How passively safe street future is creating safer roads

Similar documents
INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 188/16

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

2014 European Workshop AFB20 (2) Roadside Safety Design International Research Activities Subcommittee Wednesday, November 5, 2014

// RoWSaF Making roads safer for road workers rowsaf.org.uk. RoWSaF Strategy 2015

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/12. Guidance for Alternative Temporary Traffic Management Techniques for Relaxation Schemes on Dual Carriageways.

SMART STEEL CRASH CUSHION

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/14 Revision 02. Guidance on Alternative Temporary Traffic Management Techniques for Relaxation Works on Dual Carriageways

Safety Barrier System Acceptance Conditions SMART Steel Crash Cushion

British Road Safety: Presentation 28/10/2009 by Duncan Price, Deputy Head, Road User Safety Division

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Post impact trajectory of vehicles at rural intersections

Road Safety Partnership

Safer Verges and the Strategic Road Network

DRAFT INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/17

H8 Signs, Supports and Poles

Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2006 ROAD SAFETY IN LONDON PAST SUCCESSES AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

ROAD SAFETY AT WORK: THE PRAISE PROJECT & Good practice in the workplace Examples from Transport for London and BT

Bramshaw traffic calming proposal

What is Community Speed Watch?

The road transport system is an open and complex system. Vision Zero The Basics

Background. The scale of the problem. The scale of the problem. Road Safety in London, the statistics. 280 Fatalities from road crashes in 2002

Chicane Schemes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 12/97 December Introduction

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/11. Temporary Traffic Management Signing: Simplification of lane change zone signing for relaxation schemes.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about a borough-wide 20 mph speed limit

Cycle traffic and the Strategic Road Network. Sandra Brown, Team Leader, Safer Roads- Design

Department of Internal Affairs Mandatory Non-Financial Performance Measures 2013 Roads and Footpaths

Vision Zero: No more traffic deaths on Berkeley streets

Assessment of retaining levels of safety barriers

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Star Ratings for the Strategic Road Network. Richard Leonard - Highways England

London Safety Camera Partnership

CEDR N5 Improvements in the field of Road Safety New trends in member states Road Safety strategies

Study on fatal accidents in Toyota city aimed at zero traffic fatality

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual - Carriageways

Perne Rd / Radegund Rd Roundabout Cambridge

Technical Director, Jacobs IHT Urban Design Panel. Challenge of MfS Acknowledgements visibility forward SSD side road SSD

CAMPAIGN ASSETS THINK CYCLIST STAKEHOLDER TOOLKIT

Definition of a safe barrier for a motorcyclist A litterature study from 2015.

The Road Users Perspective and KiwiRAP

Pedestrian crossings survey in Europe

Aiming for Zero Road Worker Safety. Mark Pooley Highways Agency Road Worker Safety Programme Manager Monday 11 June 2012

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual-carriageways

Understanding Road Safety. A presentation to the Chislehurst Society by Roger Lawson April 2016 Alliance of British Drivers

Pedestrian Safety - Developments in Crash Worthiness and Crash Avoidance

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

"Prevenção de Acidentes e Lesões no Trânsito para Melhorar a Segurança dos Trabalhadores"

B741 TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS - OPSS 741

Space for Cycling. A guide for decision makers

TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET

20mph. We want to make Edinburgh a better and safer place to live, work and play.

Developing a Safer Cycling Strategy for the ACT ACRS Conference August 2012

The OSCAR Driver s Handbook Driving for OSCAR Services

Chapter 8 (2009) - Summary of key changes

Safe Road Design Practiced by KEC

Cycle Traffic and The Strategic Road Network. John Parkin and Phil Jones Presenting on behalf of Highways England

8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN

Towards Zero: Using Evidence and Aspiration to Reduce Road Trauma in Western Australia

HGV Direct Vision Standard

PAS 13:2017 Safety Barriers within the Workplace

Appendix 9 European Standards and Markings for Fall Arrest. Issue 7: August 2008

FACE CONSULTANTS LIMITED. Accelerated Abrasion Resistance Surveys. BS :2002 And BS : A2: 2011

Setting Local Speed Limits. A review of recent installations of 20mph area schemes (signage only).

Automated Traffic Enforcement Technology Guidelines

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

Vehicle Technology and Design to Improve Sightlines Around LGVs

UK Contractors Group Mobile Elevating Work Platforms Good Practice Toolkit June June 2015 Page 1 of 16

Introduction to the NRA Design Manual for Roads and Bridges

APPROVED CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE SAFE CONDUCT OF TRACK AND FIELD TRAINING

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Work Zone Traffic Safety

Temporary Vehicle Restraint System Policy

Ireland: Implementing research outputs on safety management from CEDR (Conference of European Road Directors) research programme - Paper 3

Marcus Jones, TRL. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Highway Safety Workforce Development Committee

SOMERSET ROAD SAFETY PARTNERSHIP CASUALTY REVIEW Working together to reduce casualties

Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

Managed Motorways Experience from the UK

Road Safety Inspection. Matt Chamberlain RSA Road Safety Consultants Ltd

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

Lifting Standards in Warehouse Barrier Protection

Florida Class E Knowledge Exam Road Rules Practice Questions

Improvement of vehicle and road safety at national and international level

Safe in East Sussex. In Focus Road Safety November Time to #drivelesslivemore

NZ Transport Agency Cycling Rules

irap irap The world road safety problem irap Background irap Aims A Safe Road System Vaccines for Roads 1. irap Background 2. irap Malaysia Results

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Synthesis of Practices of Geometric Design for Special Roads

Understanding school road safety

Economic and Social Council

The Vision Zero Swedish parliament (1997)

Issues at T junctions:

CITB Construction site safety update

: 70 YEARS OF DESIGN & INNOVATION BELL & AVECTOR BOLLARDS

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

CASUALTY REVIEW

REQUEST RESPONSE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Please see the attached Risk Assessment document which is attached under this response table.

road safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*

Transcription:

Page 17 How passively safe street future is creating safer roads David Milne, editor of Designing Safer Roadsides, a Handbook for Highway Engineers Specifying passively safe street furniture to the European Standard EN12767 Passively safe support structures for roadside equipment [1] potentially eliminates most deaths and serious injuries from impacts with lighting columns, signposts and similar street furniture. Passively safety was a Scandinavian development in the 1980 s and 1990 s. Norway developed aluminium Lattix signposts and Finland in particular pioneered passively safe lighting columns (see Finra Engineering News 9E [2]) European Standard EN12767 was first published in 2000 and is a test protocol to evaluate product safety performance in crash tests. Early drafts of the standard were trialled in the 1990 s following the Scandinavian development of passively safe street furniture. In the test items of street furniture such as signposts and lighting columns are impacted by a 950kg car and the vehicle behaviour and measured accelerations evaluated against safe limiting values given in the standard. Products meeting EN12767 are very unlikely to cause severe injuries to vehicle occupants in real life crashes. Lattix passively safe signposts were first installed on a new UK trunk road scheme, the A43 Silverstone Bypass in 2002. This was the first major use of a passively safe product in the UK (and still the only product capable of carrying the largest signs). A DMRB standard TA89 Use of Passively Safe Signposts Lighting Columns and Traffic signal Posts To BSEN 12767 [3] was published in 2004 and updated in 2005. It gave positive guidance on how and where to use passively safe street furniture on trunk roads and greatly encouraged the use of passively safe products. INTRODUCTION Passively safe street furniture (primarily signposts, lighting columns and traffic lights poles) deform, yield or shear when hit by a car which greatly reduces the accelerations and damage to the car and consequently the forces and risk of physical injury to the vehicle s occupants. EN12767 describes the crash test methodology. Cars weighing 950 kg are crashed into the test item at high speed (100 kph or 70 kph) and low speed (35 kph). The measured accelerations and vehicle behaviour determine the EN12767 classification. EN12767 products have excellent safety records in the UK, Finland, Norway and Denmark. The demand for passively safe street furniture products has attracted many suppliers from across Europe to the UK and competition is certainly driving down the cost of all passively safe products. EN 12767 TEST REQUIREMENTS A brief outline of the EN 12767 test procedures and classifications is given below. EN 12767 testing must be carried by an accredited testing organisation and the results assessed by a notified body. Products will also need to conform to the relevant product standards e.g. EN 40 Lighting Columns [4] for lighting columns and EN 12899-1; 2001 Fixed, vertical road traffic signs [5] for road signs. In a EN12767 test evaluation: a) 950 kg cars are crashed into the test item in two separate tests, the high speed test (usually 100 kph) and the low speed test (always 35kph). Vehicle speed, direction and impact position are carefully controlled. The chosen vehicle s crash characteristics must lie within specified limits. Crash test procedures, methodology and safety evaluation closely follow the EN 1317 Road Restraint Systems protocols for crash Figure 1: All four occupants were killed when this car hit a Welcome to Sheffield gateway sign www.tecmagazine.com 17

Page 18 HE (High Energy) where: NE products only marginally slow the vehicle over the course of the impact. LE products significantly slow the vehicles HE products greatly slow or totally stop a vehicle relatively gently over several metres as the metal de forms to absorb the energy of the vehicle. e) The classification NE, LE or HE reflects how much of the vehicle s kinetic energy is absorbed by the product in the high speed test. Signposts are typically NE products which usually break away barely slowing the vehicle. Lighting columns may accord to NE LE or HE classifications. HE lighting columns may be favoured for town use because they greatly slow or stop the vehicle thus reducing the chance of a vehicle careering on and hitting a pedestrian or another vehicle or obstacle in a secondary impact. f) Products if they pass the two tests are classified to EN12767. The label shown in Figure 4 for a Varley and Gulliver Hi-Mast signpost gives a classification 100:NE:2 which means: The product was successfully crash tested at 100 kph (and at the mandatory 35kph test) Minimal velocity was lost in the 100kph impact re sulting in NE classification Safety level was 2 (but any of the 4 safety levels are acceptable in the UK) HISTORY OF PASSIVE SAFETY IN THE UK Figure 2: First major use of Lattix signposts on a new UK trunk road scheme in 2002 (the A43 Silverstone Bypass in 2002) Figure 3: A steel signpost in a 100 kph EN 12767 test. This testing by TRL established a safe upper size of 89 mm diameter and 3.2 mm wall thickness for a steel signpost. 18 barrier tests. Test cars are instrumented with accelerometers in 3 dimensions to log accelerations during the impact b) The vehicle must behave safely in the crash with no dangerous intrusion into the vehicle c) Measured vehicle accelerations in three orthogonal directions are used to calculate values of ASI (Accident Severity Index with limits reflecting maximum safe accelerations for the human body) and THIV (Theoretical Head Impact Velocity with velocity limits reflecting the safe velocity for an unrestrained human head to hit the inside of the vehicle). These ASI and THIV values determine the safety level. There are 4 safety levels in EN 12767 but the UK has considered all of these levels to be acceptable in the National Annex to BS EN 12767. d) Speed loss in the high speed impact is used to classify the item either as NE (no energy), LE (low energy), or In 2002 the main contractor, Costain Skanska and their designer, Mott Macdonald for A43 Silverstone bypass trunk road scheme asked the Highways Agency for permission to use the Norwegian Lattix passively safe signposts (supplied in the UK by Signpost Solutions) for the 30 large signs on the scheme so he could omit the usual lengths of safety barrier in front of the signs. This was the first major use of a passively safe product in the UK and set a precedent for the UK road construction industry which was actively adopted by contractors on other schemes. Prior to 2002 small numbers of Lattix signposts had been installed notably by Neil Theobold of Cheshire CC. In 2004 the UK published TA89/04 Use of Passively Safe Signposts to give guidance on the use of passively safe signposts for use on the trunk road network. The document was published to avoid the need for approvals on a scheme by scheme basis and also to encourage the use of passively safe street furniture. The document legitimised the use of passively safe street furniture but steel posts protected by barrier remained a permitted alternative. UK employs crash barriers on the national trunk road network to prevent direct impacts with roadside hazards including large signposts, bridge piers and tall embankments. Large signs would typically be protected by 37.5m lengths of crash barrier. Since TA89/04 Use of Passively Safe Signposts was published most large new signs on the UK trunk road network employ passively safe signposts installed with no barrier provision. The advantages are: Passively safe signposts are usually cheaper than structural steel signposts safeguarded by barrier Contract period is reduced as barriers are the last item to be installed on a new road scheme Less visual clutter Damaged passively safe signposts can often be easily replaced on an undamaged foundation with minimal traffic disruption www.localgov.co.uk

Page 19 Figure 4: Varley and Gulliver Signpost Label on a passively safe signpost showing the EN12767 classification. Lack of barrier speeds erection of new signs on existing trunk roads and reduces traffic disruption on the busy network The Highways Agency before publishing TA89/04: Discussed the Lattix safety record with the Norwegian government and were suitably reassured Carried out EN 12767 tests to determine the maximum size for a circular hollow section steel post. The answer was the surprisingly small size of 89 mm diameter and 3.2 mm wall thickness. In 2005 TA89/05 Use of Passively Safe Signposts, Lighting Columns and Traffic Light Posts to EN 12767 was published. This extended the rules for passive safety to cover to lighting columns and traffic signal posts for trunk road use. EN 12767 was updated in 2007. The British version EN 12767 now contained a National Annex giving national recommendations for the use of passively safe street furniture and in particular where to use what class of EN 12767 product. TA89/05 was then withdrawn. In 2010 a new free document available on the internet was published by UK Roads Passive Safety UK Guidelines for Specification and Use of Passively Safe Street Furniture on the UK Road Network. This document provides comprehensive advice on the use of passively safe street furniture for all highways. USE OF PASSIVELY SAFE PRODUCTS IN THE UK On trunk roads, passively safe signposts and lighting columns are almost universally used for new large signs and new lighting columns where the speed limit is over 50 mph or over (unless barriers are needed for other reasons). For non-trunk roads and in cities progress has been slower. Barrier is rarely specified on these roads to safeguard signs from impact so the immediate cost saving of omitting barrier when installing a large sign is unavailable. The more progressive highway authorities are however now starting to use passively safe signposts and lighting columns on their faster and busier roads but it is harder to make the case for passively safe street furniture when roadside hazards such as trees, stone walls and ditches are so ubiquitous. A priority should be larger signs and lighting columns on 50 and 60 mph non-trunk rural A Roads where so many of our accidents happen. Initially passively safe products were Scandinavian. Passively safe products have now been developed in the UK and are now sold and exported outside the UK. SAFETY RECORD In 2002 the only passively safe product being actively marketed was the Lattix aluminium mast promoted by Signpost Solutions in the UK. Lattix today is still the only signpost strong enough for very large signs. Signpost Solutions have sold about 12000 Lattix posts. About 180 of these posts have been hit by vehicles (and replaced free of charge by Signpost Solutions in exchange for an account of the accident). Nobody has been seriously injured in any of these accidents. Most of these signposts will have been specified because they were significantly cheaper than structural steel signposts when guarded by barrier. There has been only been one single severe injury accident with an EN 12767 product since their introduction which was a car hitting two resin/glass fibre composite signposts supporting a large sign in a side impact. In comparison in 2009 alone 46 people were killed and 269 were seriously injured in single vehicle accidents with safety barrier alone on UK roads in 2009. Deaths and serious injuries from hitting roadside furniture in Britain in 2009 in single vehicle accidents are listed in Table 1. Passively safe signposts have proved safer than conventional structural steel signposts guarded by crash barrier. There are more than 40 deaths a year from impact with barriers. It is also usually a much cheaper alternative to Figure 5: Hi-Mast passively safe signposts by Varley and Gulliver (the steel post supporting the smaller sign is small enough to be passively safe) EN 12767 products available in the UK include: 5 suppliers of passively safe signposts (materials include glass fibre/resin composites, carbon fibre/resin composites, and aluminium) 5 suppliers for passively safe lighting columns (materials include steel folded plate construction, glass fibre resin composites and extruded aluminium) Several bollard suppliers (typically plastic) Several suppliers for traffic light poles (materials are aluminium and glass fibre composites) Aluminium signposts have also been used to mount roadside cameras Passively safe EN 12767 emergency roadside phones An up to date list of passively safe products (with links to the suppliers) is maintained by Passive Safety UK on their website [10] www.tecmagazine.com 19

Page 20 Figure 6: Accident with a Lattix signpost. The driver was unhurt and is standing beside his car. protection by barriers which explains why passively safe signposts and lighting columns have made such inroads on the trunk road network. Single Vehicle Accidents in Great Britain 2009 Object hit Table 1: Single Vehicle Accidents (extracted from Road Casualties Great Britain 2009 [7] ) Serious Road sign or traffic signal 35 234 Lamp post 41 293 Telegraph pole or electricity pole 14 104 175 791 46 269 Tree Crash barrier Figure 7: The car hit a Sahko Jokinen Kapu HE lighting column in a sideways impact. The driver was unhurt. Fatal The Table 1 casualty figures could be greatly reduced if passively safe street furniture was universal and trees close to the carriageway were felled. Many of these accidents occur on rural non-trunk A roads. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF PASSIVELY SAFE STREET FURNITURE Highway authorities should consider creating forgiving roadsides that are safer for vehicles leaving the road at speed. Suitable actions are: Non-trunk rural A roads have many of the worst accidents and new schemes should target passive safety Creating a clear zone on these roads next to the carriageway free of trees, larger road signs, lighting columns and utility poles. A width of 4.5m if at all possible should be provided. Limiting the size of steel signposts in the clear zone. Circular hollow section posts for signs in the clear zone should not exceed the EN 12767 limits of 102 mm in diameter and 3.2 mm wall thickness. Using passively safe signposts and lighting columns to EN 12767within the clear zone To visit countries who use passively safe products to see how they are used and to discuss policies and experiences with the highway authorities Consult the Passive Safety UK Guidelines for Specification and Use of Passively Safe Street Furniture on the UK Road Network {7] for appropriate advice Read Designing Safer Roadsides A Handbook for Highway Engineers [9] This book contains in depth advice on passively safe products and their use with authors from several countries. Visit the Passive Safety UK website for lists of products and much valuable background information [10] Consult the Institution of Lighting Professionals document TR30 Passive Safety which gives much advice especially for lighting columns THE FUTURE FOR PASSIVE SAFETY Passively safe street furniture is demonstrably much safer than traditional large signposts and lighting columns (and safety barriers) and this is being increasingly recognised by the public. Scandinavia countries are aiming for zero vision with zero vehicle deaths and in the UK targets for reducing road deaths will similarly pressure highway authorities to improve safety. Highway authorities should be on every highway authority s agenda because: some responsibility for injuries and deaths where cars leave the road may in time fall on the highway authority there will be is an ongoing need to reduce traffic accident casualties passive safety is becoming more affordable passive safe street furniture demonstrably works REFERENCES [1] EN12767 Passively safe support structures for roadside equipment [2] Finra Engineering News 9E This document gives Finland's national policy for use of passively safe lighting columns in Finland and can be read on: http://alk.tiehallinto.fi/thohje/fen9e.pdf [3] TA89/05 Use of Passively Safe Signposts Lighting Columns and Traffic signal Posts To BSEN 12767 This document was withdrawn in 2008 but can be read on: http://www.signfix.co.uk/pdfdata/advicenote-ta8905.pdf [4] EN 40 Lighting Columns Parts 1 to 7 Describes the requirements for lighting columns in all materials. [5] EN 12899-1; 2001 Fixed, vertical road traffic signs This document gives the requirements for road signs and their design including the loading and structural strength requirements for sign supports [6] BS EN 1317 Road restraint systems Parts 1 to 8 20 www.localgov.co.uk

Page 21 Describes requirements for different barriers, crash cushions, terminals and transitions [7] Passive Safety UK Guidelines for Specification and Use of Passively Safe Street Furniture on the UK Road Network. This document can be can be viewed at: http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/ Guidelines%20Print%20ready.pdf [8] Road Casualties Great Britain 2009. A comprehensive breakdown of all the road casualties in Britain can be viewed at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/acci dents/casualtiesgbar/rrcgb2009 The casualties for single vehicle accidents with roadside objects are given in Table 20 [9] Designing Safer Roadsides A Handbook for Highway Engineers This book is the best source of advice on all issues relating to passive safety. It can be purchased from d.milne@homecall.co.uk for 10.00 plus p&p [10] Passive Safety UK This organisation provides information on passively safe products. The website can be viewed at: http://www.ukroads.org/passivesafety/ Information includes: a) A list of passively safe products available in the UK b) Videos of crash demonstrations of vehicles being crashed into EN 12767 products (and steel circular hollow section posts demonstrating how much better passively safe products perform) www.tecmagazine.com Figure 8: The HE Kapu lighting column hit by the car, left, progressively deformed during the impact c) A list of relevant standards and advice documents [11] Institution of Lighting Professionals produce guidance in their document TR30 Passive Safety. This document can be purchased from the web site: http://www.theilp.org.uk/index.php?page=technicalpublications 21