Quality Assurance Charting for QC Data

Similar documents
Controls and Control Charting

STD-3-V1M4_1.7.1_AND_ /15/2015 page 1 of 6. TNI Standard. EL-V1M4 Sections and September 2015

Control Charting: Lessons Learned Along the Way Why, What, and How

If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Denise L Seman City of Youngstown

TPM TIP. Oil Viscosity

Chapter 5: Methods and Philosophy of Statistical Process Control

ASTM WK Standard Test Method for Dissolved Gases. Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Flare Gas Composition Analysis and QA/QC Lessons Learned and Lessons Lost SPECTRUM ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 1

v /07/17 Page 1 of 18

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Summary for Year 1 of the California Coast Survey

Statistical Method Certification, Coal Combustion Residuals Landfill, Reid Gardner Generating Station

5.1 Introduction. Learning Objectives

CHM Introductory Laboratory Experiment (r17sd) 1/13

Stats 2002: Probabilities for Wins and Losses of Online Gambling

STAT 155 Introductory Statistics. Lecture 2-2: Displaying Distributions with Graphs

TG GUIDELINES CONCERNING CALIBRATION INTERVALS AND RECALIBRATION

MEMORANDUM. Investigation of Variability of Bourdon Gauge Sets in the Chemical Engineering Transport Laboratory

PROTOCOL FOR COMPRESSED AIR PROFICIENCY TESTING (CAPT) PROGRAM SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Introduction to Scientific Notation & Significant Figures. Packet #6

(Lab Interface BLM) Acceleration

Guide to the Use of Control Charts in Water Analysis

NUTC R285. Effect of Trona on the Leaching of Trace Elements from Coal Fly Ash. Jianmin Wang, Ph.D., P.E. Honglan Shi, Ph.D.

23 RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BALLISTICS TARRAGONA, SPAIN APRIL 2007

PREPARED BY: Marshall K. Cheung, Ph.D., Laboratory Director. REVISED BY: Marshall K. Cheung, Ph.D., Laboratory Director

Laboratory Performance Assessment. Spring Report. Test Material A

Country report. Swedish bathing water quality in Sweden. May Photo: Peter Kristensen/EEA

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

Unit 3 ~ Data about us

Retention Time Locking: Concepts and Applications. Application

TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RADIATION SAFETY

3. Real-time operation and review of complex circuits, allowing the weighing of alternative design actions.

Laboratory Activity Measurement and Density. Average deviation = Sum of absolute values of all deviations Number of trials

Ti-Pure TITANIUM DIOXIDE DETERMINATION OF SLURRY RHEOLOGY METHOD: T WP

Laboratory Performance Assessment. Spring Report. Test Material B

March Madness Basketball Tournament

EN ISO/IEC Technical Requirements

STAT 625: 2000 Olympic Diving Exploration

DOC/DON Reference Materials

OPERATING PROCEDURE. Number: V2. Authors. Approvals

Standard Procedure. for using ConfiRM with the SoloVPE. Slope

(NIST Special Publication )

Conservation Limits and Management Targets

APPENDIX C. 40 CFR PART 60 App. B SPEC. 1-4, 6

March Madness Basketball Tournament

KWA. Evaluation of the MassTech 001 Tank Integrity Test System. EPA Forms Obtained From

ATION TITLE. Survey QC, Decision Making, and a Modest Proposal for Error Models. Marc Willerth, MagVAR

SOP-I-101 Operation and Calibration of the Analytical Balance

Chapter Pipette service & maintenance. Pipette specifications according to ISO Repair in the lab or return for service?

Understanding Winter Road Conditions in Yellowstone National Park Using Cumulative Sum Control Charts

Opleiding Informatica

MSD 96-Well MULTI-ARRAY and MULTI-SPOT Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (hg-csf) Ultrasensitive Assay

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

MIL-STD-883G METHOD

CALIBRATION. empanelled laboratories following standard procedures and using certified reference standards.

DETERMINATION OF TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE IN AMBIENT AIR BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH A PFPD DETECTOR COUPLED TO A PRECONCENTRATION TECHNOLOGY

The use of the analytical balance, and the buret.

PIQCS HACCP Minimum Certification Standards

Organic Elemental Analysis Series II CHNS/O Elemental Analyzer. proven performance. reliable results

SAMPLE MAT Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Stability of Ships

Alternative Test Procedures for Evaluating Leak Detection Methods: For Bulk Fieldconstructed

General European OMCL Network (GEON) QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

Exploring Measures of Central Tendency (mean, median and mode) Exploring range as a measure of dispersion

Other Si min/max. Cr min/max. 0.4/ / / / Bal.

METHOD 25A - DETERMINATION OF TOTAL GASEOUS ORGANIC CONCENTRATION USING A FLAME IONIZATION ANALYZER

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control Charts (SPC) Steve Harrison

VIROLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM STATISTICAL CENTER

save percentages? (Name) (University)

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

The use of Control Charts with Composite materials. E. Clarkson, Statistician ASQ Certified Quality Engineer

VIROLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM STATISTICAL CENTER

Service Calibration are you doing it properly?

Quality Control and Quality Assurance at the Mill. Philip Randall Tanzania 5 th April 2011

Diameter in cm. Bubble Number. Bubble Number Diameter in cm

Review of ISO10723 Performance Test Frequency. By Anwar Sutan

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results.

Asphalt Mixture Quality Acceptance

Check-In, Lab Safety, Balance and Volumetric Glassware Use, Introduction to Statistics, and MSDS Familiarization

Effective Use of Box Charts

Introduction. Seafood HACCP Alliance Training Course 8-1

Requirements and Methods for Calibration of Equipment in Clinical Laboratories. NK Chan (HKRCBTS) 24 August 2007

Amendment 80 Non-AFA Trawl Gear Catcher/Processor

QLD Recognised Standard 14 - Monitoring Respirable Dust in Coal Mines CHECKLIST TO HELP YOU MONITOR YOUR WORKPLACE

extraction of EG and DEG from the matrix. However, the addition of all diluent at once resulted in poor recoveries.

How Many Iterations Are Enough?

Supersedes: The copy of this document located on Measurement Canada s website is considered to be the controlled copy.

Additional Reading General, Organic and Biological Chemistry, by Timberlake, chapter 8.

Gas mixtures. Individual solutions specifically for your application

Requirements for the certification of movements and mechanical watches resistant to magnetic fields of 1.5 T ( G)

Driv e accu racy. Green s in regul ation

Title: INSTRUMENT AND EQUIPMENT DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS

Density of Brass: Accuracy and Precision

Dev Food Industry. Procedure for HACCP Plan. To establish and maintain a uniform approach to establish HACCP Plan.

POWER Quantifying Correction Curve Uncertainty Through Empirical Methods

Inquiry Module 1: Checking the calibration of a micropipette

General Accreditation Guidance. User checks and maintenance of laboratory balances

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES IN HOSPITAL ISOLATION ROOMS AND OTHER CRITICAL ENVIRONMENT APPLICATIONS

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 6

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS

Transcription:

Quality Assurance Charting for QC Data September 2018 Iowa s Environmental & Public Health Laboratory Copyright the State Hygienic Laboratory at the University of Iowa 2017. All rights reserved. Images may be subject to copyright.

Agenda Introduction Pre-Quiz Key Practices Post-Quiz Questions

60 Minute Schedule Introduction 5 min Pre-Quiz 5 min Key Practices Standard Work 20 min Quality Control 15 min Post-Quiz 5min Questions ( 10 min float)

Introduction Mark Pendergast 15 years as an analytical chemist GCMS, HPLC, Nutrients Microscopist 2015 to Present Manager, Quality Systems Advisor to SHL Director Contact Information Mark-pendergast@uiowa.edu 319.335.4236

1. DOC 2. MDL 3. LRB 4. LFB 5. MS/MSD 6. ISTD 7. CCV 8. Control Charts 9. Corrective Action 10. QC Acceptance Criteria 11. Definitions 12. Minimum Frequency for QC Quality Control

1. DOC 2. MDL 3. LRB 4. LFB 5. MS/MSD 6. ISTD 7. CCV 8. Control Charts 9. Corrective Action 10. QC Acceptance Criteria 11. Definitions 12. Minimum Frequency for QC Quality Control

Process Measurement Process Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements John Keenan Taylor

Quality Control Meet the needs of the users Satisfactory Adequate Dependable Economic

Quality Control 40 CFR 136.7 The permittee/laboratory shall use suitable QA/QC procedures when conducting compliance analyses with any part 136 chemical method or an alternative method specified by the permitting authority. These QA/QC procedures are generally included in the analytical method or may be part of the methods compendium for approved Part 136 methods from a consensus organization. For example, Standard Methods contains QA/QC procedures in the Part 1000 section of the Standard Methods Compendium. The permittee/laboratory shall follow these QA/QC procedures, as described in the method or methods compendium. If the method lacks QA/QC procedures, the permittee/laboratory has the following options to comply with the QA/QC requirements: 12 Elements

Quality Control 40 CFR 136.7 Use suitable QA/QC procedures Standard Methods contains QA/QC procedures (part 1000) The permittee/laboratory shall follow these QA/QC procedures, as described in the method or methods compendium. If the method lacks QA/QC procedures, the permittee/laboratory has the following options to comply with the QA/QC requirements: 12 Elements

Quality Control Standard Method 1020 B. Include in each analytical method or SOP the minimum required QC for each analysis. 14 Elements

Control Charts Present a graphical Record over time Demonstrate Statistical Control Detect changes in analytical process Accuracy & Precision of the test

Control Charts for Individuals Often based on single QC result per batch Accept or reject that batch may depend on this one result

Control Chart Types Accuracy (means) chart Precision (range) chart

Accuracy Control Chart Accuracy (means) chart The accuracy chart for QC samples is constructed from the average and standard deviation of a specified number of measurements of the analyte of interest.

Accuracy Control Chart Reagent blanks LCSs Calibration check standards LFBs LFMs Surrogates

Accuracy Control Chart Accuracy (means) chart Set up using calculated values for: Mean & standard deviation or Percent recovery (if concentration varies) Construct a chart for each analytical method May need to be matrix specific Enter each time QC sample is analyzed Re-calculate standard deviation ~20-50 results

Accuracy Control Chart Mean & standard deviation or Percent recovery (if concentration varies)

Hand Out Accuracy Control Chart 1. Plot 10 data points along X axis using % recovery data displayed (next slide) 2. Plot Average 3. Plot Warning Limits (2x standard deviation) 4. Plot Control Limits (3x standard deviation) Note: Excel will be displayed during this process

Calculate Average & Plot X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 7 8 9 10 1. Calculate Average = sum of y / # of data points 2. Plot as straight line on your chart

Standard Deviation X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 7

Warning Limit & Plot X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 7 1. Calculate Warning Limit = 2 x Standard Deviation 2. Add to average as high WL 3. Subtract from average as low WL 4. Plot both straight lines across your chart

Control Limit X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 7 1. Calculate Control Limit = 3 x Standard Deviation 2. Add to average as high CL 3. Subtract from average as low CL 4. Plot both straight lines across your chart

Plot next 5 data points along X axis using % recovery data displayed X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 120 7 122 8 115 9 112 10 113

Plot next 5 data points along X axis using % recovery data displayed X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 120 7 122 8 115 9 112 10 113 Points 6 to 10 are now using the WL & CL set by points 1 to 5.

Recap Accuracy Control Chart 1. Plotted 10 data points along X axis using % recovery data displayed 2. Plotted Average 3. Plotted Warning Limits (2x standard deviation) 4. Plotted Control Limits (3x standard deviation) 5. Compared daily QC value to WL & CL

Precision (range) Control Chart Constructed from average and standard deviation of a specified number of measurements. Replicate & Duplicate analysis %RSD or relative percent different (RPD) Baseline is set at zero Only upper WLs & CLs

Precision (range) Control Chart Baseline is set at zero Only upper WLs & CLs Duplicate

Precision (range) Control Chart Duplicate analyses of a standard (easier):

Precision (range) Control Chart Duplicate analyses of samples (variation in sample concentration)

Precision (range) Control Chart Duplicate analyses of samples (variation in sample concentration) Relative Percent Difference (RPD) %RPD = (sample duplicate) (sample + duplicate)/2 x 100 Normalizes the data

Precision (range) Control Chart Duplicate analyses of samples (variation in sample concentration)

Plot 5 data points on the Precision Chart using %RPD data displayed X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10

Calculate Average & Plot X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10 1. Calculate Average = sum of y / # of data points 2. Plot as straight line on your chart

Standard Deviation X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 5

1s & Plot X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 5 1. Calculate 1s= Standard Deviation + Mean 2. Plot straight line across your chart 3. Label line as 1s

Warning Limit & Plot X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 5 1. Calculate WL= 2 x Standard Deviation + Mean 2. Plot straight line across your chart 3. Label line as WL

Control Limit & Plot X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 7 8 9 10 Standard Deviation = 5 1. Calculate CL= 3 x Standard Deviation + Mean 2. Plot straight line across your chart 3. Label line as CL

Plot next 5 data points along X axis using % RPD data displayed X y 1 22 2 10 3 14 4 18 5 20 6 23 7 24 8 28 9 25 10 23

Plot next 5 data points along X axis using % recovery data displayed X y 1 96 2 103 3 92 4 85 5 101 6 120 7 122 8 115 9 112 10 113 Points 6 to 10 are now compared to the 1s, WL, & CL set by points 1 to 5.

Recap -Control Charts & QC Limits 1. Percent Recovery (unknown compared to known) 2. Relative Percent Difference (duplicate samples comparing two values) 3. X Control Chart

Control Charts & QC Limits X Control Chart 1. Mean (establish from 20 data points) 2. Warning Limits (2 standard deviations) 3. Control Limits (3 standard deviations)

Control Charts & QC Limits Control Limits Control charts utilize a central line to define and provide the best estimate of the variable plotted. Control limits define the bounds of virtually all values produced and in statistical control.

Control Charts & QC Limits Standard Deviation Standard deviation is only an estimate based on limited data. Represents the spread around the mean. Is used to establish control of a measurement.

QC Frequency Follow your method requirements If in doubt contact lab certification program

Chart Analysis At the 95% confidence level, on average: 1 out of 20 exceed the WL 1 out of 100 exceed the CL

Chart Analysis What to do to examine apparent out-ofcontrol changes in method performance?

Chart Analysis What to do to examine apparent out-ofcontrol changes in method performance? Tradeoff Missing a change in method performance (false negative)

Chart Analysis What to do to examine apparent out-ofcontrol changes in method performance? Tradeoff Missing a change in method performance (false negative) VERSUS Investigating and acting on an apparent change in method performance when nothing actually changed (false positive)

Chart Analysis Guidelines from Standard Methods: Control Limit Warning Limit Standard Deviation Trending

Chart Analysis Review Accuracy Chart Control Limit if 1 measurement exceeds the CL, repeat the analysis immediately. If the next sample: within the CL, continue exceeds the CL, discontinue analyses and correct the problem.

Chart Analysis Review Accuracy Chart Warning Limit if 2 of 3 successive points exceed the WL, analyze another sample. If the next sample: within the WL, continue exceeds the WL, evaluate bias and correct problem

Chart Analysis Review Precision Chart Standard Deviation if 4 of 5 successive points exceed 1s, or are in decreasing or increasing order, analyze another sample. If the next sample: Less than 1s, or changes order, continue Otherwise correct the problem

Chart Analysis Review Precision Chart Trending 7 successive samples are on the same side of the central line Discontinue analyses and correct the problem

Chart Analysis Remember Tradeoff Missing a change in method performance (false negative) VERSUS Investigating and acting on an apparent change in method performance when nothing actually changed (false positive)

Chart Analysis Improvement in method precision Never exceed WL Recalculate WL & CL using 10-20 most recent data. Trends in precision can be detected sooner if running averages of 10-20 are kept Trends indicate systematic error Random error is revealed by random exceedance of WLs & CLs.

Corrective Action Document Record of action relating to non-conforming event (NCE)

Next Steps Plan, Do, Check, Analyze 1. Review your policy, process, procedure, and forms 2. Improve and Repeat

QUESTIONS? Acknowledgements CFR Standard Methods Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements John Keenan Taylor CLSI QMS11-A Management of Nonconforming Laboratory Events; Approved Guideline