The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

Similar documents
The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

Wave-Phase-Resolved Air-Sea Interaction

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Ocean Surface Wave Optical Roughness Innovative Measurement and Modeling

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Waves, Bubbles, Noise and Underwater Communications

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

A study of advection of short wind waves by long waves from surface slope images

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

Ocean Surface Wave Optical Roughness Innovative Measurement and Modeling

3. Observed initial growth of short waves from radar measurements in tanks (Larson and Wright, 1975). The dependence of the exponential amplification

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

WAVE BREAKING AND DISSIPATION IN THE NEARSHORE

Vortical motions under short wind waves

Airborne Remote Sensing of Surface and Internal Wave Processes on the Inner Shelf

LASER INDUCED FLUORESCENCE MEASUREMENTS OF CARBON DIOXIDE DISSOLUTION IN WAVE-BREAKING TURBULENCE

Prediction of Nearshore Waves and Currents: Model Sensitivity, Confidence and Assimilation

An Observational and Modeling Study to Quantify the Space/Time Scales of Inner Shelf Ocean Variability and the Potential Impacts on Acoustics

RIP CURRENTS. Award # N

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

RIVET Satellite Remote Sensing and Small Scale Wave Process Analysis

"Real-Time Vertical Temperature, and Velocity Profiles from a Wave Glider"

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2.

Unsteady Wave-Driven Circulation Cells Relevant to Rip Currents and Coastal Engineering

Airborne Remote Sensing of Surface and Internal Wave Processes on the Inner Shelf

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2.

Abrupt marine boundary layer changes revealed by airborne in situ and lidar measurements

Wave-Current Interaction in Coastal Inlets and River Mouths

An experimental study of internal wave generation through evanescent regions

High Resolution Sea Surface Roughness and Wind Speed with Space Lidar (CALIPSO)

Lesson 14: Simple harmonic motion, Waves (Sections )

Wave Breaking, Infragravity Waves, And Sediment Transport In The Nearshore

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

Gravity wave effects on the calibration uncertainty of hydrometric current meters

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON WAVE OVERTOPPING OVER SMOOTH AND STEPPED GENTLE SLOPE SEAWALLS

CURRENT, WAVE AND TIDAL OBSERVATIONS FROM A HORIZONTAL ACOUSTIC DOPPLER PROFILER INSTALLED ON SCRIPPS PIER IN LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA, USA

Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait

IMAGE-BASED STUDY OF BREAKING AND BROKEN WAVE CHARACTERISTICS IN FRONT OF THE SEAWALL

PUV Wave Directional Spectra How PUV Wave Analysis Works

from a decade of CCD temperature data

WAVE IMPACTS DUE TO STEEP FRONTED WAVES

Wave phenomena in a ripple tank

Mixing and Transport in the Surfzone

SIO 210 MIDTERM, 26 October 2009.

Super-parameterization of boundary layer roll vortices in tropical cyclone models

Rip Currents Onshore Submarine Canyons: NCEX Analysis

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ]

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

Outline Chapter 7 Waves

Probing the subsurface ocean processes using ocean LIDARS

High-Resolution Measurement-Based Phase-Resolved Prediction of Ocean Wavefields

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY

Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) / Temperature Sensitive Paint (TSP) Part 1

Mesoscale air-sea interaction and feedback in the western Arabian Sea

Waves. harmonic wave wave equation one dimensional wave equation principle of wave fronts plane waves law of reflection

Rip Currents Onshore Submarine Canyons: NCEX Analysis

Determination Of Nearshore Wave Conditions And Bathymetry From X-Band Radar Systems

Lagrangian Tracer Transport and Dispersion in Shallow Tidal Inlets & River Mouths

Energy Transfer to Upper Trophic Levels on a Small Offshore Bank

Comparison of data and model predictions of current, wave and radar cross-section modulation by seabed sand waves

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

Digiquartz Water-Balanced Pressure Sensors for AUV, ROV, and other Moving Underwater Applications

Wave Transmission Testing of the Martin Ecosystems BioHaven Floating Breakwater

Core Concept. PowerPoint Lectures Physical Science, 8e. Chapter 5 Wave Motions and Sound. New Symbols for this Chapter 2/20/2011

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

LIFE TIME OF FREAK WAVES: EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

M. Mikkonen.

Noise Experiment #2. Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA February 22 February 2010

PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING OF WAVE FIELD IN FRONT OF THE CONTAINER TERMINAL PEAR - PORT OF RIJEKA (ADRIATIC SEA)

Oceans - Laboratory 12

Figure 2: Principle of GPVS and ILIDS.

Wave Motion. interference destructive interferecne constructive interference in phase. out of phase standing wave antinodes resonant frequencies

Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution

CHAPTER 91 TRACKED VEHICLE FOR CONTINUOUS NEARSHORE PROFILES. Richard J. Seymour* Alan L. Higgins** David P. Bothman***

Radar Remote Sensing of Waves and Episodic Flow Events

Modeling Surfzone/Inner-shelf Exchange

Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Boost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

4.4 WAVE CHARACTERISTICS 4.5 WAVE PROPERTIES Student Notes

Observations of noise generated by nonlinear internal waves on the continental shelf during the SW06 experiment

IMAGE-BASED FIELD OBSERVATION OF INFRAGRAVITY WAVES ALONG THE SWASH ZONE. Yoshimitsu Tajima 1

Wave-ice interaction and the Marginal Ice Zone

Surface Wave Processes on the Continental Shelf and Beach

SEASONDE DETECTION OF TSUNAMI WAVES

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 116 (2015 )

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

MEASUREMENT OF DISSOLVED CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION IN A SURF ZONE

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

Gravity waves and bores. Material kindly provided by Dr. Steven Koch GSD NOAA (Boulder, CO)

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent buoyant helium plume

Transcription:

The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging W. Kendall Melville Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0213 phone: (858) 534-0478 fax: (858) 534-7132 email: kmelville@ucsd.edu Award Number: N00014-06-1-0048 LONG-TERM GOALS The long-term goals of the work are to measure the influence of surface wave breaking on imaging across the surface and develop measurements and models of breaking statistics as input to the interpretation and modeling of oceanic radiance measurements. OBJECTIVES Image transmission across breaking surfaces will be measured in both the laboratory and the field. Field measurements of breaking and breaking statistics will be used to quantify the degradation and recovery of image fidelity by surface and subsurface processes associated with breaking, including surface turbulence and bubble entrainment. The PI will collaborate with other PIs in the use of breaking measurements and models to interpret measurements and develop models of oceanic radiance. APPROACH The transmission of light across the ocean surface, whether downwelling or upwelling, depends strongly on refraction across the air-sea interface. Models of refractive effects depend on the structure of the surface; ideally, the surface displacement and all its spatial and temporal derivatives. However, measuring the surface and its derivatives at all relevant scales is technically not possible at present as the spatial scales range from millimeters to kilometers, and the temporal scales from milliseconds to hours. The task is simplified if the temporal and spatial scales can be related through the dispersion relationship for linear surface waves, σ = σ ( k), where σ is the radian frequency, and k = k is the magnitude of the wavenumber vector; but this only works if the wave slope, ak <<1 (linear waves), whereas more generallyσ = σ ( kak ; ). The most important departures from the linear assumption occur in the neighborhood of breaking waves of all scales, from long large gravity waves, to the much smaller, but just as steep, gravity-capillary waves. In the context of ocean optics, the fact that breaking occurs near the crests of the larger waves gives combinations of large surface displacements and large slopes, which can lead to significant departures from the simplest horizontal planar-surface assumption that leads to a simple Snell s cone. Breaking also leads to surface turbulence, which does not have a dispersion relationship, and therefore no explicit deterministic relationship between the length and time scales of the surface. At the larger scales, breaking also leads to significant air entrainment and the 1

attenuation and scattering of light by bubbles. For all these reasons, a better understanding of the occurrence (statistics) and scales of breaking in the context of light transmission across the ocean surface, will lead to improved forward and inverse models of the oceanic radiance distribution. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the major components that will be deployed as part of the RaDyO field deployments off the coast of California. The centerpiece of the planned experiments will be the direct measurement of imaging through the surface using a subsurface display to generate test patterns and a color video camera above the surface. Additional and concurrent measurements include surface displacement (at various scales) as well as occurrence of breaking and air entrainment using Lidar, acoustic technologies, and underwater stereo-imagery. Figure 1. Schematic of the FLIP-based experiments showing the major components of the instrumentation and their deployment. For imaging through the surface, one of the primary questions concerns the characterization of the fraction of time during which the turbulence and bubbles due to breaking will make any imaging impractical. This requires a statistical description of the probability of breaking over different length and time scales; the characterization of the time scales between breaking at a point; the distance between breaking events at a particular time, and the time scale for the disturbance (turbulence and bubble clouds) to decay to acceptable levels for imaging. In a seminal paper, Phillips (1985) introduced, Λ( cdc r ) r, the average length of breaking fronts traveling with velocities in the range ( cc rr r, + dc). The first moment of the corresponding scalar distribution, cλ() c dc, gives the area per unit area of ocean surface per unit time swept out by breakers traveling in c Λ () c dc the same speed range. Therefore, 0 gives the area per unit area per unit time swept out by all breakers. If we assume that imaging is impractical during active breaking at a point, this gives a lower 2

estimate of the probability of breaking interfering with imaging during any time interval. Using simple arguments, based on Froude scaling (that the length and time scales are related through the dispersion relationship) it may be shown that the whitecap coverage, the fraction of surface covered by breaking 2 c Λ() c dc waves, is proportional to the second moment, 0. Similar arguments applied to the depth to which breaking mixes the surface water (and also the small optically-significant bubbles) result in the volume of fluid mixed down by breaking per unit area per unit time being proportional to the third 3 c Λ() c dc moment, 0. Thus measurements of breaking are fundamental to a determination of the effects of breaking on the transmission of light through the ocean surface and the ability to image through the surface. WORK COMPLETED Laboratory Experiments During this year we have completed a series of laboratory experiments designed to simulate the effects of wave breaking, entrained ar and gravity-capillary waves on the attenuation, scattering and refraction of light transmitted from the atmosphere. Fall 2006 was devoted to the expansion of the current laboratory studies underway at the Hydraulics Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography. New measurements were performed using a 5W Argon - Ion laser continuously generating a vertical light sheet perpendicular to a wavy surface comprised of gravity-capillary waves generated using a fan mounted on the glass wave channel channel. Two high resolution cameras (TM4100CL Pulnix 4 Megapixels monochrome cameras, 25Hz sampling rate) provided detailed surface slope information as well as the simultaneous light distribution below the surface, enhanced by fluorescent dye (Fluorescein). The schematic layout is shown in Figure 1 and a photo of the setup is in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows a waterfall plot (upper panel) of the surface profiles over a horizontal extent of approximately 9 cm for wind-generated waves. The lower panel shows the image of the surface profile at time t o and sequential images at t o - 0.04 and t o - 0.08 seconds. Note the parasitic capillary waves on the forward face of the longer gravity-capillary waves, a ubiquitous feature of wind-driven water surfaces. The impact of these parasitic capillary waves is to strongly modulate the subsurface light intensity. This is demonstrated in Figure 4, where we show in the upper and middle panels simultaneous images of the surface and the subsurface. Note the strong modulation and caustics in the subsurface image. The lowest panel is a computation of the subsurface image using geometrical optics and the measured surface (shown as a red profile) in the middle panel. Note the good agreement between the measured and computed subsurface image, especially the location of the caustics. Preparation for the RaDyO SIO Pier Experiment As hosts for the RaDyO SIO pier experiment in January 2008, a significant effort has been made to prepare for this three-week experiment. The most visible aspect of this preparation so far has been the 3

design, construction and installation of a new instrument boom on the NW corner of the pier, which is shown in Figure 5. Along with the original boom on the SW corner of the pier, this will provide RaDyo PIs with unprecedented access to incident wind and wave fields from the west. Other aspects of preparation for the pier experiment that are still in progress include the installation of two new lab spaces on the pier and the provision of trailer/office space just east of the entrance to the pier. Preparation for Field Experiments A: For the RaDyO Community The PI organized and hosted a planning workshop for the RaDyO program at Scripps June 6-8, 2007. As part of that workshop a visit to R/P FLIP at SIO s MARFAC facility on San Diego harbor was arranged to familiarize the RaDyO PIs with FLIP and its capabilities. As a result of that visit it was decided that the port boom of FLIP did not have the capacity to support all PIs needing unimpeded boom access. It was agreed that a second boom on the starboard side would be needed to accommodate the required space. The PI arranged for Eric Slater, a retired SIO engineer with many decades experience on FLIP to design and cost a second boom. Submission of the proposal to ONR for construction of this boom is imminent. B: For the PI s Program Work has proceeded to design and build the subsurface light panel (LED array) for optical transmission and imaging through the ocean surface, along with the above surface imaging system and the related supporting measurements. This system will be tested during the SIO pier experiment in January 2008. RESULTS The primary technical result in the last year has been the demonstration of the value of the laboratory experiments in demonstrating our ability to measure the fine-scale structure of a wind-driven water surface down to the scale of capillary waves (mm) and use the measured surface to predict the refraction of the incident light from above the surface into the water column. IMPACT/APPLICATIONS It is too soon for there to be any impact or applications of this work beyond the RaDyO program. TRANSITIONS RELATED PROJECTS 4

REFERENCES Phillips, O.M. Spectral and statistical properties of the equilibrium range in wind-generated gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech.,156, 505-31, 1985. PUBLICATIONS PATENTS HONORS/AWARDS/PRIZES Figure 1: Schematic of the laboratory experiment in the glass wave channel in the SIO Hydraulics Laboratory. Two high resolution cameras are used to measure detailed surface slope and its effect on subsurface light distribution. 5

Argon-Ion Laser Surface camera Light distribution camera Figure 2: Laboratory Setup. 6

9 8 7 6 Surface Wave Profile (cm) 0.4 0.2 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1 -1.2 seconds 5 4 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0-1 cm -2-3 -4-5 -6 Figure 3: Surface wave profiles are detected using the upper camera. The subsequent profile is then smoothed using an 8-pixel running mean filter. (a) shows 3 sequential profiles (dt=1/25s). Image corresponds to t=to. 7

Figure 4: Upper and middle panels: Synchronized surface and subsurface images, respectively. The subsurface light distribution is modulated by the waves. The surface image is plotted with a 10cm vertical offset for display purpose. The measured surface is also shown in red in the subsurface image (arbitrary color scale units).the lowest panel shows the calculated subsurface image using geometrical optics and the measured surface profile. Note the good agreement between the middle and lowest panels. 8

Figure 5: SIO pier showing the new boom off the NW corner. 9