Arterial Traffic Analysis Some critical concepts. Prepared by Philip J. Tarnoff

Similar documents
REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Self-Organizing Signals: A Better Framework for Transit Signal Priority

Syracuse University University Place Road Closure

James M. Moore, Director of Planning & Building Services, Town of Fairfax. Victory Village Senior Housing Development Traffic Study

An Evaluation of Signalized Intersection System Analysis Techniques Walter J. Freeman, P.E., Kien Y. Ho, P.E., Elizabeth A. McChesney, E.I.T.

Chapter 5 5. INTERSECTIONS 5.1. INTRODUCTION

MEMO DRAFT VIA . Mr. Terry Bailey Foremost Development Company. To: Michael J. Labadie, PE Steven J. Russo, E.I.T. Fleis & VandenBrink.

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Synchro Studio 8. Overview. By Ioannis Psarros

Transit Signal Priority: Help or Hype? Peter G. Furth Northeastern University

Bistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

Appendix G: Future Conditions Traffic Analysis Memorandum

Technical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc.

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

Bank Street Retail/Hotel Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

Signal Warrant Studies

Multnomah County Courthouse Relocation. Transportation Alternatives Analysis Technical Memorandum: FINAL

CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF MEMORANDUM

Student Housing Development

URBAN STREET CONCEPTS

Application of Diamond Interchange Control Strategies at Closely Spaced Intersections

S. Johnston (IBI Group)

Advisor: Peter G Furth

192 & 196 Bronson Avenue / 31 Cambridge Street

LIBERTY TREE ACADEMY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AND NECESSARY RECOMMENDATIONS CIVL 440 Project

Collision Estimation and Cost Calculation

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Tight Diamond Interchange versus Single Point Urban Interchange: Pedestrians Prospective

February 13, Mr. Chuck Marshall Stewart's Shops Corp. PO Box 435 Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue (Queens Park Crescent to Ossington Avenue) Final Report

Michigan Avenue Traffic Study

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

PRELIMINARY DRAFT WADDLE ROAD / I-99 INTERCHANGE PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FINAL TRAFFIC SUMMARY REPORT

February 24, 2017 Project #: 20076

George Street Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! Part 1: HCM. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

Travel Demand Management Plan

COMPARISON OF STOPPED DELAY BETWEEN FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND HCM 2010 ESTIMATIONS AT ACTUATED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS BY MOHAMMED ABDUL RAWOOF SHAIK

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Diverging Diamond Interchange and Double Crossover Intersection Vehicle and Pedestrian Performance

SUNY Uptown Campus and Harriman State Office Campus Traffic Impact Study for the Emerging Technology and Entrepreneurship Complex (ETEC) Building

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 9. SYSTEM CONTROL 3. DATA COLLECTION 4. SIGNAL PHASING 10. SPECIAL OPERATIONS

Congestion Mitigation at IH 27 and U.S. Hwy 70 in Plainview, TX

Actuated Signal Timing Design CIVL 4162/6162

TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT CASTLE PINES APARTMENTS CASTLE PINES, COLORADO

Arterial Traffic Analysis Actuated Signal Control

6. signalized Intersections

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

STRATEGY 4 INC Mainway, City of Burlington. [ Month Year ] Project No.: TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING STUDY APRIL 2018

Place Vanier 250 Montreal Road Transportation Impact Study Addendum. Prepared for Broccolini Construction September 20 th, 2012

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEM

SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.1 UPDATE HISTORY

Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas. Project Number: /07/2017. Trinity Landing. New Hanover County, NC

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Offset Single Point Interchange I-25 at Rio Bravo Boulevard Albuquerque, New Mexico

December TRANSPORTATION BRIEF 1-19 Beechwood Avenue, Ottawa, ON TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION TE WATER

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

DRAFT MEMORANDUM. 1. Introduction

March 11, Lynnfield Board of Selectmen Town of Lynnfield 55 Summer Street Lynnfield, MA Walnut Street Traffic Assessment

joint access drive. will be

CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF MEMORANDUM

A REAL-TIME SIGNAL CONTROL STRATEGY FOR MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF BUS STOPS ON URBAN ARTERIALS

Traffic Signal Optimization Project (Hosman Road) (Future Coordinated Corridor)

Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP CBB Transportation Engineers + Planners ITE International President Washington University

Signalized Intersections

Taming Traffic: Bethlehem Pike Phase II - Road Diet Evaluation

Signal Priority near Major Bus Terminal

WISCONSIN AVENUE EXTENSION SECOND PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING. March 28, 2017

Traffic Impact Study, Premier Gold Mines Limited, Hardrock Property

Chapter Capacity and LOS Analysis of a Signalized I/S Overview Methodology Scope Limitation

Kanata North Catholic Elementary School

Northwest Corridor Project Interchange Modification, Interchange Justification and System Analysis Report Reassessment (Phase I)

ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

Capacity Evaluation Of Rotary Intersection In Kabul Afghanistan

Pearl Street / Prospect Street / Colchester Avenue Intersection Scoping Study. April 11, 2013 Steering Committee Meeting #3

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Time Based Traffic Signal Coordination (A Case Study of Gatthaghar and Naya Thimi Intersections)

ATTACHMENT A EXISTING TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENT

25 May 2018 OUR REF:

Appendices. Appendix J: Traffic Study

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

February 8, Ms. Jamie Jun, Esq. Fromhold Jaffe & Adams 789 East Lancaster Avenue, Suite 220 Villanova, PA 19085

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Evaluation and Improvement of Signalized Intersections in Amman City in Jordan

Intersection Control Evaluation

DRAFT Step 3 Roundabout Evaluation

Mathematics of Planet Earth Managing Traffic Flow On Urban Road Networks

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

FAIRFIELD - RYAN S CORNER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Maple Street in Lexington Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Comparison

TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE SAFETY AND OPERATIONS AT SIGNALIZED DIAMOND INTERCHANGES IN NEVADA

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Transcription:

Arterial Traffic Analysis Some critical concepts Prepared by Philip J. Tarnoff

Agenda Fundamentals Signal timing concepts Actuated signal controllers Developing timing plans Types of signal control First generation Advanced techniques Relationship to the big picture (ITS)

Cycle Length Fact & Fiction Facts: Increased cycle length increases intersection capacity Shorter cycle lengths reduce delay Fiction: Cycle length has a significant impact on capacity Offset and cycle length are independent Longer cycle lengths always reduce congestion

Cycle Length and Capacity Effective Green Time (Sec./Hr.) 3,600 3,500 3,400 3,300 3,200 3,100 3,000 2,900 2,800 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Cycle Length (Sec.)

Cycle Length and Capacity Cycle Length change 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 120 to 140 0.75% 1.16% 1.59% 140 to 160 0.56% 0.86% 1.17% 160 to 180 0.43% 0.66% 0.90% 180 to 200 0.34% 0.53% 0.71%

Webster s Formula for Optimum Cycle Length C = (1.5*L+5)/(1-Y) Where: C is cycle length in seconds L is lost time = [(no. of phases)*(lost time per phase)+(all red time)] Y = sum of the critical lane flows/(1900)

Question Using Webster s equation, calculate the cycle length for an intersection with the following characteristics: Two phases (E-W and N-S) Assume lost time on each phase = 2.5 sec. 1 lane eastbound flow = 75 vph 1 lane westbound flow = 100 vph 2 lane northbound flow = 2600 vph 2 lane southbound flow = 1500 vph 2 lane flows equally divided in each lane

Question Use Webster again for: Eight Phase controller Assume lost time on each phase = 2.5 sec. Flows Equally divided N-S two thru lanes Single lane for all other movements Use flows on next slide

Question - continued NBL = 180 VPH NBT = 892 SBL = 44 SBT = 904 EBL = 104 EBT = 168 EBR = 240 WBL = 68 WBT = 160 WBR = 52

Cycle Length & Progression (offset) Space Ideal multiple of cycle length Time

Longer Cycle Lengths can Increase Congestion Upstream throughput may exceed downstream link capacity Turning bay storage can be exceeded Increased vehicle headways with long cycle lengths (longer green times)

Space Long Cycle Length Reduces Capacity Lost (wasted) green time Time

Cycle Length and Headway Space Headway Time

The Bottom Line About Cycle Length Results for an Isolated Intersection 30 Delay (sec./veh.) 25 20 15 10 5 800 vph 1200 vph 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cycle Length (sec.)

Basic Facts About Split Allocates intersection capacity to conflicting movements Directly entered on pretimed controllers Implicitly selected for actuated controllers through: Maximum green times Minimum green times

A Correct Split is Important 60 50 Delay 40 30 20 10 900 vph 1100 vph 1300 vph 0 0 25 50 75 100 Split Error (%)

Conclusions About Split Split i = Cycle * (Volume i )/(Total Volume) Bad splits mean high delays particularly at high volumes

Offsets Can Produce Smooth Flow Offset is the time relationship between intersections Offset is only relevant for undersaturated intersections Offset is useful for higher intersection spacing than generally realized Value of offset depends on mid-block friction

Platoons Determine Offset Effectiveness Space Platoon Dispersion Time

Platoon Profiles Traffic Flow % Saturation 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 % Saturation 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 1 41 5 45 9 13 49 17 21 25 29 33 37 1 41 5 45 9 49 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 % Saturation 41 45 49 Time (sec.) Time (sec.) Time (sec.)

Midblock Friction Need for coordination (offsets) determined by separation and midblock friction High friction disperses platoon Low friction allows the platoon to remain together

Levels of Midblock Friction Friction Level Typical Facility Turning Others Low High-type suburban arterial Turning bays No driveways, parking or pedestrians Medium Low-type suburban arterial Some protected turning movements Shopping center driveways, few pedestrians, no parking High Urban CBD No protected turning Pedestrians Parking Driveways

Midblock Friction Affects Platoon Dispersion Platoon profile @ 1500 ft. low friction 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 % Saturation Time (sec.) Platoon profile @ 1500 ft. moderate friction % Saturation 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 Time (sec.) Platoon profile @ 1500 ft. High friction 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 % Saturation Time (sec.)

Conclusions About Offset Offset = Spacing - Queue Length Speed Discharge Rate Offset must take queue length into account If midblock friction is low, coordination (the use of offsets) is useful for long intersection spacing

Question Calculate the relative offset between two intersections for the following conditions: Spacing 1000 ft. Ave. speed 50 fps Ave. Queue 16 veh. Queue Discharge.5 veh./sec.

Phase Sequences Leading/lagging turns present four options for NB-SB and EB-WB movements If time-space diagrams are used, best procedure is to determine offsets for favored direction Try different phase sequences to achieve best greenband in reverse direction

Space Alternate Phase Sequences NB Left Turn SB Left Turn Time

Space Alternate Phase Sequences NB Left Turn SB Left Turn Time

Double Cycling Another tool to help progression Used where interface between different types of roadways with different cycle length requirements is needed Not a panacea Only ½ the cycles are coordinated Cycle lengths are constrained to multiples of each other

Double Cycling at Work Space Double Cycled Intersection Time

Why do I need to know all this? Signal timing optimization programs do NOT always provide the best signal timing Cannot optimize for oversaturation Do not always model mid-block sources well Do not always model platoon dispersion Do not always permit evaluation of alternative phase sequences Independent analysis is mandatory

Signal Timing Process Arterial Timing Select Cycle Length Range yes Saturated? no Select Cycle Length Range Evaluate Phasing Alternatives Use Optimization Software Consider Double Cycling Determine Offsets & Splits

Points to Ponder Longer cycle lengths are not necessarily better Incorrect splits (including max greens) can significantly increase delay Offsets are important and must take secondary flows into account Alternative phase sequences can make a big difference