Suffolk Domestic Homicide Review Guidance 2018

Similar documents
Community Safety Partnership Priorities

Disciplinary Policy and Procedures

LIFT MAINTENANCE POLICY

PROCEDURE Road Traffic Collisions (Recording) Number: H 0601 Date Published: 24 May 2016

PROCEDURE Cycle Patrol. Number: A 0604 Date Published: 15 December 2015

AFL Coaches Code of Conduct

Before, During and After

Role Profile. Project Director (North or South dependent on candidate location)

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION Water Forum Terms of reference: September 2016

The Football Association Policy on Trans People in Football

Billingham Golf Club Equal Opportunity Policy

Health and Safety Inspection Procedure

1. The identity or, where an identity is uncertain, a description of the abuser.

Assessor Report. IMCA Specific Review VoiceAbility

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Version 7 October Utilisation Strategy for Speed Camera Enforcement

Classification Rules for ITTF Para Table Tennis

Byelaws: Questions and answers

Marion Marlins Masters Swimming Club Strategic Plan

Independent Ethics Committees

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

NSW Rugby League Limited Privacy Policy

2. Canoe Wales and the Equality Standard for Sport

CODE OF CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

A guide to how local communities can change local speed limits

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

Drowning Deaths at Public Swimming Pools. Dr Bernadette Matthews Principal Research Associate Aquatic Risk and Research Life Saving Victoria

An Introduction from Tom Harrison. ECB Chief Executive Officer

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal

Consolidated Guidance to Intelligence Officers and Service Personnel on the Detention and Interviewing of Detainees Overseas, and on the Passing and

Netball Australia Bench Officials Accreditation Framework. Updated 2015

The National Crime Victimization Survey: 32 Years of measuring crime in the United States

Deanshanger Athletic Football Club Constitution

YOUTH OLYMPIC GAMES BUENOS AIRES 2018 Nomination and Selection Criteria

Netball Australia Bench Officials Accreditation Framework. Updated 2018

CYNGOR SIR POWYS COUNTY COUNCIL. CABINET EXECUTIVE 18 th September Adoption of Land Drainage Byelaws.

Health and Safety Policy

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

COUNTY SPORTS PARTNERSHIP (CSP) CORE SPECIFICATION INTERPRETATION GUIDE

Bank of England Rugby Football Club

Rights of Way Enforcement Procedure for Land Managers

MEDICAL GAS CYLINDERS AND MEDICAL PIPELINE SYSTEMS (MGPS) POLICY

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

BYE-LAWS TO ARTICLE 56 DUTIES OF THE COMMISSIONS AND WORKING GROUPS

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

Contents Job Summary.. 2. Organisation Chart. 2. Key Responsibilities...3. Nature & Scope of Job.4. Knowledge, Skills and Experience...

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

So you want to be a RCM

All Stars Cricket Champion

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

Equal Opportunity Policy

EUSMUNC06 (SQA Unit Code - FG2W 04) Locate and avoid supply apparatus for Utilities Network Construction

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

ICC Anti-Racism Policy for International Cricket Implementation Guidelines for Members

Last Reviewed 14 th October 2016 HOME COUNTRY CONSTITUTION

July 2016 JD No 6 Post No 6 JOB DESCRIPTION

Code of Conduct and Team Travel Policy 2016 Inland Empire Swimming Age Group Zones/All Star Team (Please keep pages 1, 2, 4, & 5)

Scottish Hyperbaric Medical Service Strategic Context and Overview

LONDON & SE DIVISIONAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE (DOC) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 2 Speed and Traffic Management

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

An Introduction From David Collier. ECB Chief Executive

PROCEDURES FOR STANDBY

2. ATHLETE NUMBERS PODIUM AND PODIUM POTENTIAL LEVEL INVESTMENT

WEST CLUBS WOMEN S HOCKEY LEAGUE REGULATIONS SEASON

SCRUTINY PANEL EXTERNAL PROVIDER QUALITY ASSURANCE

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

Health, Safety and Environment Management System. HSE-PRO-008 HSE Responsibilities Procedure

Chapter 2.7 Bylaw sport governance and management

CODE OF CONDUCT 1. APPLICATION AND SCOPE BRINGING THE GAME INTO DISREPUTE LIABILITY FOR SUPPORTER AND SPECTATOR CONDUCT...

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

2.0 Institutional Review Board

BRIDPORT RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB DISCIPLINE POLICY

Guidelines for Nomination & Selection to 2018 Australian Youth Olympic Team Buenos Aires 6-18 October 2018

County Donegal Public Participation Network Work Plan

Meeting Outcomes of the England Athletics LTD Board held on 19 September 2018

6. Officials should maintain a high level of personal hygiene and should maintain a professional appearance at all times.

International Standard for Athlete Evaluation. September 2016

CLEAR COLLISION LEAD EVALUATE ACT RE-OPEN KEEPING TRAFFIC MOVING. CFOATechRescue ConfJuly2013v0.1

BHA SAFEGUARDING POLICY. The BHA's Vision is that 'Together we will build a brighter future for our sport, our horses and our people'.

Overview of the Justice System. Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCCJJ)

Amnesty International August l993 AI Index: EUR 45/10/93

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

The Berwick-upon-Tweed Conservation Areas Advisory Group (CAAG)

Explanatory Memorandum to The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017

GUIDELINES FOR BREATH ALCOHOL COLLECTION

Police and Crime Panel Report

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA NOMINATION POLICY YOUTH OLYMPIC GAMES BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA 6-18 OCTOBER 2018

THE MIDLANDS MINIGOLF CLUB CONSTITUTION

The FA Discipline Handbook 2011/12 Season

HILLSIDE FOOTBALL CLUB - COACHING SELECTION POLICY

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION - ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

Chief Operating Officer Approved by. Responsible Officer. Vice-Chancellor Approved and commenced 25 September, 2017 Review by September, 2020

ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA SELECTION POLICY 16 th IAAF WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS LONDON, GREAT BRITAIN 4 th to 13 th AUGUST 2017

Report to Cabinet. 18 May 2016

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

WHO WERE THE MURDER VICTIMS? RACE-SEX-AGE

REGULATION 15 AGE GRADE RUGBY

EUROPEAN COMBINED EVENTS TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS 701. PROMOTION AND RIGHTS

Transcription:

Suffolk Domestic Homicide Review Guidance 2018 This overview document outlines the approach being taken in Suffolk in meeting the Domestic Homicide Review statutory requirement. It is aimed to supplement and not replace the full Multi Agency Statutory Guidance for the Conduct of Domestic Homicide Reviews (Dec 2016) issued by the Home Office and available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/revised-statutoryguidance-for-the-conduct-of-domestic-homicide-reviews. Both the National Guidance and the Suffolk Protocol should be used together in all cases. Defining a Domestic Homicide Review A Domestic Homicide Review means a review of the circumstances in which the death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence, abuse or neglect by: (a) a person to whom he was related or with whom he was or had been in an intimate personal relationship, or (b) a member of the same household as himself, held with a view to identifying the lessons to be learnt from the death. Recent changes to the DHR guidance include where a victim took their own life (suicide) and the circumstances give rise to concern, for example it emerges that there was coercive controlling behaviour in the relationship, a review should be undertaken, even if a suspect is not charged with an offence or they are tried and acquitted. Reviews are not about who is culpable. Leading and Contributing to a Domestic Homicide Review It should be noted that an intimate personal relationship includes relationships between adults who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality. It is a statutory requirement for a Community Safety Partnership (CSP) to initiate and undertake a DHR in which the victim was normally resident or where the victim was last known to have frequented. Statutory guidance also states it is the duty of any person or body establishing or participating in a domestic homicide review to have regard to the guidance. In relation to England and Wales the persons and bodies this refers to includes: Chief officers of police for police areas in England and Wales; Local authorities; Strategic Health Authorities; NHS Commissioning Boards (NHS England); Clinical Commissioning Groups; Providers of probation services; In Suffolk, the associated costs of a DHR are shared by the statutory partners of the local CSP the DHR is conducted within. The decision to share the cost was made in April 2016, another decision to share the costs of administration was made in November 2017. The partners that share the costs of the DHR including administration costs are:

Suffolk Constabulary Babergh District Council Forest Heath District Council Ipswich Borough Council Mid Suffolk District Council St Edmundsbury District Council Suffolk Coastal District Council Waveney District Council West Suffolk Clinical Commissioning Group Great Yarmouth and Waveney Clinical Commissioning Group Ipswich Clinical Commissioning Group Suffolk County Council National Probation Service

The Domestic Homicide Review Process in Suffolk Step 1 1. Constabulary Protecting Vulnerable People Directorate liaises with Senior Investigating Officer (SIO) in advance of formal notification to CSP 2. Suffolk Constabulary notifies the CSP Chair, District/Borough lead CSP officer, SCC CSP lead and Safeguarding Leads of a suspected domestic homicide 3. SCC/District or Borough CSP Lead informs appropriate management and cabinet member. Step 2 1. Suffolk Constabulary provides formal notification using DHR1 form (Appendix A) and further information when available using DHR1A (Appendix B) 2. District/Borough CSP lead informally engages DHR author in standby capacity until further into this process. 3. District/Borough CSP Leads liaises with CSP Chair to establish a date for initial DHR advisory panel meeting (within 1 month of formal notification of potential DHR) and identifies appropriate partners to attend (Police, SCC, District and Borough, Safeguarding and Health). CSP lead starts to log additional admin costs from initial DHR advisory panel onwards. 4. Consideration should be given to the likelihood of the DHR meeting the threshold before resources are invested/independent author commissioned 5. Advisory Panel issue instruction to statutory partners and other partners as appropriate to secure files/ case records relating to the victim, offender and wider family networks. 6. At this point there are serval options available to the DHR advisory panel Decision to initiate a DHR Independent Author Commissioned Process Continued at step 3 below Unable to establish if a DHR is required Process is paused while the advisory panel await more information (within 1 month of original homicide notification where possible) If a subsequent meeting cannot be arranged within 1 month then DHR4 and a covering letter sent to Home Office with reasons. The CSP should not engage an independent author or partners until a decision is made Decision not to initiate a DHR Home Office Notified via DHR4 (Appendix C) If there are lessons to be learnt from the incident an informal review, at no cost, can be established by the CSP

7. District/Borough Community Safety (CS) Lead logs and forwards DHR4 (Appendix C) to Home Office (DHRENQUIRIES@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk sent securely via GCSX email or alternative email encryption methods). Step 3 1. The first CSP review panel meeting will be opened by the CSP chair and then handed over to the DHR author for the rest of the process. 2. The CSP lead creates a time line of the process from date of homicide through to date of publication of DHR Overview Report, Executive Summary and Action Plan. Timeline used to feed back to the CSP to learn from challenges or opportunities within the process for future reviews. 3. CSP lead liaises with independent author and agrees who needs to be invited to the review panel meetings (please see appendix D for the list of possible members) 4. A series of regular DHR review panel meetings will be held as required, chaired by the independent author. 5. The DHR Independent author liaises with agencies to produce IMRs and organisational records and undertakes interviews with agencies and family/friends and more after the first review panel Step 4 1. The Independent Author presents a draft DHR report and action plan to the Review Panel for consideration. 2. The final report is completed and discussed at the next CSP meeting (or extra-ordinary meeting held to avoid unnecessary delays in providing report to the Home Office Quality Assurance panel), (tabled only, not sent electronically) for information only, not for amendments or further work. Step 5 1. The CSP acknowledges content of report. 2. A copy of the report is submitted securely via GCSX email or alternative email encryption methods to the Home Office for Quality Assurance (DHRENQUIRIES@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk) by the CS lead on behalf of the CSP Chair. The Home Office DHR Quality Assurance Panel is held approx. every 3 months.. 3. Following the DHR Quality Assurance Panel meeting, the Home Office Quality Assurance Panel Chair provides a letter via email to the CSP lead suggesting changes to the report or recommendation to publish. 4. The CSP lead provides a copy of the Home Office Quality Assurance Panel response to the DHR Author and CSP Chair. 5. The DHR Independent Author reviews the suggested changes from the DHR Quality Assurance Panel and may amend the DHR Overview report.

6. The DHR Independent Author in conjunction with the CSP lead and CSP Chair, notifies the local authority and constabulary communication officers of the pending publication date (Embargoed). The CSP lead checks pending publication date against key dates for sensitivity and avoidance (date of homicide, birth dates of victim and offender and immediate family members, Mother s Day/Father s Day etc) 7. The DHR Independent Author notifies the victims family and offenders family of the pending publication date. 8. The CSP lead publishes the Overview Report, Executive Summary and action plan on the CSP page of the District/Borough Council. The report is also added to the Suffolk Adult Safeguarding Board Website (not the action plan) 9. The CSP lead invoices partners for author and admin costs (a log of additional time for administration costs is required to accompany the invoice) 10. The CSP continues to monitor the action plan and escalates to Violence Against Women and Girls Steering Group (VAWG) for non-compliance 11. The CSP lead regularly updates the CSP page on the District/Borough with the updated DHR action plan as recommendations are implemented 12. Upon completion of recommendations, CSP lead updates the CSP page on the District/Borough website with the completed DHR action plan. 13. The CSP formally concludes the review when all the actions are complete 14. It is suggested that records relating to DHRs are kept for a minimum of 75 years from the date of publication

Appendix A DHR1 To be completed as soon as possible following identification of a domestic homicide by Suffolk Constabulary). 1. Referrer Name Email Phone No Designation Line Manager Phone No Email the completed DHR 1 to: the chair of the CSP and Lead Officer from the list below for the related area of the potential DHR Name Organisation Email address Joanna Spicer West Suffolk CSP Chair Joanna.Spicer@suffolk.gov.uk Steve Gallant & Marry Steve.Gallant@eastsuffolk.gov.uk East Suffolk CSP Chairs Rudd mary.rudd@waveney.gov.uk Alasdair Ross Ipswich CSP Chair Alasdair.Ross@councillors.ipswich.gov.uk Helen Lindfield St Edmundsbury and Forest Heath Suffolk CSP Lead Officer Helen.lindfield@westsuffolk.gov.uk Melanie Yolland Babergh and Mid Suffolk Melanie.Yolland@baberghmidsuffolk.gov.uk Julia Catterwell East Suffolk CSP Lead Officer Julia.Catterwell@eastsuffolk.gov.uk Ian Blofield Head of Housing & Community Services Ian.Blofield@ipswich.gov.uk Please also cc all the people below Name Name Name Eamon Bridger Suffolk Police, Detective Superintendent eamonn.bridger@suffolk.pnn.police.uk Abdul Razaq Sara Blake (to be updated) Clair Harvey Suffolk County Council, Director of Public Health Suffolk County Council, Head of Localities and Partnerships Suffolk County Council, Community Safety Manager abdul.razaq@suffolk.gov.uk sara.blake@suffolk.gov.uk clair.harvey@suffolk.gov.uk

BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS AND FAMILY COMPOSITION x 2. Victim: Name of Victim Date of Birth Date of death Home address Gender Ethnic origin Nationality Disability Faith Sexual Orientation Whereabouts at time of death Suspected Perpetrator: Name of suspected perpetrator Date of Birth Home address Relationship to victim Gender Ethnic origin Nationality Disability Faith Sexual Orientation Arrested? Charged? In custody?

Family Composition/Significant Others: Name Relationship to victim Relationship to suspected perpetrator DoB Address Other comments 3. Other agencies Involved: Agency Contact Details Extent of involvement 4. Circumstances that triggered the notification The death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence, abuse or neglect by a) person to whom he/she was related or with whom he/she was or had been in an intimate personal relationship, or b) a member of the same household as him- or herself 5. Date of Referral 6. Confirmation of line manager awareness: Yes/No Note: Agencies are reminded of the need to secure their files as soon as they become aware that a Domestic Homicide Review might take place

Appendix B DHR1A supplementary information to DHR1 Supplementary Information to Notification of a Domestic Homicide to the Chair of a Community Safety Partnership To be completed as soon as possible following identification of a domestic homicide by Suffolk Constabulary). 1. Referrer Name Email Phone No Designation Line Manager Phone No Email the completed DHR 1 to: the chair of the CSP and Lead Officer from the list below for the related area of the potential DHR Name Organisation Email address Joanna Spicer West Suffolk CSP Chair Joanna.Spicer@suffolk.gov.uk Steve Gallant & Marry Steve.Gallant@eastsuffolk.gov.uk East Suffolk CSP Chairs Rudd mary.rudd@waveney.gov.uk Alasdair Ross Ipswich CSP Chair Alasdair.Ross@councillors.ipswich.gov.uk Helen Lindfield St Edmundsbury and Forest Heath Suffolk CSP Lead Officer Helen.lindfield@westsuffolk.gov.uk Melanie Yolland Babergh and Mid Suffolk Melanie.Yolland@baberghmidsuffolk.gov.uk Julia Catterwell East Suffolk CSP Lead Officer Julia.Catterwell@eastsuffolk.gov.uk Ian Blofield Head of Housing & Community Services Ian.Blofield@ipswich.gov.uk Please also cc all the people below Name Name Name Eamon Bridger Suffolk Police, Detective Superintendent eamonn.bridger@suffolk.pnn.police.uk Abdul Razaq Sara Blake (to be updated) Clair Harvey Suffolk County Council, Director of Public Health Suffolk County Council, Head of Localities and Partnerships Suffolk County Council, Community Safety Manager abdul.razaq@suffolk.gov.uk sara.blake@suffolk.gov.uk clair.harvey@suffolk.gov.uk

BRIEF RESUME OF FACTS AND FAMILY COMPOSITION 2. Victim: Name of Victim Date of Birth Date of death Home address Gender Ethnic origin Nationality Disability Faith Sexual Orientation Whereabouts at time of death Suspected Perpetrator: Name of suspected perpetrator Date of Birth Home address Relationship to victim Gender Ethnic origin Nationality Disability Faith Sexual Orientation Arrested? Charged? In custody?

Brief Details of Incident: Family Composition/Significant Others: Name Relationship to victim Relationship to suspected perpetrator DoB Address Other comments 3. Other agencies Involved: Agency Contact Details Extent of involvement 4. Circumstances that triggered the notification The death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence, abuse or neglect by a) person to whom he/she was related or with whom he/she was or had been in an intimate personal relationship, or b) a member of the same household as him- or herself 5. Date of Referral 6. Confirmation of line manager awareness: Yes/No Note: Agencies are reminded of the need to secure their files as soon as they become aware that a Domestic Homicide Review might take place

Appendix C DHR 4 (To be completed by the Chair of the CSP) Completed by Chair of XXXXCSP Date:XXXXX. Following meetings with Advisory Panel colleagues in Suffolk, reviewing all available information in connection with the homicide of: Name/Address/Date of homicide. It is recommended that this case should be subject to a Domestic Homicide Review for the following reasons: - Reason should include outcome of Advisory Panel decision including any Police information in relation to the Homicide (victim(s)/perpetrator) These circumstances therefore satisfy the criteria that the death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence abuse or neglect by: a person to whom she was related or with whom she had been in an intimate personal relationship This decision will be notified to the Home Office in accordance with 4.6 of the Statutory Guidance. (A decision not to proceed with a Domestic Homicide Review could be overturned by the Secretary of State). The following agencies/professionals have been consulted: - Date Name Agency Suffolk County Council, Specialist Lead, Locality and Partnerships Team Suffolk Constabulary, Protecting Vulnerable People Directorate Suffolk County Council, Safeguarding Adults Manager Borough/District Councils, Community Safety Lead

Others as appropriate Legal advice has not been sought Signed: XXXXXXXXXXXX Chair of XXX CSP Dated: XXXXXXXXXXX

Appendix D This is potential DHR review group members here: