SPECIES RICHNESS IN THREE OCEANFLOOR HABITATS IN BERMUDA BAYS

Similar documents
SCHOOLING BEHAVIOR OF HAEMULON SPP. IN BERMUDA REEFS AND SEAGRASS BEDS

Key Words: Attraction, Color Cue, and Wavelength. Introduction

DOMINICA REEF FISH STATUS 2002: An Assessment of the Abundance and Species Composition of Dominican Reef Fishes. ITME Research Reports Number 13

Ecological Survey of Puhi Bay and Richardson s Ocean Center

Gulf and Caribbean Research

Habitat selection during settlement of three Caribbean coral reef fishes: Indications for directed settlement to seagrass beds and mangroves

Response of Reef-Fish Habitat Specialists to Ramicrusta sp. Algal Overgrowth of Fire Coral

Thierry LISON DE LOMA. CRIOBE Centre de Recherches Insulaires Observatoire de l'environnement UMS 2978 CNRS - EPHE.

South Atlantic proposed MPAs: : three years of pre- closure data on habitat and fish assemblages

Baseline Assessment of Angaur Conservation area

Cottesloe Ecosystem Research Project: Structurally Complex Reef Habitats Enrich the Diversity and Abundance of Fish Species

L E M ASSIF R OSES A NKARANJELITA THE MARINE RESERVES OF THE BAY OF RANOBE: 2012 REPORT THE IMPORTANCE OF MARINE RESERVES

A Photographic Field Guide to Fish Species at Scott s Head and Champagne Reef

Erin Collins and Kat Quintanilla

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

St. Croix-Draft Actions and Alternatives.

6 Definition OBSERVING REEF FISHES: FISH VISUAL CENSUS

Time Will Tell: Long-term Observations of the Response of Rocky-Habitat Fishes to Marine Reserves in Puget Sound

Key words: community similarity; coral patch reef; Enewetak; reeffish; species diversity; Virgin Islands.

A Survey of Biodegradable and Non Biodegradable Debris on. Dominica s Coastal Zones

Comparative growth of pinfish in field mesocosms across marsh, oyster, and soft-bottom habitat types in a Mississippi estuary

Frequency of Percnon gibbesi in relation to. Diadema antillarum at Rodney s Rock

The marine habitat gradient of Cottesloe Reef: increasing fish abundance and diversity towards outer reef

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

The Population Density of Diadema antillarum at Champagne Reef at Scott s Head Soufriere Marine Reserve

Reef Ecology and Fisheries Anal ysis in Diani Diani--Chale, southern Kenya: Chale, southern Kenya: A G IS GIS & RDBMS application

Sea urchin density along a depth gradient at Rodney's Rock and Champagne Bay, Dominica

Integrating basic and applied ecology using paired artificial natural reef systems.

PMCP Fish and Sharks

Domain (island) wide estimates of mutton snapper (Lutjanus analis) abundance for three US Caribbean Islands based on habitat-derived densities

Technical and Financial Proposal

Oceanic Society Reef Research Team: Nicole Crane, Avigdor Abelson, Peter Nelson, Giacomo Bernardi, Michelle Paddack, Kate Crosman

IB BIOLOGY SUMMER WORK OPTION G: Ecology & Conservation

Co-Principal Investigators Stephen C. Jewett, Ph.D. Paul C. Rusanowski, Ph.D.

Analyzing spatial structure of recreational coastal reef fisheries in New Caledonia for management purposes

Design and implementation of rahui network in Tahiti Peninsula

DURING ALL ACTIVITIES, MAKE SURE YOU DON T DAMAGE THE REEF OR OTHER MARINE LIFE!

SEA GRANT PROGRESS REPORT

The Prevalence of Different Species of Fish in Four Different Habitats of Douglas Lake

Tires: unstable materials for artificial reef construction

DESCRIPTION OF REEF FISH SPAWNING AGGREGATIONS AT MONA ISLAND PUERTO RICO

Comparison of Coral Diversity Across Three Reef Habitats

Characterizing the Fish Assemblages of Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary

A comparison of two underwater visual sampling techniques used to estimate tropical reef fish communities. Sonia Jind

SAC-08-10a Staff activities and research plans. 8 a Reunión del Comité Científico Asesor 8 th Meeting of the Scientific Advisory Committee

Figures. Fish and Habitat relationships: A comparison study for habitat similarities.

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Attachment 1

EFFECTS OF PREDATION ON THE BEHAVIOR OF GAMMARUS MINUS

PHYSIS. We present Physis.

Assessment of the Introduced Lionfish in Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks

Ocean and Plume Science Management Uncertainties, Questions and Potential Actions (Work Group draft 11/27/13)

Biogeographic Assessment of Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

Field Protocol for Monitoring Coral Reef Fisheries Resources in Belize

Variation in size and abundance of Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) with change in hardbottom habitat

Artificial Habitats For Marine And Freshwater Fisheries READ ONLINE

NATURAL VARIABILITY OF MACRO-ZOOPLANKTON AND LARVAL FISHES OFF THE KIMBERLEY, NW AUSTRALIA: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

Artificial Reef Program Biological Monitoring Update

Green Sturgeon Feeding Observations in Humboldt Bay, California

Fine Scale Baleen Whale Behavior Observed Via Tagging Over Daily Time Scales

Impacts of climate change on marine fisheries

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONAL

Overview. What are Corals?

Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction 5/25/2011

Oceans Humans both depend on it and threaten it with their activities

2013 Electrofishing Program Summary. Miramichi Salmon Association In collaboration with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Significant Ecological Marine Area Assessment Sheet

ARTIFICIAL REEF RESEARCH OFF COASTAL ALABAMA

WHAT ARE ECOSYSTEMS? Dr. V. N. Nayak Professor of Marine Biology (Retd)

> >Welcome to the second issue of Fish Briefs! > > > >Articles in Issue Two: > > > >Robert S. Gregory, John T. Anderson. "Substrate selection and use

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Experimental reestablishment of populations of the long spined sea urchin, Diadema antillarum, on two small patch reefs in the upper Florida Keys

Cold-transitional Stream

Biodiversity of fishes in the Mediterranean. -Sparidae -Labridae. Anna Johanson, Satu Pakarinen

An Assessment of the Carrying Capacity of Sipadan Island Park, Sabah, Malaysia

Reef Fish Recruitment to Low and High Diversity Banks in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico

Fish Aggregations in the Florida Keys

THE SEAGRASS LANDSCAPE OF BUNDAS MARINE PROTECTED AREA, BARANGAY BAGUMBAYAN, LUPON, DAVAO ORIENTAL, PHILIPPINES

SCDNR Research and Monitoring: Habitat Needs of Different Life History Stages of Managed Reef Species

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

Warm Stream. A Brief Ecological Description of this Michigan River Type

Following Information Compliments of Avadon Divers, Placencia Belize

and found that there exist a significant overlap between the billfish resources and the exploitation activities targeting tunas and mahi mahi.

Zoe Richards, Maria Beger, Jean-Paul Hobbs, Tom Bowling, Karen Chong-Seng and Morgan Pratchett* FINAL REPORT November 10th, 2009

Storm impacts on the seabed in protected and fished areas

Video-Based Mapping of Oyster Bottom in the Upper Piscataqua River, Sturgeon Creek, and Spruce Creek

CROC'S WALL NORTH MARK (16-40)

Fish Communities in Five West Coast Spring-fed Rivers. Brandon Simcox, Eric Johnson, Amanda Schworm, Bill Pouder

Sea urchins, macroalgae and coral reef decline: a functional evaluation of an intact reef system, Ningaloo, Western Australia

Conditioned Alarm Behavior in Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas) and Test Their Ability

Bonefish Paradise. Robert J. Lennox 1,2, University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada

Marine Reserves as Tools for Fishery Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Natural Experiments in the Central Philippines,

Marine Ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems Section 2

Summary of Research within Lamlash Bay No-Take Zone - Science report for COAST July

Reef Watch Guidelines

Habitat dynamics, marine reserve status, and the decline and recovery of coral reef fish communities

CATCH A WAVE June 4-8, 2018

Habitat Fact Sheets. Rocky habitats are dominated by seaweeds and often mussels, which rely on the rocks for attachment.

SEAGRASS SURVEY CALATAGAN

DIGITAL MAPPING FOR CORAL REEF IN BINTANGOR ISLAND, WEST SUMATRA PROVINCE, INDONESIA

Transcription:

SPECIES RICHNESS IN THREE OCEANFLOOR HABITATS IN BERMUDA BAYS Madeline Department of Biology,, Worcester, MA 01610 USA (madcole@clarku.edu) Abstract Species richness of fish was compared between sand, sea grass, and coral habitats. Video and visual transects were conducted in these three habitats. Habitat, fish, and number of different families were recorded per transect. There were a significantly greater number of fish taxa in coral habitats than in sand or sea grass, and as expected, fish taxa diversity was greatest in coral habitats with 13 families of fish present. This species richness data forms a baseline that could help conservation biologists quantify growth or destruction of these communities. Key Words: Species richness, sand, sea grass, coral, Bermuda Introduction Species Richness is a term that refers to the number of species in a community, and is associated with measuring the species diversity in a habitat. One species diversity hypothesis, the heterogeneity hypothesis, states that the more structurally complex the community, the greater the species richness and diversity (Tews et al. 2003). This is because more complex habitats have greater resources. Extensive research has been conducted on coral reef species richness and diversity (Friedlander et al. 2003; Grober- Dunsmore et al. 2007), but limited work has been conducted comparing species richness between marine habitats. In accordance with the heterogeneity hypothesis, Gratwicke and Speight (2004) found that more complex marine habitats support a greater number of fish species than the less complex habitats. Therefore, because reef habitats are more complex than sea grass beds, which are more complex than sandy areas, reef habitats were predicted to have the most species diversity. Alternatively, Yoklavich et al. (2002) found no significant difference in fish densities from four distinct habitats. More research is needed to understand habitat effects on fish assemblages. The current study compares species richness in three shallow, ocean floor habitats sand, sea grass, and coral in Tobacco and Shelly Bay, Bermuda. I hypothesize that coral areas will have the greatest species richness, due to greater habitat complexity, followed by sea grass then sand. Materials and Methods Study Sites: Three ocean floor habitats were studied sand, sea grass, and coral in two shallow, Bermudan bays. The first location, Tobacco Bay, is located just outside St. Georges. Sand and coral video and visual transects were conducted here. The second location, Shelly Bay, is located in Hamilton Parish. Sand, sea grass, and coral video transects were taken here.

Sampling: Before sampling, swimming rate was standardized by swimming along a transect line multiple times to see the average distance traveled in 30 second intervals. The standard measure was 15m in 30s with approximately 1m of distance propelled by 2 kicks. At Shelly Bay, ten 30s video transects were taken over sand; ten 30s video transects were taken over sea grass; and four, 30s videos were taken over coral before the camera froze, ending sampling for the day. In Tobacco Bay, the number and common name of fish observed were recorded on underwater tablets. The researcher swam in straight lines for 30s, recording any fish that swam by. Ten of these visual transects were taken over sand; ten were recorded over sea grass; and ten were recorded over coral. In total, twenty 30s transects were taken over sand (10 video, 10 written); twenty 30s transects were taken over sea grass (10 video, 10 written); and fourteen 30s transects were taken over coral (4 video, 10 written). Video transects were reviewed to identify species of fish and the results from visual transects were compiled into a single document after sampling. Fish were accounted for by location (sand, sea grass, and/or coral) and number of transects they appeared in (Table 1). Number of fish taxa per transect was also recorded for each habitat (Table 2) Table 1: Fish taxa present in different sampling locations Habitat Number Common Name Family Sand Seagrass Coral # of Transects Present 1 Bermuda Bream Cyprinidae x x x 30 2 Bermuda Chub Kyphosidae x 5 3 Butterflyfish Chaetodontidae x 9 4 Damselfish Pomacentridae x x 3 5 Grunt Haemulidae x x x 24 6 Houndfish Belonidae x 2 7 Jack Carangidae x 6 8 Mojarra Gerreidae x 4 9 Needlefish Belonidae x 3 10 Parrotfish Scaridae x 10 11 Sand Diver Creediidae x x 8 12 Sergeant Major Pomacentridae x 6 13 Silversides Atherinopsidae x x 23 14 Slippery Dick Labridae x x x 31 15 Snapper Lutjanidae x 6 16 Squirrelfish Holocentridae x x 8 17 Surgeonfish Acanthuridae x 2 18 Wrasse Labridae x x 5 Page 46

Table 2: Number of fish taxa present in each of the transects Transect Habitat # of Taxa Transect Habitat # of Taxa Transecta Habitat # of Taxa 1 Sand 1 21 Seagrass 0 41 Coral 5 2 Sand 1 22 Seagrass 0 42 Coral 8 3 Sand 2 23 Seagrass 2 43 Coral 9 4 Sand 1 24 Seagrass 3 44 Coral 7 5 Sand 1 25 Seagrass 3 45 Coral 6 6 Sand 1 26 Seagrass 4 46 Coral 5 7 Sand 2 27 Seagrass 1 47 Coral 9 8 Sand 1 28 Seagrass 1 48 Coral 6 9 Sand 1 29 Seagrass 1 49 Coral 5 10 Sand 1 30 Seagrass 0 50 Coral 7 11 Sand 2 31 Seagrass 4 51 Coral 6 12 Sand 4 32 Seagrass 2 52 Coral 11 13 Sand 3 33 Seagrass 4 53 Coral 8 14 Sand 4 34 Seagrass 3 54 Coral 6 15 Sand 2 35 Seagrass 3 16 Sand 5 36 Seagrass 2 17 Sand 4 37 Seagrass 1 18 Sand 6 38 Seagrass 4 19 Sand 3 49 Seagrass 1 20 Sand 4 40 Seagrass 2 Results and Discussion Sixteen families of fish were identified. Six different families were present over sand, eight different families were present over sea grass and thirteen were present in the coral habitat (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Of the seventeen families identified at the three sample sites, coral had 76% of the identified fish families, while sea grass had 47% and sand had 35%. Therefore coral was the most diverse with 29% more diversity than sea grass and 41% more than sand. Sea grass had 12% more diversity than sand and sand was the least diverse of the sampling sites. Number of Fish Families Identified 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 13 8 6 Sand Seagrass Coral Habitat Fig. 1: Number of Fish taxa identified in three habitats Page 47

Fish occurrences were also recorded. Halichoeres bivittatus (Slippery Dick) present in all three habitats occurred most frequently appearing in 31 transects. Similarly, Diplodus bermudensis (Bermuda Bream), present in all three habitats, appeared in 30 transects. Menidia menidia (Silversides) and Haemulidae (Grunt) were also quite abundant, occurring in 23 and 24 transects respectively, with Grunt present in all three habitats, but Silversides only in sand and sea grass. Tylosurus crocodilus (Houndfish) and Acanthuridae (Surgeonfish) had the least occurrences, only appearing in 2 transects, both in coral habitats. Results were analyzed in JMP by means of a oneway ANOVA test comparing number of taxa by habitat. Comparisons between pairs were made using a Tukey-Kramer test. There were significant interactions between coral and sea grass (p <.0001) and coral and sand (p <.0001) such that coral has significantly more taxa than both sea grass and sand (Fig. 2). Sea grass and Sand were not significantly different. F i g. 2 : Fig. 2: Oneway ANOVA analysis of number of taxa by habitat As hypothesized, coral habitats were found to be more diverse than sea grass or sand. These results support the Friedlander et al. (2003) hypothesis that habitat complexity is an important factor in explaining fish assemblage characteristics such that the more complex the habitat, the more heterogeneous the assemblages. There are many reasons why a more complex habitat like coral could support greater fish diversity. Gratwicke and Speight (2004) identify the six components of habitat complexity that make it able to support more fish. These components include: 1) topographic complexity, 2) substratum diversity, 3) variety of refuge hole sizes, 4) vertical relief, 5) Page 48

percentage live cover, and 6) percentage hard substratum. Refuge holes, for instance, are a key difference between coral habitats and sea grass or sand. In the latter two, it is far more difficult for fish to conceal themselves from predators, making survivorship more difficult in these two areas. Percentage live cover is another key factor such that coral habitats have more food available than sea grass or sand. Resource availability is a crucial determinant of habitat. Though coral has significantly more fish taxa, there are potential confounding variables that could account for the statistical non-significance for sea grass and sand. Schooling behavior and mobility, for instance, are fish defense mechanisms exhibited by many of the sand dwelling fish. These behaviors may have caused the same fish to appear in numerous transects, moving across ocean floor locations. Sea grass, though containing slightly more taxa than sand, may have had less diversity than coral because species here were less likely to school and more likely to just be passing through to more complex regions. Coral contained both the highest diversity and significant fish occurrences, supporting the heterogeneity hypothesis of species richness and diversity. There are some limitations of the current study. Parker et al. (1994) point out the importance of the researcher s ability to recognize and identify species during sampling. The current study could be improved with greater knowledge and experience identifying Bermudian fish before sampling takes place. Though species richness was studied, the researcher s inexperience at fish identification made it only possible to identify fish genus or fish family in some cases. Therefore fish family is used here for consistency. Grober-Dunsmore et al. (2007) address fish migration. The proximity of the three sampling sites to each other could make it difficult to determine whether certain fish families mainly reside in the area they were identified in, or whether they were merely passing through, potentially confounding the data. Lastly, issues surrounding technology, specifically unavailability and dysfunction of video cameras forced fish identification to rely heavily on memory, making the written method of sampling less reliable. The current study contributes to our knowledge of fish habitats. This study forms a baseline of knowledge that could be monitored to distinguish growth or destruction of the three habitats. Using this baseline, marine conservation groups could better understand how to protect these fish communities. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Deb Robertson and Todd Livdahl for arranging and chaperoning the Ecology of Atlantic Shores class to Bermuda to conduct our research, the Bermuda Institute of Science for hosting our class and providing work space and supplies, Karissa Lear for assisting in the fish identification process, and my reviewer for his constructive criticism. Page 49

Literature Cited Friedlander, A. M., Brown, E. K., Jokiel, P. L., Smith, W. R., & Rodgers, K. S. 2003. Effects of habitat, wave exposure, and marine protected area status on coral reef fish assemblages in the Hawaiian archipelago. Coral Reefs 22: 291-305. Gratwicke, B. & Speight, M.R. 2004. The relationship between fish species richness, abundance, and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of Fish Biology 66: 650-667. Grober-Dunsmore, R., Frazer, T. K., Lindberg, W. J., & Beets, J. 2007. Reef fish and habitat relationships in a Caribbean seascape: the importance of reef context. Coral Reefs 26: 201-216. Parker Jr., R., Chester, A. J., & Nelson, R. S. 1994. A video transect method for estimating reef fish abundance, composition, and habitat utilization at Gray s Reef National Marine Sanctuary. Georgie. Fishery Bulletin 92: 787-799. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M. and Jeltsch, F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31: 79 92. Yoklavich, M., Caillet, G., Lea, R. N., Greene, H. G., Starr, R., De Marignac, J., & Field, J. 2002. Deepwater habitat and fish resources associated with the big creek marine ecological reserve. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations 43: 120-140. Page 50