Road safety design standards and the Asian Highway Network. irap Asia Pacific Workshop Greg Smith 2016/05/26

Similar documents
Star Ratings for the Strategic Road Network. Richard Leonard - Highways England

Interim Report on the Development of Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Design Standard for the Asian Highway Network

BUILDING CHINARAP. Zhang Tiejun Research Institute of Highway (RIOH) Beijing, China

ROAD SAFETY PERFORMANCE REVIEW Capacity Building Workshop for Uganda. irap METHODOLOGY Racheal M. N. Nganwa AfricaRAP Lead 1 & 2 March 2018

Austroads National Risk Assessment Model (ANRAM) Chris Jurewicz, ARRB

THE IRAP ROAD SAFETY TOOLKIT A WEBSITE-BASED APPROACH TO ADDRESSING ROAD SAFETY PROBLEMS

11 CHECKLISTS Master Checklists All Stages CHECKLIST 1 FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT

Development of the Technical Standard on the Road Safety Facility For the Asian Highway Networks

irap irap The world road safety problem irap Background irap Aims A Safe Road System Vaccines for Roads 1. irap Background 2. irap Malaysia Results

Discover the Safe System Approach

CHECKLIST 4: PRE-OPENING STAGE AUDIT

Road Safety Infrastructure Facility Standards Indian Context

Dr. CHO, Sung-min Michael

Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Unsignalized Intersections

DEVELOPMENT OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY FACILITY STANDARDS FOR THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

DEVELOPMENT OF ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY FACILITY STANDARDS FOR THE ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK

ROAD SAFETY DEMONSTRATION

2003 road trauma for. Wairoa District. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 2004

Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

usrap: An Innovation in Data-Driven Safety Analysis

International Conference on Transportation Infrastructure Projects Conception To Execution

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Closing Plenary Session

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

ROAD SAFETY RISK MAPPING USING STRUCTURED DATA

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

ASIAN HIGHWAY DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROAD SAFETY

URBAN KIWIRAP IDENTIFYING ROAD SAFETY RISK ON NEW ZEALAND S URBAN ROADS

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Safer Verges and the Strategic Road Network

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Annex II bis ASIAN HIGHWAY DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROAD SAFETY

Setting Regional and National Road Safety Targets

Risk and Safety Assessment on Road Infrastructure. Olivera Djordjevic

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Guide to Road Design Part 3: Geometric Design Session I 18 October 2016

Rebecca Szymkowski, P.E., PTOE Wisconsin Department of Transportation. ITE Midwestern District Annual Meeting June 30, 2015

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

INTERSECTION DESIGN. Bicycle Facility Workshop Intersections 4-1

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

General Design Factors

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

T10:2012 Site Category 1a) T10:2012 Site Category 1b) Railway Level Crossing Approach Traffic Signal Approach Event Code F Event Code E

Safety Features of Expressways. Cresencio M. MONTALBO Jr., PhD Assoc. Prof., SURP Faculty Affiliate, NCTS University of the Philippines

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

The Road Users Perspective and KiwiRAP

Star Rating Roads For Safety

RAA Highway Assessment. Highway One

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

REGIONAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Council Room Friday, April 27, :00 am 12:00 pm

Draft Annex IV Intergovernmental Agreement on the Asian Highway Network

Crete irap demonstration project

Title. Authors. Safety Benefits of Highway Infrastructure Investments (May 2017)

Roadway Departure Focus State Initiative Roadside Safety Systems Inspection, Maintenance & Designers Mentoring Program

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

TRB/AASHTO Geometric Design Research Efforts Supplemental Information

Rational road safety management Practice and Theory. Bhagwant Persaud Ryerson University Toronto, Canada

Federative Republic of Brazil irap Pilot Technical Report

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

TRIAL EVALUATION OF WIDE, AUDIO-TACTILE, CENTRELINE CONFIGURATIONS ON THE NEWELL HIGHWAY

SECTION 12 ROAD MARKINGS AND DELINEATION

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

road safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

Design Guidelines. Overview. Design Vision for Yellow Brick Road

SAFER ROADS INVESTMENT PLANS FOR 14 COUNTRIES IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE

Classification Criteria

RAA Highway Assessment. Dukes Highway

Scientific Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents. Requirements and Training Needs. Saving Lives through Accident Research

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Pedestrian-Bicycle Task Force, and 2017 Lawrence Budget Recommendations by Sustainability Action

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

irap Star Rating and Investment Plan Coding Manual

Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Assessing our National Highway Network: Highway Reviews and AusRAP A Combined Approach

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Geometric Design Strategic Research Program

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

OLDER PEOPLE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES. Christopher G B (Kit) Mitchell

Road safety status in ESCAP region and Regional road safety goals, targets, and indicators for the Decade of Action,

RSTF Measurements and Status

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Implementing Strategies from Missouri s Blueprint for Safer Roadways Using System-wide Safety Solutions to Save Lives

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

Road Traffic Signs in Germany

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Young Researchers Seminar 2011

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Traffic Safety in Japan

Transcription:

Road safety design standards and the Asian Highway Network irap Asia Pacific Workshop Greg Smith (greg.smith@irap.org) 2016/05/26

AH Standard Summary While developing the Asian Highway network, Parties shall give full consideration to issues of safety.

Road safety in AH Network countries Serious crashes tend to be concentrated. Eg 33% of deaths in India occur on National Highways, which account for around 3% of roads High death rates on some road sections: 0.42 deaths /km /year in Bangladesh 0.61 deaths /km /year in Indonesia 1.9 deaths /km /year in India By comparison: 0.07 deaths /km /year: highest risk road in the UK

Managing risk for pedestrians and bicyclists Pedestrian crossings with refuge islands Sidewalks Pedestrian fences Bicycle lanes Traffic calming Street lighting

Managing risk for vehicle occupants and motorcyclists Run-off road crashes: Delineation Audio-tactile lines Forgiving roadsides (including specialist motorcycle barriers where motorcycle volumes are high) Skid resistance

Managing risk for vehicle occupants and motorcyclists Head-on crashes: Delineation Audio-tactile lines Skid resistance Median treatments such as safety barriers and wide centrelines Overtaking lanes

Managing risk for vehicle occupants and motorcyclists Intersection and rear-end crashes: Delineation Priority control Rectification of skewed intersections Provision of protected turn lanes Intersection channelization Lighting Skid resistance Roundabouts Managing gaps in medians

Managing risk for vehicle occupants and motorcyclists Exclusive and non-exclusive motorcycle lanes

Class II Rolling terrain, design speed 60km/h (Typical curve and intersection frequency) Relative risk of vehicle occupant death or serious injury 1.00 Baseline + improved delineation 0.77 + shoulder rumble strips 0.65 + roadside clearzone/barriers + wide centreline 1 star 2 stars 0.51 0.35 3 stars 4 stars

Class II Rolling terrain, design speed 60km/h (Typical curve and intersection frequency) Relative risk of vehicle occupant death or serious injury 1.00 Baseline + improved delineation 0.77 + shoulder rumble strips 0.65 + roadside clearzone/barriers + wide centreline 1 star 2 stars 0.51 0.35 3 stars 4 stars

Class II Rolling terrain, design speed 60km/h (Typical curve and intersection frequency) Relative risk of vehicle occupant death or serious injury 1.00 Baseline + improved delineation 0.77 + shoulder rumble strips 0.65 + roadside clearzone/barriers + wide centreline 1 star 2 stars 0.51 0.35 3 stars 4 stars

Class II Rolling terrain, design speed 60km/h (Typical curve and intersection frequency) Relative risk of vehicle occupant death or serious injury 1.00 Baseline + improved delineation 0.77 + shoulder rumble strips 0.65 + roadside clearzone/barriers + wide centreline 1 star 2 stars 0.51 0.35 3 stars 4 stars

Class II Rolling terrain, design speed 60km/h (Typical curve and intersection frequency) Relative risk of vehicle occupant death or serious injury 1.00 Baseline + improved delineation 0.77 + shoulder rumble strips 0.65 + roadside clearzone/barriers + wide centreline 1 star 2 stars 0.51 0.35 3 stars 4 stars

Example of vehicle occupant star ratings L = level R = rolling M = mountainous S = steep Primary Design speed (km/h) Class I Class II L R M S L R M S L R M S 120 100 80 60 100 80 50 50 80 60 50 40 Baseline * + delineation + rumble strips + roadside clearzone/barriers + median treatment + int. quality + int. lighting + protected turn lanes + chanelization 1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars * Based on typical curve and intersection frequency and roadside hazards

Example of vehicle occupant star ratings L = level R = rolling M = mountainous S = steep Primary Design speed (km/h) Class I Class II L R M S L R M S L R M S 120 100 80 60 100 80 50 50 80 60 50 40 Baseline * + delineation + rumble strips + roadside clearzone/barriers + median treatment + int. quality + int. lighting + protected turn lanes + chanelization 1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars * Based on typical curve and intersection frequency and roadside hazards

Example of vehicle occupant star ratings L = level R = rolling M = mountainous S = steep Primary Design speed (km/h) Class I Class II L R M S L R M S L R M S 120 100 80 60 100 80 50 50 80 60 50 40 Baseline * + delineation + rumble strips + roadside clearzone/barriers + median treatment + int. quality + int. lighting + protected turn lanes + chanelization 1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars * Based on typical curve and intersection frequency and roadside hazards

Next steps 1. Survey of ESCAP member countries 2. Finalize list of road safety facilities 3. Draft specifications for safety facilities and their expected effect on risk (star ratings) 4. Consultation with ESCAP member countries on draft specifications, including workshop 5. Revision of specifications 6. Finalize specifications