Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, March 2007

Similar documents
Project Completion Abstract Fish Passage Activity ( Engineering Activities)

COA-F17-F-1343 YEAR END REPORT

Lakelse Sockeye Recovery Program

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Firth Creek Habitat Enhancement Project 1993

OKANAGAN RIVER RESTORATION INITIATIVE - FAQ

Lagoon Spawning Bed Rehabilitation

Cheakamus River IR 11 Floodplain Restoration Final Report Project Number 13.CMS.01

Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Redd Dewatering and Juvenile Salmonid Stranding in the Lower Feather River,

Ecology of Place: What salmon need Eric Beamer Skagit River System Cooperative. November 2010

Newaukum Watershed Culvert Assessment

nhc northwest hydraulic consultants water environment solutions VIA VIA COURIER December 8, 2003

Rivers Inlet Salmon Initiative

Shovelnose Creek Off-Channel Complex Berm Repair

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

STREAM CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING. Prepared For. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. Menzies Bay Division BOX 6000, Campbell River V9W 5E1.

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

Salmon and Migratol~Y Trout of the N,anaimo 'River lind Adjacent Streams (Revised 1,973)

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

Campbell River Elk Falls #3 Intake and Connector Channel Construction Summary

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

Fish Passage Culvert Assessment for Cahilty Creek Watershed FIA Project #

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

UNIT 4E. SALMON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

Coquitlam Water Use Plan

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Sub-watershed Summaries

OVERVIEW OF MID-COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP

South Fork Chehalis Watershed Culvert Assessment

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Proposed 2018 Fisheries Management Measures to Support Recovery of Interior Fraser River Steelhead

Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe

Terms and Conditions for Changes In and About A Stream Specified by MWLAP Habitat Officers, Cariboo Region

1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP DIVISION FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH. Horsefly River Angling Management Plan

X.B WETLANDS ROGUE RIVER ESTUARY

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

Fish Passage Culvert Inspection (FPCI) Nicklen Creek Watershed

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Stream Assessment Cut-block: For: Island Timberlands Limited Partnership, Cameron Operation

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

Creation of Fish and Wildlife Habitat on the Closed Salmon Harbour Mine in Minto, NB

Puntledge River Hatchery Summer Chinook Rearing Consolidation Project

Freshwater Fish Assessment

10 is bounded by wetlands between RM 1.8 and 3.1 on the south shore and more are scattered

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

Chinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Juvenile Steelhead and Stream Habitat Conditions Steelhead and Coho Salmon Life History Prepared by: DW ALLEY & Associates, Fishery Consultant

Assessment of Elizabeth Lake as a Potential Candidate for Stocking

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

STEELHEAD SURVEYS IN OMAK CREEK

Terms and Conditions for Changes In and About A Stream Specified by MOE Habitat Officers, Cariboo Region

Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition

August 11 Snorkel SCC side channel network (SBA, SCC3) feet 707

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

NATIVE FISH CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SPRING CHINOOK SALMON ROGUE SPECIES MANAGEMENT UNIT

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Fairhaven Creek 2000

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

TABLE 1. Riverscape surveys completed in the upper Chehalis River, Newaukum, and Satsop rivers.

Tuolumne River Gravel Introduction

1. Eating wild salmon is healthy for you and healthy for our environment. But this fishery will only continue to exist with help from you.

Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Chapter 22: Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone

Job Performance Report, Project F-73-R-9 Subproject II: SALMON AND STEELHEAD INVESTIGATIONS Study I: Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

1998 Willow Creek Downstream Migrant Trap Report. Draft. Prepared By: C. A. Walker. Lower Trinity Ranger District. Six Rivers National Forest

PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - 1. Applicant organization. USDA Forest Service Gifford Pinchot National Forest & WDFW Region 5

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT EASTERN REGION

Cross-Vane Plan View FIN-UP Habitat Consultants, Inc. 220 Illinois Avenue Manitou Springs, CO (719) P.

Lower Coquitlam River Project Water Use Plan. Temperature Monitoring Lower Coquitlam River Project Year 2 Report

2009 YUKON RIVER NORTH MAINSTEM STEWARDSHIP

Removal of natural obstructions to improve Atlantic Salmon and Brook Trout habitat in western NL. 26/02/2015 Version 2.0

Project Report for Marsh Creek and Albion River Instream Fish Barrier Removal Flynn Creek Road, CR 135, M.P. 8.1 and 8.3

Sockeye Reintroduction program. April 12, 2014 BCWF AGA Howie Wright

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

Stevens Creek Corridor

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

Coquitlam/Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

PROJECT TO INSTALL LARGE WOOD HABITAT STRUCTURES IN THE CARMEL RIVER USING CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GRANT FUNDS

COMPENSATION LAKE DESIGN CONCEPTS AND CONSTRUCTION LESSONS LEARNED

Overview of the Trinity River

Old Stream is a highly productive cold water tributary to the Machias River located in Washington County, Maine. The Machias River contains a portion

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

Transcription:

Burman Watershed Funding Source: Land Based Investment Program Of the Forest Investment Account Investment #: COTFL196551 Project #; 6551001 Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007 March 2007 Prepared for: British Columbia Timber Sales (BCTS) Strait of Georgia Business Area 370 South Dogwood Street Campbell River, BC V9W 6Y7 Submitted by: M. C. Wright and Associates 2231 Neil Drive Nanaimo, BC V9R 6T5 Phone/Fax: (250) 753-1055 Email: mcw-assoc@shaw.ca And Fisheries and Oceans Canada Habitat and Enhancement Branch 4166 Departure Bay Road Nanaimo, BC V9T 4B7 Phone: (250) 756-7005 Email: DoucetRu@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River watershed - 2007 1.0 Introduction To increase the productive capacity of the Burman River, restoration of offchannel habitat is required. Many areas of the Burman River have lost connectivity to off-channel habitat. In some locations there has been a significant loss or reduction in available spawning and rearing habitat as the result of channel aggrading. Restoration requirements in the Burman Watershed are extensive and will have to occur over multiple phases. The intent of restoration and enhancement works for the Burman will be a species diversity approach where restoration will target all species of salmonids in the watershed. This prescription has been developed as the result of surveying 1.8 km of the orphaned channel (Stream 11) on the north side of the Burman River during the winter of 2007. This channel is located 8.5km from the river mouth. Historically this channel would have provided high value spawning and rearing habitat. 2.0 Background At one time the Burman River was considered the most important Salmon River" in Nootka Sound. Escapements during the 1960 s were as high as 150,000 pink salmon. Additionally the Burman River supported large numbers of Chinook (maximum escapement 10,000), coho (maximum escapement 10,000) and chum salmon (maximum escapement 20,000). In December of 1967 logging operations commenced in the Burman River Watershed. By the fall of 1968 logging in the watershed had progressed to 9.6 km upstream of the river mouth. Logging continued in the watershed until 1978. Post logging impacts became prevalent after 1972 which had the highest pink escapement on record when 165,000 adults returned to spawn. Since 1972 salmon stocks have continued to decline. The most notable declines have been for pink salmon and by 1986 returns had fallen to less than 100. Since 1986 the highest recorded return of pink salmon has been 24 which were observed in 2001. No species of salmon has recovered since logging ceased in 1978. Since logging occurred in the Burman Watershed this Stream 11 has become severely aggraded and a fish trap causing high egg and fry mortality. On-site meetings have been held with Russ Doucet and Mel Sheng, Habitat M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Enhancement Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Doug Swift, Habitat Management Technologist, Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The representatives of DFO support the restoration of this channel. Consultation has been done with the Mowachaht Muchalaht First Nation (MFN) and the NTC Biologist (Roger Dunlop). One MFN Fisheries Program Technician was involved in the surveying of Stream 11 during 2007. 3.0 Location The Burman River is located on the west coast of Vancouver Island and flows into Matchlee Bay south-east of the Gold River. Stream 11 (orphan channel) flows into the Burman River 8.5 km upstream form the mouth. The nearest community is Gold River. 4.0 Objectives The primary objectives of this project are to: 1. Restore the channel to create high value off-channel rearing and spawning habitat. 2. Lower the bed-elevation to prevent fry from becoming trapped and desiccation of redds due to de-watering during low flow periods. 5.0 Rationale The Burman River and Stream 11 in particular were assessed for fish and fish habitat during 2005 and 2006. The assessment of Stream 11 determined that flow is predominately sub-surface during low flow periods, which isolate fry in pools and during long periods of draught causes high mortality as pools dewater. The aggraded habitat would also cause stranding of adult salmonids as well as high egg loss through dewatering of redds. This could lead to high egg loss during the incubation period. During the March 2006 survey dewatered redds were observed. This tributary is a low gradient drainage (<1%) which de-waters during summer low flow periods. The channel upstream of the bridge is aggraded with a gravel/cobble substrate covered with silt and sand. The substrate below the bridge crossing is comprised of gravels suitable for spawning. The channel was probably mined for road building when the road was first constructed. The area above the bridge would have seasonal fish use but because of its aggraded state the channel is probably a fish trap during low flow periods. In its present state the habitat above the bridge would be considered marginal while the habitat below the bridge would be considered important. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

6.0 Assessment Works On March 22 and 23, 2005 an initial assessment of Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) was conducted (Mike Wright, Steve Williams and Bob Askin) as part of a larger survey to determine condition of road crossings and bridge structures along the Burman River. During March of 2007 Stream 11was surveyed using RT-DGPS and conventional survey techniques by Strategic Forest Management Inc, Mowachaht / Muchalaht First Nation fisheries personnel and M.C. Wright and Associates personnel. Survey data was used to generate longitudinal, cross sectional and plan view drawings of the project (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). 7.0 Prescriptions The primary objective of the restoration project will involve lowering the bed elevation of the existing channel from just upstream of the confluence with the Burman River to 1.5 km upstream (0+135m to 1+500m). Stream 11 will have riffle / pool morphology throughout the length with a mean gradient of 0.5%. Restoration of Stream 11 will require lowering the bed elevation by an average of 1.5m throughout its length. The deepest cut will be necessary at 1 + 390m upstream of the confluence, where it will be necessary to remove 3.0m to 3.5m of material for the creation of a head water pond. A total of 14 pools will be created during this project. All material removed from the channel will be either trucked to a designated spoils site or used to upgrade the road prism in the area. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans has determined that restoration of Stream 11 would create high value off channel spawning and rearing habitat. Photographic Representation of the project area is presented in Appendix 1. 8.0 Accessing the Work Site All equipment will have to be barged to the Matchlee Bay log dump from Gold River, British Columbia. A temporary access road will have to be constructed off of the Burman Mainline logging road to allow equipment access to the worksite. Prior to any equipment being moved to the worksite the Burman Mainline Logging road will be upgraded. Daily access for crews to the work site will be via Water Taxi from Gold River. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

9.0 Isolating the Site (Managing Flows) The work area must be isolated to ensure silt laden water does not enter the Burman River during construction. The site will be isolated from the Burman River mainstem by building a coffer dam. Once construction has been completed the dam will be removed. All wetted areas within the work area must be salvaged and fish moved to habitat below the work area. A coffer dam and barrier nets will be used to keep fish from migrating back into the work area. 10.0 Grading the Site A total of 1.5km of Stream 11 will be rehabilitated. The mainstem elevation will be lowered to an elevation of 495m at 0+140 and to an elevation of 500.0m at 1+500 where the channel terminates in a headwater pool. The depth of the excavations will range from 0.5m to 3.0 m with a mean cut of 1.5 m. The pools will be excavated to 0.5 to 1.0 m below the groundwater table. The channel bottom widths will vary from 5 to 8 meters with 1.5 bank slopes. The volume of gravel from grading the mainstem is approximately 18,000 m 3. The gravel from the channel excavation will be used to upgrade the existing Burman Mainline. Some of the material, approximately 25% will be trucked to a designated spoil site. Location of this spoil site will be determined after a site visit with all parties. A backhoe or small excavator may be necessary for managing the excavated materials dumped at the disposal sites. All outside bends in the channel will be armored with 0.5 to 0.8 m riprap. Approximately 1000 m 3 will be required for armoring the bends in the channel. Complexing with LWD will be limited to the pools and alcoves. There are considerable amounts of LWD throughout the work area. Excavators will salvage wood from the flood plain to be used in complexing fish habitat. All woody debris will be cabled or ballasted with 1.0 m rock where necessary. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

11.0 Environmental Measures All areas disturbed during construction will be seeded with West Coast Hemlock Mix. The seed mixture is comprised of: 5.0% Canadian Bluegrass 20.0% Alsike Clover 5.0% Azay Sheeps Fescue 30.0% Creeping Red Fescue #1 5.0% Orchard Grass 10.0% Red Top Bentgrass 15.0% Timothy 10.0% Birdsfoot Terfoil This prescription should be done during the low flow period between late July and September 15. Prior to construction all fish will be salvaged from the work area and released in Burman River below the work site. Barrier nets and a coffer dam will be installed at the downstream end of the work site during construction. To ensure silt does not enter the Burman River a cofferdam will be constructed downstream of the worksite. The dams will be constructed with plastic and sandbags. Sumps will be excavated to trap seepage from the work site. Silt-laden water from the sumps will be pumped (4 trash pumps) onto the forest floor. Water will be pumped to an area where there is no possibility that the water will find its way into the Burman River. Excavators and trucks will be in good repair and will have to be steam cleaned prior to working at the site. A 10 m oil containment boom will have to be on-site at all times. The oil containment boom will be set near the channel to allow for rapid deployment should a spill occur. Spill kits for the excavators will be required at all times. A supply of oil absorbent pads will also be necessary. All fueling of equipment will be done on the logging road away from the channel. Supplies to be on-site to contain silt if necessary are; 1. 2 x 4 or possibly 1 x 6 inch trash pump and 600 ft of discharge hose 2. tarps, rope and a roll of polyethylene 3. sandbags. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

12.0 Recommendations 1. The Mowachaht / Muchalaht First Nation Fisheries Program should provide technical Assistance and laborers. 2. It should be specified in the bid package that excavator operators have experience with stream restoration. The operator and his/her qualifications should be provided. The contractor will not be allowed to substitute operators unless approved be the site manager. 13.0 Costing A breakdown of costs associated with the restoration of Stream 11 is provided in Table 1. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Tables M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Table 1. Cost estimate for the Restoration of Stream 11 (orphan Channel) Burman River, 2007. Unit Expanded Item # Construction Item Description Qty Unit Cost Cost 1 Mob/Demob lump sum barging 2 units $5,500.00 $11,000.00 2 site transport pick-up trucks 2 trucks 30 day $200.00 $6,000.00 3 minor purchases and equipment rentals pumps, fabric, netting 4 week $1,000.00 $4,000.00 4 Rock quarry riprap development 2300 cu.m riprap at approx 10 km from site 1000 cu.m $12.00 $12,000.00 6 site access prep 2 x 20 tonne track excavators 30 hr $260.00 $7,800.00 7 Clear, Grub and stockpile LWD 1 2 tonne excavator and 1 Moxy 30 hr $280.00 $8,400.00 8 Excavation of Channel 2-20 tonne track excavators and 2 Moxy trucks 250 hr $560.00 $140,000.00 9 LWD complexing-procurement and installations 2-20 tonne track excavators and 2 Moxy trucks 33.5 units $560.00 $18,760.00 10 LWD complexing-procurement and installations 2-20 tonne track excavators 105 units $260.00 $27,300.00 11 site cleanup/deactivation 2-20 tonne track excavators 35 hr $260.00 $9,100.00 12 Accommodations for 3 crew, 1 supervisor,1 other Motels 40 day $565.00 $22,600.00 13 project implementation supervisor M.Wright 40 day $500.00 $20,000.00 16 Project Supervisor Mileage at government rates 3000 km $0.46 $1,380.00 17 General Labour on site labours x 2 400 hour $50.00 $20,000.00 18 Survey Technician as needed 1 survey technician 80 hour $35.00 $2,800.00 19 Environmental Supplie and Equipment Rental (i.e. pumps) Rental of misc equipment, environmental supplies 1 lump sum $5,000.00 $5,000.00 20 Water Taxi for transport to and from site 30 day $250.00 $7,500.00 Construction subtotal: $323,640.00 Post construction 1 As-built survey and project reporting M.Wright 1 lump sum $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Post-construction subtotal: $8,000.00 Total (Excluding Taxes): $331,640.00 GST Exempt - Grand Total $331,640.00

Figures M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Appendices M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Appendix 1. Photographic Representation of the Project Area (Stream 11) taken from the Photo-Points shown on Figures 1-5, 2007. M.C. Wright and Associates Prescription to Restore Stream 11 (Orphan Channel) in the Burman River Watershed, 2007. Final Report.

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 406 March 20, 2007 406-1 Downstream 225 Burman River at outlet 406-2 Downstream 283 Outlet into the Burman River 406-3 Stream Right 4 Channel material / Boulder in channel 406-4 Upstream 72 Secondary channel from the Burman River / Riprap from road above channel 406-1 406-2 406-3 406-4 1

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 405 March 20, 2007 4051 Downstream 271 Channel looking at the Burman River outlet 405-2 Stream Right 340 Road fill riprap in the channel 405-3 Upstream 41 Channel below riprap from road fill 405-1 405-2 405-3 2

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 322 March 19, 2007 322-1 Downstream 92 Channel below old log bridge 322-2 Upstream 254 Channel above old log bridge 322-1 322-2 Hub 320 March 19, 2007 320-1 Downstream 225 LWD and rock in channel / Salmon berry on bank 320-2 Stream Right 19 Bluff beside the channel 320-1 320-2 3

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 320-3 Upstream 37 Channel at the base of a bluff 320-4 Stream Right 352 Channel below a bluff 320-3 320-4 Hub 386 March 14, 2006 386-1 Downstream 308 Gravels in channel 386-2 Stream Right 308 Close up showing channel substrate 386-3 Upstream 91 LWD above channel and boulders on bank 386-1 386-2 386-3 4

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 325 March 14, 2007 325-1 Stream Left 136 Confluence with back channel 325-2 Downstream 272 Dry ground in front of b oulder and debris in channel 325-3 Stream Left 216 Channel below confluence 325-4 Upstream 90 Alder along channel / Boulder beside channel 325-1 325-2 325-3 325-4 5

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 377 offset 6m @ 338º March 13, 2007 377-1 Downstream 272 LWD in channel 377-2 Stream Right 11 Sword fern on channel bank 377-3 Upstream 62 LWD in channel 377-1 377-2 377-3 Hub 350 March 13, 2007 350-1 Downstream 227 Channel running through flood plain forest 350-2 Upstream 60 LWD in channel / Sword fern and salmonberry on bank 350-1 350-2 6

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 411 March 22, 2007 411-1 Downstream 337 Salmonberry in channel 411-2 Stream Right 331 Mud bottom off channel 411-3 Upstream 32 Blow down in channel 411-1 411-2 411-3 7

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 410 March 22, 2007 410-1 Downstream 332 Channel through sedge 410-2 Stream Right 2 NCD entering by beaver dam 410-3 Upstream 110 Pond behind beaver dam 410-4 Stream Left 136 Beaver dam and pond left 410-1 410-2 410-3 Hub 419 March 22, 2007 419-1 Downstream 318 Beaver Dam 410-4 419-1 8

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 413 March 27, 2007 413-1 Downstream 281 Sedge wetland 413-2 Upstream 58 Sedge wetland 413-1 413-2 Hub 420 March 22, 2007 420-1 Upstream 261 Down stream end of pond 420-2 Stream Right 356 Pond looking towards side hill 420-3 Stream Right 45 Pond 420-1 420-2 420-3 9

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 421 March 27, 2007 421-1 Downstream 262 Pond near road location 421-2 Stream Right 196 Sedge and LWD in pond 421-3 Upstream 112 Pond looking towards road 421-1 421-2 421-3 10

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 425 March 27, 2007 425-1 Downstream 311 Upstream end of pond 425-2 Stream Left 199 Road location looking towards the Burman River 425-3 Stream Right 5 Swampy wet area north of the pond 425-1 425-2 425-3 11

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 426 March 28, 2007 426-1 Downstream 318 Channel coming out of wetland 426-2 Up stream 133 Sedge in channel 426-3 Stream Left 185 Looking away from channel at dry ground 426-1 426-2 426-3 Hub 429 March 28, 2007 429-1 Downstream 333 Sedge in channel / blow down over channel in background 429-2 Up stream 151 Upstream end of current channel 429-1 429-2 12

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 432 March 28, 2007 432-1 Stream Left 212 Current road location 432-2 Up stream 144 Dry ground between the side hill and the Burman River Hub 427 March 28, 2007 427-1 Downstream 332 Possible design channel location in depression near toe of slope 427-2 Up stream 119 Old pit road at upstream end of depression 427-3 Stream Left 201 Road Location at pinch point between side hill and the Burman River 427-1 427-2 427-3 13

Photo Appendix Burman River March 31, 2007 Hub 428 March 29, 2007 428-1 Downstream 311 Possible location of intake pond 428-2 Up stream 104 Slide track turning towards possible intake pond location 428-1 428-2 14