Economics of Spice Pepper Production in Oklahoma 1

Similar documents
Farm Business Management Reports

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

2018 Cotton Market Outlook: At What Price Should I Get Back Into Cotton?

2018 Soybean, Corn, & Wheat Outlook KY and TN Grain Conference

Commodity Market Outlook: Corn, Forage, Wheat & Cattle

2017/18 Corn Outlook

Cattle Market Outlook & Important Profit Factors for Cattle Producers

Utility Debt Securitization Authority 2013 T/TE Billed Revenues Tracking Report

Beef Outlook. Regional Dealer Event. February 9, Dr. Scott Brown Agricultural Markets and Policy Division of Applied Social Sciences

October 14, University of Missouri Extension

2017/18 Soybean Outlook

Beef Cattle Market Update

Grain Market Outlook and Marketing Strategies Presented By: Brian Roach

Simply Put, Just too Much! Copyright AgResource Company. All All Rights Reserved.

Page 1. USDA s Mandatory Farm Programs CBO s January 2019 Baseline

OUTLOOK FOR US AGRICULTURE. Rob Johansson Acting Chief Economist 19 February 2015

Toward an Outlook for California Agriculture Relevant to GHG Emissions Mitigation. April 30, Daniel A. Sumner

Key Figures and Trends for the Agricultural Machinery Industry

Outlook for Hog Profits in 2012

SEASONAL PRICES for TENNESSEE FEEDER CATTLE and COWS

Agricultural Commodity Outlook: Grain, Forage & Cattle Markets

Livestock Market Trends

Land Values and Chinese Agriculture

Utah Ag Bankers Conference Alfalfa and Dairy Outlook

Livestock and Dairy Market Outlook

Market Perspectives for the German and European Agricultural Machinery Industry

2016 Farm Income and 2017 Cost Outlook

Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2011

Iowa Land Values. Wendong Zhang Assistant Professor of Economics and Extension Economist

Agricultural Commodity Outlook: Grain, Forage & Cattle Markets

New Growth Segments for the Air Cargo Industry

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook: 2015 and Beyond

BMO Capital Markets 2014 Farm to Market Conference New York, New York. May 21, 2014

Cattle and Beef Markets: Short and Long Run Challenges and Opportunities

Farmland Booms and Busts: Will the Cycle be Broken?

Iowa Farmland Market Update: What s Ahead?

Macro and Agricultural Economic Outlook FCL 2017 Annual Meeting. Tanner Ehmke, Manager Knowledge Exchange Division

Small Grains Variety Evaluation at Arizona City, Maricopa and Yuma, 2013

Presentation from the USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum 2017

Soybean, Corn, & Wheat Outlook Middle Tennessee Grain Conference

Soybean, Corn, & Wheat Outlook Middle Tennessee Grain Conference

Agriculture Outlook. Rich Pottorff Doane Advisory Services

Manufacturers Continue Capacity Expansion as Technology Orders Grow

California Agriculture 2001: Trends and Issues

2018 HR & PAYROLL Deadlines

FAPRI agricultural commodity outlook

Pork Outlook. Professor of Agricultural Economics. Midwest/Great Plains & Western Outlook Conference Indianapolis, August 2007

Swine Market Outlook

Commodity Market Outlook: Corn, Forage, Wheat & Cattle

Have You Ever Heard the Phrase

Agricultural Outlook: Rebalancing U.S. Agriculture

Producer Price Index - Agriculture (PPI-A) (April - June 2003)

Wisconsin 511 Traveler Information Annual Usage Summary January 3, Wisconsin 511 Phone Usage ( )

Producer Price Index - Agriculture (PPI-A) (January March 2001)

US Economic Activity

Order No. 55/18 CENTRA GAS MANITOBA INC.: PRIMARY GAS RATE APPLICATION, EFFECTIVE MAY 1, April 26, 2018

Cotton Market Outlook. Anthony Tancredi CEO Allenberg Cotton Co. / Senior Global Platform Head Louis Dreyfus Commodities

Outlook for Livestock and Poultry. Michael Jewison World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Mexico sugar towards 2014/15. Forget the inflexion point?

Iowa Farmland Market Update: What s Ahead?

State of American Trucking

Dairy Outlook and Issues Facing The Dairy Industry

BMO Capital Markets New York Road Show New York, New York. December 5, 2013

TEGMA Fall Transportation Symposium

Livestock, Poultry, and Dairy: Situation and Outlook

Jacksonville & Terre Haute

Manufacturers continue capacity expansion as technology orders grow

Goldman Sachs U.S. Emerging/SMID Cap Growth Conference. New York, New York

Sidoti & Company, LLC West Coast Road Show. San Francisco, California

3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. Stoby

Global Outlook for Agriculture Trend versus Cycle

Cattle & Beef Outlook

California Agriculture and Global Challenges: Resources Prices and Prospects 2012 California Ag Summit January 27, 2012

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 123/13 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) October 22, 2013

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Research Report Small Grains Variety Evaluation at Arizona City, Maricopa and Yuma, 2014

2018 Annual Economic Forecast Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy

Comparison of MON76980 (Xtendimax) and Liberty Herbicide Systems for weed control in Soybeans at Rochester, MN in SUMMARY:

10/18/2015. Outline. Commodity Outlook

Goldman Sachs Eighteenth Annual Agribusiness Conference New York, New York. March 12, 2014

Steel Market Outlook. AM/NS Calvert

Lamb Market Outlook. ASI New Orleans, TX January 25, David P. Anderson Professor and Extension Economist

Feeds, Price and Vola0lity

USDA Grains & Oilseeds Outlook

The Israeli Economy 2009 The Caesarea Center Conference

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

National Poll Dorset Conference Alexandra Gartmann, CEO and Managing Director Rural Bank and Rural Finance

U.S. EXPORTS Dairy Products - by Country, 2009 (pie chart) 69 Dairy Products, 2009 v (bar graph) 70 All Dry Whey, All Dry Whey -

BMO Capital Markets 2013 Farm to Market Conference New York, New York. May 14, 2013

3. EXCEL FORMULAS & TABLES

Issues Driving the Outlook for Specialty Crops December 3, 2012

Rice Yield And Dangue Haemorrhagic Fever(DHF) Condition depend upon Climate Data

Dairy Situation and Outlook

Outlook for the U.S. Livestock and Poultry Sectors in 2012 Presented By Shayle D. Shagam World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA

Guam Future Hotel Supply Requirements. Presented By: Damien Little, Horwath HTL

Economic Analysis of Farmland Market: An Introduction

Alistair Wallace. Director, Senior Consultant and Nitrogen Team Lead CRU Group. Nitrogen Outlook

2018 Farm Bill Update and Agricultural Outlook

Transcription:

Economics of Spice Pepper Production in Oklahoma 1 Raymond Joe Schatzer and Anita M. Kinsella Department of Agricultural Economics James E. Motes and Brian A. Kahn Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Oklahoma State University Use of spice peppers in the U.S. has been increasing. "On a fresh-weight basis, the United States now uses more chile peppers (6.9 pounds per person) than many traditional vegetables including asparagus (1.0 pounds), cauliflower (3.0), and green peas (4.2)." 2 As foreign markets try to meet the quantity demanded, the quality of the imported product has declined. Spice companies are interested in obtaining additional production from domestic sources. Southwest U.S. growing conditions are suitable for the production of processing peppers. For the last fifteen years, Oklahoma State University has had research projects examining the production of spice peppers in Oklahoma. The main objectives of these projects has been the development of cultivars and the testing of cultural practices for both pungent processing peppers and sweet red processing peppers for Oklahoma conditions that are suitable for machine harvest. To attract Oklahoma farmers, these crops will have to offer a profit that exceeds other crops they are growing. Our objective is to calculate the expected costs that Oklahoma farmers may incur from growing pungent processing peppers and sweet red processing peppers and compare that cost to expected prices. 1 Paper AEP-104 of the Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, presented at the Ninth Biennial Texas Pepper Conference, Texas Experiment Station, Weslaco, Texas, June 2-4, 1993. 2 Gary Lucier and Catherine Greene. "The U.S. Chile Pepper Industry: A Commodity Highlight," Vegetables and Specialties Situation and Outlook Report, Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, April 1993, TVS-259, p. 28.

2 As with any cost study, the cost and return estimates that we have generated do not represent any particular farming operation in Oklahoma. We do have several farmers in Oklahoma that are growing pungent processing peppers, sweet red processing peppers, or both. Using information we have collected from these farmers and from our research studies, we have generated cost and return estimates for pungent peppers and sweet red peppers. These cost and return estimates are based on the delivery of wet product to a dehydration facility in the local community straight from the harvester with no post-harvest cleaning. Farmers growing these products the last few years have been delivering a dried product to the contract buyer. In Oklahoma, farmers will probably grow these peppers on sandy loam soils that they can irrigate. They probably are using these soils to currently grow crops such as peanuts, cotton, watermelons, wheat, or grain sorghum. They may rotate peppers with these crops. In generating our estimates, we have made several assumptions. 1.An average of 14 acre-inches of irrigation water is required. 2.The use of a center pivot irrigation system with water obtained from a well. 3.The use of machinery available on these farms. 4.The farmers transplant pungent peppers and direct seed the sweet red peppers. One of the cultural practices we are examining in our other research is the establishment method, direct seeding versus transplanting. Our assumed monthly breakout of production and the operating input and machinery requirements is provide in Table 1 for transplanted pungent peppers and in Table 2 for direct seeded sweet red peppers. Our expected yield, on a dry weight basis, for pungent peppers is 1,800 pounds per acre and for sweet red peppers is 2,000 pounds per acre. Tillage operations consists of a moldboard plowing, two diskings, transplant for pungent peppers and seed planter for sweet peppers, and three cultivations. Sweet peppers also received two rotary hoeings. Four applications of spray are made, one is an herbicide and three are insecticides. The same fertilizer and chemical applications are used for both crops. A ripener is used on the sweet red peppers to accelerate the

3 ripening of large mature green pods before frost and the dropping of flowers and small green peppers from the plant. Both crops are planted in April and harvested in November. A custom operator is hired to use a modified cotton stripper to harvest the peppers and a truck is hired to haul the peppers to the dehydration facility. The per acre cost and return estimates we obtain for these production and input and machinery requirements are provide in Table 3 for pungent peppers and in Table 4 for sweet red peppers. We estimate the total costs for growing pungent peppers is $981 per acre and for growing sweet red peppers is $711 per acre. On a per pound dry weight basis, we estimate the break-even price or total cost per pound, for pungent peppers to be 54.5 cents (Table 5) and for sweet red peppers to be 35.6 cents per pound (Table 6). These costs do not include a charge for management, overhead, or risk. They also do not consider the potential returns that the farmer could obtain from other crops. Peanut is an important cash crop in Southwestern Oklahoma. The estimated returns to land, overhead, and risk for irrigated quota peanuts are about $590 per acre and for dryland peanuts about $300 per acre 3. To break-even with dryland peanuts the farmer would need a price of about 70 cents per pound for pungent peppers and 50 cents per pound for sweet red peppers. Returns above variable costs (Tables 7 and 8) and returns to risk and unpaid resources (Tables 9 and 10) are calculated for several yield and price combinations. For pungent peppers, the calculated return to risk and unpaid resources is $315 per acre when the yield is 1,800 pounds per acre and the price is 72 cents per pound. For sweet red peppers, the calculated return to risk and unpaid resources is $309 per acre when the yield is 2,000 pounds per acre and the price is 51 cents per pound. We are currently examining the technical and economic feasibility of several cultural practices used in the production of spice peppers in Oklahoma. These practices include stand 3 Sholar and Hutson. Enterprise Budgets for Irrigated and Dryland Peanuts in Southwest Oklahoma, 95370047 and 95370007. Oklahoma Enterprise Budget Book, edited by Raleigh A. Jobes, Oklahoma State University, Cooperative Extension Service, May 1993.

4 establishment, within-row spacing, rate and timing of ripener application, and nitrogen application rate for sweet red peppers. We expect to examine the feasibility of the establishment of a dehydration plant to support the growth of the spice peppers industry in Oklahoma.

5 Table 1. Monthly production and operating input and machinery requirements for transplanted pungent peppers for processing. ITEMS Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PRODUCTION: Number of Units Pungent Peppers (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 OPERATING INPUTS: Number of Units Pepper Transplants (M plants) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Transplant Labor (hour) 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15-15-15 Fertilizer (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rent Fert. Spreader (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Devrinol (lbs AI) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pounce/Ambush (lbs AI) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hoeing Labor (hour) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nitrogen (lbs) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stripper (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Trucking (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 MACHINERY OPERATIONS: Times Over or Hours Used M.B. Plow (5-16) 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tandem Disk, 14 ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4-row transplanter 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sprayer, 16 ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4-Row Cultivator 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tractor, 85 H.P. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IRRIGATION (acre-inches) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

6 Table 2. Monthly production and operating input and machinery requirements seeded sweet red peppers for processing. ITEMS Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PRODUCTION ITEMS: Number of Units Sweet Red Pepper (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 OPERATING INPUTS: Number of Units Pepper seed (lbs) 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15-15-15 Fertilizer (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rent Fert. Spreader (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Devrinol (lbs AI) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pounce/Ambush (lbs AI) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hoeing/thinning Labor (hour) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nitrogen (lbs) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ripener (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Custom Air Application (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stripper (acre) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Trucking (cwt) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 MACHINERY OPERATIONS: Times Over or Hours Used M.B. Plow (5-16) 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tandem Disk, 14 ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Planter, 4-row 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sprayer, 16 ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rotary Hoe, 14 ft 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4-Row Cultivator 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tractor, 85 H.P. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IRRIGATION (acre-inches) 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table 3. Cost and return estimates for transplanted pungent peppers for processing. Pungent Peppers for Processing Schatzer and Motes Sandy Loam Soils, 14 acre-inches net irrigated May 1993 Delivered wet to dehydration facility from harvester with no cleaning TYPE OF COST UNITS PRICE QUANTITY VALUE VARIABLE COSTS: Pepper Transplants M plants 28.00 10.00 280.00 Transplant Labor Hour 4.65 12.00 55.80 15-15-15 Fertilizer Cwt 9.85 3.50 34.48 Rent Fert. Spreader Acre 2.00 2.00 4.00 Devrinol lbs AI 20.00 2.00 40.00 Pounce/Ambush lbs AI 53.50 0.60 32.10 Hoeing Labor Hour 4.65 12.00 55.80 Nitrogen lbs 0.17 30.00 5.10 Stripper Acre 80.00 1.00 80.00 Trucking Cwt 2.00 18.00 36.00 Operating Capital Dollar 0.13 313.33 40.73 Machinery Labor Hour 4.65 3.73 17.33 Irrigation Labor Hour 4.65 2.80 13.02 Machinery Fuel, Lube, & Repairs 31.74 Irrigation Fuel, Lube, & Repairs 68.32 TOTAL VARIABLE COST 794.42 FIXED COSTS: Machinery 47.52 Irrigation Equipment 72.94 Land 60.00 TOTAL FIXED COSTS 180.46 REVENUE: Pungent Peppers Cwt 72.00 18.00 1,296.00 TOTAL REVENUES 1,296.00 RETURN ABOVE TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 501.58 RETURN TO RISK & UNPAID RESOURCES 321.12 7

Table 4. Cost and return estimates for seeded sweet red peppers for processing. Sweet Red Peppers for Processing Schatzer and Motes Sandy Loam Soils, 14 acre-inches net irrigated May 1993 Delivered wet to dehydration facility from harvester with no cleaning TYPE OF COST UNITS PRICE QUANTITY VALUE VARIABLE COSTS: Pepper seed lbs 15.00 4.00 60.00 15-15-15 Fertilizer Cwt 9.85 3.50 34.48 Rent Fert. Spreader Acre 2.00 2.00 4.00 Devrinol lbs AI 20.00 2.00 40.00 Pounce/Ambush lbs AI 53.50 0.60 32.10 Hoeing/thinning Labor Hour 4.65 20.00 93.00 Nitrogen lbs 0.17 30.00 5.10 Ripener Acre 5.00 1.00 5.00 Custom Air Application Acre 4.00 1.00 4.00 Stripper Acre 80.00 1.00 80.00 Trucking Cwt 2.00 20.00 40.00 Operating Capital Dollar 0.13 169.06 21.98 Machinery Labor Hour 4.65 2.98 13.85 Irrigation Labor Hour 4.65 2.80 13.02 Machinery Fuel, Lube, & Repairs 25.93 Irrigation Fuel, Lube, & Repairs 68.32 TOTAL VARIABLE COST 540.77 FIXED COSTS: Machinery 37.59 Irrigation Equipment 72.94 Land 60.00 TOTAL FIXED COSTS 170.53 REVENUE: Sweet Red Peppers Cwt 51.00 20.00 1,020.00 TOTAL REVENUES 1,020.00 RETURN ABOVE TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 479.23 RETURN TO RISK & UNPAID RESOURCES 308.71 8

9 Table 5.Break-even prices for transplanted pungent peppers for processing for alternative yield levels. Break-even price to cover Yield Variable Costs Total Costs Cwt/acre $/cwt $/cwt 16 49.401 60.680 17 46.613 57.228 18 44.134 54.160 19 41.917 51.415 20 39.921 48.944 Table 6.Break-even prices for seeded sweet red peppers for processing for alternative yield levels. Break-even price to cover Yield Variable Costs Total Costs Cwt/acre $/cwt $/cwt 18 29.821 39.294 19 28.356 37.332 20 27.039 35.565 21 25.846 33.967 22 24.762 32.514

Table 7.Estimated returns above variable costs for transplanted pungent peppers processing for alternative yield and price levels. Price $/cwt Yield 62 67 72 77 82 Returns above variable costs Cwt/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre 16 202 282 362 442 522 17 262 347 432 517 602 18 322 412 502 592 682 19 382 477 572 667 762 20 442 542 642 742 842 10 Table 8.Estimated returns above variable costs for seeded sweet red peppers for processing for alternative yield and price levels. Price $/cwt Yield 41 46 51 56 61 Returns above variable costs Cwt/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre 18 201 291 381 471 561 19 240 335 430 525 620 20 279 379 479 579 679 21 318 423 528 633 738 22 357 467 577 687 797

Table 9.Estimated returns to risk and overhead for transplanted pungent peppers processing for alternative yield and price levels. Price $/cwt Yield 62 67 72 77 82 Returns to risk and overhead Cwt/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre 16 21 101 181 261 341 17 81 166 251 336 421 18 141 231 321 411 501 19 201 296 391 486 581 20 261 361 461 561 661 11 Table 10.Estimated returns to risk and overhead for seeded sweet red peppers for processing for alternative yield and price levels. Price $/cwt Yield 41 46 51 56 61 Returns to risk and overhead Cwt/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre $/acre 18 31 121 211 301 391 19 70 165 260 355 450 20 109 209 309 409 509 21 148 253 358 463 568 22 187 297 407 517 627

12 Abstract: Use of spice peppers in the U.S. has been increasing. As foreign markets try to meet the quantity demanded, the quality of the imported product continues to decline. Spice companies are interested in obtaining additional production from domestic sources. Southwest U.S. growing conditions are suitable for the production of pungent and sweet red processing peppers. To attract Oklahoma farmers, spice companies will have to offer a price for machine harvested peppers that provides a profit comparable to other crops such as wheat, peanuts, cotton, and grain sorghum. In Oklahoma, we have been investigating the feasibility of growing pungent and red processing peppers for several years. Although a few farmers in Oklahoma are growing these peppers, the farmers need additional information on the cultural practices, capital requirements, costs, and returns of growing these peppers. Our objective has been to determine the costs and returns for growing pungent and red processing peppers in Oklahoma for alternative production practices. The break-even cost, relatively to peanuts, of delivering wet sweet red processing peppers to a dehydration facility from the harvester with no cleaning is about $50 per hundredweight. The break-even cost of delivering wet pungent processing peppers to a dehydration facility from the harvester with no cleaning is about $70 per hundredweight.

13