Similar documents
NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

What Is a Complete Street?

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

This page intentionally left blank.

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Merrick and Memorial Neighborhood Study 5/14/2014 Public Meeting

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Bicycle Facilities Planning

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

THE PHILADELPHIA COMPLETE. an overview

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Living Streets Policy

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Bicycle + Pedestrian Connectivity Gap Analysis

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

This page intentionally left blank.

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

10/30/2012 VIA

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

Transportation Planning Division

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

Planning Regionally With Transit

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Building Great Neighbourhoods LANSDOWNE

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

Chapter 10: Pedestrian Facility Design. ACCESS MINNEAPOLIS Design Guidelines for Streets & Sidewalks

WELCOME. Thank you for joining us at the Second Public Workshop for the Carlsbad Pedestrian Master Plan. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

This page intentionally left blank.

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Complete Streets Funding Program Project Prioritization Plan

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Lawrence Avenue Streetscape Concepts August 30, 2011

WELCOME. Purpose of the Open House. Update you on the project. Present a draft recommended plan. Receive your input

Transcription:

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia The City of Philadelphia's Complete Streets policies are designed ensure that city streets are safe, comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities, whether they travel by car, bus, train, bike, or foot (see 11-901 of The Philadelphia Code). The Complete Streets Checklist is an implementation ol of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the Handbook ) and enables City engineers and planners review projects for compliance with the Handbook s design guidance. The Handbook does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, PennDOT Standards, or the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The Philadelphia City Planning Commission reviews and comments on preliminary Complete Streets Checklists as part of the Civic Design Review (CDR) process. The Philadelphia Streets Department must then approve a final Complete Streets Checklist, during final review, prior the issuance of a building permit by the Department of Licenses and Inspections. Approval of Complete Streets checklists occurs concurrently with approval of design plans. The Complete Streets Checklists required of projects not going through CRD are reviewed solely by the Streets Department as part of Plan and/or Project Review. Preliminary Planning Commission Review and Comment Comments: Date: Final Streets Department Review and Approval Approval: Date:

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia Project Name: Proposed Mixed Use Development PROJECT INFORMATION (PLEASE PRINT) Contact Person: Tina First Middle Last Roberts Suffix Address (include State Route Numbers): 1001-29 S. Broad Street, City and County of Philadelphia 19147 Additional Street Frontages (include State Route Numbers): Washingn Ave, 13 th Street, Carp Street Project Limits: On Street From Street To Street First Tina OWNER INFORMATION (PLEASE PRINT) Middle Last Roberts Suffix Company or Agency Name: Tower Investments, Inc. Address: 817 N. 3 rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123 Phone#: ( 215 ) 467-4600 ext. 105 Fax#: ( ) - Company: Tower Investments, Inc. Email: tinaroberts@werdev.com First Robert DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD (PLEASE PRINT) Middle Last Irons Suffix Company or Agency Name: Bohler Engineering Address: 1515 Market Street, Suite 920, Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone#: ( 267 ) 402-3400 ext. Fax#: ( ) - Company: Bohler Engineering Email: rirons@bohlereng.com Relationship Owner: Consultant Pennsylvania License Number: PE048804R Profession: Engineer Page 2 of 12 Jan-2015

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia COMPLETE STREETS TRIGGERS Trigger names are in italics for later reference Are you proposing Large Curb Cuts (greater than 24 feet wide)? Does this project propose the creation of a Lay-by Lane? Does the project propose Narrow Walking Zones (does not meet minimum walking zone requirements)? Is project subject Civic Design Review, as required by the Zoning Code? Have you been requested, or are you required, submit a Traffic Impact Study per PennDOT thresholds? Answer yes for all sites expected generate any of the following: 3,000 trips/day (1,500 vehicles/day), 100 trips/peak hour (ing), 100 trips/peak hour (exiting), 100 additional trips/peak hour (ing and exiting a redevelopment site), or as required by the Streets Department or other City agencies (applies all city and state routes). Does this project impact a Signalized Intersection? Is this a Capital Project (City of Philadelphia) involving a City Plan Action? Is this a Philadelphia Streets Department Project? No No No No No PLAN REQUIREMENTS CDR Projects Only: Planning Commission Review Submit separate Existing Features Survey and Currently Proposed Features Site Plans o Full sized plans, dimensioned at an identified standard engineering scale o Curb cut/driveways/lay-by lanes o Tree pits, landscaping o Bicycle racks/bike share stations/bike srage areas o Transit shelters/stairways Include additional sheets or plans, as may be required All Projects: Final Streets Department Submission Requirements All plans submitted the Streets Department, Right of Way Unit, will conform the current plan review standards, as published separately on the cusmer service page: http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/cusmer-service/downloads-andlinks Any project that changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. An application the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes create a new street/utility right of way, or remove an existing street/utility right of way, change the roadway grades, curb lines, or widths. Page 3 of 12 Jan-2015

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia STREETS List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map under the Complete Street Types field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook. Attach additional sheets as needed. Street From Street To Street Complete Street Type Broad St. Carp St. Washingn Ave. Civic/Ceremonial Washingn Ave. Broad St. South 13 th St. Urban arterial South 13 th St. Washingn Ave. Carp St. City neighborhood Carp St. Broad St. South 13 th St. Local EXISTING CONDITIONS Do the plans clearly identify the following EXISTING conditions, with dimensions? Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent the site? Street Direction Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc. Building Extensions in the sidewalk, such as stairs and sops Not Applicable Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. Curb Cuts/Driveways and Lay By Lanes (List All Below) Type Width (Curb Cut or Lay-By) Location Curb Cut 23.30 Washingn Ave., 134.47 from Broad St. Lay-By 481.36 Washingn Ave. Curb Cut 25.75 Carp St., 210.90 from 13 th St. Page 4 of 12 Jan-2015

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia PROPOSED CONDITIONS (General) Do the plans clearly identify the following PROPOSED conditions, with dimensions? Parking lanes and loading zones Street Direction Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc. Building extensions in the sidewalk, such as stairs and sops Not Applicable Sidewalks and corner curb ramps, complying with current City, PennDOT, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards (subject separate Streets Department approval). Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations w the Minimum Walking Zone width (next page) is less than required, or requires an exception. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation requirements? See sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8 for guidance. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at intersections? Identify proposed high priority building and furnishing zone design treatments that are incorporated in the design plan, w width permits. High Priority Complete Streets treatments (see Handbook) must be shown and dimensioned on plans. Bicycle Parking Street Lighting Street Trees Street Furniture (Ordinance of City Council may be Required) Benches (Ordinance of City Council may be Required) Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)? No No Curb Cuts/Driveways and Lay By Lanes (List All Below) Type (Curb Cut or Lay-By) Width Location Curb Cut 24 Washingn Ave., 85.7 from 13 th St. Curb Cut 24 Carp St., 229.9 from Broad St. Curb Cut 24 Carp St., 80.7 from 13 th St. Lay-by 278 Washingn Ave Lay-by 180 13 th Street Lay-by 273 Carp Street Page 5 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia How does the overall design create or enhance a pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for all pedestrians at all times of the day? See guidance below. Attach separate sheets, as needed. Buildings are accessible along street fronts for pedestrians as well as from the parking garage within the site. Street lighting is proposed along Washingn, 13 th and Carp streets and minimum walking zones are provided along each street provide a safe environment for pedestrians. Also, curb ramps at each intersection will be replaced w necessary provide ADA compliant ramps. Guidance: Any project that calls for the development and installation of green srmwater infrastructure, medians, lay-by lanes, curb bump-outs, pedestrian bridges, tunnels, or other such features in the right-of-way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department, prior approval. Be sure include a PWD Work Number for Green Streets projects, w permanent maintenance responsibilities for green infrastructure will be by the Philadelphia Water Department. Page 6 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia SIDEWALKS (Handbook Section 4.3 & 4.4) (All dimensions in feet) City Minimum Actual Sidewalk Plan Furnishing Width Width Zone Minimum Walking Zone Maximum Building Zone Street Frontage Required Existing Proposed As Designated Recommended Existing Proposed Required Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Broad St. Washingn Ave. 20 22.5 22.5 22 5 6.66 6 10 15.2 16 N/A N/A 12 12.72 12.9 8 4 4 4 6 8.17 6 N/A N/A 13 th St. Carp St. 12 13.17 12 12 4 4.31 4 6 8.92 6 N/A N/A 10 12.88 12.6 12 3.5 4.59 4 5 8.26 7 N/A N/A Clic k ente r Clic k ente r Clic k ente r Clic k ente r Page 7 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia Justify all pinch points, w the minimum walking zone cannot be maintained. Also list proposed improvements necessary compensate for each pinch point (e.g., accommodate passing). Attach separate sheets, as needed. N/A; the minimum walking zone is provided along each street. Planning Commission Review Comments: All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Complete Streets Handbook). STOP: Applications with only the following triggers: Large Curb Cuts, Lay-by Lanes, Narrow Walking Zones CONTINUE: Applications with any of the following triggers: Civic Design Review, Traffic Impact Study, Signalized Intersection, Capital Projects, and Streets Department Projects Page 8 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia BICYCLE PARKING (Handbook Section 4.5) List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on- and off-street. Bicycle parking requirements are provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14-804 Bicycle Parking Spaces On-Street Bicycle Parking Off-Street Bicycle Parking Building Address Required Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 1001-29 S. Broad St. 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 List elements incorporated from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at http://phila2035.org/wp-conteabbey0427nt/uploads/2012/06/bikepedfinal2.pdf Off-site (within street right-of-way) and on-site (interior building) bike parking is provided for the development promote connectivity of the existing bike lane along Washingn Ave. Off-site bike parking for retail uses is located in close proximity building access and within close proximity transit locations. Also, the minimum walking zone is provided along each street. PROPOSED CONDITIONS (Bicycles & Curbside Management, Handbook Sections 4.5 & 4.6) Do the plans clearly identify the following PROPOSED conditions, with dimensions? Identify proposed high priority bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are incorporated in the design plan, w Not applicable width permits. Are the following High Priority elements identified and dimensioned on the plan? Conventional Bicycle Lane Not applicable Buffered Bike Lane Not applicable Bicycle-Friendly Street Not applicable Does the design provide bicycle connections local bicycle, trail, and transit networks? Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections residences, work places, and other destinations? Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the curb? Does the design connect transit sps the surrounding pedestrian network and destinations? Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian traffic? Page 9 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia List how the plan affects the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness of public transit: The proposed mixed use development proposes multiple access points the building and within close proximity transit locations. The minimum walking zone is provided along each street and street lights are proposed along Washingn, 13 th & Carp promote greater visibility and connectivity public transit. Planning Commission Review Comments: Travel and Parking Lane Changes (Handbook Section 4.7) Complete the table below only if lane changes are proposed (including all curb bumpouts). Identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street frontage. Street From Street To Street Existing Lane Widths Proposed Lane Widths Design Speed What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by the design? Will the project affect a hisrically certified street? An invenry of hisric streets is maintained by the Philadelphia Hisrical Commission. Will the public right-of-way be used for loading and unloading activities? Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? W new streets are being developed, does the design connect and extend the street grid? Does the design support multiple alternative routes and from destinations as well as within the site? Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and access of all other roadway users? SU 30 No No Not applicable Page 10 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia Urban Design Component (Handbook Section 4.8) Does the design incorporate windows, srefronts, and other active uses facing the street? Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections between transit sps/stations and building access points and destinations within the site? Planning Commission Review Comments: STOP: All applications with only the following triggers: Civic Design Review, Traffic Impact Study, Capital Projects, and Streets Department Projects CONTINUE: All applications that impact a Signalized Intersection Page 11 of 12

COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST City of Philadelphia Intersections & Crossing Component (Handbook Section 4.9) Signal Cycle Locations: List all signals locations only w signal cycle changes are proposed. Attach additional sheets as needed. Signal Location Existing Cycle Length Proposed Cycle Length Does the design minimize the signal cycle length reduce pedestrian wait time? Not applicable Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians cross streets? Not applicable Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using Not applicable medians or refuge islands break up long crossings? If yes, a City Plan Action may be required. Identify High Priority intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that will be incorporated in the design, w width Not applicable permits. Are the following High Priority design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan? Marked Crosswalks Not applicable Pedestrian Refuge Islands Not applicable Signal Timing and Operation Not applicable Bike Boxes Not applicable Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all modes at intersections? Not applicable Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety? Not applicable STOP: All applications. Add any attachments directly this document for review and posting. Page 12 of 12