Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL.

Similar documents
Assembly Committee Document 7.5

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Pedestrian Level Wind Study Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

Computer-Based Pedestrian Level Wind Study Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

March 25, Katherine Grechuta MCIP, RPP, LEED AP Planner FoTenn Planning & Urban Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON, K2P 0Z8. Dear Ms.

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment, Phase 1. Ottawa, Ontario

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

Urban Environmental Climate Maps for Urban Planning Considering Urban Heat Island Mitigation in Hiroshima

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

COMPARISONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND

Gorge Wind Characteristics in Mountainous Area in South-West China Based on Field Measurement

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 350 Sparks Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

5.0 Roadway System Plan

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 398, 402, 406 Roosevelt Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Site Analysis and Parti Development

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Elmvale Acres Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Background Preliminary Review... 3

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Château Laurier Hotel Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street. Ottawa, Ontario

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 409 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Greystone Village 10 Oblats Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Forest Winds in Complex Terrain

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Sidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 83 East Street. Oakville, Ontario

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

Injector Dynamics Assumptions and their Impact on Predicting Cavitation and Performance

Wind Flow Validation Summary

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Techniques to achieve wind comfort & wind loads on buildings and appurtenances

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Possibility of Forming the Wake Flow of Large Ships by Using the Vortex Generators

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

Analyses of 03 OP-FTIR monitoring results

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Strolling down the Avenue

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Wind Microclimate Assessment

Wind Tunnel Testing of Crossgrip Roof Walkway Matting

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Safety Assessment of Installing Traffic Signals at High-Speed Expressway Intersections

AIRFLOW GENERATION IN A TUNNEL USING A SACCARDO VENTILATION SYSTEM AGAINST THE BUOYANCY EFFECT PRODUCED BY A FIRE

Technical Memorandum. I. Introduction and Overview. Nancy Clark Turnstone Consulting 330 Townsend Street, Suite 216 San Francisco, CA 94107

A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study

City of Margate, Florida. Neighborhood Traffic Management Manual

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis 129 South Street, Gananoque

List of Exhibits...ii

Winds and Ocean Circulations

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

School of Engineering & Technology University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, AL10 9AB. Wind Tunnel Testing of Crossgrip TPO Roof Walkway Matting

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

2.0 Existing Conditions

summary of issues and opportunities

Local Winds & Microclimates. Unit 2- Module 1

Abstract. 1 Introduction

3/6/2001 Fig. 6-1, p.142

Meteorology 2/6/2017. Wind, and its Interaction with Particle Plumes. Variation of wind speed with elevation. Variation of wind speed during the day

Lake Michigan Wind Assessment Project Data Summary and Analysis: October 2012

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I MOVE TO PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 556, TO REMOVE NE 173RD STREET FROM THE DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED STREETS.

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

Transcription:

Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project by NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL November 15, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...3 1. INTRODUCTION...5 2. WIND HISTORICAL DATA...7 3. COMFORT CRITERIA...8 4. METHODOLOGY...10 Analysis Sites...10 Model for Predicting Wind Conditions...11 5. RESULTS...12 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...20

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 3 November 15, 2005 To: From: Subject: Linh Do Senior Vice-President AKRF, Inc. Dennis Torok, Ph.D. US Business Manager Pedestrian Wind Study for Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Large buildings can impact wind speed and turbulence by diverting stronger winds from aloft down to street-level (downwash) and by restricting wind flow between buildings (channeling). performed a pedestrian wind study for the vicinity of the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project in Brooklyn, New York. The objective was to provide a prediction of the future pedestrian-level wind speeds in the proximity of the proposed project, focusing on the areas most likely to experience increased wind speeds caused by the future project buildings. Pedestrian level wind speeds in the future condition with the proposed project were predicted using computer fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, which include the local meteorological conditions combined with the effect of the buildings. Six wind directions representing the dominant wind directions were analyzed at pedestrian locations along Flatbush Avenue, Atlantic Avenue, Sixth Avenue, and several other locations that could potentially experience high winds. The results for all wind directions were then aggregated to produce the annual probability of various wind speeds at each location. New York City does not have wind-related pedestrian comfort criteria. The criteria used in this project follow general design guidelines used throughout the U.S. and, which define wind speeds determined to be comfortable for different expected uses at least 80% of the time. Results are presented for annual wind directional probabilities to determine comfort levels of pedestrian wind speeds around the vicinity of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 4 Highlights of the results and conclusions are summarized below: No locations were found to be in the uncomfortable range, greater than 20 mph, more than 1% of the time - well within the normal occurrence level for the area; Conditions at all locations are expected to be within the acceptable comfort levels for the existing uses and for the potential uses within the proposed project; All locations had predicted wind speeds suitable for general pedestrian activities (<20 mph) ranging from 91% to 100% of the time; With the exception of several locations near the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues and a few narrow passages between the proposed buildings, all locations had predicted wind speeds suitable for short term sitting, leisurely walking, and waiting, such as bus stops (<16 mph) ranging from 92% to 100% of the time; near the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues and within some narrow passages mentioned above such conditions would be expected at least 84% of the time; Locations that may have more extended use, such as parks and open space, would experience suitable conditions (<11 MPH) at least 91% of the time, with the exception of the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden where such conditions would be expected at least 86% of the time; Area averaged wind speeds around the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden would not exceed 13 MPH for 95% of the time. The wind speed in the garden itself would not exceed 11 MPH for 86% of the time, and would be considered suitable for sitting, walking, and general gardening activities; Wind speeds around the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden would increase by approximately 13% due to the presence of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project for the 80% recurrence level. This increase is not considered significant. The evaporative capability of the wind passing over the garden canopy is expected to increase approximately10% due to the presence of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project; In general, while ground-level wind speeds in the area are projected to increase with the addition of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project all locations identified, these increases would not cause significant hardship to pedestrians.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 5 1. INTRODUCTION Large buildings can impact wind speed and turbulence by diverting stronger winds from aloft down to street-level (downwash) and by restricting wind flow between buildings (canyon effect, or channeling). Public comments on the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project have raised concerns that the proposed tall buildings could generate downwash and produce a canyon effect that could result in uncomfortable ground-level wind speeds due to channeling. This wind study investigates potential future wind patterns and pedestrian level wind speeds in the neighborhood around the proposed project and in the open spaces in the proposed project in the future condition with the proposed buildings in place. Figure 1 Atlantic Yard Arena & Redevelopment Project Figure 1 illustrates the proposed project. Some areas where proposed buildings might increase wind speeds at pedestrian level are shown with red arrows and highlighted circles. These areas and several areas along Atlantic Avenue just north of the buildings (not visible in Figure 1) were studied. The proposed building heights would range from 185 to 620 feet which may result in channeling of wind and possible downwash. Wind approaching from the north, west, or south quadrants could potentially generate increased wind speeds between buildings resulting in potential discomfort to pedestrians. This study analyzes the frequency of

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 6 such occurrences to determine if conditions would be suitable for the existing and proposed uses, based on standard planning criteria. Figure 2 Isometric View Showing the Atlantic Yards Arena Project and Surroundings The surrounding neighborhoods to the North, South, East, and West have been added to provide completeness and provide the correct wind characteristics for an urban environment with approaching winds in all directions. All of the buildings to the South are low-rise buildings. Several taller buildings abut the proposed project to the North and may cause additional blockage for winds approaching from the North-West quadrant. Buildings North of Atlantic Avenue are taller but are less dense and may generate additional channeling of the winds approaching the proposed project in certain directions.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 7 2. WIND HISTORICAL DATA The seasonal wind distributions for the area around the proposed project were obtained by analyzing historical data measured at JFK airport. Archived wind data for a period of 10 years were obtained from a public web site. 1 The average mean wind speed was found to be 10.37 MPH with the level of recurrence of speeds greater than the mean occurring 47% of the time. The probability of occurrence of mean daily wind speeds was generated from the archived data and summarized in the Weibull distribution shown in Figure 3. Wind speeds greater than 14.4 MPH and 16.8 MPH had recurrence levels of 80% and 90% respectively. The archived yearly data did not include daily wind directions. In order to determine directional probabilities, a 1-year set of hourly mean wind and directional data was obtained from the web site. The differences between the yearly data and 10 year data sets showed minor differences that are considered negligible. Probability Wind Speed Probability Annual Mean Wind 0.000 0 20 40 60 Speed (MPH) Wind speed is usually measured at a height of 10 meters for most data collection stations. JFK has a relatively flat terrain that is adjacent to water. The average wind speeds obtained were adjusted to values just outside the ground boundary layer. These values were then used as input for the directional wind studies. Since no archival data is expected to exist at the proposed project site, it is sufficient to include parts of the neighborhood adjacent and surrounding the Atlantic Yards site to provide the correct topology to represent a developed urban environment. Figure 4 illustrates historical data taken from observations at JFK Airport that show both the directional probability and wind speed in the vicinity of Flatbush and Atlantic avenues. The highest probabilities of approaching winds and wind speeds occur in the northern, western, and southern quadrants. As these directions are somewhat aligned with the avenues, there is some credence to the concerns of potentially high groundlevel winds in the canyons formed by adjacent buildings. 0.090 0.080 0.070 0.060 0.050 0.040 0.030 0.020 0.010 1997 10 Year Figure 3 Weibull Wind Speed Distribution 1 http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/jfk/1997/2/27/dailyhistory.html?req_city=na&req_state =NA&req_statename=NA

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 8 NW Directional Probability Annual N NNW 15% NNE NE 10% Directional Wind Speeds Annual NW NNW N 20 15 NNE NE WNW 5% ENE WNW 10 5 ENE W WSW 0% E ESE Direction Probability W WSW 0 E ESE Directions Speed (Mph) SW SSW S SSE SE SW SSW S SSE SE Figure 4 (a) Annual Directional Probability and (b) Mean Wind Speeds Direction Annual % Speed N 9.61% 10.88 NNE 4.86% 10.45 NE 4.52% 11.45 ENE 2.92% 9.37 E 3.74% 11.51 ESE 2.33% 10.83 SE 2.83% 9.74 SSE 3.14% 10.41 S 12.59% 12.71 SSW 5.36% 10.01 SW 7.67% 10.79 WSW 7.56% 11.47 W 10.00% 14.72 WNW 7.03% 16.26 NW 9.01% 16.41 NNW 6.83% 12.66 Figure 5 Directional Probability and Mean Wind Speeds Figure 5 shows seven wind directions, highlighted in red: N, NE, E, S, W, WSW, and NW, that were used to determine local wind patterns around the buildings and ground level wind speeds. These data were used to model pedestrian-level winds at key locations. Directional probabilities for wind from the ENE, ESE, and SE directions were added to the probability from the E and scaled to the appropriate directional wind speed. The same procedure was used to incorporate directional probabilities of winds from the SSE and SSW with S, SW with WSW, WNW and NNW with NW, and NNE with NE. These directions had lower probabilities and thus the averaging procedure was considered valid with the results expected to be conservative. 3. COMFORT CRITERIA The pedestrian comfort criteria reflect a person s perception of the wind and depends somewhat on the activity. For example, sitting and outdoor eating requires calmer wind conditions than would be expected either for a brisk walk or general outdoor activities. Not only are the wind speeds important but also their frequency and persistence. The comfort criteria include threshold wind speeds for various activities below which a

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 9 comfort level appropriate for each activity would be expected, as well as criteria above which vulnerable pedestrians might be at risk. Results of the wind study completed for the proposed project and surrounding area are presented in the form of tables illustrating the predicted wind levels and the recurrence levels of pedestrian winds with comparison to accepted wind thresholds. The comfort criteria used in this study are summarized as follows: Leisure Sitting, Dining (L): Wind speeds below 7 MPH would be acceptable for leisure sitting for extended periods of time and is suitable for outdoor dining. Sitting (S): Wind speeds 0-11 MPH. This range of wind speeds is suitable for short term sitting at outdoor cafes, standing, or strolling. These are light to gentle breezes where wind is felt on face, leaves rustle, small branches and twigs are in constant motion. Standing (T): Wind speeds 0-16 MPH. This range of wind speeds is suitable at building entrances, bus stops, short term sitting, window shopping, and leisurely walking. These are moderate breezes where, at the higher end of this range, dust, loose paper and small branches are in motion. Walking (W): Wind speeds 0-20 MPH. This range of wind speeds is suitable for brisk walking, parks, and general pedestrian activities. At the higher end of this range, small leafed trees begin to sway, crested wavelets form on inland waterways, and umbrella usage becomes difficult. Uncomfortable (U): Wind speeds > 20 MPH. These winds are generally considered uncomfortable and begin to become a nuisance for most activities. Dangerous (D): Wind speeds > 45 MPH. At these speeds, whole trees are in motion, walking is difficult, and performance of general activities is impeded. The above have been applied and accepted on recent pedestrian wind studies. 2 New York City does not have specific pedestrian comfort requirements. The wind thresholds and comfort categories at an 80% recurrence level are used to establish conditions that, while not universally agreed upon, have been accepted by many cities to satisfy municipal requirements. This means that wind speeds should be equal to or lower than the applicable speed, determined to be comfortable for a specific use expected at a given location, at least 80% of the time. The comfort criteria used in this study are thought to be representative of those accepted by many cities and municipalities. 2 Wind Impact Study : Report on Pedestrian Winds for River Vista Condominiums, Edmonton, Alberta, January, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 10 4. METHODOLOGY Analysis Sites The study focuses on certain areas or corridors adjacent to the project s buildings to determine the effects of the proposed buildings on wind speeds and their effect on the established pedestrian comfort criteria. The height of several buildings will divert wind from different directions, divert stronger winds from aloft, and affect ground level wind speeds in existing areas such as the area around the intersection of Pacific and Flatbush Avenues, along Atlantic Avenue, and in the Sixth Avenue corridor. Figure 6 Locations of Pedestrian Points around Atlantic Yards Project Pedestrian-level wind speeds and recurrence levels at specific locations (receptors) were extracted from the model results, and compared with the criteria. Figure 6 shows the receptor locations (green dots). The pedestrian points related to key locations of interest are as follows:

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 11 Brooklyn Bears Community Garden (Receptors 4-8) A community garden area containing flowers and vegetables and tended by local residents is located in the triangular area at the intersection of Flatbush and Pacific Avenues and abutting Site 5. A concern is that the proposed buildings in the area, specifically Site 5, B1, B2, and the arena would increase the local wind speeds producing uncomfortable conditions for users, and dryer conditions requiring increased irrigation. Sixth Avenue (Receptors 14-17) Another location of concern is caused by the corridor along Sixth Avenue caused by the proposed buildings, B4, B3 and B5, B15. The avenue is aligned along the North-South corridor. Historical data shows winds from the North and South have a higher annual probability of occurrence and therefore blockage, downwash from buildings, and the channeling effect of the corridor may cause an increase in wind speeds. Atlantic and Flatbush Avenues (Receptors 1, 6, 18-25, and 6-11) Increased annual winds are possible along these avenues due to blockage from buildings and downwash from the buildings facing Atlantic Avenue caused by winds approaching from the North. Pacific Avenue, Dean Street, and Surrounding Buildings (Receptors 26-48) The wind speeds along the corridor between Pacific Avenue and buildings B6 and B7 and buildings B8 to B14 may also be affected by the narrow corridors, building blockage, and downwash. Model for Predicting Wind Conditions Determination of wind patterns for winds approaching from each direction were computed through the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on a mesh generated on the domain topology. CFD employs the principles of conservation of mass and momentum to determine the velocities at each mesh point. Solutions were obtained using Newmerical Technologies propriety CFD modeling software, FENSAP- AIRWAKE TM. A software description can be found on our website 3. Approximately one million mesh points were used throughout the computational domain. The model analyzed included the proposed buildings and a portion of the surrounding neighborhood and shown in Figure 2. It should be noted that the building massings did not include detailed architectural features which could reduce the effects of downwash 3

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 12 and channeling, such as canopies, street furniture and signs, and other landscaping features. Once the solutions for wind patterns are obtained for each wind direction, ground level wind speed contours and wind patterns are generated to provide a description of the results. Wind speeds for each receptor location, Figure 6, are obtained from the solutions. Wind rosettes shown in Figure 4, generated from JFK airport data, were used to obtain wind speed and directional probabilities for the study. Mean wind speeds for seven specified directions were applied to the model at model boundaries. A uniform wind profile scaled to represent mean annual wind levels in each direction above the ground boundary layer were used in the study. Wind patterns and ground level speeds within the modeled domain were determined from the analysis. Wind speeds for the selected receptors, located at a height of 2 meters above ground level, were obtained from the analysis. Since the neighborhoods surrounding the Atlantic Yards Arena project were included in the modeled domain, there was sufficient approach distance in all directions prior to reaching the buildings of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project for the wind to represent an urban environment. An ensemble average of product of the directional ground level wind speed and directional probabilities at each pedestrian location (receptor) is then determined to obtain the predicted annual wind speeds for comparison with pedestrian comfort criteria. 5. RESULTS A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach was used to determine solutions for wind patterns around Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues resulting from the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project. Figure 7 shows representative wind speed contours at ground level and wind patterns around the buildings for several wind approach directions. The NE and WSW directions are not presented, but would be similar to patterns for an East (c) and West (d) winds in the vicinity of the Brooklyn Bears Garden. The black arrows indicate wind direction. The colors of the wind patterns and contours indicate the speed, with red being the highest and blue the lowest. Wind contours and wind patterns around the community garden show high predicted wind speed for winds approaching from the North (a), South (b), and Northwest (e). These directions run nearly parallel with the Flatbush Avenue corridor and therefore higher winds would be expected in these directions Winds from the East (c) and West (d) would be blocked by the arena and Site 5. As seen by the blue color in Figure 7, the area around Brooklyn Bears Community Garden would have higher circulation but significantly lower wind speeds. Winds approaching from the West and East (including ENE, SE, ESE) comprise over 22% of possible wind directions and would produce minimal wind in the garden area due to significant building blockage. Other points of interest are the higher wind speeds predicted along the Atlantic Avenue corridor when winds approach from the East or West. Winds approaching from the

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 13 North and South would generate higher winds between buildings abutting Atlantic Avenue. As seen from all wind directions in Figure 8, there would be minimal wind within the central area enclosed by buildings B8 to B14. Higher wind speeds would occur between buildings abutting Atlantic Avenue that result from the smaller blockage by buildings north of Atlantic Avenue. The Flatbush Avenue corridor would experience higher winds for wind approaching from the NW, West, and South. There are several taller buildings north of Atlantic Avenue abutting Flatbush Avenue that also provide blockage and contribute to the canyon effect for winds from the NW, North, and West. (a) (b)

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 14 (c) (d) Figure 7 Wind Speed Contours and Wind Patterns Around Atlantic Yards Arena Project (a) North Wind, (b) South Wind, (c) East Wind, (d) West Wind

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 15 (e) Figure 7 Wind Speed Contours and Wind Patterns Around Atlantic Yards Arena Project (e) Northwest Wind A summary of the results when applied to pedestrian comfort levels is shown in Figures 8 and 9. The winds at each receptor are averaged with respect to probability of occurrence and directional probability. The results are presented in two ways to show pedestrian wind speeds and comparison with established comfort levels. Figure 8, compares ranges of wind speeds to given wind thresholds to compute pedestrian comfort levels. Wind speeds are considered acceptable for pedestrian comfort if they are within their specified wind thresholds for at least 80% of the time. Figure 8 shows the estimated recurrence levels of wind speeds at each location within each comfort level on an annual basis, and the comfort levels attained at least 80%. At each location, the average wind speed is compared to the wind thresholds for the different comfort levels. For instance, Location 1 is deemed suitable for all activities other than leisurely dining, while Location 7 satisfies comfort levels for only short term sitting, walking, and general activities. Locations 32 through 48, with a few exceptions, satisfy comfort levels that would allow leisure sitting and would be suitable for outdoor eating. Review of the data at all receptors for a comfort level of Sitting/Standing shows Recurrence Levels, with some exceptions, to be greater than 80%. Locations that do not meet the 80% Recurrence Level lie along the Flatbush and Atlantic Avenue corridors.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 16 PEDESTRIAN WIND SPEEDS AND RECURRENCE LEVELS Acceptance Criteria Recurrence Level Leisure Sitting,Dining <7 MPH >80% Sitting <11 MPH >80% STanding, Sitting <16 MPH >80% Walking, General Activities <20 MPH >80% Uncomfortable Dangerous >20 MPH >20% <.001 Receptor Recurrence Level Comfort Criteria L S T W Attained 1 63 84 92 94 S,T,W 2 82 97 100 100 L,S,T,W 3 93 97 99 100 L,S,T,W 4 97 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 5 64 86 95 98 S,T,W 6 46 67 85 93 T,W 7 39 64 84 92 T,W 8 55 78 93 98 T,W 9 53 73 91 97 T,W 10 50 73 90 96 T,W 11 43 66 84 91 S,T,W 12 55 76 88 93 T,W 13 82 91 95 97 L,S,T,W 14 72 91 98 100 S,T,W 15 89 97 100 100 L,S,T,W 16 84 95 99 100 L,S,T,W 17 61 79 90 94 T,W 18 57 76 89 94 T,W 19 58 78 89 93 T,W 20 56 78 93 97 T,W 21 93 99 100 100 L,S,T,W 22 65 81 92 96 S,T,W 23 78 94 99 100 S,T,W 24 92 98 100 100 L,S,T,W 25 54 77 91 95 T,W 26 98 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 27 56 74 88 93 T,W 28 97 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 29 63 82 92 95 S,T,W 30 85 97 100 100 L,S,T,W 31 92 98 100 100 L,S,T,W 32 99 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 33 97 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 34 56 78 89 93 T,W 35 68 88 94 97 S,T,W 36 88 95 98 99 L,S,T,W 37 82 97 100 100 L,S,T,W 38 55 75 89 93 T,W 39 100 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 40 79 91 95 97 S,T,W 41 91 98 100 100 L,S,T,W 42 94 99 100 100 L,S,T,W 43 100 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 44 90 98 100 100 L,S,T,W 45 79 95 100 100 S,T,W 46 93 99 100 100 L,S,T,W 47 93 100 100 100 L,S,T,W 48 100 100 100 100 L,S,T,W Figure 8 Pedestrian Comfort Levels at Specified Locations

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 17 20 WIND SPEEDS AT RECEPTOR LOCATIONS 80% Recurrence Level Wind Speed (MPH) 15 10 5 16 MPH (T) 11 MPH (S) 7 MPH (L) 0 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 Pedestrian Locations Figure 9 Predicted Wind Speeds At 80% Recurrence Levels Figure 9 illustrates the expected wind speeds at each location for particular recurrence levels. The highlighted yellow lines indicate the wind thresholds for the comfort criteria of interest. Wind speeds at each location are computed for the 80% recurrence level (i.e., the wind would be at this speed or less 80% of the time). All receptor locations are seen to have wind speeds below the 16 MPH threshold for an 80% recurrence level. Brooklyn Bears Community Garden Area Several locations near the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden would have wind speeds in excess of 16 MPH but less than 20 MPH at a 95% recurrence level. These locations would be considered suitable for general outdoor activities and brisk walking. The higher wind speeds would be due to the higher directional probability of approaching winds along the Atlantic and Flatbush Avenue corridors. Due to limited historical data on directional probability of approaching wind on a seasonal basis, no conclusions can be drawn on seasonal variability of wind speed.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 18 Wind Speeds (MPH) Near Brooklyn Community Gardens Direction Probability Baseline Atlantic Yards Archival Data N 9.61% 6.60 17.84 NNE 4.86% 6.34 6.02 NE 4.52% 6.95 6.60 ENE 2.92% 5.69 2.40 E 3.74% 6.99 2.95 ESE 2.33% 6.58 2.77 SE 2.83% 5.91 2.51 SSE 3.14% 6.32 12.02 S 12.59% 7.72 14.68 SSW 5.36% 6.08 11.56 SW 7.67% 6.55 6.03 WSW 7.56% 6.96 6.41 W 10.00% 8.93 9.74 WNW 7.03% 9.86 11.70 NW 9.01% 9.96 11.81 NNW 6.83% 7.68 9.11 Recurrence Level Average Speed 80% 8.74 80% 9.92 Figure 10 Wind Speeds Near Brooklyn Bears Community Garden An average of the wind speeds at receptor locations in the vicinity of the community garden for each approach direction is shown in Figure 10. Baseline wind conditions for each compass direction are taken from wind histories and scaled to an elevation of 2 meters from ground. The low-rise buildings in the neighborhood offer minimal blockage and do not affect wind speeds in the garden area. Baseline wind speeds are computed based on historical data for an 80% recurrence level. The effects of the proposed project on wind speeds around the community gardens are shown for an 80% recurrence level. The proposed project would increase the average wind speed above the community garden canopy by 14% when compared to the baseline wind speeds. The garden can be considered as a canopy containing various types of plants and vegetables. The ground under the canopy currently has a water budget. Water evaporation is caused by various processes; wind, radiation, etc. The water budget is maintained at an acceptable level by the residents by irrigation. Increased winds would tend to increase the evaporation rate requiring more irrigation to keep the soil s current water budget. A comparison of the evaporative capability of the winds above the canopy for the baseline and Atlantic Yards Arena project can be estimated knowing the wind speeds.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 19 The ability of the prevailing winds to remove moisture above the canopy is a function of the mass transfer of water vapor away from the canopy. The amount of mass transfer is a function of the thermodynamic properties of the air and the concentration gradients of vapor above the canopy, and the wind speed. Higher wind speeds will generally be able to remove more moisture (evaporated water) away from the garden area. At constant thermodynamic properties, the relative change in moisture removal capability caused by the proposed project is directly proportional to the ratio of the prevailing winds over the canopy taken to the 0.8 power. Wind results for the proposed project predict a 14% increase in the prevailing winds around the garden area, resulting in a predicted 11% increase in the evaporative capability of the prevailing winds above the canopy. Soil water budget of the garden is a subjective measure and not quantitatively measured. It is possible that a tendency to irrigate more due to the perception of higher winds could result in an increased water budget in the soil over current levels. Garden irrigation may exceed the amount needed to compensate for the estimated 11% increase in evaporation capability of the local winds. Atlantic Avenue Winds from the North, West, and Northwest have a significant influence on wind speed along the Atlantic Avenue corridor. Wind speeds greater than 11 MPH and less than 16 MPH for the 95% recurrence level are seen to occur generally along Atlantic Avenue. Receptor locations 6 and 7 have the highest predicted wind speeds as a result of the canyon effect caused by the buildings on either side of the avenue at the intersection with Flatbush Avenue. With these exceptions, wind speeds at all locations were predicted to be less than 16 MPH for a 95% recurrence level and would be below 11 MPH for an 80% recurrence level. These wind levels indicate comfort conditions that are suitable for standing, walking, window shopping, and general activities along major portions of Atlantic Avenue. Some of the narrow passages between buildings abutting Atlantic Avenue would experience increased wind speed in northerly wind conditions. At these locations, overall wind speeds would be between 11 and 16 MPH for an 80% recurrence level. Since these locations would not have significant amenities for outdoor seating or dining, the conditions at these locations would be considered appropriate for other outdoor uses. Flatbush Avenue, Arena Wind speeds along Flatbush Avenue would exceed 16 MPH at several locations. Receptor locations 6, 7, and 11 have the highest predicted wind speeds as a result of the canyon effect caused by the buildings on either side of the avenue. With the exception of a few receptor locations, all locations would experience wind speeds less than 16 MPH for a 95% recurrence level. All receptor locations indicate wind speeds less than 16 MPH for an 80% recurrence level. These wind levels indicate comfort conditions suitable for walking and general activities.

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 20 Dean Street Wind speeds along Dean Street adjacent to the Arena would be influenced by the proximity of Flatbush Avenue and Sixth Avenue. These wind levels indicate conditions suitable for standing, walking, and general activities. Sixth Avenue Wind speeds along the Sixth Avenue corridor would be highest near the intersection with Atlantic Avenue. The speeds could approach the 16 MPH wind threshold. The winds would be reduced proceeding southward along Sixth Avenue. These wind levels indicate comfort conditions suitable for walking, and general activities near the Atlantic Avenue intersection. Pacific Avenue A majority of locations studied in this area would have wind speeds below 7 MPH due to the effective blockage by the surrounding buildings. Locations between buildings along Atlantic Avenue would experience wind levels reaching 16 MPH. Pedestrians may experience these higher wind levels when nearing Atlantic Avenue. Wind speeds along the Pacific Avenue corridor would range between 11 MPH and 16 MPH and would be generally suitable for standing, walking, and general activities. Some areas may be suitable for leisure sitting and outdoor eating at sidewalk cafes. Buildings abutting Dean Street. The area enclosed by buildings B8 through B14 have numerous areas that would experience winds below 7 MPH and would generally be suitable for leisure sitting or outdoor eating. More detailed examination of wind levels at nearby locations would be necessary to further define these low wind levels areas. 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS performed a pedestrian wind study in the vicinity of the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project in Brooklyn, New York. The objective was to provide a prediction of the pedestrian wind speeds in the proximity of the proposed re-development focusing on the area around the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues, along Sixth Street, and other street-level areas around the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project that might experience high winds caused by downwash or channeling. A number of wind directions representing the largest frequency of occurrence were analyzed on the proposed site topology. Pedestrian locations were identified. New York

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 21 City does not have specific pedestrian comfort requirements. The criteria used in this project follow generally accepted guidelines used throughout the US and. Results are presented for annual wind directional probabilities to determine comfort levels of pedestrian wind speeds in the area around the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project. Reviewing the tables presented in Figures 9 through 11, the following conclusions can be drawn: No locations were found to be in the uncomfortable range, greater than 20 mph, more than 1% of the time - well within the normal occurrence level for the area; Conditions at all locations are expected to be within the acceptable comfort levels for the existing uses and for the potential uses within the proposed project; All locations had predicted wind speeds suitable for general pedestrian activities (<20 mph) ranging from 91% to 100% of the time; With the exception of several locations near the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues and a few narrow passages between the proposed buildings, all locations had predicted wind speeds suitable for short term sitting, leisurely walking, and waiting, such as bus stops (<16 mph) ranging from 92% to 100% of the time; near the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues and within some narrow passages mentioned above such conditions would be expected at least 84% of the time; Locations that may have more extended use, such as parks and open space, would experience suitable conditions (<11 MPH) at least 91% of the time, with the exception of the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden where such conditions would be expected at least 86% of the time; Area averaged wind speeds around the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden, would not exceed 13 MPH for 95% of the time. The wind speed in the garden itself would not exceed 11 MPH for 86% of the time, and would be considered suitable for sitting, walking, and general gardening activities; Wind speeds around the Brooklyn Bears Community Garden would increase by approximately 14% due to the presence of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project for an 80% recurrence level. This increase is not considered significant. The evaporative capability of the wind passing over the garden canopy is expected to increase approximately 10% due to the presence of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project;

Atlantic Yards Report Preliminary Draft. 3-2006, November 2006, page 22 In general, while ground-level wind speeds in the area are projected to increase with the addition of the proposed Atlantic Yards Arena project for all locations identified, these increases would not cause significant hardship to pedestrians.