Metro Nashville Sidewalk Requirements. Section (Provision of sidewalks) Effective July 1, 2017

Similar documents
Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

This page intentionally left blank.

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Classification Criteria

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Section 7 Complete Green Street Guidelines DRAFT

Traffic Calming St. Clarens Avenue between Brandon Avenue and Davenport Road

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSET (TCA) Reporting Guidelines for Land Development Projects

San Francisco Planning Department IPIC Report 2016

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

This page intentionally left blank.

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Committed to Service. Development Services. February 21, ACHD Commission. Mindy Wallace, AICP

ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner III Tandem Ridge/ EPP / PP-07-16/ RZ-12-16/ CPA-01-16/ A-07-16

Committed to Service

Living Streets Policy

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

This page intentionally left blank.

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

New Planning Code Summary: Better Streets Plan and Curb Cut Restrictions

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Samish-Maple-Ellis Corridor Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Improvements. Bellingham City Council March 26, 2018

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Mount Pleasant Industrial Area Parking Strategy and Access Improvements

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

BOI / DRH S. 13 th Street Mixed use office/retail development with residential dormitory

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

Complete Streets for Louisiana

Improving Pedestrian Access to Transit: The Sacramento Pedestrian Master Plan

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

This page intentionally left blank.

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Traffic Calming Rosemount Avenue, between Ralph Street and Queenslea Avenue

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

BPP / SUB

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Charlottesville Bike-Ped Steering Committee Meeting Notes 2/26/2015 Master Plan Update

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

SNCC Demographic Trends

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

The previous chapters in this plan have established the value of this plan (Chapter 1), the

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element

2016 Planning Conference July 26, CONNECT COLUMBUS Building Columbus Transportation Future

Road Diets FDOT Process

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Exhibit B: Proposed amendments to the Transportation Element of the Oakland Comprehensive Plan

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Development Services Department

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS FOR THE VILLAGE GREEN MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Building Great Neighbourhoods QUEEN ALEXANDRA

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Land Use and Urban Design

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Transcription:

Metro Nashville Sidewalk Requirements Section 17.20.120 (Provision of sidewalks) Effective July 1, 2017

Why are sidewalks a critical priority? Lack of requirements from 1950s to 1990s NashvilleNext, nmotion, and WalknBike Plans highlight walking safety Mayor s Green & Complete Streets Executive Order

Growth and Preservation Concept Map Indicates where housing and employment growth is planned over the next 25 years and shows what areas should be preserved.

Transportation Plans NashvilleNext General Plan Implementing Complete Streets Major and Collector Street Plan WalknBike City Bike-Ped Plan Access Nashville 2040 City Transportation Plan nmotion City Transit Plan Plan to Play City Greenways Plan

Major and Collector Street Plan Major and Collector Street Plan outlines street character Reflects the city s transportation plans Establishes sidewalk widths per street segment

WalknBike Priority Sidewalk Network

Developing Interactive Mapping Tool Applicability Eligibility for in-lieu contribution Existing sidewalks Priority Sidewalk Network

o Sidewalks required: Multi-family or nonresidential development when property is: within Urban Services District (USD) on a street in the Major and Collector Street Plan (MCSP) and/or within 1/4 mile of a center designated in the General Plan o Requires sidewalks for multifamily and nonresidential development, based on new construction, percentage value of renovation, percentage of expansion, percentage of value of expansion. One or two-family residential development when property is: within the Urban Zoning Overlay (UZO) on a street within the MCSP in the Urban Services District and/or within a 1/4 mile of a center designated in the General Plan o Includes right of way dedication for additions and expansions over 25% of building value. Grading applies to abutting sidewalks and planned sidewalks in Priority Sidewalk Network.

o Sidewalks must be built (in-lieu contribution not available): replacement or repair of existing sidewalk extension of sidewalk proposed for adjacent development when existing sidewalks are present on the same block face within the UZO (multi-family/nonresidential) along a street in the MCSP (multi-family/nonresidential) o In-lieu contribution available: Allows an exception for a project that is funded and scheduled. In-lieu contribution calculated July 1 each year.

Capital Improvements Budget and Capital Spending Plan

Other relevant sidewalk items include: Required right-of-way must be dedicated with the issuance of the building permit. This is the only requirement for single-family or two-family renovation over 25% value or addition. Installation or in-lieu contribution is not required. Grading of improvements within the right-of-way for properties that abut existing sidewalks and planned sidewalks identified in the Priority Sidewalk Network. Metro Planning must make a recommendation on sidewalk variances to the Board of Zoning Appeals and whether there are potential alternative designs that could result in installation of public sidewalk. Obstructions are prohibited within the required pedestrian travelway, but may be located within a grass strip or frontage zone. Existing obstructions shall be relocated.

Questions? Michael Briggs, AICP Transportation Planner Metro Nashville Planning Department michael.briggs@nashville.gov 615.862.7219

IMPLEMENTING COMPLETE STREETS Development Zone Pedestrian Zone Green Zone Parking Zone Bicycle Zone Vehicle Zone Bicycle Zone Parking Zone Green Zone Pedestrian Zone Development Zone

Multifamily and Nonresidential redevelopment Applicability of 17.20.120 for Multifamily and Nonresidential Development in Urban Services District in General Services District On an MCSP street Not on an MCSP street Within ¼ mi. of NN center Not within ¼ mi. of NN center 17.20.120 applies 17.20.120 does not apply

One and Two Family Development Applicability of 17.20.120 for One and Two Family Development in Urban Zoning Overlay Not in Urban Zoning Overlay On an MCSP street within USD Not on an MCSP street within USD Within ¼ mi. of NN center Not within ¼ mi. of NN center 17.20.120 applies 17.20.120 does not apply

17.20.120 applies Sidewalk Construction Required vs. in lieu fee eligibility when 17.20.120 applies. Sidewalk Exists but is Substandard No Sidewalk Exists Sidewalk Exists and meets standards Eligible for Contribution In Lieu of Construction of new sidewalk On an MCSP Street (multifamily only) Not on an MCSP Street Within Urban Zoning Overlay (multi-family only) Not Within UZO No Sidewalk proposed w/ Dev. on Same/Adjacent Block Face Construct New Sidewalk Sidewalk exists on Same or Adjacent Block Face No Sidewalk exists on Same or Adjacent Block Face Sidewalk proposed with Development on Same or Adjacent Block Face