Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations

Similar documents
Identifying mule deer migration routes to and from the Pinedale Anticline Project Area

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes Along the Pinedale Front

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes

The role of memory in shaping migratory behavior

Sublette Moose Project! 2014 Capture Report

Thank you in advance for considering this important issue. We hope that we may hear from you soon with a positive answer.

Mule deer migration and the Bald Mountain Mine a summary of baseline data

Improving Big Game Migration Corridors in Southwest Wyoming

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

The Role and Economic Importance of Private Lands in Providing Habitat for Wyoming s Big Game

San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CO; Availability of Record of

Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project. Summer 2017 Update

UTAH ACTION PLAN. For

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming

Summary of discussion

OREGON ACTION PLAN. Introduction

2009 Update. Introduction

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

Importance of un-named tributary streams to Brook Trout populations. Dr. Jonathan M. Niles Dr. Dan Ressler

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Sublette County WPLI Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 5, 2017 Pinedale, WY

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

NEVADA ACTION PLAN. For

Factors Influencing Cattle, Elk, and Mule Deer Distribution in Managed Forests

Wyoming Public Lands Initiative (WPLI) Fortification Creek Advisory Committee Meeting March 13, 2017

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

The Cumulative Impacts of Shoreline Armoring on Forage Fish Spawning Habitat in San Juan County, Washington

Wildlife Issues With Oil and Gas Exploration. Peter D. McKone, CWB Senior Project Director

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

Potential Effects of Oil and Gas Development on Mule Deer and Pronghorn Populations in Western Wyoming

Hunter use of public-access lands in the Rainwater Basin and beyond

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Assessing Ecosystem Impacts from Road Stream Crossings through Community Involvement

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Brendan A. Oates Curriculum Vitae April 2016

Sandhill Crane Hunting in Nebraska - Predicted Economic Effects

Deschutes Bull Trout

Deer Management Unit 252

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Mule deer and pronghorn migration in western Wyoming

Draft Wild Horse Management Plan

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming.

22 Questions from WildEarth Guardians - September 19, 2016

PUBLICATION OF THE WYOMING GAME & FISH DEPARTMENT JULY 2006 $2.00

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LION DAU L-1

Sustaining the Great Salt Lake Brine Shrimp Resource

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Susquehanna University and the PFBC Unassessed Waters Initiative in the Susquehanna Basin Jonathan M. Niles Mike Bilger

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Anak Pattanvibool,

Results of Argali Survey in Big Pamir and the Wakhjir Valley by the Marco Polo Sheep Survey Team 2008

Coastal and marine recreation in New England is ingrained in the region s economic and

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Early History, Prehistory

Comparison of Documents Norton: FWS-WDC. 1. What is the Porcupine caribou herd's historic calving range?

Final Review of New Information Appendix E AMPs-Sheep Allotments in Gravelly Mountains. c,llorttarta 'Fisft, MADISON RANGER DISTRICT.

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Using GPS Data for Arterial Mobility Performance Measures

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT CAPTURES, RELOCATIONS, AND REMOVALS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING

1. What is the National Wildlife Refuge System? 2. Who started the National Wildlife Refuge System? When?

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

Analyzing Human- Environment Interactions using GIS. Cape Breton Highlands Education Centre/Academy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Trout Unlimited and the Kittatinny Ridge Coalition.

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

Losing Ground. Energy Development s Impacts on the Wildlife, Landscapes, and Hunting Traditions of the American West

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

PROTECTING SAGE GROUSE AND THEIR HABITAT IN THE WEST. John Harja Senior Counsel on Detail to the Public Lands Office

Submitted to: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Developing a programme to make Taranaki predator-free

Appendix H RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS

Great Lakes Sea Duck Meeting: Project Summary and Focus Group Exercise Results July 2017 Winous Point Marsh Conservancy Port Clinton, Ohio

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

2008 WMU 502 white tailed deer, mule deer, and moose

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

Western native Trout Status report

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

WADE WEST INCENTIVE TAGS 2016 NDOW- REPORTING BIOLOGIST SCOTT ROBERTS

Deer Management Unit 152

Transcription:

2013 Annual Report Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations Teal Wyckoff 1,2, Matt Kauffman 3, Hall Sawyer 4, Shannon Albeke 2 1 Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 2 Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 3 US Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 4 Western EcoSystems Technology (WEST), Inc., Laramie, WY Introduction The Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and the University of Wyoming with support from the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) and Wyoming Wildlife: The Foundation (WWTF), initiated this project in 2011 with the following objectives: To evaluate the relationship between development intensity and behavior of migrating mule deer To assess whether development intensity impedes the ability of migratory mule deer to track phenology This project leverages data partnerships with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST). This project will be completed in July 2014. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 1

Study Area Migratory mule deer in southwestern Wyoming winter in basin sagebrush steppe habitat and follow greenup as they migrate in spring to higher elevation summer ranges. Data used in this study were collected for other long-term monitoring projects from the Pinedale area, the Atlantic Rim and the Platte Valley. These migrations vary in the amount of development each animal encounters, from relatively intact to heavily developed habitat. Background Migration in ungulates is an adaptive behavioral strategy to gain access to high quality forage and mediate effects of deep snow in winter. Because animals come off of winter range in an energy deficit, access to high quality spring forage is a critical part of a migratory ungulates annual energy budget. This study asks the question, how do increasing levels of development influence migratory mule deer behavior? Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 2

Intact Disturbed Understanding Behavioral Change Relative to Amount of Development We are evaluating each route for amount of disturbance, across a gradient of development from the most intact to the most disturbed migration corridors. Once each route is scored, the behavior of each animal is analyzed and compared. Anthropogenic Disturbance Human disturbance in southwestern Wyoming consists of a variety of human-developed landscape features, from energy development and associated roads and well pads, to housing development and all of its features traffic, dogs, horses, and other noise. We have developed a human footprint on the landscape that acts as a proxy for human presence, including traffic and associated noise and movement. Because southwest Wyoming is undergoing rapid expansion of energy resource extraction and associated housing development, we seek to understand what level of development can occur and still sustain viable migratory ungulate populations. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 3

Anthropogenic Disturbance An example (Pinedale area) of the anthropogenic data layers that have been created for evaluating the influence of development on mule deer movement and habitat use. Areas of blue indicate high levels of anthropogenic disturbance; areas in white indicate no disturbance. Combined Weight of Development Features These anthropogenic disturbance layers consist of a combination of GIS datasets: roads (residential, major, county, well pad roads) and well pads. We applied a kernel density estimate to each dataset individually with a maximum distance of 1 kilometer, and then combined the individual kernel density estimates and weighted each one by their relative influence as outlined by previous literature and field work. Quantifying Disturbance We know there is development along the migration route of a deer as she migrates from her summer range in Jackson, to her winter range along the Pinedale Front. Now we have a measure of that development, and can evaluate her behavior relative to the disturbance. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 4

Movement Rate At early phenology, plants are highest in crude protein and digestibility. When forage plants develop beyond early phenology, ungulates travel to higher elevation where plants are just beginning to emerge, effectively surfing the green wave. Development may cause impediments to this movement and reduce access to high quality forage. Thus fare, we have used GPS collar technology to evaluate if migrating animals alter their rate of travel through different portions of migration routes. These graph below depicts movement rate in gray dots for each individual animal in the Atlantic Rim area, and movement rate through development in the connected orange dot. In general, animals move faster through developed areas than through more intact portions of their migration routes. Three of these individuals are depicted in the map above, illustrating intact and disturbed habitat segments. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 5

Intact Habitat Disturbed Habitat Movement Rate Increases through Developed Areas Movement rates (Km per day) of mule deer in the Pinedale Area as they migrate through intact and disturbed portions of their migration routes represented here in a paired analysis of spring migrations. Similar to the Atlantic Rim, Pinedale mule deer generally move faster through developed portions of their migration routes, and slower through more intact habitat. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 6

Stopover Sites Mule deer use stopover areas to forage along their migration routes. Deer spend 95% of their time along their migration foraging in these stopovers, to which they have high fidelity between seasons and year. Stopover Use Stopover use (Km 2 per kilometer) of mule deer in the Atlantic Rim area in intact and disturbed portions of habitat along their migration routes represented here in a paired analysis. We found that most deer display a decreased area of stopover use in developed, compared to intact habitat. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 7

Stopover use before development Stopover use after development Decreased Stopover Use We found that stopover use decreased between years in an area of the Atlantic Rim that was developed during the summer of 2008. This makes the migration less viable for mule deer, and may indicate a reduction in the foraging benefit of migration. Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 8

Next Steps We are using behavioral information to identify critical thresholds in amount of development that alter how migrating deer use the landscape. For instance, at some threshold mule deer may stop using a migration route, or stop migrating altogether, thereby loosing access to the critical spring, summer and fall seasonal forage. Understanding these critical thresholds will enhance our ability to conserve migration routes and stopover areas. In addition to understanding behavioral changes of migratory mule deer, we will also assess the ability of deer to track changes in forage greenup across the landscape, and assess whether development impedes this ability. We anticipate project completion in 2014. Acknowledgements Thank you to all of our project supporters and partners without whom this project would not be possible. Major Financial Support has been provided by: Wyoming Game & Fish Department Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative Wyoming Wildlife: The Foundation Data partners making this project possible: Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. United States Geological Survey a Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations WY Coop Unit 11/15/2013 9