and Summer Flounder Paralichthys dentatus (Image B. Guild Gillespie/www.chartingnature.com) United States Bottom gillnet, handline, trap nets 1/07/16 The Safina Center Seafood Analysts Disclaimer Seafood Watch and The Safina Center strive to ensure that all our Seafood Reports and recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at the time of publication. All our reports are peer-reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or of The Safina Center or their recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch and The Safina Center are solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. Seafood Watch and Seafood Reports are made possible through a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and other funders.
2 About The Safina Center The Safina Center (formerly Blue Ocean Institute) translates scientific information into language people can understand and serves as a unique voice of hope, guidance, and encouragement. The Safina Center (TSC) works through science, art, and literature to inspire solutions and a deeper connection with nature, especially the sea. Our mission is to inspire more people to actively engage as well-informed and highly motivated constituents for conservation. Led by conservation pioneer and MacArthur fellow, Dr. Carl Safina, we show how nature, community, the economy and prospects for peace are all intertwined. Through Safina s books, essays, public speaking, PBS television series, our Fellows program and Sustainable Seafood program, we seek to inspire people to make better choices. The Safina Center was founded in 2003 by Dr. Carl Safina and was built on three decades of research, writing and policy work by Dr. Safina. The Safina Center s Sustainable Seafood Program The Center s founders created the first seafood guide in 1998. Our online seafood guide now encompasses over 160-wild-caught species. All peer-reviewed seafood reports are transparent, authoritative, easy to understand and use. Seafood ratings and full reports are available on our website under Seafood Choices. TSC s Sustainable Seafood Program helps consumers, retailers, chefs and health professionals discover the connection between human health, a healthy ocean, fishing and sustainable seafood. Our online guide to sustainable seafood is based on scientific ratings for more than 160 wildcaught seafood species and provides simple guidelines. Through our expanded partnership with the Monterey Bay Aquarium, our guide now includes seafood ratings from both The Safina Center and the Seafood Watch program. We partner with Whole Foods Market (WFM) to help educate their seafood suppliers and staff, and provide our scientific seafood ratings for WFM stores in the US and UK. Through our partnership with Chefs Collaborative, we created Green Chefs/Blue Ocean, a free, interactive, online sustainable seafood course for chefs and culinary professionals. Our website features tutorials, videos, blogs, links and discussions of the key issues such as mercury in seafood, bycatch, overfishing, etc. Check out our Fellows Program, learn more about our Sustainable Seafood Program and Carl Safina s current work at www.safinacenter.org. The Safina Center is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization based in the School of Marine & Atmospheric Sciences at Stony Brook University, Long Island, NY. www.safinacenter.org admin@safinacenter.org 631.632.3763
3 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium s Seafood Watch program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wildcaught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of Best Choices, Good Alternatives or Avoid. The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible. Other sources of information include government technical publications, fishery management plans and supporting documents, and other scientific reviews of ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch Research Analysts also communicate regularly with ecologists, fisheries and aquaculture scientists, and members of industry and conservation organizations when evaluating fisheries and aquaculture practices. Capture fisheries and aquaculture practices are highly dynamic; as the scientific information on each species changes, Seafood Watch s sustainability recommendations and the underlying Seafood Reports will be updated to reflect these changes. Parties interested in capture fisheries, aquaculture practices and the sustainability of ocean ecosystems are welcome to use Seafood Reports in any way they find useful. For more information about Seafood Watch and Seafood Reports, please contact the Seafood Watch program at Monterey Bay Aquarium by calling 1-877-229-9990.
4 Guiding Principles The Safina Center and Seafood Watch define sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether fished 1 or farmed, that can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Based on this principle, Seafood Watch and the Safina Center have developed four sustainability criteria for evaluating wild-catch fisheries for consumers and businesses. These criteria are: How does fishing affect the species under assessment? How does the fishing affect other, target and non-target species? How effective is the fishery s management? How does the fishing affect habitats and the stability of the ecosystem? Each criterion includes: Factors to evaluate and score Guidelines for integrating these factors to produce a numerical score and rating Once a rating has been assigned to each criterion, we develop an overall recommendation. Criteria ratings and the overall recommendation are color-coded to correspond to the categories on the Seafood Watch pocket guide and the Safina Center s online guide: Best Choice/Green: Are well managed and caught in ways that cause little harm to habitats or other wildlife. Good Alternative/Yellow: Buy, but be aware there are concerns with how they re caught. Avoid/Red: Take a pass on these for now. These items are overfished or caught in ways that harm other marine life or the environment. 1 Fish is used throughout this document to refer to finfish, shellfish and other invertebrates.
5 Summary Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), commonly known as fluke, is a bottom-dwelling, left-eyed flatfish found in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean from Maine to Florida. It is most abundant in the Mid- Atlantic Bight from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. This report assesses the sustainability of U.S. summer flounder caught with handlines, trap nets (e.g., pound nets and weirs), and gillnets. These fishing methods contribute to a low proportion of the total catch. Most summer flounder are caught in bottom trawl fisheries, which have been assessed in a separate report. The abundance of summer flounder was low in the 1980s and 1990s, but the population has increased and is now moderately abundant. But the most recent assessment update for summer flounder indicated that overfishing is occurring. Managers have responded by reducing the commercial and recreational catch limits for summer flounder. The gillnet, trap net, and handline fisheries that catch summer flounder are typically mixed-species fisheries. Bycatch in these fisheries varies by gear type. The handline fisheries catch few non-target species. In the trap net fisheries, there is some concern about incidental catches of coastal bottlenose dolphin. The gillnet fisheries incidentally catch several protected, threatened, and endangered species, including Atlantic sturgeon, marine mammals, and sea turtles. Management measures are in place to reduce bycatch of these vulnerable species. The handline fisheries have a minimal impact on bottom habitats, while trap nets and bottom gillnets have a low to moderate impact on the sandy/muddy habitats where summer flounder are found. Overall, due to current overfishing on summer flounder and concerns about the bycatch of vulnerable ocean wildlife, the trap net and gillnet fisheries are rated Red or Avoid. The handline fishery is rated Yellow or Good Alternative.
6 Table of Conservation s and Overall Recommendations Species / Fishery Criterion 1 Impacts on the Species Under Assessment Summer flounder United States North Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Impacts on Management other Species Effectiveness Criterion 4 Impacts on the Habitat and Ecosystem Overall Recommendation Red (2.00) Red (0.95) Yellow (3.00) Yellow (3.12) Red/Avoid (2.054) Atlantic - Gillnet, Bottom Summer flounder Red (2.00) Red (2.16) Green (3.46) Yellow (3.12) Red/Avoid (2.614) United States North Atlantic - Trap net Summer flounder United States North Atlantic - Handline Red (2.00) Yellow (2.71) Green (3.46) Green (3.46) Yellow/Good Alternative (2.840) Scoring Guide Scores range from zero to five where zero indicates very poor performance and five indicates the fishing operations have no significant impact. Final Score = geometric mean of the four Scores (Criterion 1, Criterion 2, Criterion 3, Criterion 4). Best Choice/Green = Final Score >3.2, and no Red Criteria, and no Critical scores Good Alternative/Yellow = Final score >2.2, and neither Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) nor Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) are Very High 2, and no more than one Red Criterion, and no Critical scores, and does not meet the criteria for Best Choice (above) Avoid/Red = Final Score <=2.2, or either Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) or Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) is Very High 2, or two or more Red Criteria, or one or more Critical scores. 2 Because effective management is an essential component of sustainable fisheries, Seafood Watch issues an Avoid recommendation for any fishery scored as a Very High for either factor under Management (Criterion 3).
7 Table of Contents About The Safina Center... 2 About Seafood Watch... 3 Guiding Principles... 4 Summary... 5 Introduction... 8 Assessment... 11 Criterion 1: Impact on the Species Under Assessment... 11 Criterion 2: Impacts on Other Species... 16 Criterion 3: Management effectiveness... 23 Criterion 4: Impacts on the Habitat and Ecosystem... 35 Acknowledgements... 41 References... 42 Appendix A: Main Species Considered in the Assessment... 49
8 Introduction Scope of the analysis and ensuing recommendation This report assesses the sustainability of summer flounder caught with gillnets, trap nets (e.g., pound nets and weirs), and handlines along the East Coast of the United States. Summer flounder caught with bottom trawls has been assessed in a separate report. Overview of the species and management bodies Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), or fluke, is a left-eyed, bottom-dwelling flatfish (URI 1998). It is found from Maine to Florida in the United States (Packer et al. 1999). It is sometimes found as north as Nova Scotia, Canada, although rarely (Froese and Pauly 2014). It is most abundant in the Mid-Atlantic Bight from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. Summer flounder undergoes seasonal migrations and can be found inshore during the spring and summer, and offshore during the fall and winter (Packer et al. 1999). In offshore waters, it is found at depths to 150 m (Packer et al. 1999). Summer flounder is typically found on soft-bottom habitats such as sand, silt, or mud (Packer et al. 1999). Male summer flounder reach a maximum size of 61 cm (24 in.) in length and can live to 7 years of age. Females can reach 82 to 94 cm (32 to 37 in.) in length and can live to 12 years of age (Collette and Klein-MacPhee 2002). Summer flounder in the United States has been jointly managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) since 1988. The species is managed as a single population from the United States/Canada border to the southern border of North Carolina (MAFMC 2014d). Since 1993, managers have set annual catch limits for summer flounder. The catch limit is divided 60/40 between the commercial and recreational fisheries, respectively (ASMFC 2015e). Figure 1. Management unit of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) from Maine to North Carolina. Image from NOAA Fisheries Greater Atlantic Region.
9 Production Statistics Summer flounder along the East Coast of the United States supports both a commercial and recreational fishery. In 1983, total landings (commercial and recreational) hit a peak of 26,000 metric tons (mt) (57 million lbs) (NEFSC 2013b). From the late 1980s to the early 1990s, total landings dropped dramatically, and have remained relatively stable (ASMFC 2015e). In 2014, total commercial landings of summer flounder were 4,900 mt (10.9 million lbs). North Carolina landed the most summer flounder, followed by Rhode Island, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. In 2014, recreational landings of summer flounder were 3,350 mt (7.4 million lbs), with New Jersey and New York accounting for most of the recreational catch (MAFMC 2015b). In the commercial fishery, bottom trawls are the most commonly used gear to catch summer flounder (Rootes-Murdy 2014). Small amounts of summer flounder are caught in coastal waters with gillnets, pound nets, weirs, and handlines. In 2014, bottom trawls accounted for 96% of summer flounder landings, while handlines, gillnets, pound nets, and weirs each contributed 1% or less of the landings (MAFMC 2015b). Some summer flounder are also caught as bycatch in dredge, trap, and pot fisheries (NOAA 2015a). In 2014, states that used gillnets and handlines to catch summer flounder included Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Virginia. States that caught summer flounder using pounds nets or weirs included Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia (NOAA 2015a). Figure 2. Commercial landings and recreational harvest of summer flounder in millions of pounds. Image from ASMFC: summer flounder profile.
10 Importance to the U.S./North American market Summer flounder is solely caught in the U.S. In 2014, summer flounder commercial landings totaled 4,900 mt (10.9 million lbs). The summer flounder fishery is the largest flatfish fishery on the U.S. Atlantic Coast. U.S. landings of Atlantic flounders (summer, winter, witch, and yellowtail) totaled 9,300 mt in 2014. Additionally, 50,800 mt of arrowtooth flounder were landed by the U.S. on the Pacific coast (NOAA 2015c). The National Marine Fisheries Service reports imports and exports of all flounder species together. In 2014, the U.S. imported 12,500 mt of flounder, the majority of which was from China (NOAA 2015b). There are no reported exports of flounders. Common and market names Summer flounder is commonly marketed as fluke, flounder, northern fluke, and hirame (sushi or sashimi) (NOAA FishWatch 2014). Primary product forms Summer flounder is usually found fresh or frozen, either whole or as fillets, and is commonly used raw for sushi or sashimi (Froese and Pauly 2014) (NOAA FishWatch 2014).
11 Assessment This section assesses the sustainability of the fishery(s) relative to the Seafood Watch Criteria for Fisheries, available at http://www.seafoodwatch.org. Criterion 1: Impact on the Species Under Assessment This criterion evaluates the impact of fishing mortality on the species, given its current abundance. The inherent vulnerability to fishing rating influences how abundance is scored, when abundance is unknown. The final Criterion 1 score is determined by taking the geometric mean of the abundance and fishing mortality scores. The Criterion 1 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Score >2.2 and <=3.2=Yellow or Moderate Score <=2.2=Red or High Rating is Critical if Factor 1.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Critical. Criterion 1 Summary SUMMER FLOUNDER Region / Method Factor 1.1 Inherent Vulnerability United States North Atlantic Medium Gillnet, Bottom United States North Atlantic Medium Handline United States North Atlantic Medium Trap net Factor 1.2 Abundance 4.00:Low 4.00:Low 4.00:Low Factor 1.3 Fishing Mortality 1.00:High 1.00:High 1.00:High Criterion 1 Score Red (2.000) Red (2.000) Red (2.000) Criterion 1 Assessment SUMMER FLOUNDER Factor 1.1 - Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines Low The FishBase vulnerability score for species is 0-35, OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make it resilient to fishing, (e.g., early maturing (
12 Medium The FishBase vulnerability score for species is 36-55, OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make it neither particularly vulnerable nor resilient to fishing, (e.g., moderate age at sexual maturity (5-15 years), moderate maximum age (10-25 years), moderate maximum size, and middle of food chain). High The FishBase vulnerability score for species is 56-100, OR species exhibits life history characteristics that make is particularly vulnerable to fishing, (e.g., long-lived (>25 years), late maturing (>15 years), low reproduction rate, large body size, and top-predator). Note: The FishBase vulnerability scores is an index of the inherent vulnerability of marine fishes to fishing based on life history parameters: maximum length, age at first maturity, longevity, growth rate, natural mortality rate, fecundity, spatial behaviors (e.g., schooling, aggregating for breeding, or consistently returning to the same sites for feeding or reproduction) and geographic range. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Medium FishBase assigns summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) a medium inherent vulnerability to fishing score of 47 out of 100 (Froese and Pauly 2014). Males reach a maximum size of 61 cm (24 in.) in length and can live to 7 years of age. Females can reach 94 cm (37 in.) in length and can live to 12 years of age. The average size for this fish typically ranges from 40 to 56 cm (16 to 22 in.) (Collette and Klein- MacPhee 2002). Summer flounder reach maturity at around 2 years and at a length of 25 30 cm (10 12 in.) for males and 30 37 cm (12 15 in.) for females (Packer et al. 1999). They begin to spawn as they move offshore during the fall and winter months, and continue to spawn throughout the winter (Collette and Klein-MacPhee 2002). It has been estimated that females can produce 460,000 to over 4,000,000 eggs, with egg production increasing with size (Collette and Klein-MacPhee 2002). Summer flounder are considered opportunistic feeders and are high-level predators in the food chain (Froese and Pauly 2014). Fish make up the largest percentage of their diet but other components include a variety of marine worms, shrimp, clams, and crabs (Packer et al. 1999). Factor 1.2 - Abundance Scoring Guidelines 5 (Very Low ) Strong evidence exists that the population is above target abundance level (e.g., biomass at maximum sustainable yield, BMSY) or near virgin biomass. 4 (Low ) Population may be below target abundance level, but it is considered not overfished
13 3 (Moderate ) Abundance level is unknown and the species has a low or medium inherent vulnerability to fishing. 2 (High ) Population is overfished, depleted, or a species of concern, OR abundance is unknown and the species has a high inherent vulnerability to fishing. 1 (Very High ) Population is listed as threatened or endangered. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Low A 2015 population assessment update of summer flounder estimated the abundance of sexually mature fish (spawning stock biomass) to be 40,300 metric tons (mt) (90% confidence interval = 35,486 to 49,918 mt), which is 65% of the target abundance level (62,400 mt). Although abundance is below the target abundance level, it is above the limit abundance level (31,200 mt) and therefore the population is not considered overfished/depleted (Terceiro 2015). The target abundance level is set at 35% of the abundance of an unfished population, and is considered a proxy for the biomass at maximum sustainable yield (B MSY ). The limit abundance level is set at one half of the target (Terceiro 2015) (NEFSC 2013a). The abundance of adult summer flounder declined to historical lows in the late 1980s and early 1990s but then greatly increased, reaching peak levels in 2003 and 2010 (NEFSC 2013a). But in recent years, abundance has declined some. Recruitment, or the amount of new fish entering the population, was below average from 2010 2013, but was close to the average level (41 million fish) in 2014 (Terceiro 2015). See Figure 3. We have awarded a low concern score since the abundance of summer flounder is below the target level, but the species is not overfished/depleted.
14 Figure 3. Summer flounder Spawning Stock Biomass (solid line) and Recruitment at age 0 (bars). Dashed line = proxy for Spawning Stock Biomass at Maximum Sustainable Yield). Image from NEFSC Summer Flounder Assessment Update for 2015. Factor 1.3 - Fishing Mortality Scoring Guidelines 5 (Very Low ) Highly likely that fishing mortality is below a sustainable level (e.g., below fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield, FMSY), OR fishery does not target species and its contribution to the mortality of species is negligible ( 5% of a sustainable level of fishing mortality). 3.67 (Low ) Probable (>50%) chance that fishing mortality is at or below a sustainable level, but some uncertainty exists, OR fishery does not target species and does not adversely affect species, but its contribution to mortality is not negligible, OR fishing mortality is unknown, but the population is healthy and the species has a low susceptibility to the fishery (low chance of being caught). 2.33 (Moderate ) Fishing mortality is fluctuating around sustainable levels, OR fishing mortality is unknown and species has a moderate-high susceptibility to the fishery and, if species is depleted, reasonable management is in place. 1 (High ) Overfishing is occurring, but management is in place to curtail overfishing, OR fishing mortality is unknown, species is depleted, and no management is in place. 0 (Critical) Overfishing is known to be occurring and no reasonable management is in place to curtail overfishing.
15 United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net High The 2015 update assessment of summer flounder indicates that fishing mortality is above the fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield (F MSY ), which means that overfishing is occurring. Fishing mortality was estimated to be 0.36 in 2014 (90% confidence interval = 0.27 to 0.44), 16% above the F MSY proxy of 0.31 (Terceiro 2015). The previous 2013 assessment of summer flounder indicated that overfishing on summer flounder was not occurring, but there has been a tendency in recent years to underestimate fishing mortality and overestimate abundance (NEFSC 2013a) (Terceiro 2015). In 2014, commercial landings of summer flounder were 4,900 mt and recreational landings were 3,400 mt (MAFMC 2015b). An additional 800 mt of summer flounder were discarded at sea in the commercial fishery and 900 mt were discarded in the recreational fishery (Terceiro 2015). Although catches have equaled or been only slightly above the specified catch limits in recent years, there is evidence of substantial illegal and unreported fishing of summer flounder, which is likely contributing to the overfishing of this species (ASMFC 2015e). To address the overfishing of summer flounder, managers reduced the total allowable catch by 29% for the 2016 fishing season (MAFMC 2015a). See Figure 4. Because overfishing of summer flounder is occurring, we have awarded a high concern score. Figure 4. Total catch and estimated fishing mortality for summer flounder. Red line = fishing mortality at maximum sustainable yield. Image from NEFSC Summer Flounder Assessment Update for 2015.
16 Criterion 2: Impacts on Other Species All main retained and bycatch species in the fishery are evaluated in the same way as the species under assessment were evaluated in Criterion 1. Seafood Watch defines bycatch as all fisheries-related mortality or injury to species other than the retained catch. Examples include discards, endangered or threatened species catch, and ghost fishing. To determine the final Criterion 2 score, the score for the lowest scoring retained/bycatch species is multiplied by the discard rate score (ranges from 0-1), which evaluates the amount of non-retained catch (discards) and bait use relative to the retained catch. The Criterion 2 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Score >2.2 and <=3.2=Yellow or Moderate Score <=2.2=Red or High Rating is Critical if Factor 2.3 (Fishing Mortality) is Critical. Criterion 2 Summary Only the lowest-scoring main species is/are listed in the table and text in this Criterion 2 section; a full list and assessment of the main species can be found in Appendix A. Summer flounder Region / Method Factors 2.1-2.3 Factor 2.4 Discard Criterion 2 Score Lowest Scoring of Lowest Species Rate Modifying Score ((Discards+ Other Species Subscore Bait)/Retained Catch) United States North Marine Mammals 1.000 0.95 (20-40%) Red (0.950) Atlantic, Gillnet, Bottom United States North Finfish 2.709 1.00 (<20%) Yellow (2.709) Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Bottlenose Dolphin 2.159 1.00 (<20%) Red (2.159) Limited information is available on other species caught in the handline, trap net, and gillnet fisheries that catch summer flounder, but some information was obtained from fisheries experts. When rating some species or species groups, we utilized the Seafood Watch Unknown Bycatch Matrix, which is based on a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion on the bycatch impacts of each gear type. All fisheries are likely to catch several other coastal fish species, such as striped bass, bluefish, scup, menhaden, croaker, dogfish, weakfish, and shad (RI DFW 2015) (DNREC 2015a) (pers. comm., Mike Bednarski, MA DMF, 2015) (pers. comm., Harry Rickabaugh, MD DNR, 2015). These species are considered together under the group finfish. Some of the fish species that are known to be caught are considered depleted, but fishing mortality on these fish species is likely to be only a low to moderate
17 concern. In addition, some trap net fisheries are known to incidentally catch bottlenose dolphins (Federal Register 2014a), so we have rated this species for the trap net fisheries. Trap net fisheries may also occasionally entangle sea turtles, but risks to sea turtles are considered low and in most cases they are able to be released uninjured (Federal Register 2014c); therefore sea turtles were not included in the assessment. The gillnet fisheries are likely to catch several protected, threatened, and endangered species, including Atlantic sturgeon, marine mammals, and sea turtles, so these species were assessed for the gillnet fishery (NMFS 2013a) (Federal Register 2014a). Overall the handline fishery has a moderate impact on other species, with the limiting species being other finfish. Impacts on other species are of higher concern in the trap net and gillnet fisheries. Bottlenose dolphin limits the score for the trap net fishery, and marine mammals limit the score for the gillnet fishery. Criterion 2 Assessment BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN Factor 2.1 - Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States North Atlantic, Trap net High All marine mammals are considered to have a high inherent vulnerability to fishing because they are long-lived, reach sexual maturity late in life, and have low reproductive rates. Factor 2.2 - Abundance Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.2 above) United States North Atlantic, Trap net High There are three coastal populations of bottlenose dolphins that may interact with Mid-Atlantic trap net fisheries: Northern Migratory Coastal, Southern Migratory Coastal, and Northern North Carolina Estuarine System (Federal Register 2014a). The Northern and Southern Migratory Coastal populations are listed as depleted under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the status of the Northern North Carolina Estuarine System population is unknown (NOAA 2015g). We have therefore awarded a high
18 concern score. Factor 2.3 - Fishing Mortality Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.3 above) United States North Atlantic, Trap net Moderate The Virginia pound net fishery is listed as a Category II fishery under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, due to occasional injuries or mortalities to coastal bottlenose dolphins (Federal Register 2014a) (NOAA 2014e). The Virginia pound net fishery interacts with three different coastal bottlenose dolphin populations. Because these populations overlap in North Carolina and Virginia waters, it is difficult to determine the mortality on each population. However, there is concern that the total cumulative fishery mortality (from pound nets and gillnets) on the Northern North Carolina Estuarine System bottlenose dolphin population is exceeding the potential biological removal (PBR = 7.9 animals/year), meaning that more dolphins are being killed than the population can sustain (Federal Register 2014b). Although the Virginia pound net fishery s contribution to the total mortality on the Northern North Carolina Estuarine System bottlenose dolphin population is unknown, it could be substantial (Federal Register 2014b). In 2008 2009, the average annual mortality to all dolphins by this fishery was 11 per year (with as many as 8.5 dolphins/year taken from the Northern NC Estuarine population). After the implementation of gear modification regulations in 2010, the number of dolphin mortalities for 2010 2011 dropped to 4 animals per year (with as many as 1.5 dolphins/year taken from the Northern NC Estuarine population). The gear modifications, which require fishers to use modified pound net leaders, were originally implemented to reduce sea turtle catches, but they have been shown to reduce dolphin catches too. Managers recently expanded the use of these gear modifications to further reduce dolphin mortalities (Federal Register 2014b) (Federal Register 2015). Other trap net fisheries in the Mid-Atlantic are considered Category III fisheries under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which means interactions with marine mammals are likely to be rare (Federal Register 2014a). Because the Virginia pound net fishery may be having an adverse impact on some bottlenose dolphin populations, but management actions have been taken to reduce dolphin catches in the fishery, we have awarded a moderate concern score. FINFISH
19 Factor 2.1 - Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) United States North Atlantic, Handline Medium A variety of finfish species may be caught in the gillnet, handline, and trap net fisheries that catch summer flounder. To account for the diversity of species we have ranked inherent vulnerability as medium. Factor 2.2 - Abundance Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.2 above) United States North Atlantic, Handline High Limited information was available on the catch of other target and non-target species in the summer flounder handline fisheries. Potential finfish species that may be caught along with summer flounder include black sea bass, scup, sea robins, dogfish, bluefish, striped bass, weakfish, and Atlantic croaker (pers. comm., Mike Bednarski, MA DMF, 2015) (DNREC 2015a) (RI DFW 2015). Although most of these fish are at healthy abundance levels, weakfish is at a very low abundance level and is considered depleted (NOAA 2009). Additionally, the last assessment for striped bass (2013) indicated that the species was not depleted/overfished, but the population was nearing the overfished threshold level and was expected to continue to decline through 2015 (ASMFC 2013). Because some depleted species are likely caught, we have awarded a high concern score. Factor 2.3 - Fishing Mortality Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.3 above) United States North Atlantic, Handline Low None of the fish species that are likely targeted in the handline fisheries along with summer flounder is considered to be experiencing overfishing (ASMFC 2013) (ASMFC 2010) (NOAA 2009). Additionally, handline fisheries are generally considered to have a low impact on other fish species, and unwanted species can often be released alive. We have rated fishing mortality of finfish species as low concern, consistent with the unknown bycatch matrix (see Appendix 3 in the Seafood Watch Wild Fisheries Assessment Criteria).
20 MAMMALS Factor 2.1 - Inherent Vulnerability Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.1 above) High All marine mammals are considered to have a high inherent vulnerability to fishing because they are long-lived, reach sexual maturity late in life, and have low reproductive rates. Factor 2.2 - Abundance Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.2 above) Very High A variety of marine mammals species may be caught in the Atlantic gillnet fisheries including bottlenose dolphin, common dolphin, harbor porpoise, Risso s dolphin, white-sided dolphin, gray seal, harbor seal, harp seal, hooded seal, humpback whale, North Atlantic right whale, pilot whale, minke whale, and fin whale (Federal Register 2014a). The humpback whale, North Atlantic right whale, and fin whale are listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (NOAA 2015e). The coastal bottlenose dolphin populations are listed as depleted under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (NOAA 2015g). None of the other species is listed as depleted, threatened, or endangered, but all marine mammals are highly vulnerable to fishing. We have awarded a very high concern score because the gillnet fisheries may interact with endangered marine mammal species. Factor 2.3 - Fishing Mortality Scoring Guidelines (same as Factor 1.3 above) High The Mid-Atlantic gillnet and Northeast gillnet fisheries are listed as Category I fisheries under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. This means these fisheries cause frequent incidental mortality or serious injury to marine mammals. The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fisheries (South Carolina to Long Island, NY) may incidentally catch several marine mammals species, but the high catches of coastal bottlenose dolphins
21 are driving the Category I listing. The Category I listing for the Northeast gillnet fisheries (Long Island to U.S./Canada border) is due to high catches of harbor porpoises, humpback whales, North Atlantic right whales, and minke whales (Federal Register 2014a). The Category I listing excludes gillnet fisheries that occur in inshore waters, such as bays and estuaries. The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery and North Carolina inshore gillnet fishery are listed as Category II fisheries, meaning there are occasional interactions with marine mammals. Interactions with bottlenose dolphins are the largest concern in these fisheries. The inshore gillnet fisheries in Delaware, New York, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts are considered Category III fisheries, which means interactions with marine mammals are rare (Federal Register 2014a). Because many gillnet fisheries in the U.S. Atlantic are known to have a high impact on marine mammals, we have awarded a high concern score. ALL SPECIES Factor 2.4 Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use Scoring Guidelines The discard rate is the sum of all dead discards (i.e. non-retained catch) plus bait use divided by the total retained catch. Ratio of bait + discards/landings Factor 2.4 score <20% 1 20-40% 0.95 40-60% 0.9 60-80% 0.85 80-100% 0.8 >100% 0.75 20-40% Discards rates (discard/landings) in gillnet fisheries can vary greatly, ranging from 0% to 66% (Kelleher 2005). Discard rates in U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Northeast gillnet fisheries range from 2% to 28% (NMFS 2013b).
22 United States North Atlantic, Handline < 20% The handline fisheries that catch summer flounder likely retain the majority of fish that are captured. Unmarketable and undersized fish can often be released back to sea alive. Discards rates (discards/landings) in handline fisheries typically range from 0% to 7%, with an average discard rate of 2% (Kelleher 2005). United States North Atlantic, Trap net < 20% Trap net fisheries typically catch a mix of fish species. Because the fish remain alive in the nets until they are sorted, the majority of fish that cannot be retained and sold are released alive. We therefore consider the dead discard to landings ratio to be <20%.
23 Criterion 3: Management effectiveness Management is separated into management of retained species (harvest strategy) and management of non-retained species (bycatch strategy). The final score for this criterion is the geometric mean of the two scores. The Criterion 3 rating is determined as follows: Score >3.2=Green or Low Score >2.2 and <=3.2=Yellow or Moderate Score <=2.2 or either the Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) or Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) is Very High = Red or High Rating is Critical if either or both of Harvest Strategy (Factor 3.1) and Bycatch Management Strategy (Factor 3.2) ratings are Critical. Criterion 3 Summary Region / Method Factor 3.1 Harvest Strategy Factor 3.1 Bycatch Strategy Criterion 3 Score United States North Atlantic Gillnet, Bottom United States North Atlantic Handline United States North Atlantic Trap net 3.00: Moderate 3.00: Moderate 3.00: Moderate 3.00: Moderate 4.00: Low 4.00: Low Yellow(3.000) Green(3.464) Green(3.464) Factor 3.1: Harvest Strategy Scoring Guidelines Seven subfactors are evaluated: Management Strategy, Recovery of Species of, Scientific Research/Monitoring, Following of Scientific Advice, Enforcement of Regulations, Management Track Record, and Inclusion of Stakeholders. Each is rated as ineffective, moderately effective, or highly effective. 5 (Very Low ) Rated as highly effective for all seven subfactors considered. 4 (Low ) Management Strategy and Recovery of Species of rated highly effective and all other subfactors rated at least moderately effective. 3 (Moderate ) All subfactors rated at least moderately effective. 2 (High ) At minimum, meets standards for moderately effective for Management Strategy and Recovery of Species of, but at least one other subfactor rated ineffective.
24 1 (Very High ) Management exists, but Management Strategy and/or Recovery of Species of rated ineffective. 0 (Critical) No management exists when there is a clear need for management (i.e., fishery catches threatened, endangered, or high concern species), OR there is a high level of Illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing occurring. Factor 3.1 Summary Factor 3.1: Harvest Strategy Region / Management Method Strategy and Impl. United States North Atlantic Gillnet, Bottom United States North Atlantic Handline United States North Atlantic Trap net Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective Recovery Scientific of Species Research & of Monitoring Moderately Highly Effective Effective Moderately Highly Effective Effective Moderately Highly Effective Effective Record of Following Scientific Advice Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective Enforcement of Regs. Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Track Record Stakeholder Inclusion Moderately Highly Effective Effective Moderately Highly Effective Effective Moderately Highly Effective Effective Factor 3.1 Score 3.00: Moderate 3.00: Moderate 3.00: Moderate Factor 3.1 Assessment Subfactor 3.1.1 Management Strategy and Implementation Considerations: What type of management measures are in place? Are there appropriate management goals, and is there evidence that management goals are being met? To achieve a highly effective rating, there must be appropriate management goals, and evidence that the measures in place have been successful at maintaining/rebuilding species. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Highly Effective Because summer flounder are frequently caught in both inshore state waters and offshore federal waters, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the federal Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) jointly manage summer flounder under the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan. The joint management plan was first implemented in 1988 (MAFMC 2014d). Since its inception, the fishery management plan has undergone a number of
25 changes through the adoption of various amendments, addenda and framework adjustments (MAFMC 2014d) (Rootes-Murdy 2014). The current objectives of the management plan include: reducing fishing mortality to avoid overfishing, increasing the abundance of fish capable of reproducing by decreasing mortality on immature fish, improving the yield from the fishery, promoting cooperative management between ASMFC and MAFMC, providing consistent enforcement, and minimizing the amount of regulations it takes to accomplish these objectives (Rootes-Murdy 2014). Target abundance and fishing goals have been defined for summer flounder, and regulations for summer flounder include total allowable catch limits, minimum size limits (14 in. for commercial fishery; varies by state for recreational fishery), gear restrictions, a moratorium on entry to the commercial fishery, recreational bag limits and seasons, and mandatory data collection requirements (Rootes- Murdy 2014) (MAFMC 2014d). Roughly 60% of the total allowable catch is given to the commercial fishery and 40% to the recreational fishery. The commercial catch limit or quota is further allocated among individual states. If a state goes over their catch limit or quota, there is a deduction the following year (NOAA 2014b). When scientists and managers set the annual catch limit, they factor in how many summer flounder are likely to be discarded to sea in the commercial and recreational sectors, and consider uncertainty levels in the abundance and fishing mortality estimates (MAFMC 2013). Managers are responsive to changes in summer flounder abundance and the latest scientific assessments. The most recent assessment update for summer flounder indicated that overfishing is occurring, so managers have reduced catches by 29% for the 2016 season (Terceiro 2015) (MAFMC 2015a). Other species that are likely targeted and retained along with summer flounder in the handline, trap net, and gillnet fisheries are also managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission and/or the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. Because the management plan for summer flounder includes appropriate goals and fishing controls, we have awarded a highly effective score. Subfactor 3.1.2 Recovery of Species of Considerations: When needed, are recovery strategies/management measures in place to rebuild overfished/threatened/ endangered species or to limit fishery s impact on these species and what is their likelihood of success? To achieve a rating of Highly Effective, rebuilding strategies that have a high likelihood of success in an appropriate timeframe must be in place when needed, as well as measures to minimize mortality for any overfished/threatened/endangered species. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Moderately Effective
26 In the late 1980s/early 1990s, summer flounder were at a very low abundance, and a rebuilding plan was established in 1993 (Rootes-Murdy 2014). Since then, the abundance of summer flounder has greatly increased and the population is no longer overfished/depleted, though abundance remains below the target level (NEFSC 2013a) (Terceiro 2015). Summer flounder caught with handlines, gillnets, and trap nets are often caught in mixed-species fisheries, and some currently depleted/overfished species may be targeted or retained; for example, weakfish and American shad. These species have been at low abundances for over a decade, due to a number of factors. However, management measures are in place to prevent overfishing (ASMFC 2015b)(ASMFC 2015c). The status of striped bass is also a concern because the population was near the overfished threshold in 2013 and was expected to continue to decline through 2015. New regulations were implemented in 2015 to reduce fishing levels on striped bass and rebuild their population (ASMFC 2015d). Overall, management efforts to recover species of concern are considered moderately effective. Subfactor 3.1.3 Scientific Research and Monitoring Considerations: How much and what types of data are collected to evaluate the health of the population and the fishery s impact on the species? To achieve a Highly Effective rating, population assessments must be conducted regularly and they must be robust enough to reliably determine the population status. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Highly Effective Research surveys are conducted by state agencies from Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina; the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS); and the Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) to monitor the abundance of summer flounder (NEFSC 2013a). The surveys provide information on the abundance of young, immature fish and adult fish, as well as information on the biology of the species (Rootes-Murdy 2014). Federally permitted fishers must submit records of all fishing activity on a monthly basis. Also, federally permitted vessels are required to allow onboard observers if their vessel is selected randomly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) observer program (NOAA 2014b). States monitor summer flounder catches in relation to the catch limit or quota through the mandatory submission of monthly or weekly fisher logbook and dealer reports, and in some states through dealer Interactive Voice Response (IVR) a program in which dealers may call in and report their information to an automated system. Additionally, in 2014, Massachusetts had observers onboard several targeted summer flounder trips (Rootes-Murdy 2014).
27 Population assessments for summer flounder, along with updates to the assessments, are performed on a regular basis and use data collected from research surveys and the fisheries (NEFSC 2013a). Fishery Management Plan reviews are performed every few years (ASMFC 2015e). For these reasons, scientific research and monitoring is awarded a score of highly effective. Subfactor 3.1.4 Management Record of Following Scientific Advice Considerations: How often (always, sometimes, rarely) do managers of the fishery follow scientific recommendations/advice (e.g. do they set catch limits at recommended levels)? A Highly Effective rating is given if managers nearly always follow scientific advice. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Highly Effective The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council s (MAFMC) Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) provides ongoing advice to help manage the summer flounder fishery. Together, the Summer Flounder Monitoring Committee and the SSC provide recommendations on the acceptable catch levels and harvest limits for the commercial and recreational fisheries. These recommendations are then passed along to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service, and limits are set. The commercial quota is further broken down state by state (MAFMC 2013). Total allowable landings can be specified for up to 3 years but must be based on the best available science (Rootes- Murdy 2014). This factor is therefore rated highly effective. Subfactor 3.1.5 Enforcement of Management Regulations Considerations: Do fishermen comply with regulations, and how is this monitored? To achieve a Highly Effective rating, there must be regular enforcement of regulations and verification of compliance. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Moderately Effective In federal waters, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Office for Law Enforcement and the U.S. Coast Guard are responsible for enforcing fisheries regulations (MAFMC 2014c) (NOAA 2014c). In state waters, individual states marine resource law enforcement personnel are responsible for enforcement of regulations. Both the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission have Law Enforcement Committees. These committees
28 may help coordinate enforcement efforts among states/regions, identify potential enforcement problems, propose resolutions, and monitor enforcement of measures incorporated into the various fishery management plans (ASMFC 2014b). NOAA Fisheries monitors the states quotas through the use of state dealer reports, and determines when to close the fisheries when harvest levels are reached. Weekly updated summer flounder catch reports for all states can be monitored online at NOAA s Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office (GARFO) (GARFO 2015). If a fish is landed in a particular state, those landings go against that state s quota, regardless where it was harvested. If a state exceeds its quota, the excess pounds are subtracted from its following year quota, even if the total coastwide quota wasn t exceeded (NOAA 2014b). Once all states are closed, fishing for summer flounder in federal waters is then closed (NOAA 2014h). This fishery has a relatively good track record of staying under or only slightly going above the commercial quota. Since 2008, landings have stayed within +/ 5% of the quota (MAFMC 2013). One issue facing enforcement in this fishery is illegal harvest. Illegal harvest and underreporting can cause major problems for managers, who need an accurate picture of what is being harvested in order to set sustainable quotas. Often, the penalties for overharvesting are less than the economic gain of harvesting the illegal amounts. Because adequate enforcement can be an issue, many fishers are willing to take that risk (King and Sutinen 2010). Recently, it was found that commercial fishers and seafood dealers were taking advantage of the Research Set-Aside (RSA) program, in which profits from fishers who bid for more quota went toward fisheries research. The commercial fisheries and seafood dealers were abusing the program by underreporting summer flounder catches and submitting false reports (NOAA 2015d). Because of this, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) decided to suspend the Research Set-Aside (RSA) program (MAFMC 2014b). The summer flounder fishery does not have vessel monitoring systems (VMS), electronic reporting, or specific observer requirements (NOAA 2014b); if these were mandatory, they would likely help to ensure accurate catch reporting. This factor is awarded a score of moderately effective. Subfactor 3.1.6 Management Track Record Considerations: Does management have a history of successfully maintaining populations at sustainable levels or a history of failing to maintain populations at sustainable levels? A Highly Effective rating is given if measures enacted by management have been shown to result in the long-term maintenance of species overtime. United States North Atlantic, Handline United States North Atlantic, Trap net Moderately Effective