APPENDIX M FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PORTION OF THE VISION 2050 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
REVISED DRAFT APPENDIX I IH 43 BETWEEN HOWARD AVENUE AND SILVER SPRING DRIVE RECONSTRUCTING WITH WIDENING AND NOT WIDENING

PROPOSED VISION 2050 AMENDMENT

FISCALLY CONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION TO DATE OF YEAR 2035 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CONCEPTUAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION SCENARIOS

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

WSYBL Baseball 2014 Final Standings

A JURISDICTIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM PLAN FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY

EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND IMPACTS OF RECONSTRUCTING WITH WIDENING AND NOT WIDENING IH 43 BETWEEN HOWARD AVENUE AND SILVER SPRING DRIVE

Chapter 7 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES ELEMENT INTRODUCTION

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

The region is also served by Greyhound Bus Lines, Badger Coaches, Wisconsin Coach Lines, Lamers Bus Lines, and Amtrak Trains.

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

TRANSPORTATION. The intent of this chapter is to address these issues and requirements set forth by the Wisconsin Statutes.

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

PURCHASING POWER PROFILE OF ZIP CODE IN CUDAHY, WISCONSIN

SEWRPC MEMORANDUM REVIEW, UPDATE, AND REAFFIRMATION OF THE YEAR 2035 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Chapter 6

2008 REPORT OF THE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Minutes of the Ninth Joint Meeting of the ADVISORY COMMITTEES ON REGIONAL LAND USE PLANNING AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLANNING

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

VISION. Introduction WHAT S INSIDE. One Region, Focusing on Our Future

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Beyond the Highway. Tale of the Trails. Tom Beekman, P.E. Northwest Regional Planning Chief Department of Transportation

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Appendix C. Corridor Spacing Research

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

2.0 Existing Conditions

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

This page intentionally left blank.

Information on display. Inside this handout. Triangle Area revisions. Project need displays. Preferred alternative on aerial maps

Minutes of the Joint Meeting

#83875 v1 Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Recommended Plan. Overview and Summary June

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

Functional Classification of Roads and Streets

Executive Summary June 2015

DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

FI-2 I-66 Between Route 29, Lee Highway and Route 15, James Madison Highway

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

BICYCLE FACILITIES & PROGRAMS

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

York Region Population and Employment Growth

VIII. Project Prioritization & Implementation

Provo City Transportation Master Plan

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

INTERSECTION SAFETY AUDIT: STH 16/67 AND CTH Z

Road Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

2016 Girls Fastpitch State Tournament Results

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

4APNOIPF Vh, YII PTC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. 8K TH 63 River Crossing Bridge Replacement Project

Revised on 7/21/16 Page 1 of 6

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

This page intentionally left blank.

Peterborough Council on Aging

Route 29 Solutions Projects

2012 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Program

APPENDIX E BIKEWAY PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY

Bicycle & Pedestrian Section DRAFT: October 29, 2015

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

3.0 Future Conditions

CHAPTER 6: TRANSPORTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

National Network Safety Analysis (6/4/2015 Revision) FRA and FRA PID 86661

Chapter 7 TRANSPORTATION. Transportation Goal, Objectives & Policies

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION Following the 2010 U.S. Census, 70 the Milwaukee urbanized area boundary extends beyond the Southeastern Wisconsin Region across the boundary line between Waukesha and Jefferson Counties, comprising a 2.7 square mile area immediately west of the City of Oconomowoc. The year 2010 census and adjusted boundary of the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area is shown on Map M.1. Being designated an urbanized area brings with it Federal requirements for metropolitan, or areawide, transportation planning and programming for the urbanized area, including preparation of a long-range regional transportation plan (RTP) and short-range regional transportation improvement program (TIP). These requirements must be met for Federal highway and transit funds to continue to be used for local, County, and State transportation improvement projects within the urbanized area. Since the Commission currently serves as the areawide, or metropolitan, transportation planning organization for the Milwaukee urbanized area and four other urbanized areas within the sevencounty Southeastern Wisconsin Region (the Kenosha, Racine, Wisconsin portion of the Round Lake Beach, and West Bend urbanized areas), the Commission and Jefferson County entered into a cooperative agreement to provide the necessary transportation planning and programming services for the County s portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area, including the inclusion of this area in the RTP. This appendix summarizes the existing transportation systems of regional significance and transportation-related recommendations within the portion of Jefferson County in the Milwaukee urbanized area in VISION 2050. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES This section describes the transportation system of the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area in 2016, including streets and highways, public transit, and bicycle facilities. This inventory provides the base year conditions for use in the development of the transportation-related recommendations under VISION 2050 for the Jefferson County portion of the urbanized area. 70 After each decennial U.S. Census, the U.S. Census Bureau delineates the urbanized areas of the nation. The U.S. Census Bureau defines an urbanized area as an inner core of census blocks or tracts that have a total land area of less than three square miles and minimum population density of 1,000 persons per square mile surrounded by contiguous, densely settled census tracts and blocks having a minimum population density of 500 persons per square mile, along with adjacent non-contiguous densely settled blocks and block groups that together encompass a population of at least 50,000. VISION 2050 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PORTION OF THE MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA APPENDIX M VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 229

Belgium Fredonia Farmington Saukville Grafton Cedarburg 16,-94,-41 Brookfield,-94,-43,-43 Waukesha Ottawa Vernon Mukwonago Genesee 59 67 67 83 16 83 83,-94,-43,-94,-,-43 M I L W A U K E E C O. W A U K E S H A C O. Eagle 0112 67 0118 20 0141,-43 60 59 0118 33 83 28,-41 16 0141 59 36,-41,-,-41 36,-,-41 32 Waterford 20 0118 0141 60 0118 24 33 0141 57 57 57 57 59 57 32 0141 32 38 32 32 38 32 32 31 32 0 0.3 0.6 Miles Map M.1 Jefferson County Portion of the Milwaukee Urbanized Area ELMWOOD AVE KEWASKUM BELGIUM FREDONIA 144 MILWAUKEE URBANIZED Kewaskum AREA Wayne NEWBURG Barton Port WEST Washington BEND 144 PORT WASHINGTON 175 SAUKVILLE Addison Trenton West Bend SLINGER HARTFORD JACKSON GRAFTON CEDARBURG 164 Hartford Polk Jackson Germantown 181 MEQUON L A K E M I C H I G A N THIENSVILLE 167 145 RICHFIELD GERMANTOWN 167 167 O Z A U K E E C O. 175 W A S H I N G T O N C O. Erin BAYSIDE 100 RIVER FOX HILLS POINT Oconomowoc Merton BROWN LANNON DEER 164 181 MERTON MENOMONEE FALLS SUSSEX LAC LA BELLE GLENDALE CHENEQUA WHITEFISH Lisbon BUTLER BAY OCONOMOWOC 175 OCONOMOWOC HARTLAND SHOREWOOD 190 LAKE 190 NASHOTAH PEWAUKEE MILWAUKEE 145 WAUWATOSA BROOKFIELD ELM GROVE DELAFIELD 181 PEWAUKEE 164 SUMMIT 794 WEST WEST MILWAUKEE ALLIS 100 Delafield DOUSMAN WALES YEAR 2010 CENSUS-DEFINED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA ST. FRANCIS 794 CUDAHY SOUTH MILWAUKEE 894 GREENFIELD NEW BERLIN 894 119 HALES CORNERS GREENDALE 164 NORTH PRAIRIE 241 OAK FRANKLIN CREEK 100 BIG MUSKEGO BEND EAGLE MUKWONAGO WHITEWATER CALEDONIA 164 EAST TROY Norway Raymond WATERFORD La Grange East Troy Troy MOUNT PLEASANT 230 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M

Arterial Streets and Highways Arterial streets and highways are that portion of the total street and highway system principally intended to provide travel mobility, serving the through movement of traffic and providing transportation service between major subareas of a region and also through the region. Access to abutting property may be a secondary function of some types of arterial streets and highways, but the primary function of arterial streets and highways is traffic movement. The definition of arterials has been determined by an evaluation of four major factors: 1) traffic characteristics traffic volume and type, operating speeds, and average trip length; 2) physical characteristics horizontal and vertical alignment, pavement width, and pavement type; 3) system integration system continuity and facility spacing; and 4) land use service the areawide significance of the land use activities served. Based on these considerations, the existing arterial street and highway system for the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area was identified, as shown on Map M.2. The existing arterial street and highway system for the Jefferson County portion of the urbanized area totals 5.9 route-miles. Streets and highways may also be classified according to jurisdiction. Jurisdictional classification establishes which level of government State, county, or local has responsibility for the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of each segment of the total street and highway system. Of the 5.9 total route-miles, the facilities under State jurisdiction (shown as red lines on Map M.2) in 2016 consist of 4.5 route-miles (or 76 percent), the facilities under County jurisdiction consist of 1.0 route-mile (or 17 percent), and the facilities under local jurisdiction consist of 0.4 route-miles (or 7 percent). Transit Service Commuter bus service was provided in 2016 between the City of Oconomowoc in Waukesha County and the City of Milwaukee central business district in Milwaukee County. This service operates primarily over the freeway system and is operated for Waukesha County by Wisconsin Coach Lines, Inc. The service has a stop at the Collins Street Parking Lot in the City of Oconomowoc, just east of the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area. Local fixed-route transit service is currently not provided in the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area. Bicycle Facilities On arterial streets and highways with a rural cross-section, bicycles may be accommodated with a four-foot paved shoulder and six-foot gravel shoulder on a two-traffic-lane facility, and with an eight-foot paved shoulder on a fourtraffic-lane facility. On arterial streets with an urban cross-section, bicycles may be accommodated with bicycle lanes five to six feet in width, or with a widened outside lane of 14 feet. Accommodations may also be provided on urban and rural arterials with parallel, physically separate paths of eight to 12 feet in width (five to six feet for one-way paths) and ten feet of separation from the travel lanes. Map M.3 identifies the 0.5 miles of arterial streets and highways that provided accommodation through paved shoulders in 2016. In addition, bicycle accommodations can be provided on separate off-street bicycle paths. As part of VISION 2050, these paths are envisioned, upon completion, to connect the Region s major urban centers Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha, and Waukesha and the Region s urban communities. These paths intended for seasonal use provide particularly safe and aesthetically attractive routes with separation from motor vehicle traffic. Currently, there are no existing off-street bicycle facilities within the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area. VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 231

Map M.2 Existing Arterial Street and Highway System in the Jefferson County Portion of the Milwaukee Urbanized Area: 2016 4 ELMWOOD AVE 4 ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA BOUNDARY STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 0 0.3 0.6 Miles TRUNK HIGHWAY LOCAL TRUNK HIGHWAY NUMBER OF TRAFFIC LANES (2 LANES WHERE UNNUMBERED) 4 232 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M

Map M.3 Existing Bicycle Accommodations on the Arterial Streets and Highways in the Jefferson County Portion of the Milwaukee Urbanized Area ELMWOOD AVE ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA BOUNDARY PAVED SHOULDER 0 0.3 0.6 Miles ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY WITHOUT BICYCLE ACCOMMODATION VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 233

VISION 2050 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PORTION OF THE MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA This section describes the transportation-related recommendations under VISION 2050 for the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area with respect to transit service, bicycle accommodations, and arterials streets and highways. Public Transit VISION 2050 recommends that the existing commuter bus service be replaced with a commuter rail service between the City of Oconomowoc and downtown Milwaukee. The Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area would be served by a station proposed to be located in the City of Oconomowoc. Transit service to the industrial areas in the Town of Ixonia from the commuter rail station could be provided through a van shuttle service. Map 1.8 in Chapter 1 of Volume III shows how the commuter rail line recommended to serve the City of Oconomowoc connects with the other components of the recommended transit element of VISION 2050. Bicycle Element As shown on Map M.4, VISION 2050 recommends that as the 5.9 miles of arterial streets and highways in the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area are resurfaced and reconstructed segment-by-segment, bicycle accommodation be considered and implemented, if feasible, through bicycle lanes, paved shoulders, widened outside travel lanes, or enhanced bicycle facilities, such as a separate path within the road right-of-way. 71 VISION 2050 also recommends that a system of off-street bicycle paths be provided between the Kenosha, Milwaukee, Racine, Round Lake Beach, and West Bend urbanized areas. These off-street bicycle paths would be located in natural resource and utility corridors and are intended to provide reasonably direct connections between the Region s urbanized and small urban areas on safe and aesthetically attractive routes with separation from motor vehicle traffic. While such an off-street bicycle path is not proposed within the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area, the plan does recommend an interurban recreational trail south of the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area that would connect the City of Oconomowoc in Waukesha County and the City of Watertown in Jefferson County. As shown on Map M.5, this interurban recreational trail would be constructed within the existing WE Energies right-of-way corridor and would connect with the existing Lake Country Trail in Waukesha County. The recommended interurban recreational trail could serve as the bicycle accommodation for the STH 16 corridor between the Cities of Watertown and Oconomowoc. Arterial Streets and Highways Element As shown on Map M.6, VISION 2050 recommends that the 5.9 miles of roadway within the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area be resurfaced or reconstructed to provide essentially the same capacity. As the existing and future forecast year 2050 traffic volumes approach, but do not exceed, the design capacity of STH 16 between CTH F and the terminus of the STH 16 Oconomowoc Bypass, just west of Wisconsin Avenue, 234 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 71 The only location where on-street bicycle accommodations may not be possible is along a 1.7 mile segment of STH 16 between the STH 16 interchange at Wisconsin Avenue and the Jefferson/Waukesha County line. This segment of STH 16 is part of the Oconomowoc Bypass which is a controlled access highway.

0 0.3 0.6 Miles Map M.4 Bicycle Accommodations on the Arterial Streets and Highways in the Jefferson County Portion of the Milwaukee Urbanized Area: VISION 2050 ELMWOOD AVE ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA BOUNDARY ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY WITH BICYCLE ACCOMMODATION (IF FEASIBLE) Note: The only location where on-street bicycle accommodations may not be possible is along a 1.7-mile segment of STH 16 between the STH 16 interchange at Wisconsin Avenue and the Jefferson/ Waukesha County line. This segment of STH 16 is part of the Oconomowoc Bypass, which is a controlled access highway. VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 235

Map M.5 Recommended Interurban Trail Between the City of Oconomowoc in Waukesha County and the City of Watertown in Jefferson County HUMBOLDT ST RIVER RD HUSTISFORD RD BICYCLE FACILITY YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA BOUNDARY RECOMMENDED INTERURBAN TRAIL 0 0.5 1 Miles EXISTING OFF-STREET BICYLE PATH 236 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M

0 0.3 0.6 Miles Map M.6 Functional Improvements to the Arterial Street and Highway System in the Jefferson County Portion of the Milwaukee Urbanized Area: VISION 2050 ELMWOOD AVE 4 ARTERIAL STREET OR HIGHWAY YEAR 2010 ADJUSTED MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA BOUNDARY RESURFACING OR RECONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE ESSENTIALLY THE SAME CAPACITY RESERVE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT (ADDITIONAL LANES) NUMBER OF TRAFFIC LANES FOR NEW OR WIDENED AND/OR IMPROVED FACILITY 4 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M 237

VISION 2050 recommends the reservation of right-of-way along this section of STH 16 to accommodate possible improvement of the facility beyond the plan design year of 2050. This recommendation would be revisited as the Commission monitors traffic counts taken by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) on a three-year cycle, and as the Commission reviews, updates, and amends the regional transportation plan every four years. Additionally, it is recommended that the VISION 2050 recommendations under the arterial streets and highways element presented in Chapter 1 of Volume III be implemented in the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area, if applicable, including addressing safety needs for arterial streets and highways. Safety improvements identified in the STH 16 corridor study completed by WisDOT in 2014 should be considered for implementation, as appropriate, when the segment of STH 16 within the Milwaukee urbanized area is resurfaced or reconstructed. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF EXPECTED PLAN COSTS AND REVENUES The costs associated with the implementation of the VISION 2050 plan recommendations within the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area are included in the expected costs of the VISION 2050 transportation system, as described in Chapter 1 of Volume III. Given the existing and reasonably expected available revenues through the year 2050, the bicycle and arterial street and highway elements of the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area can be funded. However, due to the expected funding gap to implement the transit element of the plan, it is expected that transit service would decline in the Region over the next 35 years, rather than be significantly expanded and improved as recommended under VISION 2050, including the recommended commuter rail service between the City of Oconomowoc and downtown Milwaukee. As Federal regulations require the Region s transportation plan to only include projects that can be funded with existing and reasonably expected revenues, only the funded portion of VISION 2050 would be considered the fiscally constrained regional transportation plan by the Federal Government and is titled the Fiscally Constrained Transportation Plan (FCTP) for VISION 2050 (as further described in Chapter 2 of Volume III). Under the FCTP, there would be sufficient existing and reasonably expected revenues to continue the operation of the commuter bus service between the City of Oconomowoc and downtown Milwaukee, with the Jefferson County portion of the Milwaukee urbanized area continuing to be served by the Collins Street Parking Lot in the City of Oconomowoc. 238 VISION 2050 - VOLUME III: APPENDIX M