Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Similar documents
2009 MUTCD New Provisions for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Housekeeping

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Ohio Department of Transportation Edition of the OMUTCD It s Here!

2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

An Overview of the 2009 MUTCD

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

(This page left intentionally blank)

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE (1) For

MEMORANDUM. Date: 9/13/2016. Citywide Crosswalk Policy

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES INTRODUCTION

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Designing Accessible Traffic Signals

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

Sets forth Basic Principles and Prescribes

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fundamentals of Traffic Control Devices

Memorandum MAR or in part.

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

Appendix A. Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines. Appendix A: Knoxville TPO Greenway Signage Guidelines Knox to Oak Ridge Greenway Master Plan

PBIC Webinar. Accessible Pedestrian Signals [IMAGE] March 11, 2014, 2 pm

What's in the 2012 California MUTCD for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and School Areas?

PART 7. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR SCHOOL AREAS CHAPTER 7A. GENERAL

Designing for Pedestrian Safety. Alabama Department of Transportation Pre-Construction Conference May 2016

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & HIGHWAY SAFETY BULLETIN Controlled Approaches. Uncontrolled Approaches. Midblock Locations

Taking a Step back, can we make crossing the street less chancy? Kerry Wilcoxon City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS

DPS 201 RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

MUTCD Part 6D: Pedestrian and Worker Safety

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Appendix A-6. Signing and Marking Guidelines. Number Name Pages. 2B.06 Signing at T Intersections 1. 2B.12 Pedestrians in Crosswalk 1

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

CTCDC California Traffic Control Devices Committee

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Traffic Signs and Markings. Instructor: Dr. Yahya Sarraj Associate Prof. Of Transportation

Traffic Signs and Signals

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

by MUTCD standards and guidance include signs, signals, pavement

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons

Complete Streets Design Considerations. Second Street Corridor Complete Streets Workshop and Assessment Manchester, NH April 26, 2013

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Lecture 9 Pedestrian Characteristics & Facility Design and Operation

Town of Windsor Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines

Traffic Control Devices

IMPROVING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AT UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS. Guidelines for Marked Crosswalks

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

2003 Edition Page 2B-1

Traffic Engineering Update on Bike/Ped Topics. Marc Lipschultz, P.E. PTOE Central Office Traffic Engineering Division

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES Section 2B.01 Application of Regulatory Signs Standard:

Chapter 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS

ITE Wayfinding Workshop, Oct , 2004

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Designing for Bicyclist Safety at Crossings and Intersections

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Attachment No. 13. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

TRANSMITTAL LETTER. Revision to Publication 149, Chapter 20 (Criteria for the Design of Traffic Signal Supports) - March 2009 Edition

MUTCD Workshop INLTAP Core Course #8. Laura Slusher, INLTAP Karen Stippich/Rick Drumm, FHWA

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Updated There is no park access points beyond the limit of the phase I work. roadway to be constructed Viewport has been along full limits of the park

Transportation Planning Division

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

Designing for the Visually Impaired

Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

FHWA Experimentation #4-298(E) Modified HAWK Signal and Bike Signal - Draft Report

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

ARLINGTON COUNTY PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIFICATIONS

TRAFFIC LINE MANUAL Edition Revision 1 June 2012 TRAFFIC-ROADWAY SECTION

Designing for Individuals who are visually impaired or blind

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Guide Recommendations and Case Study. FHWA Safety Program.

Proposed changes to Massachusetts MUTCD Supplement

In response to your request for information on mid-block pedestrian crossing policies and guidelines, the following information is enclosed:

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

ADA & Public Rights of Way

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

Today s presentation

Transcription:

Impact of the New MUTCD on Pedestrians and Bicyclists Bruce Friedman and Scott Wainwright FHWA MUTCD Team

Development of the 2009 MUTCD NPA published in the Federal Register on January 2, 2008 Received 1,840 individual letters with over 15,000 comments Final Rule published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2009 Effective date = January 15, 2010

2009 MUTCD overriding themes

Uniformity

Complete street concept all road users Aging population

Successful (?) innovation

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 2

Variant of Yield Here to Pedestrians signs for State laws requiring full stop

Overhead pedestrian crossing signs

In street pedestrian crossing signs Placement locations Background may be fluorescent yellow or fluorescent yellow green

Supports for in street pedestrian crossing signs must be designed to bend over and bounce back when struck

Symbol added to pedestrian pushbutton signs

New special purpose pushbutton signs

R10 15 New symbolic design for the R10 15 sign

Fluorescent yellow green color Required for school and school bus signs Optional for pedestrian, bike, and playground signs

New sign and plaque for combined pedestrian/bicycle crossing

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 3

Sections 3B.13 and 3B.14 Guidance against use of RPMs with right hand edge lines softened for some conditions Should not be used unless engineering judgment indicates: - Benefits of enhanced delineation outweigh possible impacts to bicycles using shoulder, and - Spacing of RPMs is close enough to avoid misinterpretation as a broken line on wet night

Revised guidance for provision of marked crosswalks New marked crosswalks alone, without other substantial measures to reduce speeds, shorten crossing distance, enhance driver awareness of crossing, and/or provide active warning of ped presence should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways with: > 4 travel lanes, and Speed limit > 40 mph, and ADT > 12,000 without raised median or ped refuge, or > 15,000 with raised median or ped refuge

New Chapter 3C Pavement markings at roundabouts

Section 3G.01 Colored pavements Non retroreflective, for aesthetics only, not to communicate a message = not a TCD Retroreflective or intended to communicate a regulatory, warning, or guidance message = TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE (shall comply with color code and other provisions for markings)

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 4

Signal warrants revisions to Warrant 4 (Pedestrian Volume) More comparable to vehicular volume warrants

Signals based only on Warrant 4 (Ped Volume) or Warrant 5 (School Crossing) should also control the minor street or driveway No half signals

Chapter 4F new pedestrian hybrid beacon Should not be installed at or within 100 feet of an intersection

If signal timing provides only enough time for pedestrians to cross to the median ped signals, pushbuttons (if actuated), and signs are required in the median

New meaning of flashing upraised hand when pedestrian countdown signals are present was NOT ADOPTED Ped may enter the intersection on the flashing upraised hand when a countdown pedestrian signal indication is present if they are able to travel to the far side of the traveled way by the time conflicting traffic receives a green signal

Section 4E.06 Pedestrian intervals and signal phases If a walking person or a flashing upraised hand is displayed A steady red or flashing red must be displayed to any conflicting vehicular movement that is perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the crosswalk Crosswalk w/ ped signals across signalcontrolled RT slot

Slower walking speed for calculating ped clearance time (guidance) 4 feet per second Pedestrian Clearance Time based on 3.5 feet per second [Exception allows 4 ft/sec if extended button press or passive ped detection allows slower peds to request additional crossing time] Sum of Walk time + Ped Clearance Time based on 3 ft/sec for distance from pedestrian detector to far side

Ped change interval (FDW) shall end at least 3 seconds ( buffer ) before release of Buffer shall not begin later than the start of the red clearance interval, if used Compliance date 12/31/2014 or when timing adjustments are made (whichever occurs first) conflicting traffic

Slower walking speed for calculating pedestrian clearance time (guidance) 4 feet per second Ped. Clearance Time based on 3.5 feet/sec [Exception allows 4 ft/sec if extended button press or passive ped detection allows slower peds to request additional crossing time] Sum of Walk time + Ped. Clearance Time based on 3 ft/sec for distance from ped detector to far side

Optional leading pedestrian interval

Countdown pedestrian displays Required for all ped signals where ped change interval is more than 7 seconds No specific compliance date for retrofitting existing ped signals (can remain w/o countdown until ped heads replaced) May be used even if ped change interval is 7 seconds or less

New guidance and figures for locations of pedestrian pushbuttons for a variety of conditions (APS compatible)

Positioning of pedestrian pushbuttons and legends on pushbutton signs shall clearly indicate which crosswalk signal is activated by which pushbutton

Accessible pedestrian signals (APS) and accessible detectors combined and reorganized into five new sections 4E.09 General 4E.10 Location 4E.11 Walk indications 4E.12 Tactile arrows and locator tones 4E.13 Extended press button features

APS pushbutton locations APS pushbutton locations similar to 2003 edition now apply to non APS pushbutton also (Section 4E.08) As close as possible to the crosswalk line furthest from center of intersection, and as close as possible to the curb ramp If 2 buttons on same corner, separate them by at least 10 ft. (unless physical constraints make impractical) 10 ft MIN 10 ft MIN

APS WALK indications Shall provide both in both audible & vibrotactile form Audible: Same duration as WALK interval Percussive tone (8 to 10 ticks/sec), except: If 2 buttons < 10 ft apart or on same pole, shall use speech WALK message rather than audible tone (Street Name). Walk sign is on to cross (Street Name). Vibrotactile vibrating tactile arrow

Tactile arrows Shall be located on each pushbutton Shall be aligned parallel to the direction of travel on the associated crosswalk Locator tone Shall be incorporated into each APS pushbutton Shall operate during intervals other than the WALK interval

Special APS features via extended pushbutton press May be actuated by button press of 1 second or more: Longer crossing time Speech information message Audible beaconing

Speech information messages Actuated only during intervals other than WALK Required if two ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL pushbuttons on same corner < 10 ft apart or on same pole (optional otherwise) Message format: Wait. Wait to cross (Street Name 1) at (Street Name 2) Unusual geometry, phasing may also be described

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 7

Schoolchildren symbol may be used on in street signs at school crossings R1 6b R1 6c

Overhead pedestrian crossing signs with schoolchildren symbols may be used at unsignalized school crossings

Operating procedures for adult crossing guards changed from recommended to required Shall not direct traffic in the usual law enforcement regulatory sense Shall pick opportune times to create a sufficient gap in traffic flow Shall stand in roadway Shall use a STOP paddle

Adult school crossing guards and law enforcement personnel performing school crossing supervision must wear Class 2 highvisibility apparel (compliance date is 12/31/2011) Provisions in former Chapter 7E regarding school age crossing guards were deleted

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 8

Audible devices are required at active LRT grade crossings used by pedestrians AUDIBLE DEVICE

New Chapter 8D on pathway grade crossings

2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 9

Interesting, but not included in 2009 MUTCD

Lateral offset and mounting height requirements for traffic control devices on shared use paths

Bicycle lane regulatory signs are no longer required

New sign for lanes that are too narrow for bicyclists and motorists to operate side byside R4 11

New selective exclusion signs for modes other than bikes and pedestrians R9 13 R9 14

Three new pushbutton signs including two that include a bicycle symbol R10 24 R10 25 R10 26

Revised legend on W5 4a sign W5 4a

New sign and plaque for combined pedestrian/bicycle crossing W11 15 W11 15P

Type 3 object markers for use on shared use paths OM3 L OM3 C OM3 R

New bicycle destination guide signs D1 3c D11 1c

Reference location signs for use on shared use paths D10 2 D10 2a

D11 1a D11 2 D11 3 D11 4 New mode specific guide signs for shared use paths

New Bicycle Route sign that provides a place for a pictograph M1 8 M1 8a

Revised design of the U.S. Bicycle Route sign M1 9

Changes in design and sizes of auxiliary signs used with Bicycle Route signs M4 14 M4 5

New shared lane pavement marking

Questions??