 2.4 was used on a study into the economic impact of hosting ITF Davis Cup tennis» A multiplier of around 2 could be suggested as appropriate for this event

LONDON & PARTNERS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY NFL INTERNATIONAL SERIES LONDON, 28 OCTOBER 2012 DECEMBER 2012 22 About SMG Insight / YouGov SMG Insight / YouGov is an independent research consultancy specialising in the business of sports and sponsorship fields. The company has many years of experience of working in the rights marketing environment, and in the development and application of sponsorship valuation models. SMG Insight / YouGov operates from an international network of offices in London, North America, Scandinavia, Germany, France, and Middle East. Contact SMG Insight 50 Featherstone Street London EC1Y 8RT T: +44 (0)20 7012 6000 F: +44 (0)20 7012 6001 E: info@smg-insight.com www.smg-insight.com 2012 SMG Insight Limited No part of this document may be copied or distributed in any form or by any means, including photocopying and e-mail, without the prior written permission of SMG Insight Limited. Written permission must be obtained before any part of the report is stored on any retrieval system. All rights of publication are solely reserved by SMG Insight Limited. Disclaimer The opinions, conclusions, projections, evaluations and estimates in this report are based on more than 40 years of experience in the media, sports and lifestyle research industry. However, whilst great care has been taken in the preparation of this document, SMG Insight cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information contained herein and disclaims all liability for any loss or damage from reliance thereupon.