SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION. March 28, 2018

Similar documents
SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION

31/10/17. October 31, HIP Developments Inc. 700 Rupert Street Waterloo, ON N2V 2B5

Dear Ms. Maw: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment St-Charles Market, 135 Barrette Street, Ottawa GWE File No.

June 3, Mr. Steven Grandmont, Chief Operating Officer Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4K1

Dear Mr. Nicolini: Qualitative Pedestrian Level Wind Assessment Montreal Road, Ottawa GWE File No.: DTPLW

Urban Design Terms of Reference. Pedestrian. Wind Comfort and Safety Studies. June 2014

March 25, Katherine Grechuta MCIP, RPP, LEED AP Planner FoTenn Planning & Urban Design 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, ON, K2P 0Z8. Dear Ms.

23/02/18. Pedestrian Wind Assessment Ladies Golf Club of Toronto Markham, Ontario Novus Project # February 23, 2018

1700 Webster Street Oakland, CA. Final Report. Pedestrian Wind Conditions Consultation Wind Tunnel Tests RWDI # July 16, 2015

Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Re: Wind Impact Assessment Marina del Rey Tower Marina del Rey, California RWDI Reference No Description of Proposed Development

Brad Caco Group M8X 2X9. Mr. Caco: Gradient. for mitigation

Fig$1.!Wind!Rose!Shearwater! ! August 7th, 2015

2 Bowen Crescent Residential Development, Melbourne

Wellington Street : Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment. To Whom It May Concern, RE: Proposed Wellington Street Wind Impact Qualitative Assessment

Computer-Based Pedestrian Level Wind Study Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Subject: Wind Impact Evaluation for the Facebook Campus Project, Menlo Park

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Donald Ballanti, Certified Consulting Meteorologist, Wind Impact Evaluation for the Menlo Park Facebook Campus Project, August 26, 2011.

Assembly Committee Document 7.5

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 350 Sparks Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment, Phase 1. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 83 East Street. Oakville, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 409 Brant Street. Burlington, Ontario

APPENDIX 11 WIND EFFECTS ASSESSMENT

Design Features to Change and/or Ameliorate Pedestrian Wind Conditions. Leighton Cochran 1 PhD CPEng

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Wind Microclimate Assessment

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Greystone Village 10 Oblats Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Château Laurier Hotel Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario

UDB. Urban Design Brief (Continued - Section 6) 137 and 141 George Street, 321 Dalhousie Street May 2013

Preliminary Pedestrian Level Wind Study. Elmvale Acres Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Three Springs Design Guidelines Fencing and Wall Standards

300 George Street, Brisbane Pedestrian Level Winds - Wind Tunnel Test

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 12 Stirling Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Pedestrian Wind Impact Study for Atlantic Yard Area & Redevelopment Project NEWMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL.

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 398, 402, 406 Roosevelt Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

DUNDONALD LINKS CLUBHOUSE

June 11, RE: Comments on the ENF for The Boston Garden project, MEPA # Dear Mr. Sullivan:

Advisory Circular. Legal Land Survey for AZR Clearance Attestation

PROPOSED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY Vicinity of Route 123/I-495 Interchange Tysons, Fairfax County, Virginia

Guthriesville Village Manual of Written & Graphic Design Guidelines

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

FINAL REPORT. Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia

Melancthon Pits Extension Noise Study Part of West Half of Lots 12 and 14, Concession 3 O.S. Township of Melancthon, County of Dufferin

Technical Memorandum. I. Introduction and Overview. Nancy Clark Turnstone Consulting 330 Townsend Street, Suite 216 San Francisco, CA 94107

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } Decision and Order

AERODYNAMIC FEATURES AS AUXILIARY ARCHITECTURE

Highland Park Glengarry Court. Landscape design and Fencing rules

Southside Pilot Proposal

Swimming Pool/Hot Tub Package

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Incentive Zoning. Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee June 21, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

Community Meeting: Proposed Development 4520 Penn Ave. Notes January 30, :30-8:30pm

Can Wind Energy Be Captured in New York City? Case Study on Urban Wind based on a Feasibility Study by Orange Line Studio. Spark 101 Educator Resource

EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF THREE WIND ANALYSIS TOOLS FOR CONCEPT DESIGN OF AN URBAN WIND SHELTER

2013 Wall of Wind (WoW) Contest Informational Workshop

Strolling down the Avenue

FALL PROTECTION

MARLWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB WASAGA BEACH, ONTARIO

TOWN OF AURORA. Pool Enclosure Permit Guide. PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES Building Division

Aspects of Using CFD for Wind Comfort Modeling Around Tall Buildings

Bentleigh GLEN EIRA COUNCIL TRANSFORMATIONAL CONCEPTS 15

Building a Liveable Ottawa 2031 Backgrounder 5: Barrhaven/Riverside South/Leitrim

Site Improvements

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy & Guidelines

Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

Compliance with Section 18-52(4) City of Thornton Development Code

COUNTY ROAD 22 HORSESHOE VALLEY ROAD. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. simcoe.ca

CPHA Pre-conference Toronto May 2014

Fall Protection on Low Sloped Roofs for General Industry. Presented by: Brian Stickler

The Art of Natural Ventilation Balancing Heat and Air Flows?

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Your views are important. Please fill in a form before you leave. Or alternatively

Town of Beaumont Sidewalk Café Guidelines

Site Analysis and Parti Development

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF / BOOKLET

Wind Field Modifications in Habitable Urban Areas

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

The content of this resource has been generously provided by the AGC Houston, the Associated General Contractors of America.

DRAFT. A fifth objective, other considerations, has been added to capture considerations not captured by the four primary objectives.

Obey Creek PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION EAST WEST PARTNERS PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CREEK SIDE LANE SLIP STREET SCOTT MURRAY MAIN STREETS EAST/WEST

Section 1. Global Wind Patterns and Weather. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

Comments on KXLY DRB Submittal from Southgate Neighborhood Council

See Figure 38, Existing Nonmotorized Connections.

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Transcription:

March 28, 2018 Mr. Carlos Ramirez Project Manager YORK Developments 303 Richmond St, Suite 201 London, ON N6B 2H8 carlos.ramirez@yorkdev.ca Re: Preliminary Pedestrian Wind Study 131 King Street - London, ON RWDI Project 1802234 Dear Mr. Ramirez, Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI) has prepared this Preliminary Wind Report to present our opinion on the potential pedestrian wind conditions on and around the proposed development at 131 King Street in London, Ontario. Our findings are based on a qualitative assessment of the wind conditions in the context of the local wind climate and our expert understanding of wind flows around buildings. This Preliminary Wind Study is required by the City of London in support of the Zoning Bylaw Amendment submission for this project. A more detailed study involving scale model tests in a boundary-layer wind tunnel will likely be required for the Site Plan Approval to quantify these wind conditions and, if necessary, develop wind control solutions. SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION The proposed development will be located on the south side of King Street between Talbot Street and Richmond Street in London, Ontario (see Image 1). The site is currently a surface parking lot. It is immediately surrounded by low-rise buildings in all directions. Surrounding buildings farther away from the site are generally low-rise with groups of high-rise buildings to the east through north to west of the site. Based on the drawings received by RWDI on March 7, 2018, the proposed development will include a mixed-use 30-storey tower with the ground-level restaurant/retail/service, four levels of above-ground parking, and 25 levels of residential units (see Image 2). The main entrance to the building and the entrance to the commercial area are located along the north façade on King Street. Other pedestrian areas include public sidewalks along King, Talbot, York and Richmond Streets, a laneway on the west side of the building, a surface parking lot on the south side of the building, and outdoor amenity areas at Level 6 and on the roof top of the proposed tower.

Image 1: Aerial View of the Development Site and Surroundings (Photograph Courtesy of Google TM Earth) Image 2: North View of Proposed Development WIND DATA Long-term wind statistics recorded at London International Airport were analyzed for the summer (May through October) and winter (November through April) seasons (see Image 3 on the next page). This is the nearest weather station with long-term, reliable wind data. When all winds are considered (regardless of speeds), winds from south, south-southwest, west through northwest and east directions are predominant during summer. During winter, winds from the southwest through northwest and east directions are predominant. Strong winds of a mean speed greater than 30 km/h (yellow and red bands) occur more often in the winter than in the summer, and they are typically from the east and southwest through west directions. PEDESTRIAN WIND ASSESSMENT To provide an opinion on the overall wind conditions expected around the proposed development, RWDI reviewed the long-term meteorological data for the area, drawings and renderings of the proposed development, and information regarding the surroundings. These data, in conjunction with our engineering judgement, allow us to predict the expected wind conditions as outlined below (use plans in Image 4 for reference). Project #1802234 Page 2

Wind Speed (km/h) Probability (% Summer Wi Calm 4.9 3 1-10 48.5 37 11-20 37.1 41 21-30 8.2 13 31-40 1.1 2 >40 0.1 0 Summer (May through October) Winter (November through April) Image 3: Directional Distribution of Winds Approaching London International Airport (1981-2014) Image 4: Reference Plans and Elevation The proposed tower is considerably taller than its immediate surroundings and therefore is exposed to the prevailing winds in all directions. Taller buildings tend to intercept the stronger winds at higher elevations and redirect them down to the ground level. Such a downwashing flow (see Image 5a) is the main cause for increased wind activity around tall buildings at grade level. Project #1802234 Page 3

Tower setbacks on a podium and adjacent low buildings to the east and west will reduce the direct impact of downwashing wind flows at grade. However, higher wind speeds are expected on the terraces at the podium level (see Image 5b). Image 5a: Downwashing Flow Image 5b: Downwashing Flows on to a Podium The addition of the proposed development will increase the wind activity on King Street sidewalks (Locations A in Image 4), but the resultant wind conditions are generally expected to be comfortable for the intended use of sidewalks. Wind conditions on sidewalks along York, Talbot and Richmond Streets are not expected to be altered by the proposed development due to their farther distances from the proposed development. The main entrance to the tower and the entrance to the commercial area are located along the north façade on King St (Locations B1 and B2, respectively). The main entrance is recessed from the north façade and has a vestibule, which is a positive design feature, as it will provide a space for pedestrian to take shelter during high wind events. Also, the 5-storey podium is expected to keep winds accelerating down the building away from the ground and the entrances along this facade. There is also a canopy structure along the north building façade above these entrances that will provide additional wind protection. As a result, wind speeds at the main entrance are expected to be comfortable throughout the year. The commercial entrance (Location B2) is at the northwest corner of the building and there is a large gap under the vertical wall structure at the corner that allows winds to accelerate into the entrance area (lower corner diagram in Image 4). The wind conditions at this corner are expected to be uncomfortable from time to time in the winter and may exceed the wind safety criterion. Project #1802234 Page 4

We recommend extending the wall down to the ground (eliminating the gap) or installing a tall screen or a coniferous planter on the west side of the commercial entrance. Alternatively, the commercial entrance should be relocated northward away from the building corner and recessed from the main façade. Due to the prevailing westerly winds downwashing off the proposed tower, increased wind activity is expected along the west laneway (C in Image 4) and at the part of the parking lot that is close to the tower (Location D). These wind conditions, however, are considered appropriate for the intended use of these areas throughout the year since pedestrians are not expected to stay in these areas for a prolonged period of the time. The podium terraces are located on the north side of the building at Level 6. The east terrace (Location E1 in Image 4) is better sheltered than the west terrace (Location E2) from the prevailing westerly winds. In addition to the proposed perimeter guardrails, horizontal elements such as trellises, canopies and landscaping is recommended for the west terrace (Location E2) for wind control. Wind speeds at the rooftop terrace (Location F in Image 4) are expected to be higher than desired for passive activities in the summer due to its elevation and exposure. Typical wind control solutions would include tall guardrails along the entire perimeter to deflect winds up. Local wind control measures such as screens, trellises and landscaping should be considered for any proposed seating areas. The proposed development has several positive design features such as the 5-storey podium, the recessed main entrance, and the canopy structure along the north façade. Suitable wind conditions are expected at the main residential entrance, along sidewalks and the laneway west of the tower, in the parking lot south of the tower, and on the east podium terrace. Accelerated winds and potentially unsafe conditions during the winter are expected at the northwest corner of the proposed development where the commercial entrance is located. Project #1802234 Page 5

Higher-than-desired wind speeds are also expected at the west podium terrace and on the rooftop terrace. Mitigation measures have been provided herein to ensure comfortable wind conditions are achieved at these areas. Wind tunnel tests can be conducted to quantify these wind conditions and evaluate the effectiveness of these control measures. The wind tunnel tests, if required, are typically completed in support of the SPA submission. CLOSING We trust this meets your current requirements for this project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours truly, Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI) Hanqing Wu, Ph.D., P.Eng. Technical Director / Principal John Alberico, M.Sc., CCEP, WELL AP Senior Project Consultant / Principal Project #1802234 Page 6