Understanding alligator gar movements and the importance of river connectivity through trace element analyses

Similar documents
Life History Study of the Alligator Gar in the Ouachita River, Arkansas

Casey Cox, Intern, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Arkansas Field Office, Conway, AR Phone:

Status and Distribution of Alabama Shad (Alosa Alabamae) in the Little Missouri, Ouachita, Arkansas, and White Rivers

Ecology and control of invasive Northern Pike in the Columbia River, Canada

Conduct a Status Survey of the Southeastern Shrew (Sorex longirostris)

NINA Aquatic Research Station, Ims

Klamath River Green Sturgeon Acoustic Biotelemetry Monitoring 2008 FINAL Technical Memorandum

2016 Conservation Stamp, Esther Semple. Dr. Brian Riddell, Pacific Salmon Foundation, Vancouver, B.C. Contacts:

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

Age, Growth, and Mortality

Investigating Juvenile Life History and Maternal Run Timing of Chehalis River Spring and Fall Chinook Salmon using Otolith Chemistry

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Ecology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams

2017 Proposal to AGFC SWG Program Eggleton et al. Project Title: Distribution and Status of Alabama Shad Alosa alabamae in Arkansas Rivers

Tracking Juvenile Summer Flounder

Last Fall I was fishing for striped bass using green crabs and sand fleas for bait but without any luck. In this presentation I will look into the

WFC 10 Wildlife Ecology & Conservation Nov. 29, Restoration Ecology: Rivers & Streams. Lisa Thompson. UC Cooperative Extension

Texas Water Resources Institute

Fin Ray Chemistry as a Potential Natural Tag for Smallmouth Bass in Northern Illinois Rivers

Biological Review of the 2014 Texas Closure

Life history patterns: many solutions to the same problem

An Overview of Lobster and Crab Enhancement Throughout the World

San Joaquin River Chinook Salmon Trap and Haul Donald E. Portz, PhD Bureau of Reclamation Fisheries & Wildlife Resources Group

Refined Designated Uses for the Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Tributaries

Nechako White Sturgeon: Conservation Fish Culture; Recruitment Restoration and Harm Reduction

Burbot Conservation Aquaculture at The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho s Hatchery 2 - Twin Rivers Hatchery

Scott Carleton and Matt Kaufmann Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit University of Wyoming Laramie, WY Annual Report.

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Objective. Materials and Methods

Adaptations of Flora and Fauna in Rhode Island s s Estuaries

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

Survival Testing at Rocky Reach and Rock Island Dams

SHARKS KAKADU RIVERS

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Office of Science & Technology

Performance Report. B. Project Title: Evaluating Atlantic and Shortnose Sturgeon Behavior Related to the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project

Allegheny Parker. Credit: Timothy Wertz, PFBC

Kurt Conrad Heim Website

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Life History and Management of Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus)

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

STEVEN L. WHITLOCK 457 SW Washington Ave. #5 Corvallis, Oregon Phone: (707)

ALLIGATOR GAR WORKSHOP MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE June 11, 2002

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

Addressing Critical Uncertainties in the Reintroduction of Chum Salmon to Oregon Tributaries of the Columbia River. Kris Homel

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

David Wells 1, Jay Rooker 1, David Itano 2

THE OREGON. PLAN for. Salmon and Watersheds. Assessment of Western Oregon Adult Winter Steelhead Redd Surveys Report Number: OPSW-ODFW

Gulf and Caribbean Research

[FWS R5 ES 2015 N021; FXES FF05E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for the Gulf

Sturgeon. Sturgeon for Tomorrow. for tomorrow. Membership. You Can Help Protect Michigan s Living Fossil The Lake Sturgeon

COMMUNITY WATERSHED PROJECT

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

Warm-up # 7 A day 5/17 - B day 5/18 UPDATE YOUR TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

Family Clupeidae. River Herring of the James

Final Report to Cornell Water Resources Institute

Potential effects of climate change on the high seas life history and ecology of steelhead in the North Pacific Ocean

11426 Moorage Way P.O. Box 368 LaConner, WA Phone: Fax:

Diadromous Fish Assemblage Assessment in the Saco River Estuary, ME

CALFed Progress Questionnaire California Sea Grant College Program

Wetland Recovery and Salmon Population Resilience: A Case Study in Estuary Ecosystem Restoration

R & E Grant Application Biennium

The green sturgeon and its environment: past, present, and future

STURGEON CONSERVATION

Proposed Pensacola Fish Hatchery: Potential Biological Impacts and Best Practices. Will Patterson

Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

Green Sturgeon Feeding Observations in Humboldt Bay, California

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund

Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe Natural Resources Department Report to General Council September 13, by Scott Chitwood

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

SOCIETAL GOALS TO DETERMINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH: A FISHERIES CASE STUDY IN GALVESTON BAY SYSTEM, TEXAS

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Lesson 1-1: Introduction to the Nechako White Sturgeon

Application for Exempted Fishing Permit

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Pacific Lamprey in the Pacific Northwest. Conserving a Poorly- Understood Northwest Fish. Jeffrey C. Jolley U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Spilling Water at Hydroelectric Projects in the Columbia and Snake Rivers How Does It Benefit Salmon?

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Critical Habitat for Atlantic Sturgeon

Nearshore Ecology of Atlantic Salmon in the Gulf of Maine Region. Workshop 2: Bays and the Gulf of Maine

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

Allison (DeRose) Lebeda, Timothy Spier, Neal Jackson. Upper Midwest Invasive Species Conference La Crosse, WI Oct , 2016

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

OHRC Advisory Committee. Research Report. 19 September 2011

Comparative growth of pinfish in field mesocosms across marsh, oyster, and soft-bottom habitat types in a Mississippi estuary

Rivers Inlet Salmon Initiative

Culvert Replacement and Stream Restoration in Wolfden Run, Garrett County, Maryland

Stronghold Investment Partnership Basin Liaisons 2009

Trends in salmon fisheries

Beach. Coastal Fishing

Essential Fish Habitat Description Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)

Faculty Focus. Robert J. Naiman, Professor. MD: Were you the only freshwater person at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI)?

Environmental Law and Policy Salzman & Thompson

Transcription:

Understanding alligator gar movements and the importance of river connectivity through trace element analyses Project summary The alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) is a large, mobile species, with a historically broad distribution: inhabiting large river systems ranging from inland Arkansas to the Gulf of Mexico. However, the importance of river connectivity for normal movements and the timing and relative use of estuarine and freshwater habitats are not well understood. This study will provide an initial understanding of these relationships through trace element analyses of calcified structures in alligator gar, which can be used to guide management and conservation of this species and other large-river fishes. Project leader Peter J. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, 662-325-4768 (phone), 662-325- 8726 (fax), pallen@cfr.msstate.edu Project partners Lee Holt - Fisheries Management Biologist, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission 1201 Highway 49 N, Brinkley, AR 72021, 877-734-4581 (phone), 870-735-4585 (fax) rlholt@agfc.state.ar.us Richard Campbell Hatchery Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Private John Allen National Fish Hatchery, 111 Elizabeth St., Tupelo, MS 38802, 662-842-1341 (phone), 662-842-3215 (fax) Richard_Campbell@fws.gov Allyse Ferrara, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, 223 Gouaux Hall, Thibodaux, LA, 985-448-4736 (phone), 985-493-2496 (fax) Allyse.Ferrara@nicholls.edu Dennis Riecke Fisheries Coordinator, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks Fisheries Bureau, 1505 Eastover Dr., Jackson, MS 39211, 601-432-2207 (phone), 601-432-2203 (fax) dennisr@mdwfp.state.ms.us Nathan G. Smith, Ph.D. Fisheries Biologist, Heart of the Hills Fisheries Science Center, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries, 5103 Junction Hwy, Mountain Home, TX 78058, 830-866- 3356 (phone), 830-866-3549 (fax), Nate.Smith@tpwd.state.tx.us James Hobbs, Ph.D. Research Scientist, University of California, Davis, Interdisciplinary Center for Plasma Mass Spectrometry, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, 707-480-0188 (phone) jahobbs@ucdavis.edu Total project cost: $54,491 State Wildlife Grant request: $27,381 Matching Funds and In-Kind Services: $27,110 (Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Mississippi State University) 1

Funding needs and conservation priorities Priorities for funding and conservation related to this project are listed under the Fish and Habitat sections of the Arkansas Wildlife Action Plan. There are two critical information needs that will be addressed by this project. The first is to identify barriers to connectivity for alligator gar. The second is to contribute to watershed planning processes for high priority streams related to the benefit of species of greatest conservation need. Alligator gar, a species of great conservation need, are large river fishes that are known to move for spawning and foraging, and move on a daily and seasonal basis. Migration barriers are likely impacting these movements, however, it is not known how much these fish move or at what life history stages movements may be most impacted. These are questions of great interest throughout the distribution of alligator gar. As a result, a large thrust of recent studies has been to identify the degree of movement exhibited by this species, and to understand life history related patterns in movement. Only by addressing these questions can this species be effectively managed and conserved. However, these types of studies are logistically difficult and expensive due to the habitats that these fish occupy, and the long distances of potential movements which may span river systems and state and regional boundaries. To address these movements, a less expensive alternative is needed, particularly early in the planning process that can be used to focus the efforts of future studies. The analysis of trace element concentrations, which are stored in calcified structures of fish, offers this possibility. Calcified structures, such as otoliths, retain trace element concentrations from the environment as fish grow, providing a retrospective look at movements and habitat use (Elsdon and Gillanders 2003). A number of recent studies have shown the usefulness of this approach (Allen et al. 2009, Clarke et al. 2007, Hobbs et al. 2007). The use of aquatic habitats in connected river systems and estuarine environments by large river fishes such as alligator gar can have important ramifications for watershed planning processes. Alligator gar utilize a wide variety of habitat types as a normal part of their life history, and exhibit a fairly broad salt tolerance from an early age (Suchy 2009). This species distribution ranges from Arkansas and Tennessee to the Gulf of Mexico. However, it is not known whether fish broadly range between freshwater habitats and estuarine habitats or remain in a relatively small area throughout their life. There is an indication that there is some population structuring (B. Kreiser, University of Southern Mississippi, pers. comm.), which may be related to spawning location fidelity. However, fish from inland regions are fairly euryhaline (D. Schwarz, Mississippi State University, unpublished data) and may move between fresh and saline habitats. Further, the degree of mixing between populations may be high at certain life history stages, even if fish do separate to spawn at particular locations, as has been found in a number of fishes (Hobbs et al. 2007, Israel et al. 2004, Lindley et al. 2008). There has been an integrated and concerted effort to understand alligator gar life history, movement, the importance of river connectivity and habitat use throughout this species distribution. The trace element analysis of otoliths provides a relatively inexpensive method for analyzing these questions, and can provide a broad comparison between regional differences in populations. To support these endeavors, a number of research partners have provided samples to make this project possible. This study provides an important next step in addressing knowledge gaps in connectivity and habitat use and aiding in the management and conservation of this species. Study Objective The objectives of this study are to measure trace element concentrations in alligator gar otoliths from Arkansas and surrounding populations to determine connectivity of the populations and use them to understand freshwater to saline water habitat use and life-history-based movements. This study will provide insight into determining if alligator gar make long-distance down-river movements to estuaries, whether dams such as those existing in Arkansas rivers restrict these natural movements, and how life history-based movements in alligator gar from Arkansas compare with other populations. 2

Expected Results and Benefits Results of this study will provide Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (AGFC) fisheries biologists with an understanding of the distances moved by Arkansas alligator gar, and whether they are utilizing estuarine habitats at some point during their life history. Further, information will be generated to determine how these movements and habitat use compare with other populations of alligator gar in other portions of their distribution. This knowledge can be used to understand potential barriers to movement and migrations and habitat use, and direct management and conservation decisions related to alligator gar and other large river fishes within Arkansas, and in the surrounding region. Approach Collection of Arkansas alligator gar otoliths AGFC fisheries biologists will collect otoliths from alligator gar captured as a part of commercial fishing efforts on rivers in Arkansas. Otoliths will be used to age the fish, and fish will also be measured for body weight, total length and sex. Trace element analysis of otoliths Trace element analyses of otoliths will be conducted using Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) by Dr. Peter Allen of Mississippi State University in collaboration with Dr. James Hobbs at the Interdisciplinary Center for Plasma Mass Spectrometry, University of California, Davis using methods similar to Allen et al. (2009), see Figure 1. B Figure 1: Trace element analysis of freshwater to seawater transition in the calcified structure of a fish. (A) Calcified structure used for trace element analysis. Dark arrows denote annuli. White arrow denotes laser transect. Laser pits are visible in the growth zones between annuli. (B) Trace element signature showing the differences between fresh water and seawater signatures. Techniques used laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. From Allen et al. (2009). 3

Calibration of trace element signal using alligator gar held in known salinities To understand the trace element signatures obtained from the Arkansas fish, trace elements will also be measured in alligator gar held in known salinities. These fish will be obtained from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Private John Allen National Fish Hatchery in Tupelo, MS. Fish (n=6/salinity) will be held at either freshwater (0 ppt), low-salinity estuarine water (8 ppt), or higher salinity waters (16 and 24 ppt) for several months in order to establish stable trace element concentrations reflective of environmental concentrations in the otoliths. These experiments will be carried out at the Mississippi State University Aquatic Sciences Center. Comparison with other populations of alligator gar Comparison of otoliths obtained from Arkansas alligator gar will be made with alligator gar from other populations such as coastal Louisiana, inland Texas, and/or coastal Mississippi to understand how movements may be vary between the populations. These samples have already been collected by partnering fisheries biologists. Location of Work Otoliths (n=12) will be collected from alligator gar obtained from rivers in Arkansas, such as the Red River, by AGFC fisheries biologists. A separate group of alligator gar will be reared in known salinities at the Mississippi State University Aquatic Sciences Center. Additional samples from wild alligator gar have already been collected from coastal Louisiana, coastal Mississippi, and inland Texas to be used as comparisons for the Arkansas fish. Budget Source Item Total Costs Cost Share Grant Salary Expenses: One AGFC biologist @ $40/man-hour for 80 hrs/year $3,200 $3,200 $0 Principal investigator @ salary and fringe 8,296 8,296 0 Graduate student @$1,771/month for 8 months 14,168 3,542 10,626 Capital Expenses: Trace element analyses Laser ablation ICPMS $7,740 0 $7,740 Solution ICPMS 1,728 0 1,728 Chemicals and supplies 500 0 500 Travel, room and board 2,000 0 2,000 Age and growth equipment microscope slides $100 0 $100 microscope slide boxes 100 0 100 digital calipers 500 0 500 mounting medium 100 0 100 Isomet saw blades 1,000 0 1,000 miscellaneous expenses 500 0 500 Mississippi State University Overhead Expenses $14,559 $12,343 $2,216 Project Totals $54,491 $27,381 $27,110 Total Project Cost $54,491 4

References Matching Funds and In-Kind Services $27,381 State Wildlife Grant Request $27,110 Allen PJ, Hobbs JA, Cech Jr. JJ, Van Eenennaam JP, Doroshov SI. 2009. Using trace elements in pectoral fin rays to assess life history movements in sturgeon: estimating age at initial seawater entry in Klamath River green sturgeon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 240-250. Clarke AD, Telmer KH, Shrimpton JM. 2007. Elemental analysis of otoliths, fin rays and scales: a comparison of bony structures to provide population and life-history information for the Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 354-361. Elsdon TS, Gillanders BM. 2003. Reconstructing migratory patterns of fish based on environmental influences on otolith chemistry. Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries 13: 219-235. Hobbs JA, Bennett WA, Burton J, Gras M. 2007. Classification of larval and adult Delta smelt to nursery areas by use of trace elemental fingerprinting. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 518-527. Israel JA, Cordes JF, Blumberg MA, May B. 2004. Geographic patterns of genetic differentiation among collections of green sturgeon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 922-931. Lindley ST, Moser ML, Erickson DL, Belchik M, Welch DW, Rechisky EL, Kelly JT, Heublein J, Klimley AP. 2008. Marine migration of North American green sturgeon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 182-194. Suchy MD. 2009. Effects of salinity on growth and survival of larval and juvenile alligator gar Atractosteus spatula, and on plasma osmolality of non-teleost actinopterygiian fishes. Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA. Qualifications of individuals and organizations involved Peter Allen Assistant Professor, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS Ph.D. in Physiological Ecology, 10 years experience working with large-river fishes Experience with alligator gar and trace element analyses Lee Holt Fisheries Management Biologist, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Brinkley, AR M.S. in Fisheries and Wildlife Science, 10 years experience working in fisheries and wildlife biology and with gar. Serves on Alligator Gar Technical Committee Richard Campbell Hatchery Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pvt. John Allen Hatchery, Tupelo, MS. Extensive interagency leadership roles, 20 years experience in the biology and culture of alligator gar. Serves on Alligator Gar Technical Committee Allyse Ferrara Associate Professor, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA Ph.D. in Fisheries Ecology, 15 years experience working in fisheries ecology, extensive experience in the biology and culture of gar. Serves on Alligator Gar Technical Committee Dennis Riecke Fisheries Biologist, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks, Jackson, MS, 20 years experience working in fisheries biology, ecology and management Nathan Smith, Fisheries Research Biologist, Texas Parks and Wildlife, Mountain Home, TX Ph.D. in Natural Resources, Fishery Science. 15 years experience in fisheries biology and with gar James Hobbs Research Scientist Interdisciplinary Center for Mass Spectrometry, University of California, Davis, CA 5

15 years experience working with trace element analyses on calcified tissues in fishes 6