save percentages? (Name) (University)

Similar documents
Is lung capacity affected by smoking, sport, height or gender. Table of contents

Math SL Internal Assessment What is the relationship between free throw shooting percentage and 3 point shooting percentages?

Grade: 8. Author(s): Hope Phillips

Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

y ) s x x )(y i (x i r = 1 n 1 s y Statistics Lecture 7 Exploring Data , y 2 ,y n (x 1 ),,(x n ),(x 2 ,y 1 How two variables vary together

1. The data below gives the eye colors of 20 students in a Statistics class. Make a frequency table for the data.

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS?

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up. 1. Find the x- and y-intercepts of 2x 5y = 20. Describe the correlation shown by the scatter plot. 2.

Equation 1: F spring = kx. Where F is the force of the spring, k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the spring. Equation 2: F = mg

Lesson 2 Pre-Visit Slugging Percentage

Age of Fans

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer for each problem.

Atmospheric Rossby Waves in Fall 2011: Analysis of Zonal Wind Speed and 500hPa Heights in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres

Chapter 12 Practice Test

Analysis of Highland Lakes Inflows Using Process Behavior Charts Dr. William McNeese, Ph.D. Revised: Sept. 4,

The Reliability of Intrinsic Batted Ball Statistics Appendix

Bioequivalence: Saving money with generic drugs

The probability of winning a high school football game.

Question LCHL: Descriptive Statistics

Pearson Edexcel Level 3 GCE Psychology Advanced Subsidiary Paper 2: Biological Psychology and Learning Theories

Bivariate Data. Frequency Table Line Plot Box and Whisker Plot

Algebra 1 Unit 6 Study Guide

Exploring Measures of Central Tendency (mean, median and mode) Exploring range as a measure of dispersion

Kinetic Energy Analysis for Soccer Players and Soccer Matches

Year 10 Term 2 Homework

PSY201: Chapter 5: The Normal Curve and Standard Scores

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SEVENTH REGULAR SESSION August 2011 Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

TRIP GENERATION RATES FOR SOUTH AFRICAN GOLF CLUBS AND ESTATES

A REVIEW OF AGE ADJUSTMENT FOR MASTERS SWIMMERS

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

8th Grade. Data.

MiSP Photosynthesis Lab L3

Sports Analytics: Designing a Volleyball Game Analysis Decision- Support Tool Using Big Data

Report for Experiment #11 Testing Newton s Second Law On the Moon

STANDARD SCORES AND THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

March Madness Basketball Tournament

Boyle s Law: Pressure-Volume Relationship in Gases. PRELAB QUESTIONS (Answer on your own notebook paper)

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up Lesson Presentation. Lesson Quiz

Lesson 1: Decimal Place Value. Concept/Topic to Teach: Students use Bruins statistical data to order and compare decimals to the thousandths.

Exploring the relationship between Heart Rate (HR) and Ventilation Rate (R) in humans.

Lab 11: Introduction to Linear Regression

Psychology Advanced Subsidiary Paper 2: Biological Psychology and Learning Theories

Full file at

Appendix E Mangaone Stream at Ratanui Hydrological Gauging Station Influence of IPO on Stream Flow

Clutch Hitters Revisited Pete Palmer and Dick Cramer National SABR Convention June 30, 2008

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

Competitive Performance of Elite Olympic-Distance Triathletes: Reliability and Smallest Worthwhile Enhancement

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Chapter 4: Single Vertical Arch

March Madness Basketball Tournament

Los Angeles Unified School District. Student Test Booklet

MEMORANDUM. Investigation of Variability of Bourdon Gauge Sets in the Chemical Engineering Transport Laboratory

Atomspheric Waves at the 500hPa Level

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

Movement and Position

Simple Time-to-Failure Estimation Techniques for Reliability and Maintenance of Equipment

Lesson 3 Pre-Visit Teams & Players by the Numbers

from ocean to cloud HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS

Lesson 14: Modeling Relationships with a Line

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

Motion Graphing Packet

Lab #12:Boyle s Law, Dec. 20, 2016 Pressure-Volume Relationship in Gases

46 Chapter 8 Statistics: An Introduction

Overview. Learning Goals. Prior Knowledge. UWHS Climate Science. Grade Level Time Required Part I 30 minutes Part II 2+ hours Part III

Core practical 14: Investigate the relationship between the pressure and volume of a gas at fixed temperature

NMSU Red Light Camera Study Update

Boyle s law Verifying the relation between air pressure and volume measuring air pressure in a closed container.

Spirit Lesson 3 Robot Wheelies Lesson Outline Content: Context: Activity Description:

Stats in Algebra, Oh My!

Domestic Energy Fact File (2006): Owner occupied, Local authority, Private rented and Registered social landlord homes

Results and Discussion for Steady Measurements

Modeling Fantasy Football Quarterbacks

USING A CALCULATOR TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER A LINEAR, QUADRATIC OR EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION BEST FITS A SET OF BIVARIATE NUMERICAL DATA

LESSON 5: THE BOUNCING BALL

The Rise in Infield Hits

Statistical Measures

Applying Hooke s Law to Multiple Bungee Cords. Introduction

Tying Knots. Approximate time: 1-2 days depending on time spent on calculator instructions.

Bungee Bonanza. Level 1

Opleiding Informatica

!!!!!!!!!!!!! One Score All or All Score One? Points Scored Inequality and NBA Team Performance Patryk Perkowski Fall 2013 Professor Ryan Edwards!

Exploring the relationship between the pressure of the ball and coefficient of restitution.

Section 5 Critiquing Data Presentation - Teachers Notes

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

DS5 The Normal Distribution. Write down all you can remember about the mean, median, mode, and standard deviation.

LEVEL 2 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS MATHEMATICS 09866

Students measure the change in pressure by varying the volume of trapped air in a syringe while:

Unit 3 - Data. Grab a new packet from the chrome book cart. Unit 3 Day 1 PLUS Box and Whisker Plots.notebook September 28, /28 9/29 9/30?

Gizachew Tiruneh, Ph. D., Department of Political Science, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, Arkansas

Algebra I: A Fresh Approach. By Christy Walters

THUNDER BAY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Effect of homegrown players on professional sports teams

Organizing Quantitative Data

a) List and define all assumptions for multiple OLS regression. These are all listed in section 6.5

STT 315 Section /19/2014

The MACC Handicap System

8 th grade. Name Date Block

HOCKEY HALL OF FAME INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION PROGRAM

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Transcription:

1 IB Maths Essay: What is the correlation between the height of football players and their save percentages? (Name) (University)

Table of Contents Raw Data for Analysis...3 Table 1: Raw Data...3 Rationale and Introduction...4 Statement of Task...4 Plan of Investigation...4 Mathematical Investigation...5 Descriptive Statistics...5 Equation 1: Formula for Mean...5 Figure 1: Height Bar Graph...6 Figure 2: Save Percentage Bar Graph...6 Equation 2: Formula for Standard Deviation...6 Table 2: Standard Deviation...6 Figure 3: Mean and Standard Deviation for Height Graph...8 Figure 4: Mean and Standard Deviation for Save Percentage Graph...8 Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient...8 Table 3: Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient...8 Equation 3: Formulas for Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient...9 Equation 4: Condensed Formula for Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient...9 Discussion and Conclusion...9 References...12

3 This is the raw data for analysis: Raw Data for Analysis Table 1: Raw Data 2015 (FOXSports 2015) 2013 (FOXSports 2013) Average Save % Height (cm) Save % Height (cm) Save % Height (cm) 0.295 188 0.417 183 0.356 185 0.261 188 0.333 185 0.297 187 0.333 188 0.377 193 0.355 191 0.294 183 0.431 193 0.363 188 0.322 173 0.367 185 0.344 179 0.254 170 0.351 191 0.302 180 0.183 184 0.294 183 0.238 183 0.198 191 0.277 185 0.237 188 0.262 191 0.436 188 0.349 189 0.308 180 0.308 183 0.308 182 0.364 180 0.405 191 0.385 185 0.333 183 0.469 193 0.401 188 0.177 193 0.341 191 0.259 192 0.279 185 0.378 188 0.329 187 0.250 185 0.341 183 0.296 184 0.200 196 0.302 196 0.251 196 0.213 193 0.228 185 0.220 189 0.174 196 0.207 185 0.190 190 0.174 188 0.314 191 0.244 189 0.216 183 0.393 175 0.305 179 0.269 185 0.400 188 0.335 187 0.233 188 0.313 178 0.273 183 0.208 193 0.364 191 0.286 192 0.147 191 0.364 160 0.255 175 0.152 196 0.167 183 0.159 189

Rationale and Introduction One of the most common sports is football within the United Kingdom. As such, one of the most well-known game series is the FIFA World Cup. However, it is noted that all players have different heights. Moreover, each of these players have different save percentages. These save percentages refer to the percentage of saves that a goalie has made in comparison to shots faced (FOXSports 2015; FOXSports 2013). The rationale for this study came from noting the height differences and save percentages differences, leading to the question: What is the correlation between football players height and save percentage? Statement of Task The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a correlation and/or relationship between the height of football players and the save percentage. This was done for the years 2013 and 2015 for the FIFA World Cup. Therefore, through all instances, the x variable is height, whereas the y variable is save percentage. Plan of Investigation In order to determine the correlation and/or relationship between the height of football players and the save percentage, descriptive statistics (mean, median, and range) will be used to describe the data for both variables for 2013, 2015, and the average of the years. Following this, the standard deviation will be calculated for 2013, 2015, and the average of the years, for both variables. This will be followed by the calculation of the Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient for both years and the average of the years.

5 Mathematical Investigation The data comes from the FIFA World Cup website for 2013 and 2015. As the data is from the official FIFA site, it is expected that the data is reliable. The mathematical investigation includes descriptive statistics (mean, median, range, and standard deviation), and Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (height versus save percentage for both years). Descriptive Statistics The descriptive statistics used within this study are mean, median, range, and standard deviation. The mean is the average of the data. The formula for mean is: Equation 1: Formula for Mean In this formula, refers to the sum of the data points and n refers to the total number of data points. Based on the data in Appendix A, the mean for the 2013 height is 185.81 cm and the mean save percentage for the same year is 0.343. The mean for the 2015 height is 185.79 and the mean save percentage for the same year is 0.244. The median is determined by first ordering the values from smallest to largest and then determining what number lies in the middle. If the data count is even, then the median two numbers are averaged. The median for 2013 height is 185 cm and the median 2015 save percentage is 0.351. The median for 2015 height is 188 cm and the median 2015 save percentage is 0.250. The range is used to determine how wide the data variability is. This is done by ordering the numbers from smallest to largest. The range for 2013 height is 160 cm to 196

cm, whereas the range for 2013 save percentage is 0.167 to 0.469. On the other hand, the range for 2015 height is 170 cm to 196 cm, whereas the range for 2015 save percentage is 0.147 to 0.364. This is shown through the following two figures with the raw data: Figure 1: Height Bar Graph Figure 2: Save Percentage Bar Graph The standard deviation shows the normal distribution of data, evident through the distance of the data points from the mean. For this study, the standard deviation by: Equation 2: Formula for Standard Deviation In this formula, N is the number of data points, is the individual data point, and is the mean of the data range. For this study, the standard deviation is calculated for both years, as well as for both variables. This is shown in the following table: Table 2: Standard Deviation 2015 2013 Average Save % Height Save % Height Save % Height N 1 24 24 24 24 24 24 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.244 187 0.343 186 0.293 187 0.051 1.160 0.074-2.880 0.063-1.280 0.017 1.160-0.010-0.880 0.004 0.720 0.089 1.160 0.034 7.120 0.062 4.720

0.050-3.840 0.088 7.120 0.070 1.720 0.078-13.840 0.024-0.880 0.051-7.280 0.010-16.840 0.008 5.120 0.009-6.280-0.061-2.840-0.049-2.880-0.055-3.280-0.046 4.160-0.066-0.880-0.056 1.720 0.018 4.160 0.093 2.120 0.056 2.720 0.064-6.840-0.035-2.880 0.015-4.280 0.120-6.840 0.062 5.120 0.092-1.280 0.089-3.840 0.126 7.120 0.108 1.720-0.067 6.160-0.002 5.120-0.034 5.720 0.035-1.840 0.035 2.120 0.036 0.720 0.006-1.840-0.002-2.880 0.003-2.280-0.044 9.160-0.041 10.120-0.042 9.720-0.031 6.160-0.115-0.880-0.073 2.720-0.070 9.160-0.136-0.880-0.103 3.720-0.070 1.160-0.029 5.120-0.049 2.720-0.028-3.840 0.050-10.880 0.012-7.280 0.025-1.840 0.057 2.120 0.042 0.720-0.011 1.160-0.030-7.880-0.020-3.280-0.036 6.160 0.021 5.120-0.007 5.720-0.097 4.160 0.021-25.880-0.038-11.280-0.092 9.160-0.176-2.880-0.134 2.720 0.003 1.346 0.005 8.294 0.004 1.638 0.000 1.346 0.000 0.774 0.000 0.518 0.008 1.346 0.001 50.694 0.004 22.278 0.003 14.746 0.008 50.694 0.005 2.958 0.006 191.546 0.001 0.774 0.003 52.998 0.000 283.586 0.000 26.214 0.000 39.438 0.004 8.066 0.002 8.294 0.003 10.758 0.002 17.306 0.004 0.774 0.003 2.958 0.000 17.306 0.009 4.494 0.003 7.398 0.004 46.786 0.001 8.294 0.000 18.318 0.014 46.786 0.004 26.214 0.008 1.638 0.008 14.746 0.016 50.694 0.012 2.958 0.004 37.946 0.000 26.214 0.001 32.718 0.001 3.386 0.001 4.494 0.001 0.518 0.000 3.386 0.000 8.294 0.000 5.198 0.002 83.906 0.002 102.414 0.002 94.478 0.001 37.946 0.013 0.774 0.005 7.398 0.005 83.906 0.019 0.774 0.011 13.838 0.005 1.346 0.001 26.214 0.002 7.398 0.001 14.746 0.002 118.374 0.000 52.998 0.001 3.386 0.003 4.494 0.002 0.518 0.000 1.346 0.001 62.094 0.000 10.758 0.001 37.946 0.000 26.214 0.000 32.718 7

0.009 17.306 0.000 669.774 0.001 127.238 0.008 83.906 0.031 8.294 0.018 7.398 0.091 1055.360 0.125 1294.64 0.089 557.040 0 0.004 43.973 0.005 53.943 0.004 23.210 0.062 6.631 0.072 7.345 0.061 4.818 The changes in mean based on the standard deviation are shown in the following graphs for height and save percentages: Figure 3: Mean and Standard Deviation for Height Graph Figure 4: Mean and Standard Deviation for Save Percentage Graph Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient is used to determine the relationship between two variables. In this context, each data point is plotted on the line of best fit in order to see the disbursement from this line. An upward slope indicates a positive correlation. A downward slope indicates a negative correlation. Correlations are measured as low (±0.1 to ±0.3), moderate (±0.3 to ±0.5), or high (±0.5 to ±1.0). To begin with, it is necessary to prepare the data for analysis. As noted previously, the x variable is height, whereas the y variable is save percentage. The following table is used to prepare the data for all three tests based on the raw data: Table 3: Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient x y xy x 2 y 2 2013 4647 8.577 1596.3 865079 3.068 2015 4671 6.099 1133.512 873735 1.579 Average 4657 7.337 1365.618 868063 2.246

9 The formula for Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient involves a primary equation for r and three secondary equations, as shown below: Equation 3: Formulas for Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient These can be condensed to result in: Equation 4: Condensed Formula for Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient The formulas for all three tests are calculated below: For the first test, there is a negative high correlation. However, the second and third tests show a low positive and negative correlation, respectively. However, in 2013, it is suggested that there was a low positive correlation between height and save percentage. Discussion and Conclusion The mean for the 2013 height is 185.81 cm and the mean save percentage for the same year is 0.343. The mean for the 2015 height is 185.79 and the mean save percentage for the same year is 0.244. This information shows that with a higher average height, there was an average higher save percentage and vice versa. The median for 2013 height is 185 cm and the median 2015 save percentage is 0.351. The median for 2015 height is 188 cm and the

median 2015 save percentage is 0.250. Based on this information, it is suggested that height has no bearing on save percentage as the median save percentage is lower, even with the higher median height. The range for 2013 height is 160 cm to 196 cm, whereas the range for 2013 save percentage is 0.167 to 0.469. On the other hand, the range for 2015 height is 170 cm to 196 cm, whereas the range for 2015 save percentage is 0.147 to 0.364. The difference in height range for 2013 is 25, whereas the difference in save percentage range for 2013 is 0.217. On the other hand, the difference in 2015 height range is 36, whereas the difference in 2015 save percentage range is 0.302. Similar to the mean, it is suggested that the range in heights may have an impact on the save percentage. For 2013 height, the standard deviation is 7.25, whereas the standard deviation for 2013 save percentage is 0.072. For 2015 height, the standard deviation is 6.50, whereas the standard deviation for 2015 save percentage is 0.062. This information suggests that there is a lower difference for 2015 height, as well as a lower difference in save percentages. Based on the results of Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient it is suggested that in 2015, there was a high correlation between height and save percentage. Moreover, this correlation was negative. This means that one variable is increasing as the other decreases. It can be theorized that save percentage increases as height decreases. However, in 2013, it is suggested that there was a low positive correlation between height and save percentage. This suggests that both variables are increasing, suggesting that there is a slight relationship between the variables. When analysing the average, there is a low negative correlation, again suggesting that one variable is increasing while the other decreases. Based on the results of Pearson s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, it is

11 evident that there is an overall negative relationship between height and save percentages of football players. This is confirmed through the trend lines shown in Figures 3 and 4.

References FOXSports, 2013. 2013 Goalkeeping Statistics. World Cup Statistics. Available at: http://www.foxsports.com/soccer/stats? competition=31&season=20130&category=goalkeeping&pos=goalie&team=0& isopp=0&splittype=0&sort=9&sortorder=0. FOXSports, 2015. 2015 Goalkeeping Statistics. World Cup Statistics. Available at: http://www.foxsports.com/soccer/stats? competition=31&season=20150&category=goalkeeping&pos=goalie&team=0& isopp=0&splittype=0&sort=9&sortorder=0.