City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission Agenda November 5, :00 PM City Commission Room, City Hall

Similar documents
August 1, 2016 Agenda 7:00 PM - City Commission Room, City Hall

City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission Agenda August 6, :00 PM City Commission Room, City Hall

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission August 6, 2012 Minutes

City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission February 2, 2015 Minutes

MANUAL FOR SCHOOL CROSSING CONTROL

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Consider rescinding the 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT on 4 th Street between McDonald Drive & Michigan Street.

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

School Zone Traffic Control Policy

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

Table of Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Elements of the School Crossing Program 1

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIONS

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

TODAY S WEBINAR AGENDA

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

HAWK Signal. Pedestrian Safety. Illinois Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference Thursday, October 21, 2010

Speed Reduction in School Zones

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

TOWN OF MORAGA MORAGA WAY AND CAMINO PABLO/CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Town Council Meeting March 13, 2019

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

Traffic Calming Program Update

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Traffic Engineering. Deepthi Arabolu. Establish Speed Limit

Establishing Procedures and Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Intersection Control. Constituent. Deepthi Arabolu. Relocate Stop Sign

Appendix B Warrants, Standards, and Guidelines for Traffic Control Devices used at Senior Citizen and Disabled Person Crossings

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Meeting Agenda Marking Technical Committee National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices January 19-20, 2011 Arlington, VA

CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

DOT Policy and Procedure Integrity Excellence Respect

MOUNTAIN BROOK CITY COUNCIL PRE-MEETING AGENDA PRE-COUNCIL ROOM (A106) CITY HALL 56 CHURCH STREET MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL AUGUST 26,2013 6:00 P.M.

Chapter 315 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. Section Manual and Specifications For Traffic Control Devices.

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Ch. 447 HAZARDOUS WALKING ROUTES CHAPTER 447. HAZARDOUS WALKING ROUTES

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Traffic Calming Policy

Guidelines for Pedestrian Treatments at Uncontrolled Locations January 18, 2018

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

Document 2 - City of Ottawa Pedestrian Crossover (PXO) Program

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

S 0659 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

POLICY FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING

Pasco County Engineering Services Traffic Operations Division 7536 State Street, Room #124 (727)

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

City of Vallejo Traffic Calming Toolbox

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Military Road Safety Improvements

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Street for approximately 50 feet east of Mississippi Street.

Town of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

Transportation Policy Manual

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TRAFFIC AND PARKING COMMISSION

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

In response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:

A Study of School Crossing Protection

Community Transportation Plan

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Brookings Traffic Safety Committee 2017 Annual Report

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

Kingston Drive (Traffic Calming) Recommend denial of traffic calming on Kingston Drive from Princeton Boulevard to Iowa Street

Broadway Street Pedestrian Safety Study Cass Street to 700 Feet North of Randall Avenue

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Report

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

Traffic Control Signals - Cosburn Avenue and Cedarvale Avenue

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Student Pedestrian Safety Fiddlers Canyon Elementary Community Council 2012

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

City of Edinburg Department of Public Works 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, TX (956) SPEED HUMPS INSTALLATION POLICY

Transcription:

traffic@lawrenceks.org 785-832-3034 City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission Agenda November 5, 2012-7:00 PM City Commission Room, City Hall MEMBERS: Dan Harden, Chair; Edwin Rothrock, Vice-Chair; Stuart Boley; Ryan Devlin; Cody Howard; Jason Novotny; Tracy Russell; Chris Storm; and John Ziegelmeyer Jr. Anyone who wishes to be notified when an item will be heard by the City Commission must provide their name and a telephone number or an e-mail address. ITEM NO. 1: Review and approve the minutes of the Traffic Safety Commission meeting, October 1, 2012. ITEM NO. 2: Consider request for SCHOOL CROSSING TRAFFIC CONTROL at 10 th Street & Connecticut Street. Facts: 1. The City s School Crossing Control Policy (SCCP) requires an average of at least ten (10) students using a crossing in order to consider any school crossing traffic control. 2. Appropriate traffic control is based on the number of students crossing and the number of sufficient gaps in traffic. 3. Pedestrian counts taken during September found an average of 9.33 students using this intersection during the morning crossing time. 4. Traffic gap studies conducted in October found six (6) of nine (9) 5-minute periods during the morning crossing time with less than one (1) adequate gap per minute; and all six (6) 5-minute periods during the afternoon crossing time with less than one (1) adequate gap per minute. Traffic Safety Commission Agenda 5 November 2012 1

traffic@lawrenceks.org 785-832-3034 5. Based on the results of the gap study, the SCCP would provide that an adult crossing guard may be provided if there were sufficient students crossing the street. 6. Due to the part-time nature of an adult crossing guard and the annual cost, this commission has previously recommended that a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon be constructed in lieu of providing an adult guard. ITEM NO. 3: Consider request for a CROSSWALK at 27 th Street & Kasold Drive. Facts: 1. Kasold Drive is classified as an arterial street, generally paved five (5) lanes wide with a posted speed limit of 40mph. 2. Traffic data collected October 9-10, 2012, found 9130 vehicles in a 24-hour period with an 85 th percentile speed of 52.4mph. 3. A comprehensive study of approximately 2000 crosswalks nationwide found the following: a. Under existing traffic conditions, if a crosswalk was marked at either 27 th Street or 28 th Street, where no pedestrian refuge area is available in the center of the street, there is no statistical difference in the crash rate for an unmarked vs. marked crosswalk; however, when the traffic volume on Kasold increases to 12,000, the crash rate for a marked crosswalk is four (4) times higher than for an unmarked crosswalk. b. Under existing traffic conditions, if a crosswalk was provided at a mid-block location between 27 th Street & 28 th Street, where a pedestrian refuge island would be provided, there is no statistical difference in the crash rate for an unmarked vs. marked crosswalk; however, when the traffic volume on Kasold increases to 15,000, the crash rate for a marked crosswalk is again four (4) times higher than for an unmarked crosswalk. 4. Therefore, if a pedestrian crossing is provided, it is recommended that it be at a mid-block location where a pedestrian refuge can be provided and that a pedestrian hybrid beacon also be provided. Traffic Safety Commission Agenda 5 November 2012 2

traffic@lawrenceks.org 785-832-3034 ITEM NO. 4: Consider request for a STOP sign on St. Andrews Drive at Tam O Shanter Drive. Facts: 1. Both St. Andrews Drive and Tam O Shanter Drive are classified as local streets in a residential area 2. According to Police Department records, there have not been any reported crashes at this intersection during the past three (3) years. 3. The speed limit on both streets is 30 mph. 4. Stopping sight distance measured in the field shows sufficient sight distance looking to the east of almost 40 mph and looking to the west of over 50 mph. ITEM NO. 4: Public comment. ITEM NO. 5: Commission Items. ITEM NO. 6: Miscellaneous. Traffic Safety Commission Agenda 5 November 2012 3

10/23/2012 Page 1 of 1 David Woosley From: cbranson@douglas-county.com Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:25 AM To: David Woosley Subject: Request for traffic study I would request that a traffic study be completed for the intersection of 10 th and Connecticut streets for the purpose of assessing whether or not the intersection meets the criteria for additional traffic controls pursuant to the City s School Crossing Control Policy. The intersection is adjacent to New York Elementary school. Specifically, whether or not the intersection is appropriate for a Reduced Speed Zone with Flashing Beacon due to having 10 or more students with safe gaps of 1.0 1.5 per minute. If not, then whether a Reduced Speed Zone is appropriate or a Marked Cross Walk or School Advanced Sign. If you have any questions or need any information, please call me at 766 7892. Thank you. Charles. Charles E. Branson District Attorney Douglas County Kansas 111 East 11th Street Lawrence, Kansas 66044-2909 PH: (785) 841-0211 FAX: (785) 832-8202 http://www.dgcoda.com This_email_has_been_scanned_by_the_MessageLabs_Email_Security_System.

CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS SCHOOL CROSSING CONTROL POLICY Resolution No. 5777, March 19, 1996 Resolution No. 6604, August 16, 2005 Resolution No. 6748, January 22, 2008 Resolution No. 6777, July 22, 2008 Premises: 1. Traffic control signs, markings, and signals (other than School Advance and School Crossing signs, and Marked Crosswalks) will be provided for elementary students only. Junior and senior high students are capable of walking to-and-from school without special assistance from adults or traffic control devices. 2. In order to consider an adult guard or other traffic control device, the number of children using a crossing during the crossing period must average at least 10 during either the morning or afternoon crossing period. The crossing periods to be studied shall be the 45 minutes prior to the beginning of school and the 30 minutes after school dismissal, in 5-minute increments. A minimum of 3 morning and/or 3 afternoon studies will be conducted to determine the average number of children. SCHOOL ADVANCE SIGN A School Advance Sign may be provided on each approach of each street adjacent to a school and in advance of every marked school crosswalk that is not adjacent to a school. MARKED CROSSWALKS A marked crosswalk may be provided at crossings adjacent to school property, and at other locations where the following minimum requirements are met: vehicles enter the crosswalk (without being required to stop) at a rate exceeding 150 vehicles per hour during any 5-minute increment of the morning or afternoon crossing period. Marked crosswalks shall be limited to one per street per school when practical. Unprotected crosswalks (absence of stop sign, traffic signal or adult crossing guard) may be marked if required by a school route plan or, if a school route plan does not exist, it is not practical for children to use a protected crosswalk. REDUCED SPEED ZONE (20 MPH) A reduced speed zone may be provided for each marked school crosswalk that is not protected by a stop sign, traffic signal or adult crossing guard. The reduced speed zone shall begin approximately 150-200 feet in advance of the crosswalk and shall end approximately 50-100 feet beyond the crosswalk. The reduced speed zone shall be in effect at times provided in the Code of the City of Lawrence. Page 1 of 2

City of Lawrence, Kansas, School Crossing Control Policy, July 22, 2008 REDUCED SPEED ZONE (20 MPH) WITH FLASHING BEACON A reduced speed zone with flashing beacon may be provided for each marked school crosswalk that is not protected by a stop sign or traffic signal, if the following minimum requirements are met: the average number of students exceeds 40 and the available safe gaps in the traffic is greater than 1.5 per minute; or if the average number of students is 10 or greater and the available safe gaps in the traffic is 1.0-1.5 per minute. The reduced speed zone shall begin approximately 150-200 feet in advance of the crosswalk and shall end approximately 50-100 feet beyond the crosswalk. The reduced speed zone shall be in effect for 45 minutes prior to the beginning of school and for 30 minutes after the end of school. Any beacons installed under this provision will be removed upon installation of a stop sign or traffic signal under other provisions of this policy. STOP SIGN AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL A Stop Sign or Traffic Signal will only be provided in accordance with criteria established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as published by the Federal Highway Administration, and adopted by the State of Kansas and the City of Lawrence. ADULT CROSSING GUARD An Adult Crossing Guard may be provided if any of the following minimum conditions are met: 1. At an unprotected crosswalk if: (a) the average number of students exceeds 40 and the available safe gaps in the traffic is 1.0-1.5 per minute; or (b) if the average number of students is 10 or greater and (1) the speed limit on the street is over 35mph, or (2) the street is marked for more than 3 lanes of traffic, or (3) the product of the crossing time (in seconds) and the speed limit for approaching traffic (in feet per second) is equal to or larger than the measured sight distance, or (4) the available safe gaps in the traffic is less than 1.0 per minute. 2. At a crosswalk protected by a Stop Sign (not an all-way stop) or a Traffic Signal, if the average number of students is 30 or greater; and (a) the street is marked for 4 lanes or more lanes of traffic and vehicles enter the crosswalk without being required to stop at a rate exceeding 150 vehicles per hour during any 5-minute increment of the morning or afternoon crossing period; or (b) the street is marked for less than 4 lanes of traffic and vehicles enter the crosswalk without being required to stop at a rate exceeding 300 vehicles per hour during any 5-minute increment of the morning or afternoon crossing period. 3. At a crosswalk at an All-Way Stop if the average number of students is 10 or greater and the all-way stop is warranted during the crossing period. Page 2 of 2

Connecticut St New York St. E10thSt

u u u u u u 8 Pedestrian Crash Rate (Pedestrian Crashes per Million Crossings 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Sig. = Significant Difference N.S. = No Significant Difference 0.12 (p=0.62)* N.S. 0.12 M U No Median All ADT's 2 Lanes (914 Sites) (p=0.87) N.S. 0.25 0.17 M U No Raised Median < 12,000 ADT 3 to 8 Lanes (260 Sites) (p=0.02) Sig. 0.63 0.15 M U No Raised Median 12,000-15,000 ADT 3 to 8 Lanes (149 Sites) (p=0.00) Sig. 1.37 0.28 M U No Raised Median > 15,000 ADT 3 to 8 Lanes (417 Sites) 0.17 Crosswalk Type (p=0.59) N.S. 0 M U Raised Median < 15,000 ADT 3 to 8 Lanes (87 Sites) M= Marked U= Unmarked (p=0.004) 0.74 Sig. 0.17 M U Raised Median > 15,000 ADT 3 to 8 Lanes (173 Sites) Type of Crossing Figure 4. Pedestrian crash rate vs. type of crossing.

Kasold Dr Meadow Pl W27thSt W28thSt Lazy Brook Ln Green Meadows Cṭ

10/22/2012 Page 1 of 1 David Woosley From: Diana Ice [dianaice@sunflower.com] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 2:12 PM To: David Woosley Cc: David Ice Subject: Safety concern at St. Andrews Drive and Tam O'Shanter Drive To the Traffic Safety Commission: I believe there is a safety issue at St. Andrews Drive where it T-bones with Tam O'Shanter Drive. There is no traffic sign at that intersection. We live on St. Andrews Drive and know from personal experience there are many close calls there. There is a hill on Tam O'Shanter which makes it hard to see. I believe there will be a serious accident there someday. Please consider putting a stop sign on St. Andrews Drive at that intersection. Please email your reply regarding this matter to dianaice@sunflower.com. Thank you very much, Diana Ice Diana Ice, MME, BT-BC Board Certified Music Therapist 1713 St. Andrews Drive Lawrence, KS 66047 dianaice@sunflower.com 785-766-7696

μ 1 inch = 60 feet 295.47 Camelback Pl Tam O'Shanter Dr St Andrews Dr 443.66 Camelback Dr