Table 1 Traffic and Pedestrian Counts on Lafayette Street

Similar documents
Windy Ridge Elementary School

Meadow Woods Elementary School

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

Orange Center Elementary School

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Traffic Circulation & Pedestrian Safety Study

SCHOOL ROUTE PLAN. For HUNTER S CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATION 14 ORANGE COUNTY. Prepared for:

Durrance Elementary School

Lake Whitney Elementary School

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

Drag and drop pic and stretch/crop to the limits of the blue rectangle (delete this text box) Maxey Elementary School

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

C/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Signs. signs, signals and road markings. in this chapter

Student Pedestrian Safety Fiddlers Canyon Elementary Community Council 2012

180 Grand Avenue, Suite x117 Dowling Associates, Inc.

Traffic Signal Phasing Study Summary & Staff Recommendations

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Video Review: Signs, Signals and Markings Video Review 4.1

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

Speed Control & Limits

Sets forth Basic Principles and Prescribes

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE TRAFFIC CODE UPDATE MASTER RECOMMENDATION REPORT: 9.14, 9.16, 9.18

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

S 0659 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

DESIGN CRITERIA DIVISION 4900 TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Intersection Control. Constituent. Deepthi Arabolu. Relocate Stop Sign

2007 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY LIST SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE/MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION.

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

BICYCLE RULES OF THE ROAD

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES

Parental Responsibilities

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Alexander Ikefuna City of Charlottesville Director of Neighborhood and Development Services

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

School Zone Traffic Control Policy

WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Chapter #4 Traffic Control Devices and Laws

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR STREET BANNER APPLICATION PACKAGE

Washington St. Corridor Study

Appendix B Warrants, Standards, and Guidelines for Traffic Control Devices used at Senior Citizen and Disabled Person Crossings

AGENDA ITEM 6 D THOMASVILLE ROAD (HERMITAGE BOULEVARD TO LIVE OAK PLANTATION ROAD) ROADWAY SAFETY AUDIT

Advance Yield Markings Reduce Motor Vehicle/Pedestrian. Conflicts at Multilane Crosswalks with an Uncontrolled Approach.

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES Section 2B.01 Application of Regulatory Signs Standard:

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

Reference: Laguna Canyon Road Traffic Conditions Data Collection Summary

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

MINNEAPOLIS PARK & RECREATION BOARD DRAFT TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR: SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

Southside Pilot Proposal

MEMORANDUM. Discussion of the planned crosswalk improvement on Mount Vernon Road near Stratham Drive

Military Road Safety Improvements

CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. Responsible Driving (Red book) NOTES & STUDY GUIDE

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

RECOMMENDATION: Approve traffic calming projects as recommended by the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Committee (NTCC) on the following streets:

A Study of School Crossing Protection

A Study of Effectiveness of Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Analyzing a Selection of High-Visibility Warning Signs

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

Everyday Hazards for School Bus Drivers. Reference Guide and Test

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx

Chicago Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to High School (SRTS/SRTHS)

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Chapter 3.3 Horizon Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. June 2009

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

Simulation Analysis of Intersection Treatments for Cycle Tracks

July 5, Arthur R. Ware, Jr. Elementary School 2017 Safe Routes to School Walkabout Report

Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, :00 PM City Council Chambers, 1 Civic Center Drive, San Marcos, CA 92069

Transcription:

Downtown Salem Transportation Study 2 July 8, 2005 On-street parking is allowed on both sides of Lafayette Street. Cars were parked at the island that separates a pull-out area in front of the school entrance from the northbound traffic. The pull-out is used by school buses/vans to pick up students after school. Also, cars were parked very close to the pull-out exit and on the southbound side close to the main crosswalk. These cars could potentially obstruct the view of motorists on Lafayette Street. On June 22, 2005, CTPS conducted an additional field reconnaissance from 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM to observe afternoon school crossings and traffic conditions. The observations are summarized below (see Table 1 for traffic and pedestrian counts on Lafayette Street in the school area): The flashing school speed limit (20 MPH) sign on the north had begun flashing previous to the arrival of staff for the start of observations at 2:30 PM. The flashing sign on the south side was not functioning during the observation period. No school crossing guard was present during the observation period. According to two parents who took students home, the school crossing guard had been absent for two weeks. School ended at 3:00 PM. In the half-hour period from 3:00 PM to 3:30 PM, 18 pedestrians (6 adults and 12 children) from the school crossed Lafayette Street using the midblock crosswalk. During the same period, 14 pedestrians crossed Lafayette Street using the Hancock Street crosswalk. Among them, only 1 parent and 1 child were from the Saltonstall School; the others were people living in the neighborhood and middle school students dropped by school buses at the intersection. Traffic on Lafayette Street was heavy. During the one-hour period, CTPS counted 875 northbound vehicles and 758 southbound vehicles passing the midblock crosswalk. Traffic speed approaching the school zone was estimated at about 35 to 40 MPH. During the one-hour period, some vehicles were observed to travel at a speed higher than 20 MPH in the school zone. Table 1 Traffic and Pedestrian Counts on Lafayette Street Number of Pedestrians Number of Vehicles Midblock Crosswalk Crosswalk Count Interval in Front of School at Hancock Street Northbound Southbound 2:30-2:45 0 5 205 162 2:45-3:00 8 4 196 196 3:00-3:15 15 3 207 210 3:15-3:30 3 11 267 190 1-Hour Total 26 23 875 758 Signing for School Area Traffic Control To ensure student safety, school crossings are usually accompanied by a series of control devices to warn and slow the traffic approaching the designated school zone. The purpose is to slow traffic in the vicinity of school property, not just at the crossing location. Figure 2 shows a typical signing arrangement for school area traffic control. As shown, school advance warning signs 1 (showing school ahead), school crosswalk warning assembly 2 (showing a designated school crosswalk), and 1 Section 7B.08, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition. 2 Section 7B.09, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition.

Downtown Salem Transportation Study 3 July 8, 2005 End School Zone signs 3 (indicating permission to resume the normal speed limit on the street) should be installed in addition to school speed limit signs. At the Saltonstall School, only the school speed limit signs are installed, and the one on the south side facing the northbound traffic is located too close to the school property. The present signs are insufficient to warn and slow the approaching traffic. Proposed Improvements The school s arrangement of drop-offs and pick-ups on Salem Street is appropriate, as it promotes student safety, reduces traffic conflicts, and minimizes traffic delay on Lafayette Street. The number of students observed crossing Lafayette Street is relatively low. At this time, CTPS does not recommend the installation of a traffic signal at the midblock school crossing. Usually other remedial measures, such as school advance warning signs and crossing guards, should be considered before the installation of a traffic signal. 4 The recommended improvements are listed below, and the locations of some of them are illustrated in Figure 3. A school crossing guard should be present, uniformed, and visible at the midblock crosswalk during student arrival and departure time. If funding is available, an additional crossing guard can be considered at the Hancock Street crosswalk. Repair the flashing school speed limit sign on the south side of the school property and plan to relocate this sign to at least 150 feet south of the existing location. Remove or relocate the Doctors Office Patient Parking sign that is currently located under the flashing school speed limit sign on the north side of the school property. The school speed limit sign is an important message to motorists. The parking sign mounted right under the speed sign can be distracting to motorists, and it undermines respect for school zone signs. school advance warning signs (S1-1) in advance of the school speed limit signs in both directions. end school zone signs on the opposite side of Lafayette Street where the school advance warning signs are located. school crosswalk warning assembly (S1-1 with diagonal arrow) on both sides of the two crosswalks in the school zone. Prohibit parking at or near the midblock crosswalk, including the separator island at the pull-out area in front of the school. CYW&EP/cyw 3 Section 7B.13, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition. 4 Section 4C.06, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition.

Approaching Traffic 35-40 MPH Chase St. Salem St. Flashing School Speed Limit Sign Assembly of Student Arrivals Cars Parked at or Near Figure 1 Existing Conditions Lafayette St. Crosswalk with School Crossing Guard Crosswalk Drop-Offs/Pick-Ups on Salem Street Flashing School Speed Limit Sign (in Disrepair) Hancock St. N Approaching Traffic 35-40 MPH

School Advance Warning Sign (S1-1) School Speed Limit Sign End School Zone Sign (S1-1 with Diagonal Arrow) (S1-1 with Diagonal Arrow) End School Zone Sign School Speed Limit Sign School Advance Warning Sign (S1-1) Figure 2 Typical Signing for School Area Traffic Control (Source of Figure: Section 7B.09, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition)

School Advance Warning Sign (S1-1) End School Zone Sign Remove or Relocate Doctors Office Patient Parking Sign from the Signpost Figure 3 Proposed Improvements (S1-1 with Diagonal Arrow) Crossing Guard: Uniformed and Visible Prohibit Parking at or Near Repair Flashing School Speed Limit Sign (Short-Term) (S1-1 with Diagonal Arrow) End School Zone Sign Relocate School Speed Limit Sign (Long-Term) School Advance Warning Sign (S1-1) N