Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project. Summer 2017 Update

Similar documents
Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

2009 Update. Introduction

Sublette Moose Project! 2014 Capture Report

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Deer Management Unit 127

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

021 Deer Management Unit

Deer Management Unit 252

Deer Management Unit 152

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Deer Management Unit 122

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

DMU 038 Jackson County

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Deer Management Unit 349

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Ecology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park

Deer Management Unit 249

Evaluating the Influence of Development on Mule Deer Migrations

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

22 Questions from WildEarth Guardians - September 19, 2016

Sublette County WPLI Advisory Committee Meeting Summary April 5, 2017 Pinedale, WY

5/DMU 069 Otsego County Deer Management Unit

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

DMU 045 Leelanau County Deer Management Unit

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

DMU 040 Kalkaska County Deer Management Unit

DMU 024 Emmet County Deer Management Unit

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

Deer Management Unit 255

WGFD. News Release. Dec. 23, Contact: Al Langston (307) For Immediate Release:

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Early History, Prehistory

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. October 1, 2017

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Photo by Mark Hebblewhite

DMU 053 Mason County Deer Management Unit

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

DMU 057 Missaukee County Deer Management Unit

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Deer Population Student Guide

MORTALITY OF WHITE-TAILED DEER FAWNS IN THE WICHITA MOUNTAINS

DMU 073 Saginaw County Deer Management Unit

Influence of nutritional condition on migration, habitat selection and foraging ecology of elk (Cervus elaphus) in western Wyoming.

PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

DMU 332 Huron, Sanilac and Tuscola Counties Deer Management Unit

Pr oject Summar y. Principal Investigators: Walter Cook, Elizabeth Williams, Fred Lindzey, and Ron Grogan. University of Wyoming

DMU 047 Livingston County Deer Management Unit

SEA GRANT PROGRESS REPORT

Typical calf survivorship

Protect Our Reefs Grant Interim Report (October 1, 2008 March 31, 2009) Principal investigators: Donald C. Behringer and Mark J.

Population Dynamics and Adaptive Management of Yellowstone Bison

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

Oh Deer! Objectives. Background. Method. Materials

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

Subject: Scoping Comments Ochoco Summit OHV Trail Project

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L2

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

48 7 ( ; $ 6 :, / ' /, ) (

Science Skills Station

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Modern status of Sea otter population on the Commander Islands

By Kip Adams, Deer Project Leader, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department and Darrell Covell, UNH Wildlife Extension Specialist

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L3

Evolution by Natural Selection 1

2018 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Research Project Request Descriptions

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

Identifying Mule Deer Migration Routes Along the Pinedale Front

Improving Big Game Migration Corridors in Southwest Wyoming

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

DMU 046 Lenawee County Deer Management Unit

Search for the missing sea otters

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Fish Survey Report and Stocking Advice for Loch Milton. (Loch a Mhuilinn), May 2011

The Importance of Radio-collared Bears

DMU 082 Wayne County Deer Management Unit

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Transcription:

Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project Summer 2017 Update

TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT BACKGROUND... 3 WINTER 2016/2017... 4 Adult Survival... 4 Fawn Survival... 4 MARCH 2017 ADULT CAPTURES... 5 Nutritional Condition... 5 Pregnancy... 6 FAWN SURVIVAL... 7 Fawn Capture and Collaring... 7 Cause-Specific Mortality of Fawns... 8 Habitat and Maternal Conditions... 9 FUTURE RESEARCH EFFORTS... 9 Project Partners and Funders... 9 2

PROJECT BACKGROUND The Wyoming Range Mule Deer Project was initiated in March 2013. The overarching goal of the project is to investigate the nutritional relationships among habitat conditions, climate, and behavior to understand how these factors interact to regulate population performance. Since the initiation of the project, we have tracked and monitored the survival, behaviors, reproduction, and habitat conditions of 164 female, adult mule deer of the Wyoming Range. In March 2015, we expanded our research efforts to include evaluation of survival and cause-specific mortality of fawns belonging to our collared mule deer. This component of the project is aimed at unraveling the relative contributions of habitat, maternal nutrition, and predation on survival of young mule deer a study that is the first of it s kind in Wyoming. This update will report on some of our accomplishments and preliminary findings of adult survival and reproduction and will highlight the breadth of factors that contribute to fawn mortality in western Wyoming. So far, our research has gleaned invaluable insight into what regulates population performance of this iconic population, and we aim to further refine our understanding of the factors that affect the population with continued, robust data collection on various aspects of mule deer ecology, including nutrition and habitat contributions, predation, migration, reproduction, and survival. 3

WINTER 2016/2017 Adult Survival This last winter of 2016/2017 proved to be a tough one for mule deer. Conditions on winter ranges for Wyoming Range mule deer were severe with snowpack levels exceeding 200% and numerous days of sub-zero weather. These harsh winter conditions strongly affected winter survival and only 63% of our collared adults survived from November until summer 2017 (compared with >90% in years past). Older animals and animals that entered winter in poor condition were more susceptible to succumbing to winter exposure (Figure 1). a. b. Figure 1. The effects of age (a) and December body fat (IFBFat %; b) on the probability of survival overwinter. Probability of survival decreases as animals get older and as the % body fat (IFBFat %) in December decreases. Fawn Survival Winter conditions tend to have the greatest effect on survival of fawns and this winter was no exception. We observed 100% mortality of the fawns we collared in summer 2016 and had survived to the beginning of winter. Mortality rates of that caliber can have substantial repercussions on population dynamics because the majority of an entire cohort of deer is gone. Although these numbers are staggering, winter die-offs like the one observed this winter do occasionally occur and populations do eventually rebound. We have now found ourselves with a unique opportunity to evaluate how mule deer populations rebound from harsh winters. We retrieved all remains of mortalities of collared fawns. Whole carcasses were submitted to the Wyoming State Veterinary Lab and WGFD Wildlife Health Laboratory for necropsy. 4

MARCH 2017 ADULT CAPTURES Since March 2013, we have recaptured collared mule deer as they enter winter ranges in December and before they leave winter ranges in March. This has allowed us to track changes in nutritional condition and reproductive status of animals. Nutritional Condition Nutritional condition in March 2017, measured as % body fat, was the lowest we have observed in our research (averaging 1.8% ± 0.25; Figure 2). Although it is rare to see animals in this poor of condition, it was expected given the severity of the winter. We use ultrasonography to measure % body fat and evaluate pregnancy of collared mule deer. Figure 2. Average % body fat of adult, female mule deer on North (near Big Piney,WY) and South (near Cokeville and Evanston, WY) winter ranges for Wyoming Range mule deer. Deer were in significantly poorer shape in March 2017 than any other year. 5

Pregnancy Despite extremely poor nutritional condition of animals this March, fetal rates among winter ranges were comparable to the preceding 4 years (Figure 3) and pregnancy rates remained high. Interestingly, average eye diameter of fetuses was lower in March 2017 (14.0 ± 0.18) than in previous years (15.3 ± 0.11; Figure 4). Fetal eye diameter is a measure of fetal development and is often used to estimate the timing of birth. Figure 3. Fetal rates (average number of fetuses per pregnant animal) did not differ among years despite severe winter conditions. Figure 4. Average fetal eye diameter measured in March of each year. Fetal eye diameter was significantly smaller in March 2017 compared with any other year. 6

FAWN SURVIVAL Fawn Capture and Collaring Since March 2015, we have been capturing and collaring fawns of our collared adults to evaluate what factor most influence fawn survival. Fawns are located using a vaginal implanted transmitter (VIT) deployed in pregnant females that is expelled at birth. Once fawns are located, we then capture, radio-collare, and collecte a suite physical data (e.g., body weight). We then monitored daily survival of collared fawns. Over the three summers, we have tracked the survival of 194 mule deer fawns throughout the Wyoming Range. 2015 2016 2017 - So Far Number of Fawns Tracked Summer Mortality Median Birthdate Average Weight at Birth 58 70 66 45% 56% 44% June 10 June 13 June 16 3.56 (± 0.098) 3.41 (±0.093) 3.04 (±0.099) Newborn fawns caught in 2017 were significantly lighter than newborn fawns caught in previous years (Figure 5). This was of little surprise because of the overall poor nutritional condition of pregnant females and the smaller eye diameter of fetuses measured in March 2017. With this information, we are now in a position to better evaluate the influence of birth weight and maternal condition on summer survival of fawns. Figure 5. Average weight of fawns captured <48hours from birth. Fawns were significantly lighter in 2017 compared with the previous two years. 7

Cause-Specific Mortality of Fawns To evaluate cause-specific mortality of fawns, we track daily survival of all fawns captured over the course of the summer. When a mortality is detected, we immediately investigate the event to ensure an accurate assessment of the cause of mortality. There is a breadth of various causes for fawn mortality including predation, disease, malnutrition, drowning, hypothermia, vehicle-collision, and just getting caught up in vegetation. The proportion of fawns that die because of the aforementioned causes varies from year to year (Figure 6). So far, in summer 2017, 30% of mortalities were because fawns were stillborn. Currently, this is leading cause of death for fawns in 2017, but that will inevitably change as the summer progresses and more fawns die of other causes such as disease and predation. Figure 6. The relative occurrences of various causes of mortality for mule deer fawns. Cause of Mortality: Malnutrition 8 Cause of Mortality: Predation

Habitat and Maternal Conditions The condition of a female and the habitat conditions she experiences in the summer may be very important in predicting and understanding fawn survival especially in understanding the influence of malnutrition and disease on fawn survival. Therefore, we are evaluating forage and habitat conditions within summer home ranges of collared deer. Specifically, we are measuring habitat structure and forage availability of known locations of use by collared adults that gave birth to fawns. We will then couple these data with information on maternal condition (i.e., nutritional condition) and evaluate the influence on fawn survival. FUTURE RESEARCH EFFORTS Throughout summer and winter of 2017, we will continue our research efforts aimed at elucidating the relative influence of predation, climate, and habitat conditions on fawn survival in the Wyoming Range. The severe winter conditions of 2017 will provide us with a unique opportunity to evaluate how severe winter weather may influence the ability of females to subsequently rear young, and thus, provide valuable insight into the factors that regulate population growth and examine the prospects for recovery of this cherished herd. Project Partners and Funders The Wyoming Range Deer Project is a collaborative partnership in inception, development, operations, and funding. Without all the active partners, this work would not be possible. Funds have been provided by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Wyoming Game and Fish Commission, Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust, Muley Fanatic Foundation, Bureau of Land Management, Knobloch Family Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey, National Science Foundation, Wyoming Governor s Big Game License Coalition, Boone and Crockett Club, Animal Damage Management Board, Ridgeline Energy Atlantic Power, Bowhunters of Wyoming, and the Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association. Special thanks to the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Bureau of Land Management, and Wyoming State Veterinary Lab for assistance with logistics, lab analyses, and fieldwork. Also, thanks to the Cokeville Meadows National Wildlife Refuge and U.S. Forest Service for providing field housing. For additional information: Kevin Monteith Haub School/WY Coop Unit (307) 766-2322 kevin.monteith@uwyo.edu Gary Fralick WY Game & Fish Dept. (307) 730-2802 gary.fralick@wyo.gov Samantha Dwinnell Haub School (507) 384-2903 sdwinnel@uwyo.edu 9