Cob Flies, Megaselia spp. (Diptera: Phoridae), in Sweet Corn 1

Similar documents
Identifying Some Pest and Beneficial Insects on Your Sticky Cards

Your Name Your Parent s Name Your Mailing Address Age Grade in School Name of School Number of Years in Rabbit Project Number of Years in 4-H Name of

Identifying Some Pest and Beneficial Insects on Your Sticky Cards Leanne Pundt UConn Extension

TOC. INDEX Stable Fly Management for Feedlot Cattle. Douglas D. Colwell. Take Home Message. Introduction

Identifying Moths in Traps for Sweet Corn Pests

Inheritance of Leaf Shape and Main Vein Color in Caladium 1

Field Evaluation of a Novel Lure for Trapping Seedcorn Maggot Adults

Third Grade Manatee Curriculum Lesson 12: Pollution and Other Threats to Manatees 1

Stonefly. Gilled Snails

Field Evaluations of Insecticide Modes of Action Classes for Control of Horn Flies in Nebraska

Walk Through Trap to Control Horn Flies on Cattle

What is an insect? An insect is an invertebrate (an animal with no spine) that has three pairs of legs and three

Reducing Fly Populations on Pastured Cattle in Nebraska David Boxler, UNL, North Platte, NE

4-H INSECT PROJECT. Some manuals are used more than one year. An additional copy will cost $1.00.

Point Rating: 3 Size: 10 mm Description: Caddisfly larvae are builders. They make sticky silk from their spit and use it to spin webs for trapping

Grading Ornamental Fish 1

Cylicocyclus spp. Walls of the Buccal Capsule:

IPM Fun with Insects, Weeds and the Environment. Lesson #2 Insect IPM. The New York State Integrated Pest Management Program

Description of the Immature Stages of Galindomyia leei Stone and Barreto, 1969l. Abdiel J. Adames* and Pedro Galindo*

Longnose Skate Raja rhina

Water Hammer In Irrigation Systems 1

Fig. 3 D. rufipes sternite 8 from Fig. 1. D. confusa apex of. Fig. 2 D. rufipes apex behind abdomen showing surstyli.

ADM Alliance Nutrition. IGR & 4X Products. ADM Alliance Nutrition

The Hessian Fly. in Oregon L. P. ROCKWOOD

Slide 1. Slide 1. Next. 5:30:08 AM

Cotton Comments OSU Southwest Oklahoma Research and Extension Center Altus, OK

CULTURE Dr. Gary C. Pavlis, Ph.D. Atlantic County Agricultural Agent

Coronis Fritillary Field Identification: Reference Guide

Report of Progress 895

E-208 5/04. Jeffery K. Tomberlin*

House fly, Musca domestica Linnaeus 1

EFFICACY OF EAR TAGS FOR HORN FLY CONTROL IN TEXAS Ben Walker Cooperator Barry Watson Cooperator

Instructions: CLASSIFY ANIMALS AS BLOOD FEEDERS OR NON-BLOODFEEDERS 1. Take out the ADULT CARDS, and place them on the correct boxes 2.

Paulding Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Sale Guide

Photo: Gevork Arakelian, LA County entomologist, bugwood.org # Bagrada Bug (Bagrada hilaris)

Fly Control in Caged Layer Buildings

Which fish is for which state?

Contribution to the morphology of the third-instar larvae of Laccophilus poecilus KLUG (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)

A NEW SPECIES OF COPTODISCA (HELIOZELIDAE) FROM MISSISSIPPI ON FARKLEBERRY (VACCINIUM ARBOREUM) J. D. LAFONTAINE

Entomology in Action: The Steven Truscott Case:

Forensic Entomology. Insect Life Cycles & Development

Chapter 12 Part 2. The Worms Platyhelminthes, Nematoda & Annelida

Comparison of Two Yellow Sticky Traps for Capture of Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Rhagoletis indifferens) in Tart Cherry in Northern Utah 2015

Harvesting Ornamental Fish From Ponds 1

Student Handout #2 Using Abiotic and Biotic Parameters to Monitor Water Quality: A Field Experiment

Hester-Dendy Sampling Method Leaf Bag Sampling Method D-Net Sampling Method

Development and Management of Bulls 1

Body Sections. Write each one on its proper box. Head Thorax Abdomen Antennae Six legs. How many sections or parts do the insects have?

Archival copy: for current recommendations see or your local extension office. Made for Eating! 1

Using Traps to Monitor Blueberry Fruit Fly in New Hampshire

What happened to Porky?

EXPERT GUIDANCE. IMPERATIVE CONTROL. The Gentrol family of products offers an indispensable, proven arsenal that reduces call-backs.

Parasitic wasps for Silverleaf whitefly control in vegetable crops

Using and Constructing a Classification Key Adapted from Prentice Hall Lab 29. Pre-Lab Discussion

Mountain Goat Gender Identification Guide

Cattle Breeds. Crystal Fincher Putnam County 4-H Agent

FLY CONTROL. -on the Farm he Home ~GRICULTURE LIBRA Y. CIRGuLAXIf4~CQP AGRICULTURE LIBR CIRCULATING C

272 Short-eared Owl. SHORT-EARED OWL (Asio flammeus) SEXING IDENTIFICATION

Making the Most of Your Monitoring Using Macroinvertebrates

Recognizing the healthy horse. Keep in mind. Beginning an examination. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

IPM Fun with Insects, Weeds and the Environment. Lesson #2 Insect IPM. The New York State Integrated Pest Management Program

Thresher Shark Alopias vulpinus

Bison Identification Guide and Quiz

Blood Sucking Insects

PRACTICAL 16 FAMILIARIZATION WITH ENEMIES OF HONEY BEES AND THEIR CONTROL

The Varroa Bee Mite 1

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

THE MAGNOLIA SCALE (NEOLECANIUM CORNUPARVUM THRO.).

Animal Science Info Series: AS-B-226 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Comparison of the reproductive ability of varroa mites in worker and drone brood of Africanized Honey Bees

External Parasites of Horses

Genetic Experiments with Drosophila Modified from CBSC: Carolina Drosophila Manual

ANGLER S GUIDE TO FLORIDA SHARKS OF THE GULF OF MEXICO

Learning to identify a common cause of winter death in Northern Climates

LABORATORY 7: GENETICS OF ORGANISMS

Hardin County 4-H Bottle/Bucket Calf Record 4-H er Name: Club: Grade:

A NEW ERADICATION STRATEGY FOR SMALL, REMOTE GYPSY MOTH INFESTATIONS

Water Snail Class Gastropoda

Screening Aid. Tomato Fruit Borers. Hanna R. Royals 1, Todd M. Gilligan 1 and Steven C. Passoa 2

flies BASF Pest Control Solutions The Evolution of Better Pest Control

1*1 Agriculture. Canada. Publication 1881/E. Insects. infesting seed alfalfa. in the Prairie Provinces. a field guide

Brevard County, FL 4-H Junior and Intermediate Horse Project Record Book

Introducing the Read-Aloud

Beekeeping PARASITIC MITES OF HONEY BEES. Greg Hunt, Bee Specialist, Purdue University

Beekeeping in Coastal California. January

Aquatic Insects. Dayton Steelman Northwest Arkansas Master Naturalist

The Leopard Frogs of New Jersey

GYPSY MOTH (LYMANTRIA DISPAR) TRAPPING & TREATMENTS IN MINNESOTA 2012 UPDATE

Varroa Mites. Diagnose the disease first then diagnose the problem with the Honey Bee. Where can You find Varroa Mites?

Cockroach Control Protocol

EQUINE PARASITE CONTROL

THE MGK GUIDE TO COCKROACHES PREVENT. CONTROL. ELIMINATE.

Figure 1: Life stages of the house fly. (Photo courtesy Clemson University.) Figure 2: Black blow fly

fathead minnows Anna Field Brookfield Central High School

Managing Burrowing Mammals

Evaluation of Insecticide Effects on Biology of Cherry Fruit Fly. Various homeowners in Tri-Cities and Yakima, WA

Class XI Chapter 4 Animal Kingdom Biology

Managing Crane Flies on Turf

Insect Identification Flash Cards INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. Kindergarten & Grade 1 Curriculum Z Z I I R

Archival copy: for current recommendations see or your local extension office.

Transcription:

ENY-754 Cob Flies, Megaselia spp. (Diptera: Phoridae), in Sweet Corn 1 David Owens, Gregg S. Nuessly, Robert Beiriger, and Nicholas Larsen 2 Introduction Phorid flies (Diptera), also known as humpback flies or scuttle flies for their appearance and behavior, are an extremely diverse group of flies that are saprophagous (feed on decaying organic matter), parasitic, or phytophagous (feed on plants). Within the Phoridae family, the genus Megaselia is also extremely diverse, with more than 1400 described species, many very similar in appearance. The name cob fly was given to a Megaselia spp. that attacked corn in Texas (Walter and Wene 1951). To date, only one described species (Megaselia seticauda Malloch) has been observed to damage sweet corn. This species was originally identified as the ubiquitous saprophagous fly Megaselia scalaris, but was later correctly identified as M. seticauda (CDFA 1996). Geographical Distribution Megaselia seticauda was first collected in Costa Rica from an area cleared for pasture, corn, and potatoes (Cresson and Malloch 1914). There are reports of damage to immature green corn ears from Texas (1944), Mexico (1942), and Ecuador (1954). It has been collected in Brazil (1962), and it was detected in California in 1996 (Walter and Wene 1951, Borgmeier 1962, CDFA 1996). In Texas, M. seticauda was found in a few corn ears in 1944, but by 1950, fields that were not treated with DDT for corn earworm were severely infested with both M. seticauda and the silk fly Euxesta stigmatias (Diptera: Ulidiidae). Larvae of both E. stigmatias and M. seticauda were reported as being relatively unaffected by DDT spray residues, leading to the recommendation to treat adults (Walter and Wene 1951). In Florida, a Megaselia spp., possibly M. seticauda, has sporadically been found over the last 8 years in sweet and field corn ears that were not protected by insecticides and were grown during the late spring dry and summer rainy seasons. In early April 2016, ears of early-silking sweet corn in a variety trial at the UF/IFAS Everglades Research and Education Center in, were heavily damaged by phorid larvae. The field had low silk fly populations and was treated only once when all ears had begun silking with an organophosphate insecticide. These phorid larvae feed on silks, cobs, and kernels as do silk flies, but phorid larvae develop faster and cause damage quicker than silk fly. When observed in a field immediately before silking, these phorids should be regarded as an economic concern, and this document was written with the intent of helping crop consultants identify this fly. The following information is based on our field and laboratory observations of live immature and adult stages of this fly species. There are very little data on the economics, population dynamics, seasonality, or insecticide susceptibility of corn-infesting Megaselia spp. More research is needed to improve our understanding of how this fly impacts Florida sweet corn production. 1. This document is ENY-754, one of a series of the Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 2016. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. David Owens, graduate research assistant; Gregg S. Nuessly, professor and center director; Robert Beiriger, sr. biological scientist, plant breeding; and Nicholas Larsen, senior biological scientist; Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Everglades Research and Education Center, 3200 E. Palm Beach Rd., 33430. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county s UF/IFAS Extension office. U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.

Distinguishing Cob Fly from Similar Corn Ear Pests Egg Dozens of cob fly eggs are deposited in the silks at tip of corn husks. There have been reports of fly eggs deposited on husk leaves before silks emerge; these may be either cob fly or silk fly eggs. Larvae In ears of corn, larvae of phorids can be distinguished from larvae of silk flies by the tapering shape of the posterior abdomen (Figure 1). In contrast, silk fly larval abdomens terminate bluntly, and two dark-colored, peg-like spiracular (breathing tube opening) plates can be easily seen at the end of the abdomen (https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in381). These spiracular plates are not present in cob fly larvae. Phorids retain their white coloration throughout the larval stage, while silk flies darken to a yellow color in the third instar. When disturbed, silk fly larvae will grab their spiracular plates with their mouth hooks on the head, flex, and jump several centimeters. Phorid larvae do not exhibit this behavior. and destroys them before reaching the ear tip (Figures 2 and 3). Larvae develop and damage silks quickly enough to interfere with pollination. Once they reach the ear, larvae feed on the cob and developing kernels at the tip (Figures 4 and 5). Cob flies leave the ear 10 14 days after first silk, usually before blister stage, by leaving a visible shiny mucous trail on the drying silks (Figure 6). For comparison, silk fly larvae are still developing in the ear until the ear is in milk stage and ready for harvest. Silk flies require 12 19 days from oviposition to mature and leave the ear. Silk flies also do not leave a mucous trail when they exit ears. In April 2016, cob fly damage was also observed on ears and tassels of plants that developed as suckers from the main plant, as well as on secondary and tertiary ears beneath the primary ear on the main shoots. Figure 2. A cluster of phorid larvae (5 visible) feeding on the silks at the entrance to the silk channel. Brown discoloration of the silks caused by phorid larvae feeding. Figure 1. Two phorid larvae. The posterior end (pointing up) is tapered and spiracles cannot be easily observed as they are with silk fly. Mucous trail of larvae is visible on the cloth beneath the larvae. When the larvae emerge from the eggs, they quickly enter the ear to feed on silks, cob, and kernels. Cob fly larvae can be observed as a larval mass that feeds through the silks Figure 3. Dozens of phorid larvae that have destroyed the silk channel. Note the white, tapered posterior of the phorid larva in the right third of the picture. 2

Pupae Most cob fly larvae leave the ear at the end of larval development (end of the 3rd instar) and pupate in shallow soil. Occasionally, pupae can be found in the dried silks or rarely between kernels in the ear. Pupae are light brown, somewhat triangular and noticeably flattened, with ridges across the surface. Two narrow, black respiratory horns are prominently displayed on the posterior end (Figure 7). Silk fly pupae, which are reddish brown, elongate, cylindrical, and only slightly flattened with the anterior end tapered to a blunt point, are easily separated from these phorid pupae. Silk fly pupae have large black oval spiracles at the posterior end. We do not currently know how long pupal development requires in the field. Figure 4. Cob fly larva feeding between two kernels at the tip of an ear. Note the white, tapered posterior. Figure 5. Cob fly larvae feeding within kernel and surrounding flydamaged kernels. Center, Figure 7. A cob fly pupa with head end upward in a sweet corn ear at harvest. Pupae are light brown, somewhat triangular in side profile, and ridged. Two narrow, black respiratory horns project outward from the posterior third of the pupae. Adult Figure 6. Shiny, white mucous trails left behind as cob fly maggots leave the ear. These trails are not produced by silk flies (Euxesta or Chaetopsis spp.). Center, Adult cob flies are 2 3 mm in length, about half the length of silk flies (4 7 mm). Adult phorids are light brown with dark brown to black markings on the dorsal side of the abdomen. Hind femurs have a dark pigmentation at the end. These corn-feeding phorids have no dark bands across their wings, further distinguishing themselves from silk flies. Phorid wing venation is very distinct, with heavy veins curving to meet the wing margin about half way between the wing tip and the body. Smaller, lighter veins radiate out from the thick veins. The head is small and has large, black bristles (Figures 8 and 9). Phorid flies have a very distinctive locomotion. They move very quickly in a herky-jerky fashion characterized by short, rapid running, a pause, a turn, and more short, rapid running. 3

infested with phorid larvae frequently display pollination disruption with the top 25 to 50% of the cob bare of kernels at harvest (Figure 12). Because larvae develop faster and leave the ear earlier than silk fly, it is possible that phorids are partly responsible for the damage often attributed to silk fly. Figure 8. Female (left) and male (right) cob fly adults reared from infested ears. Note dark pattern on upper surface of the abdomens, strong bristles on the heads, and absence of dark wing bands. There is also a dark spot at the end of femurs on the hind (third) legs. Wing venation with thickened veins on the anterior margin is characteristic for the family. Bars above flies are 1 mm apart. Figure 10. Silk damage at the tip of a phorid-infested ear. Figure 11. An ear with extensive cob fly larval damage to the silks, kernels and cob. Larvae have exited the ear to complete development. Figure 9. A gravid female cob fly moving rapidly among healthy, undamaged silks during the oviposition process. Note dark brown pattern on dorsal suface of abdomen. Damage This fly has been observed damaging field and sweet corn in the summer in small untreated corn plots at the UF/IFAS Everglades Research and Education Center. However, in 2016, cob fly larvae appeared in early April, considerably earlier than previously observed. Cob fly damage was widespread to ears of early varieties less than 7 days after first silk. Damaged silk tissue is reddish brown to brown (Figure 10). Heavily damaged silk appears wet and slimy and may be a site of secondary infection by pathogens. Severe tip damage can occur on ears that are still at least one week to ten days from harvest (Figure 11). Large populations and heavy damage occurred in another experimental field less than 5 days after first silk at the end of May. Field corn ears Figure 12. Field corn ears at harvest with exposed cobs showing poor pollination resulting from cob fly larval damage to silks. Center, 4

Management Scouting corn for cob flies should begin at tassel-push (as the tassel emerges from the plant at the beginning of the reproductive stage). Treatment may be justified prior to first silk or as early as ear shoot emergence, if phorids adults are present. Experimental fields at UF/IFAS EREC that received multiple insecticide applications per week for silk fly control had reduced cob fly damage. Therefore, contact insecticides used for silk fly management may provide cob fly control. Bioassays to evaluate insecticide efficacy against cob flies have not yet been performed. Contact the authors or your local UF/IFAS Extension agent if you think you have cob flies in your corn so that more data can be collected on these flies. References Borgmeier, T. 1962. Versuch einer Uebersicht euber die neotropischen Megaselia-Arten, sowie neue oder wenig bekannte Phoriden verschiedener Gattungen (Dipt. Phoridae). Studia Ent. Petropolis 5: 289 488. California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). 1996. California plant pest and disease report, v 15: 150 181. Ed. R. J. Gill. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/ppd/pdf/ CPPDR_1996_15_5-6.pdf. Verified 22 April 2016. Cresson, E. T., Jr., and J. R. Malloch. 1914. Costa Rican Diptera collected by Philip P. Calvert, Ph.D., 1909 1910. A partial report on the Borboridae, Phoridae, and Agromyzidae. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 40: 1 36. Walter, E. V., and G. P. Wene. 1951. Tests of insecticides to control larvae of Euxesta stigmatias and Megaselia scalaris. J. Econ. Entomol. 44: 998 999. 5