Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Similar documents
DESIGN MEMORANDUM WITH DESIGN EXCEPTIONS SP SP

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Introduction to Roadway Design

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Roadway Design Manual

SECTION 1A NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE GEOMETRIC DESIGN

ENGINEER S PRELIMINARY REPORT. for the #######-###### COLLISION

Roadway Design Manual

Geometric Design Tables

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Access Management Standards

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE. Bureau of Planning and Research Transportation Planning Division April 2016 (Updated March 2018)

Driveway Design Criteria

INGHAM COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT AUSTIN E. CAVANAUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 301 Bush Street, P.O. Box 38, Mason, MI

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

Shared Use Path Design

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF DEFICIENCIES

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Freeway System Considerations

APPENDIX L. Design Criteria

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

PENNDOT HPMS DATA COLLECTION GUIDE

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

APPENDIX A SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

Provides an extension of a road to the subdivision boundary or parcel to facilitate the continuity of possible adjacent development.

J-Turn An Intersection Safety Improvement Purdue Road School 2016 Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Brian Malone, INDOT & Josh Cook, HNTB

4APNOIPF Vh, YII PTC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. 8K TH 63 River Crossing Bridge Replacement Project

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

CHAPTER 7 STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Route 47 (North Main Street) Reconstruction

Gwinnett County Department of Transportation SR 324 / Gravel Springs Road at I-85 / SR 403 Interchange Project Number F , PI No.

(PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MSCR)). REVISED 02/03/17 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS.

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Chapter 6: Transportation

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Page 1B-6 Added the following definition; AUXILIARY LANE See LANE

Access Management Regulations and Standards

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

DRAFT Sellwood Bridge Existing Roadway Deficiencies

ADA Training Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) 2018 MnDOT

CITY OF KASSON TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES KASSON SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

This update addresses several minor corrections and omissions in the English Road Design Manual (in dual units).

Parks Highway: MP Lucus Road to Big Lake Road

Update to DOTD Roundabout Design Policy

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE Traffic Department MEMORANDUM

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

Attached for your reference please find project updates on ongoing VDOT construction projects in Southampton County.

By: CHE ROS ISMAIL PROF DR MOHD ROSLI HAININ DR HARYATI YAACOB DR SITTI ASMAH HASSAN JGP-FKA, UTM

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Chapter 5 Shared-Use Paths

Section 4 Basic Geometric Design Elements

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Impact Report April 7 through April 14, 2017

Preliminary Engineering Study

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Friday, May 20, :46 PM Cambria N Armstrong Fw: Wolf Creek REV.pdf

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES:

BI-DIRECTIONALS FREE-ACCESS

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN

JUNE, 2000 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 5-0(1) CHAPTER 5 AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Report

FDOT Treasure Coast Traffic Impact Report

CTH M HIGHWAY PROJECT CTH Q to STH 113

Le Sueur County, MN Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Board Meeting

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

EXHIBIT B-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

FY 2006 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

Chapter 3 - Local Urban Road System CHAPTER 3 LOCAL URBAN ROAD SYSTEM

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Transcription:

To: From: Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering Date: March 20, 2001 Subject: Roadway Geometric Design Criteria Project: TH 14/218 Design-Build Project, SP 7408-29, Owatonna, MN Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department) Copy: Richard Augustin, P.E., Project Manager Kevin Anderson, P.E., Bridge Project Manager 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed improvements to Trunk Highway (TH 14) east of Owatonna, MN, have been identified by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Department) as an interregional corridor project for expedited delivery. This project will be completed through a single design-build contract identified as State Project 7408-29. This project involves expanding the four-lane roadway on TH 14 east of Owatonna. The project extends from 0.4 mi. east of Jct. CSAH 45 to 0.8 mi. east of Jct. TH 218, and is approximately 2.29 miles long. The project will comprise: Construction of two new westbound lanes and a bridge (Br. #74014) over the junction of TH 218 for the new westbound lanes New ramps for the westbound lanes at the junction of TH 218 Realignment of the existing ramps for the eastbound lanes at the junction of TH 218, including an acceleration lane for the eastbound entrance ramp on to TH 14 Grade raises on the existing roadway (the new eastbound lanes) along sections of the east and west bridge embankment to accommodate a new median ditch Replacement of the east and west approach panels for Bridge #74010 A mill and bituminous overlay of the existing roadway for the proposed eastbound lanes Reconstruction of TH 218/CSAH 48 and addition of turn lanes Construction of an at-grade median crossing and turn lanes at the CSAH6/TH14 intersection For the reconstruction of TH 218/CSAH 48, work begins on TH 218 approximately 1,800 feet south of TH 14 and ends on CSAH 48 approximately 2,300 feet north of TH 14. Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 1 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

2 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 2.1 Definitions TH 14 Mainline: The TH 14 roadway, consisting of two traffic lanes in each direction (eastbound and westbound) TH 218/CSAH 48: The roadway under the TH 14 overpass, consisting of a single lane in each direction (northbound and southbound) Ramp: A roadway segment providing access between the mainline and a local crossroad Base Plan: The roadway plan and profile provided by the Department. This plan depicts the proposed roadway geometric design, existing and proposed right-of-way limits, and project work limits. The Base Plan and the design criteria shown on it shall be considered reliable information for the purpose of advancing the final design. Right-of-Way Authorization Map: A project map, provided by the Department, depicting existing and proposed right-of-way and temporary construction easements. The right-of-way shown on this map shall take precedence over the right-of-way shown on the Base Plan. The design-builder shall restrict its operations to the rightof-way limits and construction easement limits as depicted on this map. It shall be the responsibility of the design-builder to adequately mark the limits depicted on this map in order to control and limit their operations to these areas. 2.2 Abbreviations CSAH: County State-Aid Highway ROW: right of way TH: Trunk Highway Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 2 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

3 EXISTING ROADWAY ELEMENTS Element TH 14 TH 218/CSAH 48 Lane Width: 12 12 Outside Shoulder Width: 8 8 Inside Shoulder Width: 3 NA Centerline-to-Centerline Width: 64 NA Side Slope: 4:1 3:1 Mainline Surfacing: Asphalt Asphalt Shoulder Surfacing: Asphalt Asphalt Existing ROW: 264 50 on eastern side 75 on western side Median: NA = not applicable Depressed grass (divided section) None Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 3 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

4 PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN CRITERIA Element TH 14 TH 218/CSAH 48 Functional Classification: Rural principal arterial Minor arterial 2003 AADT (Two-Way): 12,600 4,350 (existing) 2023 AADT (Two-Way): 19,900 NA Roadway Type: 4-lane divided 2-lane with through/turning lane at ramp intersections Design Speed: 65 mph 60 mph Posted Speed: 55 mph 45 mph Lane Width: 12 ft 12 ft (through and turning) Outside Shoulder Width: 10 ft 8 ft (2 ft when adjacent to a through/turning lane) Inside Shoulder Width: 4 ft NA Clear Zone: In accordance with the Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 In accordance with the Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 Inslope: 4:1 NA Sideslope: 4:1 4:1 Roadway Cross Slope: 0.02 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft Shoulder Cross Slope: 0.03 to 0.04 ft/ft 0.04 ft/ft Median: Depressed grass Raised concrete Design Vehicle: WB63 WB63 Terrain Characteristics: Rolling Rolling Maximum Grade: 4% NA Passing Sight Distance: Stopping Sight Distance: 2,300 ft K value = 1720 550 to 725 ft K value = 230-400 (crest) K value = 130-180 (sag) NA 525 to 650 ft K value = 150-220 (crest) K value = 120-160 (sag) AADT = average annual daily traffic; mph = miles per hour; NA = not applicable Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 4 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

5 PROPOSED RAMP GEOMETRIC AND DESIGN CRITERIA Element Ramp E Ramp F Loop G Loop H Design Speed: 50 mph 50 mph 50 mph 50 mph Minimum Radius: 1,432.39 954.93 230 230 Superelevation: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Maximum Superelevation: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Cross Slope: 0.02 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft Lane Width: 16 ft 16 ft 16 ft 16 ft Right Shoulder Width: Left Shoulder Width: Clear Zone: 6 ft 6 ft 6 ft 6 ft 2 to 4* ft 2 to 4* ft 2 to 4* ft 2 to 4* ft Refer to Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 Refer to Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 Refer to Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 Refer to Road Design Manual, Chapter 4 Side Slope: 4:1 4:1 4:1 4:1 Median: 10-ft raised concrete median (on base plan) 10-ft raised concrete median (on base plan) 10-ft raised concrete median (on base plan) 10-ft raised concrete median (on base plan) * 4 ft. when loop ramp is adjacent and parallel to other ramp; see base plan typical section. Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 5 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

6 PROPOSED DITCH SECTION DESIGN CRITERIA Element TH 14 TH 218/CSAH 48 Type Rural Rural Depth 4 to 6 ft 4 to 6 ft Bottom Width 8 ft V ditch Inslope 4:1 4:1 Backslope 4:1 4:1 7 GUARDRAIL The design-builder shall design and construct guardrail where necessary. The use of guardrail is anticipated only for bridge end protection and bridge slope transition. The design-builder shall use the Department s approved guardrail list, and design and installation standards. 8 RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCING The design-builder shall be responsible for replacing existing right-of-way fence throughout the project limits, and installing new right-of-way fence as required. Right-of-way fencing limits and type are depicted on the Base Plan. Materials and installation shall conform to Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction, 2000, Section 2557. 9 ROADWAY DESIGN Base Plan and RFP. The design-builder shall prepare the final horizontal and vertical design of the roadway and structures using the base plan supplied by the Department. The design-builder shall be responsible for ensuring that the design criteria, as listed in the RFP, will meet the intent and the constraints of the project as shown on the base plan and described in the RFP. Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 6 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

Conflicts. If any of the design criteria listed in the RFP conflicts with the field conditions or is indirect conflict with the constraints as listed, the design-builder shall notify the Department for clarification prior to submission of the design-builder s proposal. Alignment Changes. Changes in horizontal or vertical alignment to those shown on the base plan must be approved by the Department prior to submission of plans and before any permanent construction takes place. Innovation. Because this design-build project will be awarded on the basis of a low bid, the design-build teams submitting price proposals must base their lump-sum, low-bid price on the base plan and the design criteria listed in the RFP. The RFP will describe allowable procedures for the design-builder to propose innovative design or construction concepts. However, the costs of any such concepts shall not be included in the lump-sum price submitted in the price proposal, but shall be negotiated with the Department after award of the contract. 10 RIGHT-OF-WAY Base Plan. The design-builder shall provide a design that stays within the current ROW boundaries as shown on the base plan, and plan construction activities and staging areas to remain within these same boundaries. Temporary Easements. The Department will not be responsible for, nor will it participate in obtaining, any temporary easements outside of the right-of-way boundaries shown on the base plan. The design-builder may at its own discretion negotiate temporary easements for construction activities or staging areas with adjacent landowners. New Right-of-Way. Additional right-of-way is required to design and construct the proposed ramps as depicted on the base plan. The Department is in the process of acquiring this right-of-way and negotiating with the private landowners. The Department plans to have acquired or to provide right of entry on all ROW by October 1, 2001. If there are parcels that are not available to the designbuilder and the parcels are demonstrated to be on the project s critical path, a change order for time will be negotiated. It is possible that the Department may have some of the new right-of-way acquired before this date, but the design-builder shall be responsible for planning and scheduling construction activities around these areas, and shall be prepared to do so. 11 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Design-Builder Plans. The design-builder shall produce plans that aid and facilitate design review by the Department, and provide adequate information for safe, efficient, and highquality construction. The plans shall include (at a minimum) the following items: Cover Sheet and List of Standard Drawings Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 7 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01

General Notes and General Layout Sheet Roadway Plan and Profile Roadway Cross Sections Guardrail Type and Location Drainage Plans with Structure Profiles Interchange Lighting Plans Permanent Striping and Roadway Delineation Special Details (other than standard plates) As-Built Plans. The design-builder shall be responsible for producing a complete set of asbuilt plans upon completion of the project. As-built plans must incorporate all plan changes and field changes that occurred throughout the project duration. Roadway Geometrics.doc Page 8 of 8 Printed on 3/20/01