Document Version Index:

Similar documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITE DESCRIPTION NOISE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS...

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION... 2

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Appendix B Transportation Report

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR A FENCE PERMIT

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

South Street Campus Lands Development. City of London TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

2200 FIFTH STREET CONTINUED PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Traffic Calming Policy

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Appendix D: Concept Screening

2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

COUNTY ROAD 22 HORSESHOE VALLEY ROAD. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. simcoe.ca

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

Errata Date February 2016 Errata Edition Field. Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7 Field Edition (FE) - ERRATA

Bistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Troutbeck Farm Development

South Albion-Bolton Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

7 June 2018 OUR REF:

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division

Interstate Route 77 / US Route 62 / State Route 687 (Fulton Road) Transportation Improvement Project. Prepared September 6, 2017

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Carondelet High School Athletic Fields. Walnut Creek, CA

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Safety Assessment Grade Crossing. Executive Summary ENCLOSURE 1

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

REAR YARDS - There shall be a rear yard no less than forty (40) feet.

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Swimming Pool/Hot Tub Package

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Committed to Service

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

The effect of close proximity, low height barriers on railway noise

PEDESTRIAN FENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. For CHABAD LA JOLLA. Prepared for. Rabbi Baruch Ezagui. and. Edwin L. Laser, AIA. May 1, 2008

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Monroe County Department of Transportation Vertical Curve Safety Study

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES. Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts. Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC.

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

Railroad Inspection Procedure Manual

DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY BOULDER AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

APPENDIX R-2 VIBRATION AND OVERPRESSURE SOUND ASSESSMENT. RAINY RIVER PROJECT Final Environmental Assessment Report

Dundas. Plan Propose. ed North Northea Town

Joshua Jester, E.I., Florida Department of Transportation, District One

Appendix A: Safety Assessment

IOTA CAROL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

ARTICLE V - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN ESTATE RESIDENTIAL - A- SER

3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.

Transcription:

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 117-0082-100 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration Document Version Index: Version Date Description of Changes 1.0 May 25, 2017 Final - Issued to Client 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 117-0082-100 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................... 1 1.1 SITE........................................................... 1 1.2 CN HALTON SUBDIVISION........................................ 2 2.0 VIBRATION GUIDELINES................................................ 2 3.0 METHOD............................................................. 2 3.1 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS...................................... 2 3.2 TRANSDUCER PLACEMENT....................................... 3 3.3 DATA ACQUISITION.............................................. 3 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS................................................. 3 4.0 RESULTS............................................................ 3 5.0 SIMULTANEOUS RAIL PASS-BYS......................................... 4 6.0 CONCLUSIONS....................................................... 4 7.0 REFERENCES........................................................ 4 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF MEASURED OVERALL MAXIMUM VIBRATION VELOCITY MAGNITUDES OF CN FREIGHT TRAINS.......... 5 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 KEY PLAN CONCEPT PLAN CN RAILWAY VIBRATION MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A RAIL TRAFFIC CORRESPONDENCE APPENDIX B VIBRATION VELOCITY TIME HISTORIES RAILWAY TRAIN PASS-BYS 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration File: 117-0082-100 Page 1 Railway Vibration Study 5209 Stonehaven Drive Proposed Residential Development City of Burlington EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Valcoustics Canada Ltd. (VCL) has prepared this report in support of the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Re-zoning application for the proposed residential development on the south side of Dundas Street (municipally known as 5209 Stonehaven Drive) as well as for the Consent application for the 3-lot parcel on the east side of Orchard Road (municipally known as 2474 Sutton Drive) in the City of Burlington. This report addresses the potential vibration impact on the proposed residential development due to train movements on the Canadian National Railway (CN) Halton Subdivision. Ground-borne vibration velocities measured on-site April 28, 2017 at the locations of the closest proposed dwelling facades to the rail line did not exceed the Federation of Canadian Municipalities/Railway Association of Canada vibration guideline limit. Therefore, vibration mitigation measures are not required for this development. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Measurements of railway induced ground-borne vibration have been carried out to determine if vibration isolation of the proposed building foundations is warranted, relative to vibration guidelines recommended by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities/Railway Association of Canada (FCM/RAC). 1.1 SITE The site consists of two parcels: a larger parcel (5209 Stonehaven Drive) located at the southeast corner of Dundas Street and the CN Railways Halton Subdivision consisting of 10 detached lots and one 8-unit townhouse block; and a smaller parcel (2474 Sutton Drive) on the east side of Orchard Road consisting of three detached lots. The larger portion of the site is surrounded by: the CN rail line, with an existing fitness facility (gym) and other retail/commercial uses beyond, to the west; 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration File: 117-0082-100 Page 2 Dundas Street, with existing industrial and commercial uses beyond, to the north; a proposed public park, with an existing school (John William Boich Public School) to the east; and existing residential uses to the south. The smaller portion of the site is located southeast of the larger portion, to the southeast of the proposed park, and is an extension of the existing dwellings located on the east side of Orchard Road. Figure 1 shows a key plan. On the west side of the site, adjacent to the CN rail line, there is an existing 3 m high sound barrier atop the 2.5 m high rail safety berm. The concept plan also shows the locations of proposed sound barriers. The assessment is based on the Concept Plan (Concept A1) prepared by IBI Group dated May 23, 2017. Figure 2 shows the Concept Plan in reduced form. 1.2 CN HALTON SUBDIVISION The CN Halton Subdivision is classified as a Principal Main Line. Rail activity includes freight traffic only. Information provided by CN Engineering Services indicates the railway line consists of a double mainline track and is continuously welded rail in the vicinity of the site. The grade of Dundas Street is elevated relative to the railway line, as there is an underpass for the railway. Note, the traffic data provided by CN shows volumes in terms of eastbound and westbound. However, in the vicinity of the site the CN tracks are oriented more towards the north and south directions. For ease of reference in this report relative to the figures and consistency of the on-site observations, the northbound and southbound directions have been used. Rail traffic data correspondence are included as Appendix A. 2.0 VIBRATION GUIDELINES At the present time, there are no railway vibration guidelines in the land use approvals process in Ontario. However, in May 2013, the FCM and the RAC jointly released "Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations". The FCM/RAC guideline recommends a maximum vibration threshold of 0.14 mm/sec root-mean-square (RMS) (using a one second averaging time) between 4 Hz and 200 Hz. It is understood that CN has adopted the use of this guideline. Thus, the FCM/RAC guideline limit has been applied to the railway vibration analysis in this study. 3.0 METHOD 3.1 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS Vibration measurements were done at three locations and are labelled as Locations 1, 2 and 3 on Figure 3. 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration File: 117-0082-100 Page 3 Location 1 was approximately 30 m east from the CN right-of-way, 15 m from the existing acoustic fence atop the safety berm. Location 1, represents the first row of dwellings with the closest proposed building facades to the rail line. Locations 2 and 3 were located approximately 40 m and 55 m from the CN right-of-way, respectively, and were used to determine the vibration decay on the site and vibration magnitudes at dwellings located beyond the first row. 3.2 TRANSDUCER PLACEMENT An accelerometer was used at each location to measure the ground-borne vibration generated by the train pass-bys. The accelerometer was securely mounted with a stud, onto the top surface of a heavy metal plate and placed on the existing ground at-grade. 3.3 DATA ACQUISITION A total of six railway movements (all freight trains) were monitored on April 28, 2017. Simultaneous recordings of the vibration signals were made at Locations 1, 2 and 3 for train pass-bys #2 to #5. Vibration monitoring for pass-bys #1 and #6 were made at Location 1 only. The vertical axis signal from each accelerometer was recorded digitally, using an NI Sound and Vibration Assistant data acquisition and analysis system, and integrated from the measured acceleration to obtain the vibration velocity, in mm/s. The accelerometers were calibrated prior to measurements with a Metra Meâ-und Frequenztechnik (MMF) vibration calibrator, model: VC20. 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS Time histories of the overall integrated vibration velocity produced by each train pass-by were plotted using an RMS averaging time constant of one second. The analysis procedure conforms with the guidelines recommended by FCM/RAC. 4.0 RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the maximum, measured, overall vibration velocity for each train pass-by, together with the train details. Appendix B contains recorded time histories for the railway trains at each measurement location. The train pass-bys produced maximum vibration velocity magnitudes ranging from: 0.02 to 0.04 mm/s at Locations 1 and 2; and 0.01 to 0.03 mm/s at Location 3. The overall vibration velocity magnitudes reported are the maximum (one second RMS averaging) that occurred for the duration of each individual pass-by. The measured ground-borne vibration velocities on the site, a locations representing the proposed dwelling locations, were below the FCM/RAC guideline limit. Thus, vibration mitigation is not required for any dwelling on the site. 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration File: 117-0082-100 Page 4 Note, the above conclusion is based on the dwelling locations as shown on Figure 3. If the site concept is altered and dwellings are to be located closer than 30 m to the rail right-of-way, the assessment should be reviewed. 5.0 SIMULTANEOUS RAIL PASS-BYS There are two railway tracks in the vicinity of the site. However, the tracks merge to one at the bridge crossing over the creek, about 1 km north of the site (just south of Highway 407). Thus, it is unlikely that two simultaneous train pass-bys would occur opposite the site. If by chance there were two trains opposite the site at the same time, one of the trains would likely need to be stopped to let the other pass through. Notwithstanding the above, the passing of two simultaneous trains at speed would not be expected to create any significant vibration impact at the site. In the worst case, simultaneously pass-bys could result in vibration levels being 3 db (or less) higher than any of the vibration levels measured on site from a single train pass-by. Accounting for this, the resulting vibration would still be below the FCM/RAC limit. See Table 1. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The maximum overall ground-borne vibration velocities measured on site at the locations of the closest proposed dwellings to the adjacent CN railway line were below the vibration guideline limit suggested by FCM/RAC. Therefore, vibration mitigation measures are not required for this development. 7.0 REFERENCES 1. Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations, prepared for The Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Railway Association of Canada, May 2013. RL\ML\tk J:\2017\1170082\100\Reports\Vibration\5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington - Railway Vibration V1_0.wpd 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration File: 117-0082-100 Page 5 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF MEASURED OVERALL MAXIMUM VIBRATION VELOCITY MAGNITUDES OF CN FREIGHT TRAINS Measurement Date: 2017-04-28 Pass-by # Time/Period Estimated speed (kph) Train Details # of Locos # of Cars Maximum Vibration Velocity (1) (mm/s) (# in brackets is db re: 1 microinch/sec) at Locations (2) Vibration Guideline Limit Velocity (1) (mm/s) (# in brackets is db re: 1 microinch/sec) Complies with Limit Direction 1 2 3 (Yes/No) 1 10:50 10:56 30 3 100+ Northbound 0.02 (58) Yes 2 12:28 12:38 20 2 100+ Northbound 0.02 (58) 0.02 (58) 0.01 (52) Yes 3 12:44 12:48 50 2 100+ Southbound 4 13:56 13:59 60 2 100+ Southbound 0.02 (58) 0.03 (62) 0.04 (64) 0.04 (64) 0.02 (58) 0.03 (62) 0.14 (75) Yes Yes 5 14:40 14:41 70 2 13 Northbound 0.03 (62) 0.03 (62) 0.02 (58) Yes 6 17:11 17:12 60 2 6 Southbound 0.04 (64) Yes Notes: (1) Maximum overall vibration velocity occurring for the entire pass-by; one second RMS averaging. (2) See Figure 3. 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

596600 596700 596800 596900 597000 597100 597200 597100 597200 4807500 4807500 4807600 596500 4807600 596400 4807400 4807400 Forterra Brick 4807300 4807300 Carwash 4807100 SUBJECT SITE OR CH AR D RO AD D BIR 4806900 ST ON EH AV E N DR IVE LA Fitness 4807000 4807100 4807000 DR IV E John William Boich Public School Dufferin Custom Concrete 4806900 N 4807200 4807200 SU TT O BO ULE VAR D.R e dlif Goo ess Fitn N C. Existing Commercial 4806800 4806800. 4806600 AP PL EB Y 596400 E:\AA\1170082\Cadna\Stonehaven.cna 596500 LI NE 596600 4806700 4806600 4806700 Existing Commercial (Fortinos) Existing Commercial 596700 596800 596900 597000 Title Date Key Plan 2017-05-15 Project Name Project No. 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington - Vibration 117-0082-100 Figure 1 Date Plotted: 15.05.17

Legend 596780 596800 596820 596840 596860 596880 596900 596920 596940 596960 596980 597000 Measurement Location Extent of Dundas St. Road Widening 4807000 4807020 4807040 4807060 3.0 m High Sound Barrier on 2.5 m High Berm 5 6 2.5 m High Sound Barrier 7 Location 3 8 9 PARK 11 12 13 ORCHARD RD 1.8 m High Sound Barrier 4807060 4807040 4807000 4807020 4806980 4806960 4806940 3.5 m High Sound Barrier 4 1 2 3 Location 2 Location 1 10 TOWNHOUSE BLOCK STONEHAVEN DR 4806980 Existing 3 m High Sound Barrier on 2.5 m High Berm C. N. R. BIRD BLVD 4806860 4806860 4806880 4806880 4806900 4806900 4806920 4806920 4807080 4807080 4806960 4806940 4807100 4807120 4807140 4807100 4807120 4807140 596780 596800 596820 596840 596860 596880 596900 596920 596940 596960 596980 597000 Title CN Railway Vibration Measurement Locations Project Name 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington - Vibration Date 2017-05-25 Project No. 117-0082-100 Figure 3 \\10.7.11.12\Jobs\2017\1170082\100\Reports\Vibration\For V1_0\Figure 3 - Stonehaven Measurement Locations_2017-05-25.cna Date Plotted: 25.05.17

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 117-0082-100 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration APPENDIX A RAIL TRAFFIC CORRESPONDENCE 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 117-0082-100 5209 Stonehaven Drive/Burlington Railway Vibration APPENDIX B VIBRATION VELOCITY TIME HISTORIES RAILWAY TRAIN PASS-BYS 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223/E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #1 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 10:50 10:56 Northbound 0.02 Appendix B 1

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #2 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 12:28 12:38 Northbound 0.02 2 12:28 12:38 Northbound 0.02 3 12:28 12:38 Northbound 0.01 Appendix B 2

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #3 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 12:44 12:48 Southbound 0.02 2 12:44 12:48 Southbound 0.04 3 12:44 12:48 Southbound 0.02 Appendix B 3

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #4 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 13:56 13:59 Southbound 0.03 2 13:56 13:59 Southbound 0.04 3 13:56 13:59 Southbound 0.03 Appendix B 4

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #5 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 14:40 14:41 Northbound 0.03 2 14:40 14:41 Northbound 0.03 3 14:40 14:41 Northbound 0.02 Appendix B 5

5209 Stonehaven Drive, Burlington CN Railway Vibration 117-0082-100 Date of Measurement: 2017-04-28 CN Freight Pass-by #6 Overall Vibration Velocity 1 17:11 17:12 Southbound 0.04 Appendix B 6