TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

Similar documents
Pressure Test Tubing for Leak

Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

Carbon Fiber Sucker Rods versus Steel and Fiberglass

Don-Nan Pump & Supply. Don-Nan Pump & Supply 1

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Gas Locked Pumps are NOT Gas Locked!

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

Anomaly Marker Method for Gas-Lift Wells

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 20 22, 2017

Acoustic Liquid Level Testing of Gas Wells

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate Determined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well

2010 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Optimizing Production and Reducing Costs by Solving Rod Pumping Problems With The Beam Gas Compressor

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

Dan Casey Pro-Seal Lift Systems, Inc.

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Optimizing Chemical Injection

Setting Plunger Fall Velocity Using Venturi Plungers

Plunger Lift: SCSSSV Applications

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

Pacemaker Plunger Operations in Greater Natural Buttes

Intermittent Gas Lift and Gas Assist Plunger Lift

Pressure Activated Chamber Technology (PACT)

Plunger Lift Algorithms A Review

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

37 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 3 7, Alan Brodie, PTC

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Gas Assisted Rod Pump

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Is The Selection Of Artificial Lift

32 nd Gas-Lift Workshop. Optimizing Subsea Well Kick-off Operations Case Study Using FlowLift2

Using Valve Performance in Gas Lift Design Software

High Pressure Continuous Gas Circulation: A solution for the

Selection, optimization and safe operation of bypass plungers

Global Gas Lift Optimization Using WellTracer Surveys

31 st Gas-Lift Workshop

Downhole Pressure Boosting: A production enhancement tool for both dry and liquid loaded Gas wells

Troubleshooting Unloading Gas Lift Design using DynaLift TM

Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading

Correlating Laboratory Approaches to Foamer Product Selectione

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

Improving Performance of Gas Lift Compressors in Liquids-Rich Gas Service

Continuous Injection of Hydrate Inhibitor in Gas Lift Gas to Mitigate Downtime Due to Downhole Annular Plugging

Presented By Dr. Youness El Fadili. February 21 th 2017

Considerations for Qualifying Elastomers Used in Artificial Lift Equipment

Bellows Cycle Life & How Manufacturing Processes Can Impact it

Hydraulic Piston Pump Field Trial

Gas Lift Valve Testing

Wireless I/O, Connecting Remote Sensors in a Wide Range of Environments

Honeywell s On-line Gas Lift Optimization Solution

Gas-Lift Test Facility for High- Pressure and High-Temperature Gas Flow Testing

How does an unstable GLV affect the producing zones?

Barrier Philosophy for Wells on Gas lift and Ways of Reducing HSE Risks. Alan Brodie Feb 2011 For more info visit

36 th Gas-Lift Workshop. Reverse Flow Check Valve Reliability and Performance Testing of Gas Lift Barrier Check Valves

Plunger Lift Optimize and Troubleshoot

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 29 March 2, 2016

A Combined Experimental & Numerical Research Program to Develop a Computer Simulator for Intermittent Gas-lift

Gas-liquid flow optimization with a Bubble Breaker device

Dual Gas Lift Well Analysis Using WellTracer

De-Liquification and Revival of Oil & Gas Wells using Surface Jet Pump (SJP) Technology

Downhole Gas Separators

Well Testing Plan. New York Marginal Well Study. Introduction. I. Tests to be Conducted. II. Testing Procedures

Acoustic Liquid-Level Determination of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Technology in a Mature Industry. September 2017 John C. Patterson Consultant Retired from ConocoPhillips (2015)

Contact Information. Progressive Optimization Service. We Provide: Street Bay #2. Grande Prairie, AB T8V - 4Z2

Restoring Fluid Flow in Tubing Strings

10 Steps to Optimized Production

Presents the following instructional slide show:

ACOUSTIC VELOCITY FOR NATURAL GAS

Multi-Stage Plunger Lift: Case Histories

Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Simulation: Unconventional Oil & Gas Well Case Histories

Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

VortexFlow DX (Downhole) Tool Installation Instructions

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

A LIFE OF THE WELL ARTIFICIAL LIFT STRATEGY FOR UNCONVENTIONAL WELLS

Optimizing Production Throughout the Well s Lifespan. Gas Lift

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS

Artificial Lift Basics Pre Reading

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

Float Operated Level Controllers

Perforating Options Currently Available in Horizontal Shale Oil and Gas Wells. Kerry Daly, Global BD Manager- DST TCP

Gas Well De-Liquification Workshop. Denver, Colorado February 27 - March 1, Multi-Staging Wells. Chandler Frost Production Control Services

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

Transcription:

10 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 16-19, 2014 TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS John Sparks, COG OPERATING LLCU Lynn Rowlan, Echometer Company

Overview 1. Practice of shooting fluid levels has become a wellknown mainstay to daily operations 2. Common to use acoustic liquid level instrument to shoot distance to the liquid level in the casing annulus 3. Determine if a well is producing the maximum fluid potentially available from the formation 4. Determine if the current artificial lift method needs to be modified to increase production 5. Much-lesser-known is to shoot inside the tubing. 6. Valuable trouble-shooting technique to shoot down the tubing on wells that have either stopped producing, or production rate has drastically decreased. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 2

Shoot a Fluid Level Generate Blast to Create Traveling Wave Acoustic Wave Travels at Speed of Sound Echoes from well bore diameter change recorded at Round Trip Travel Time Reduction seen as a down-kick (Liquid Level) Increase is seen as an up-kick (Hole in Tubing) Liquid Level, LL, gives large kick and lets almost no energy past Collars Hole Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 3 LL

Direction of Kick of the Acoustic Signal 1. Reflected echo indicates enlargements and reductions 2. For an Explosion shot reduction in the cross sectional area are displayed as downward kicks. 3. Wellbore decreases displayed as a down kick: Liners tops, tubing anchors, paraffin/scale deposits, blockages, the liquid level 4. Wellbore increase displayed as upward kick: Hole in tubing, perforations, open hole, sliding sleeves, parted casing, parted tubing, end of tubing. 5. Implosion created acoustic trace, then the echoes will be reversed from explosion pulse echoes 6. Software allows the selection of implosion pulse type so trace is inverted; then implosion and explosion acoustic traces on the same well appear identical. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 4

Troubleshooting Procedures - General 1. Upon arrival a well is normally turned off, if the well is suspected of no pump action or no production. 2. Acquire two (2) fluid level shots down the casing and verify acoustic traces appear the same on both shots. 3. Acquire two (2) fluid level shots down the tubing and verify acoustic traces appear the same on both shots. 4. Since the shut-in well is normally quiet the casing tubing collar echoes are normally very clear. 5. Remember that inside the tubing of a rod-pumped well, the presence of rod couplings skews the analysis and that s why it s necessary to use the acoustic velocity obtained in the casing fluid level analysis. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 5

Potential Results from Analysis 1. Whether or not the well has a hole in the tubing. 2. If the well has kicked a. Excessive gas flow has unloaded the tubing liquids b. Backpressure adjustment is required to apply more tubing pressure. 3. Is gas flowing up the tubing? Determined by dp/dt greater than 0 from the pressure buildup test. 4. % liquid in the tubing, determines the effectiveness of the downhole gas separation equipment. 5. Tubing fluid level shots at regular intervals can show the operator if a well is truly pumping up. 6. Too much paraffin makes shooting difficult so beware. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 6

Liquid Level Normally Located at Pump Collars count depth (C) is noted on the acoustic signal. For Accuracy Verify 4207 ft Distance to Tubing Anchor Liquid Level Depth (LL) of 4458 feet is determined by counting as many collars as possible and using the average acoustic velocity of the collars counted to determine the distance to the liquid level. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 7

Analysis Method: Count Collars Casing Collar Analysis Distance down tubing is determined by using the average acoustic velocity obtained from the casing shot, because inside the tubing the echoes from couplings are spaced at the length of the sucker rods. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 8

Well Shut-down No Production to Surface Liquid Level Depth (LL) at 3678 feet is above tubing anchor and perfs. High hole in tubing is suspected, but no obvious up kick seen on trace. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 9

Remove Collar Noise Collars to See HIT Up Kick from Hole Repeat Echo Inverted by Hole Use less pressure differential in gas gun to shoot the liquid level and see echoes near the surface OR apply low pass filter to remove noise. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 10

Casing Acoustic Velocity Determined to be 973 ft/sec by Counting Tubing Collars Near Surface Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop

Casing acoustic velocity determined to be 973 ft/sec Tubing Collars Frequency in Casing of 14.96 Jts/second at 32.15 ft/joint Rod Couplings Frequency in Tubing of 19.46 Jts/second at 25.0 ft/joint

Comparing Tubing Hole Up Kick Echo by Overlay of Low Pass Filtered Casing Shot to Raw Tubing Shot Distance to the Tubing Hole is 263 feet Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 13

Find the Tubing Hole Shooting fluid levels down can show if there is a hole in the tubing. Begin by shooting a fluid level down the casing. Connected to the tubing valve and use the same procedure as shooting a fluid level inside the casing. Shooting inside the tubing usually requires 50 to 65% less charge pressure into the gas gun than is normal for the casing shot. Using the acoustic velocity determined from analyzing the casing shot generally is the easiest and most accurate method for determining distance down the tubing. Rod on tubing wear often creates a hole in the lower portion on the tubing string and the tubing leak is usually deep, but the presence of a deep hole in the tubing allows equalization of the two fluid levels. Re-shoot the tubing to verify the hole after operating the pumping unit for 30-60 minutes, a hole in the tubing is likely if the fluid level inside the tubing has not risen Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 14

First determined FL to be high in tubing ~ only 274 from surface Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 15

1 st Csg shot w/ PCP turned off showed only 571 of FAP Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 16

Downkick showed up 447 from surface w/ PCP running. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 17

Below is the email from the consultant that pulled the well Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 18

Tiny split in between threads. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 19

View from the inside. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2013 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 20

Pressure Test the Tubing Novice Fluid Level Shooters should confirm the hole by pressure test When a tubing fluid level shot and a casing fluid level shot indicates a HIT, then a recommended practice is to confirm the HIT by either calling a pump truck to determine if the tubing can be loaded. Tubing is usually pressured up to 500 psi(g) and the pressure is held for a period of time If a hole in the tubing is small and near the surface, then a good pump truck can often increase the water injection rate (barrels/minute) to increase the tubing pressure to 500 psi(g). But if a hole is present, then the tubing pressure will very quickly leak off (30 seconds to a minute). A single leaking tubing collar can take as much as 10 minutes to leak off 500 psi(g) of pressure. HIT and a leaky surface casing check valve have many of the same symptoms, but with a HIT the tubing will not pass a pressure test. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 21

Wells that Kick Excessive amounts of gas produced up the tubing can unload the tubing Horizontal leg can kick large quantities of gas After unload the tubing occurs 1. Operator discover the well not producing to the tank 2. May suspect the well has a hole in the tubing 3. Foreign material may stick open a valve in the pump 4. Surface back-pressure may be insufficient. Restart Pump action by loading the tubing with water Frequent operator intervention required on these wells Usually additional back-pressure on the tubing is required Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 22

Pumper Reported Well Not Pumping ~ No Fluid to Surface. Arrived on location the well shut-down (HOA on OFF). ANOTHER WELL WITH UNLOADED TUBING Initial Cards showed no pump action. 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 23

Casing 4094 Fluid Level 5 min After PU Startup 1 st Tubing Shot 4367 Fluid Level 25 mins After PU Startup

1 st Tubing Shot 4367 Fluid Level 25 mins After PU Startup 2 nd Tubing Shot 1577 Fluid Level 5 min After PU Startup 147 mins After PU Startup 3 rd Tubing Shot 115 Fluid Level 178 mins After PU Startup Measured Liquid Rise in Tubing/Rod Annulus (1577 115 ) / 31 min / 8.29 SPM = 5.7 Ft/Stroke

Feet/Stroke Liquid Level Rise Between 1 Rod and 2.875 Tubing Annulus Measured 5.7 Ft/Stroke Liquid Rise in Tubing Almost Equal to Expected 5 Ft/Stroke Rise Expected 26

Left Well Pumping with 450 psi Back-pressure 286 BPD Pump Displacement @ 8.29 SPM 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 27

Documenting Fluid Movement Pump installed in the well was under-performing and not pumping sufficient liquid per stroke into the tubing Dynamometer pump card shows good pump action As the well was produced, the lowered fluid level increased the pressure acting across the plunger and pump slippage increased. High differential pressure acting across the PAP plunger, lost pump displacement due to slippage Fluid level shots down the tubing determined whether or not the pump in this well is truly pumping No matter what the cards look like, the fluid level shot down the tubing shows the pump is not lifting fluid Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 28

Fluid Level Rise Inside Tubing Successive tubing fluid shots show PAP pump was under-performing by not pumping sufficient liquid per stroke 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 29

Feet/Stroke Liquid Level Rise Between 1 Rod and 2.875 Tubing Annulus Calculated Measured Rise Low Pump Under Performing 30

Measured 1.0 ft/min Fluid Level Rise Too Slow With no pump slippage the pump should fill approximately 4.25 feet of tubing /sucker rod annular volume per stroke. 170 barrels per day pump displacement Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 31

Conclusions For Rod Pumped Wells, If no pump action or no production to surface, then shoot a fluid level down the tubing. Distance down the tubing typically determined by using the average acoustic velocity obtained from the casing shot. Checked for an upkick from the tubing hole appearing on both traces at or near the same depth. Dynamometer Pump Card height is less than fluid load determined using fluid level to calculate load required to lift liquid to the surface. Monitoring the fluid level in the tubing over time can be used to determine if the pump action is filling the tubing with liquid. When data is properly interpreted and acted upon, gassy wells can be operated without frequent intervention. Shooting a fluid level inside the tubing is a valuable troubleshooting technique used on wells that have either stopped producing altogether, or production rate has drastically decreased. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 32

Copyright Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to: Display the presentation at the Workshop. Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Other use of this presentation is prohibited without the expressed written permission of the author(s). The owner company(ies) and/or author(s) may publish this material in other journals or magazines if they refer to the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop where it was first presented. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 33

Disclaimer The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Sucker Rod Pumping Web Site. The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained. The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials. The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose. Sept. 17-20, 2013 2014 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 34