Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network

Similar documents
Road safety design standards and the Asian Highway Network. irap Asia Pacific Workshop Greg Smith 2016/05/26

Development of the Technical Standard on the Road Safety Facility For the Asian Highway Networks

Dr. CHO, Sung-min Michael

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Standards Indian Context

Draft Annex IV Intergovernmental Agreement on the Asian Highway Network

11 CHECKLISTS Master Checklists All Stages CHECKLIST 1 FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

THE IRAP ROAD SAFETY TOOLKIT A WEBSITE-BASED APPROACH TO ADDRESSING ROAD SAFETY PROBLEMS

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

BUILDING CHINARAP. Zhang Tiejun Research Institute of Highway (RIOH) Beijing, China

ASIAN HIGHWAY DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROAD SAFETY

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Annex II bis ASIAN HIGHWAY DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROAD SAFETY

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

Austroads National Risk Assessment Model (ANRAM) Chris Jurewicz, ARRB

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

ROAD SAFETY PERFORMANCE REVIEW Capacity Building Workshop for Uganda. irap METHODOLOGY Racheal M. N. Nganwa AfricaRAP Lead 1 & 2 March 2018

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Star Ratings for the Strategic Road Network. Richard Leonard - Highways England

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Road Safety Trends, Targets and Safety Programs in New Zealand. by Dr Shane Turner

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

THE COMMON FINDINGS FROM ROAD SAFETY AUDITS AND ROAD SAFETY INSPECTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKAN REGION WION

SECTION 12 ROAD MARKINGS AND DELINEATION

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual - Carriageways

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

SECTION 12 ROAD MARKINGS AND DELINEATION

irap irap The world road safety problem irap Background irap Aims A Safe Road System Vaccines for Roads 1. irap Background 2. irap Malaysia Results

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual-carriageways

Intersection Safety 6/7/2015 INTERSECTIONS. Five basic elements should be considered in intersection design. Intersection Safety (continued)

DEVELOPMENT OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY FACILITY STANDARDS FOR THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

Closing Plenary Session

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN

Toole Design Group is live tweeting this webinar

Supplementary Appendix to ARTC Track & Civil Code of Practice. Establishing Minimum Protective Measures at Level Crossings ETF-16-01

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Setting Regional and National Road Safety Targets

CHECKLIST 4: PRE-OPENING STAGE AUDIT

DEVELOPMENT OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY FACILITY STANDARDS FOR THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

Pedestrian Crosswalk Audit

Classification Criteria

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Road Safety in Asia and the Pacific and The Updated Regional Road Safety Goals and Targets for Asia and the Pacific

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

ROAD SAFETY DEMONSTRATION

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Engineering Your Community Safe

5 AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT PROPOSAL

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Guidelines for flush medians RTS 4

Public Information Centre

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Risk and Safety Assessment on Road Infrastructure. Olivera Djordjevic

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

An International Experience on the Safety Performance of 2+1 cross-section. Basil Psarianos Nat l Techn. Univ. Athens, Greece

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Road design and Safety philosophy, 1 st Draft

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

JCE 4600 Transportation Engineering. Traffic Control

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Discover the Safe System Approach

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS TO ENSURE ROAD SAFETY: EXPERIENCES FROM INDIA

2012 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Why do we need checklists?

Transcription:

Development of Road Infrastructure Safety Facility Standards Expert Group Meeting on Asian Highway United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 3-4 October 2016 Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network Julian THG KWONG Road Safety Consultant

Contents Background and Objectives Basis of the Work Scope of the Design Standard Development of Contents

Overview Formulation of a design standard with both mandatory requirements and recommendations Asian Highway Network member countries shall make every effort to comply with the design standard within reasonable timeframe Applications Online highway improvement or upgrading projects New bypass projects New addition of roads to the Asian Highway Network Dedicated road safety improvement projects Routine maintenance activities

Objectives of the Design Standard Vision Zero Zero Death or Serious Injuries Best performing countries Long Term Three-Star Rating Current Situation

Diversity of Asian Highway Routes Google Street View Google Street View

Diversity of Asian Highway Routes Google Satellite

Current Status of the Network Development towards more Primary, Class I and Class II roads Class III roads and below will continue to exist for some time Class I roads have the highest fatality rate by km Class II/III roads have the highest fatality rate by veh-km

Contents Background and Objectives Basis of the Work Scope of the Design Standard Development of Contents

Intergovernmental Agreement on The Asian Highway Network RIFs Output from irap Work Flow Information from AH Participating Countries (Bangladesh, China, India, Korea, Thailand) Key References - AASHTO/FHWA - Korean Standard International References - UNECE-TERN - Europe/Australia etc - International organizations Output by Korea Expressway Corporation (KEC) Integration by Consultant in collaboration with KEC Design Standard

International References Selection Criteria Well-performing countries Pioneering design concepts and practices Design standards accessible 36 Fatalities per 100,000 Population Asian Highway Network member countries mainly 10-25 Singapore Japan US International reference countries Canada Australia France Germany Norway Netherlands Switzerland United Kingdom Sweden < 5

United States - AASHTO Standards - Forgiving Roadside - MUTCD International References Netherlands - Sustainable Safety - Self-explaining Roads - Traffic calming - Bicycle infrastructures Norway - Vision Zero - Mountain roads France - Expressways - Mountain roads - Intersections/Roundabouts Sweden - Vision Zero - 2+1 Roads United Kingdom - Aggressive research - Elaborate design standard - Innovations Germany - New Rural Road Design Standard Australia - Vigorous developments - Abundant research

Trans European Road Network (TERN) Trans-European Motorway (TEM) International E-Roads Contiguity/Overlap with Asian Highways Road design standards for TERN, TEM and tunnels

UNECE Design Standards

Contents Background and Objectives Basis of the Work Scope of the Design Standard Development of Contents

Proposed Design Standard Annex I ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ON THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK Annex II ASIAN HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS Annex III IDENTIFICATION AND SIGNAGE OF THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK Annex IV ASIAN HIGHWAY ROAD SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS Mandatory APPENDIX 1 RIF DESIGN GUIDELINE Recommendations

Considerations Long term vision Vs Short term issues Feasible across different countries Compatibility with national standards/practices Harmonization of practices Flexibility with alternative solutions Amenable to updating Subtle use of wordings shall (mandatory) should (highly recommended) It is advisable to (recommended) may (optional depending on circumstances)

Road Infrastructure Facilities (RIFs) selected by irap A-1 Line marking A-2 Chevron mark A-3 Raised pavement marker A-4 Flexible delineation posts B-1 Roadside barrier B-2 Median barrier B-4 Central Hatching B-5 Crash cushion with channelization B-6 Safety barrier end treatment B-7 Clear Zones C-2 Centreline/Edge line Rumble Strip E-1 Protected turn lane E-2 Intersection Channelization E-3 Roundabout F-1 Speed hump F-2 Visual Traffic Calming F-3 Automatic Regulation Cameras G-1 Bicycle Lane G-2 Exclusive Motorcycle Lanes H-2 Lighting H-7 Sight distance D-1 Pedestrian crossings D-2 Sidewalk (footpath) D-3 Pedestrian Fences D-4 Pedestrian Refuge Island Anti-glare Facilities

Potential Road Safety Topics for Inclusion Integration into the design standard is recommended Road Network Development Road Infrastructures Overtaking Strategy Parking Areas, Service Areas, Rest Areas Long steep grades Climbing lanes Service roads Wrong-way driving Wildlife facilities Noise abatement Facilities Tunnels Intersections Grade-separated Interchanges U-turn facilities At grade railway crossings Road Signage Traffic Signs Directional signing Asian Highway signing Speed Limits

Road Network Development Interface Issues X X X X Temporary termination via interchange Temporary termination onto existing roads Class 1 Class 2 Multi-lane roads onto existing alignment Class 3 Class 2 Class 3 Online geometry onto existing alignment Class 2 Class 1 Class 2 Online improvements

Contents Background and Objectives Basis of the Work Scope of Design Standard Development of Contents

Proposed Annex IV Road Safety Infrastructure Standard

Rock Slope (aggressive) Guarded by Safety Barrier Roadside Safety and RIFs Median Safety Barrier Shoulder Passively Safe Sign Safety Zone comprising Shoulder and Clear Zone Clear Zone Google Street View

Sample Texts of Annex IV Sample

Traffic Calming for Towns and Villages Gateway Sign Major village Market town 50 (40) 60 (70) 80 (70) Traffic Calming with Speed Management Small villages Isolated houses Enhancement of safety level

RIF Design Manual Definition and Functions WHAT & WHY Provision Criteria WHERE & WHEN Locations Conditions for application Technical Requirements HOW Layout, Dimensions Capacity, Performance, testing standard Construction, operation, maintenance Precautions Targeting at critical issues and common concerns

RIFs are interdependent of each other Priority intersections on Class I roads Involve median barriers, protected turn lane, side road channelization island, visibility, end treatments, signing/markings, speed limit etc Google Satellite

V =< 8km/h RIF : Chevron Marks Within the context of a bend signing system 8km/h < V =< 16km/h Source: CEREMA, France 16km/h < V =< 40km/h V > 40km/h If poor visibility around bend Enhance measures exceptionally according to circumstances

Provision Criteria Sharp bends which RIF : Chevron Marks requires approach traffic to reduce speed substantially are not conspicuous due to an open background are not clear due to presence of intersections or tangential features have poor visibility Technical Requirements Sign height between 600mm and 900mm Facing drivers at right angle Mounting height ~ 1m-1.5m, higher for crests Installation intervals Passive safety

RIF : Protected Turn Lanes (Hatched Markings) Reduces risk of rear-front collisions Encourages more cautious maneuvers Google Street View

RIF : Protected Turn Lanes (Hatched Markings) Provision Criteria Crossroad and T-intersections with turning traffic >300 vpd Technical Requirements Symmetrical or asymmetrical layout Turning lane between 3.0m and 5.0m Through lane between 3.0m and 3.5m Hard shoulder >1.75m (1.5m min) if used by pedestrians and slow traffic Geometry based on approach taper, diverge taper, deceleration length and queuing length Possible enhanced delineations

Priority Intersections Need to regulate types of intersections permitted Strict requirements for Class I roads Source: CEREMA, France

Sample Texts under Development

Development of Road Infrastructure Safety Facility Standards Expert Group Meeting on Asian Highway United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 3-4 October 2016 Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network Julian THG KWONG Road Safety Consultant