ZONE ANALYSIS FOR BICYCLE PLANNING. Department of Transportation Safe Streets Division Bicycle & Pedestrian Program June 2018

Similar documents
Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE

5.13 Soledad. Demographic Profile. Disadvantaged Communities. Safety Profile

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

APPENDIX E BIKEWAY PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

Methodology. Reconnecting Milwaukee: A BikeAble Study of Opportunity, Equity and Connectivity

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Bike Share Social Equity and Inclusion Target Neighborhoods

Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Analyzing Gainesville s Bicycle Infrastructure

TR NEWS. Public Health and Transportation. Innovation, Intervention, and Improvements NUMBER 299 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2015

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Rail Station Fact Sheet UNT Dallas Station

Rail Station Fact Sheet Downtown Carrollton Station

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

Evaluation of San Diego's First CicloSDias Open Streets Event

Existing Pedestrian Conditions. PSAC February 8, 2011

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST CRASH ANALYSIS 2015

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

The North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy and Western Richmond Terrace 1 : The Forgotten Corridor

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

APPENDIX A. Outreach Summary

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Rail Station Fact Sheet Buckner Station

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

SF Transportation Plan Update

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Rail Station Fact Sheet North Side Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

G AT E WAY PLAN. Community BRIEFING KIT GATEWAY BIKE

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Rail Station Fact Sheet Downtown Denton Transit Center

Transportation 2040 Update: Eudora Public Input As of June 1, 2017

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study. Old Colony Planning Council

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT

Agenda. US-1 Corridor Study and HIA Update. Pathway Diagram / Primary Indicators. Research Questions. Linking Multimodal Improvements to Indicators

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

VISION ZERO: What will it take?

As a part of the San Mateo Bicycle Master Plan update, Toole Design conducted a needs and demand analysis that included:

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

AMENDING MOTION: Mobility Plan - Pedestrians and Disadvantaged Communities

City of Frederick Bike Share Feasibility Study i

This page intentionally left blank.

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Bicycle Facilities Planning

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study


RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

North Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for

BICYCLE ACTIVITY AND ATTITUDES SURVEY

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

San Francisco Streetscape Prioritization. Best Practices Review. November 2014

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1994 through 2000

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Transcription:

ZONE ANALYSIS FOR BICYCLE PLANNING Department of Transportation Safe Streets Division Bicycle & Pedestrian Program June 2018

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 DEFINING THE ZONES...4 BASIC FACTS...5 SOCIOECONOMICS...6 BICYCLING RATES...9 BIKEABILITY...20 SAFETY...30 NEXT STEPS...35 SOURCES & ENDNOTES...37 OLDER DATA FOR COMPARISON...44 2

INTRODUCTION Oakland is a city of contrasts by race and income, but also by geography: food culture amidst food deserts and tent cities within blocks of million-dollar bungalows. Oakland is flat and hilly. Downtown is central to just half of the city, and 88% of Oakland s BART stations are clustered in 34% of the city s land area. What does this mean for bicycle planning? Citywide averages hide differences that are critical to understanding Oakland. Analyzing data by geographical zone can bring these differences into focus. Because of the differences between zones, different zones will have different solutions. What datasets can we draw upon to improve Oakland s bicycle planning? Socioeconomics Race & ethnicity Income Age Disability Geography Topography Proximity to Downtown Proximity to BART Infrastructure Pavement quality Bikeways Bicycle parking One parent households Rent burdened households Language barriers Motor vehicle access Bicycle Use Bicycling rates Crashes Traffic stress 3

DEFINING Determination THE of Zones ZONES Zones highlight the similarities within each zone and the contrasts between zones that may be hidden in citywide averages. The size of the zones seek to balance land area and population (given large variations in density). The eight zones follow census tract boundaries and geographic edges created by topography, neighborhoods, and freeways. Variations within a single zone may be analyzed by comparing data for the census tracts in each zone. 4

BASIC FACTS Zone Area (Square Miles) Population Population Per Square Mile Number of Workers Number of Bicycle Commuters Percent of Bicycle Commuters Female Bicycle Commuters Male Bicycle Commuters Bicycle Commuters Per Square Mile Central East Oakland 7.8 98,937 12,684 38,031 308 0.8% 23% 77% 39 Coliseum / Airport 6.2 3,752 605 1,486 28 1.9% 29% 71% 5 Downtown / West Oakland 7.4 45,032 6,085 21,869 1,067 4.9% 38% 62% 144 East Oakland Hills 10.3 30,733 2,984 15,126 70 0.5% 41% 59% 7 Eastlake / Fruitvale 5.8 98,739 17,024 45,631 1,157 2.5% 28% 72% 199 Glenview / Redwood Heights 3.7 31,976 8,642 16,876 270 1.6% 20% 80% 73 North Oakland Hills 8.8 23,658 2,704 12,677 62 0.5% 82% 18% 7 North Oakland / Adams Point 5.6 79,213 14,145 47,779 3,161 6.6% 43% 57% 564 Citywide 55.6 412,040 7,417 199,475 6,123 3.1% 38% 62% 110 Across the city bicycling rates vary sharply, with the highest levels of commuting in North Oakland / Adams Point and Eastlake / Fruitvale, and lowest levels of bicycle commuting in the zones furthest from downtown. The cells in dark blue are the high value for each column and the cells in white are the low value. The density of bike commuters varies dramatically, from a high of 564 per square mile to a low of 5 per square mile. 5

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning SOCIOECONOMICS

COMMUNITIES OF CONCERN Communities of Concern is a metric created by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to identify areas of socioeconomic disadvantage using eight indicators from the US Census Bureau. In the MTC s analysis, large extents of Oakland are identified as Communities of Concern. The City of Oakland reworked the metric from a binary output to a continuous output. This allows Oakland to understand the extent of socioeconomic disadvantage within MTC s Communities of Concern. Zone Minority Low-Income Limited English Speakers People in Zero Vehicle Households Seniors Over 75 People with a Disability People in Single- Parent Families Cost-Burdened Renters Total Disadvantaged Population Score Central East Oakland 93% 55% 16% 12% 3% 12% 25% 16% 0.91 Coliseum / Airport 96% 50% 17% 6% 4% 13% 16% 12% 0.83 Downtown / West Oakland 77% 51% 15% 44% 7% 19% 17% 26% 1.00 East Oakland Hills 73% 22% 3% 8% 7% 12% 16% 8% 0.58 Eastlake / Fruitvale 85% 49% 22% 16% 5% 13% 17% 18% 0.88 Glenview / Redwood Heights 48% 16% 5% 8% 6% 9% 11% 6% 0.43 North Oakland Hills 31% 6% 1% 2% 7% 8% 8% 1% 0.25 North Oakland / Adams Point 50% 27% 4% 20% 5% 11% 9% 17% 0.56 Citywide 73% 39% 12% 17% 5% 12% 16% 15% 0.74 7

ADDITIONAL Socioeconomic Data SOCIOECONOMICS Zone Median Household Income Under 18 Asian Black / African American Hispanic / Latino Non-Hispanic White Other Race Central East Oakland $42,562 29% 5% 34% 50% 7% 7% Coliseum / Airport $44,125 29% 4% 35% 53% 4% 7% Downtown / West Oakland $38,532 15% 25% 32% 14% 23% 7% East Oakland Hills $89,483 18% 11% 41% 14% 27% 10% Eastlake / Fruitvale $44,562 21% 28% 18% 34% 15% 8% Glenview / Redwood Heights $102,936 21% 16% 14% 11% 52% 9% North Oakland Hills $157,550 19% 14% 5% 6% 69% 6% North Oakland / Adams Point $75,655 12% 11% 20% 12% 50% 9% Citywide $57,778 20% 16% 25% 27% 27% 8% These socioeconomic data help communicate who is living in each zone. Understanding these differences is shaping how available resources are turned into meaningful services: serve each zone differently, based on the needs of the people in each zone. The above data are related to (but not explicit) in the analysis of Communities of Concern. They help in understanding that socioeconomic indicators vary widely across the city. Median household income highlights the economic stratification across the city with a difference of over $100,000 between the wealthiest zone and the four poorest zones. 8

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning BICYCLING RATES

BICYCLE COMMUTERS COMMUTER BICYCLING COMMUTER BICYCLING 7000 6000 2.9% 3.0% 5000 Over the past 25 years, the number of commuter bicyclists has more than tripled, with most of that growth in the past 10 years. 2.7% 2.9% 4000 2.2% 3000 1.5% 1.2% 2000 1000 1.1% The data labels are the percent bicycle mode share for select years. In the past few years, the mode share has been leveling off while the number of bike commuters continues to rise due to the growth of Oakland workers. 0 YEAR 10

BICYCLE 2000 US Census: COMMUTERS Oakland bicycle mode (2000) share by tract 11 11

2005-2009 ACS: Oakland bicycle mode share by tract BICYCLE COMMUTERS (2005-2009) 12 12

BICYCLE 2010-2014 American COMMUTERS Community Survey: Oakland (2010-2014) Bicycle Mode Share by Tract 13 13

BICYCLISTS TO BART (2008) 14

BICYCLISTS TO BART (2015) 15

BICYCLE MODE SHARE BY CENSUS TRACT NUMBER OF CENSUS TRACTS 20 18 16 14 18 17 16 13 This graph shows the number of census tracts by percentage of commuter bicyclists. In 2000, five census tracts had 5% or more of residents commuting by bicycle as their primary means of transportation. By 2010-2014, that number increased to 24 census tracts. 12 10 9 10 9 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 PERCENT BICYCLE MODE SHARE 2000 US Census 2005-2009 American Community Survey 2010-2014 American Community Survey 16 16

BICYCLING TO WORK AND TO BART BICYCLISTS 4500 4000 3500 3000 This table compares bicycle use in the late 2000s to the mid 2010s. It combines bicycle commuter data from the US Census Bureau with home-based bicycle trips to BART. The numbers at the top of each column are the total number of daily bicyclists from both datasets, for each zone, and for each of the two time periods. 3,083 4,240 2500 2000 2,099 1,958 1500 1000 973 929 617 500 368 133 183 155 204 75 0 23 55 0 Central East Oakland Coliseum/Airport Downtown/West Oakland East Oakland Hills Eastlake/Fruitvale Glenview/Redwood Heights North Oakland Hills North Oakland/Adams Point HOME ZONE Bicycle Commuters (2005-2009 ACS) Bicyclists to BART (2008) Bicycle Commuters (2010-2014 ACS) Bicyclists to BART (2015) 17

BICYCLISTS BICYCLISTS TO BART BY STATION 1200 1000 Over the past 20 years, the number of people bicycling to Oakland BART stations has increased more than fivefold, from 776 (1998) to 1,753 (2008) to 4,280 (2015). Of BART s 43 stations, the top five stations by number of bicyclists are all Oakland stations. 800 764 792 705 659 630 600 544 400 359 200 0 221 154 72 45 51 56 13 227 12th Street 19th Street Coliseum / Oakland Airport 283 224 244 199 161 167 114 96 29 Fruitvale Lake Merritt MacArthur Rockridge West Oakland BART STATION 1998 2008 2015 18

BICYCLISTS TO BART MODE SHARE BY STATION BICYCLE MODE SHARE 22% 20% 18% Over the past 20 years, the percentage of bicyclists accessing Oakland BART stations more than tripled, from 3.0% (1998) to 10.9% (2015). Of BART s 43 stations, the top four stations by bicycle mode share are Oakland stations. 16% 14% 14.3% 14.8% 14.0% 12% 10% 9.9% 10.9% 12.2% 8% 8.2% 8.2% 7.2% 6% 4% 2% 1.1% 2.6% 5.8% 2.5% 6.2% 2.2% 0.5% 5.3% 4.3% 5.4% 4.4% 4.8% 4.8% 3.1% 0.9% 0% 12th Street 19th Street Coliseum / Oakland Airport Fruitvale Lake Merritt MacArthur Rockridge West Oakland BART STATION 1998 2008 2015 19

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning BIKEABILITY

STREET SLOPE Note: Some individual street segments in the flatlands have anomalous slopes. This may be caused by embankments, bridges, and other aerial structures like elevated BART tracks. 21

STREET SLOPE PERCENT OF ROADWAY MILES 30% 25% 20% Oakland is both very flat and extremely hilly. This graph shows the proportion of streets in each zone by the slope of those streets. 15% 10% 5% 0% MAXIMUM SLOPE OF STREET SEGMENT Central East Oakland Coliseum / Airport North Oakland Hills Glenview / Redwood Heights East Oakland Hills Downtown / West Oakland Eastlake / Fruitvale North Oakland / Adams Point Maximum Slope of Street Segment Central East Oakland Coliseum / Airport Downtown / West Oakland East Oakland Hills Eastlake / Fruitvale Percent of Zone Roadway Miles Glenview / Redwood Heights North Oakland Hills North Oakland / Adams Point 0-3% 91% 80% 92% 28% 78% 35% 9% 77% 62% 3-6% 6% 8% 2% 39% 17% 41% 27% 17% 19% 6-9% 2% 9% 3% 23% 4% 19% 32% 5% 12% 9+% 1% 4% 2% 11% 1% 5% 31% 2% 7% Citywide Slope Weighted by Segment Length 1.3% 2.1% 1.2% 5.1% 2.1% 4.7% 7.6% 2.1% 3.2% 22

DISTANCE Distance Proximity to to TO Downtown DOWNTOWN This map shows the distance to Downtown (at Broadway / 14 th Street) to the center of each census tract as a measure of the access each zone has to the city s center. When overlaid with the map of bicycle commuters, there is a strong relationship between bicycle commuting and distance to Downtown. Tracts within a one-mile radius have fewer cyclists, likely due to the practicality of walking to work. Zone Central East Oakland Coliseum / Airport Downtown / West Oakland East Oakland Hills Eastlake / Fruitvale Glenview / Redwood Heights North Oakland Hills North Oakland / Adams Point Miles to Downtown 5.6 6.2 1.3 7.0 2.5 3.5 4.1 2.1 23

PROXIMITY Proximity to Bart BART TO BART 24

Percent of Zone Area Bike Commute Percent Proximity PROXIMITY to BART TO BART BART s original design planned for automobile access to BART stations for professionals working in the downtowns of San Francisco and Oakland. Through transit-oriented development, BART stations are now hubs for investment. BART plus bikes is a strategy for making BART valuable to those who do not work near a BART station. For most zones, there is a strong correlation between BART proximity and bicycle commuter mode share, except Central East Oakland which has high BART proximity but a low bicycle commuter mode share. 100% 7% 90% 80% 6% Area Within Radius of 0 BART Stations 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% Area Within Radius of 1 BART Station Area Within Radius of 2 or More BART Stations Bike Commuter Mode Share 0% North Oakland / Adams Point Downtown / West Oakland Eastlake / Fruitvale Coliseum / Airport Glenview / Redwood Heights Central East Oakland North Oakland Hills East Oakland Hills 0% Zone 25

PAVEMENT QUALITY The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a means for measuring and analyzing the quality of pavement on Oakland s streets. It ranks street segments on a scale of 0 to 100 where higher values indicate better pavement quality. The mean PCI for all streets is comparable across the zones (between 52 and 59). Bikeways tend to have better pavement than other streets. This is the result of 10 years of work to coordinate paving projects with bikeway construction. Zone Central East Oakland Coliseum / Airport Downtown / West Oakland East Oakland Hills Eastlake / Fruitvale Glenview / Redwood Heights North Oakland Hills North Oakland /Adams Point Citywide Mean PCI 56 58 59 58 55 55 52 53 56 Mean PCI for Existing Bikeways Mean PCI for Proposed Bikeways 73 88 67 69 78 62 63 71 70 66 62 63 70 72 60 65 69 67 26

EXISTING Bicycle Bikeway Network BIKEWAY NETWORK Oakland s existing bikeway network is the most developed in the zones that are closest to downtown and have the best BART access. These zones also have the most bicycle commuters and the busiest BART stations for bicyclists. Since the early 2010s, Oakland has had a bikeway network with basic connectivity. Work is now focused on improving the quality of bikeways, and extending the network into new areas with unrealized potential for bicycle use. Better Bikeways Zone Bike Paths (mi) Bike Lanes (mi) Bike Boulevards (mi) Arterial Bike Routes (mi) Other Bikeways Bike Routes (mi) Total Existing Bikeways (mi) Total Roadways (mi) Bikeways out of all Roadway Miles Central East Oakland 1 10 1 1 1 13 184 7% Coliseum / Airport 7 1 0 0 0 9 54 16% Downtown / West Oakland 14 23 1 2 2 41 169 25% East Oakland Hills 0 0 0 0 16 16 146 11% Eastlake / Fruitvale 2 13 3 6 1 24 160 15% Glenview / Redwood Heights 0 3 1 1 3 7 88 8% North Oakland Hills 1 1 0 0 18 21 139 15% North Oakland / Adams Point 1 18 5 3 0 28 157 18% Citywide 27 69 10 13 40 160 1,096 15% 27

PROPOSED BIKEWAY NETWORK Oakland s proposed bikeway network includes 251 centerline miles of streets and paths. Better Bikeways include dedicated space for bicyclists (bike paths, bike lanes) and streets with low motor vehicle volumes and speeds (bike boulevards). Other Bikeways have bicyclists sharing lanes with motorists on busier streets, including bike routes for recreational cycling in the Oakland Hills. The shared lanes in the Oakland Flatlands (arterial bike routes) are narrow busy streets that will require tradeoffs to create Better Bikeways with dedicated space for bicyclists. Better Bikeways Zone Bike Paths (mi) Bike Lanes (mi) Bike Boulevards (mi) Arterial Bike Routes (mi) Other Bikeways Bike Routes (mi) Total Proposed Bikeways (mi) Total Roadways (mi) Bikeways out of all Roadway Miles Central East Oakland 5 21 8 5 0 39 184 21% Coliseum / Airport 8 8 1 1 0 18 54 34% Downtown / West Oakland 17 33 1 3 0 55 169 33% East Oakland Hills 1 6 1 6 13 26 146 18% Eastlake / Fruitvale 6 20 5 6 0 37 160 23% Glenview / Redwood Heights 1 3 7 7 0 17 88 20% North Oakland Hills 1 5 1 1 15 23 139 17% North Oakland / Adams Point 1 23 7 5 0 35 157 23% Citywide 40 118 31 34 28 251 1,096 23% 28

BICYCLE PARKING Oakland s CityRacks Bicycle Parking Program has installed bicycle racks by public request since 1994. The location of bike racks is thus a useful indicator of where historically there has been bicycling activity and demand for bicycle parking. The racks also indicate the locations of commercial activity. (The CityRacks Program has not installed bike parking in residential areas for residential use.) Bike racks are concentrated in Downtown and in neighborhood commercial districts. Zone Central East Oakland Coliseum / Airport Downtown / West Oakland East Oakland Hills Eastlake / Fruitvale Glenview / Redwood Heights North Oakland Hills North Oakland / Adams Point Citywide Bike Parking Spaces 585 62 4,095 30 1,152 312 314 3,350 9,900 Bike Parking Spaces per Square Mile Bike Parking Spaces per Bicycle Commuter 75 10 553 3 199 84 36 598 178 1.9 2.7 5.2 0.9 1.1 1.3 3.3 1.2 1.8 29

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning SAFETY

BICYCLIST-INVOLVED Collision Crashes CRASHES BY SEVERITY This map and table show five years of bicyclist-involved crashes that resulted in a bicyclist injury or fatality. Note the lines of dots along specific streets like International Blvd, San Pablo Ave, and Grand Ave. The areas with the greatest number of bicyclist crashes generally match the areas with the greatest number of bicyclists. Normalizing the crashes by the number of bicycle commuters or by land area provides limited insight. For example, the East Oakland Hills has few crashes and even fewer bicycle commuters, resulting in the highest crash rate. Zone Fatalities Severe Injuries Other Injuries Total Crashes Crashes per 100 Bicycle Commuters per Year Crashes per Square Mile per Year Central East Oakland 3 8 112 123 7.9 3.2 Coliseum / Airport 0 3 6 9 7.8 0.3 Downtown / West Oakland 2 21 279 302 7.6 8.2 East Oakland Hills 0 3 12 15 9.1 0.3 Eastlake / Fruitvale 1 19 188 208 4.1 7.2 Glenview / Redwood Heights 0 2 23 25 2.1 1.4 North Oakland Hills 0 3 27 30 6.4 0.7 North Oakland / Adams Point 2 14 254 270 1.9 9.6 No Location Available 1 7 62 70 N/A N/A Citywide 9 80 963 1052 3.9 3.8 31

BICYCLIST-INVOLVED Collision CRASHES BY RACE & ETHNICITY This map and table show five years of bicyclist-involved crashes that resulted in a bicyclist injury or fatality. The crashes are categorized by the race / ethnicity of the bicyclists. The number of crashes by race / ethnicity is compared to survey results that identified the race / ethnicity of people who had biked in the previous month. People who identified as Black or White are over-represented in crashes. People who identified as Asian or Hispanic are under-represented in crashes. The zones with the most crashes for a given race / ethnicity generally match the zones with those populations and the most bicyclists. Zone Asian Black Hispanic White Other Blank - Not Stated Total Central East Oakland 2 74 31 10 2 4 123 Coliseum / Airport 0 4 3 2 0 0 9 Downtown / West Oakland 21 85 27 141 9 19 302 East Oakland Hills 0 2 1 12 0 0 15 Eastlake / Fruitvale 14 54 55 63 8 14 208 Glenview / Redwood Heights 1 3 3 16 2 0 25 North Oakland Hills 1 2 0 27 0 0 30 North Oakland / Adams Point 13 55 18 162 11 11 270 No Location Available 7 16 5 36 3 3 70 Citywide Totals 59 295 143 469 35 51 1052 Percent of All Crashes 6% 28% 14% 45% 3% 5% 100% Biked for Any Reason in the Past Month 18% 19% 31% 32% 32

BICYCLIST-INVOLVED Collision CRASHES BY AGE This map and table show five years of bicyclist-involved crashes that resulted in a bicyclist injury or fatality. Bicyclists aged 15 through 49 are overrepresented in crashes compared to their share of the population. Downtown / West Oakland had the largest number of crashes for all categories from 15 to 64 years of age. Central East Oakland had the largest number of crashes involving children and youth (ages 5-14) while Eastlake / Fruitvale had the largest number of crashes involving seniors (ages 65-84). Zone 5-14 15-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65-84 Not Stated Total Central East Oakland 26 19 17 31 26 3 1 123 Coliseum / Airport 1 2 2 3 1 0 0 9 Downtown / West Oakland 7 54 113 70 44 5 9 302 East Oakland Hills 1 3 4 4 3 0 0 15 Eastlake / Fruitvale 16 45 50 47 38 12 0 208 Glenview / Redwood Heights 3 2 6 8 6 0 0 25 North Oakland Hills 0 2 5 9 12 2 0 30 North Oakland / Adams Point 9 53 103 59 39 6 1 270 No Location Available 1 5 18 17 23 6 0 70 Citywide Totals 64 185 318 248 192 34 11 1052 Percent of All Crashes 6% 18% 30% 24% 18% 3% 1% 100% Percent of the Oakland Population 11% 10% 18% 22% 18% 10% 33

BICYCLIST-INVOLVED Collision Crashes CRASHES BY SEX This map and table show five years of bicyclist-involved crashes that resulted in a bicyclist injury or fatality. While women were 38% of Oakland s bicycle commuters, they were only 25% of the bicyclists involved in crashes. These proportions are similar across Oakland. Men are more likely to commute by bicycle, and male bicyclists are even more likely to be involved in crashes. Zone Female Male Not Stated Total Female-to-Male-Involved Crashes Female-to-Male Bicycle Commuter Central East Oakland 19 102 2 123 1 to 5 1 to 4 Coliseum / Airport 2 7 0 9 1 to 3 1 to 2 Downtown / West Oakland 86 213 3 302 1 to 2 1 to 2 East Oakland Hills 3 12 0 15 1 to 4 1 to 2 Eastlake / Fruitvale 41 167 0 208 1 to 4 1 to 2 Glenview/Redwood Heights 6 19 0 25 1 to 3 1 to 3 North Oakland Hills 6 24 0 30 1 to 4 3 to 1 North Oakland / Adams Point 80 186 4 270 1 to 2 1 to 2 No Location Available 24 46 0 70 1 to 2 N/A Citywide 267 776 9 1052 1 to 3 1 to 2 34

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning NEXT STEPS

NEXT STEPS Work is underway to add analysis in these areas: Bicyclist Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) Bicyclist suitability, by combining street slope and LTS Future work may explore these areas: Public health data AC Transit data Hospital crash data Proximity to jobs Sales tax revenues Student populations and school-related issues 36

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning SOURCES & ENDNOTES

SOURCES Page Page Number Cover 1 Streets INTRODUCTION 3 BART fact Topic Source Table/Other Info Universe City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit DEFINING THE ZONES 4 Census Tract Boundaries 2016 Bureau of Census Water Features BASIC FACTS 5 Area City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit US Department of Commerce. Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles - Census Tracts for California Population ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Total Population Workers and Bicycle Commuters COMMUNITIES OF CONCERN 7 All COC Topics ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates MTC Communities of Concern 2018 derived from 2012-2016 ACS 5 Year Estimates B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Workers 16 years and over Population ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Total Population Minority ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B03002 HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE Total Population Low-Income Limited English Speakers ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates C17002 RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS B1605 NATIVITY BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER Population For Whom Povery Status is Determined Population 5 Years and Older Zero Vehicle Households ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B08201 HOUSEHOLD SIZE BY VEHICLES AVAILABLE Households Seniors Over 75 ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B01001 SEX BY AGE Total Population People with a Disability ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates C18108 AGE BY NUMBER OF DISABILITIES Single Parent Families Cost Burdened Renters Average size of household and rented household ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B11004 FAMILY TYPE BY PRESENCE AND AGE OF RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS B25070 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS B25010 AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE OF OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE Average size of 1 parent family ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates S1101 HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES ADDITIONAL SOCIOECONOMICS 8 Median Household Income ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates Population, Age, Race, and Ethnicity B19013 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS (IN 2016 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Families Renter-occupied housing units Occupied housing units (Oakland city, California) Households for Alameda County Tracts 38

SOURCES Page Page Page Topic Source Table/Other Info Universe Page Number Topic Source Table/Other Info Universe Number MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR COMMUTER BICYCLING 10 Bicycle Commuters City 2000 of Census Oakland's Summary Departent File 3of Workers 16 years and over Cover 1 Streets WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER Information Technology, GIS Unit MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR City 2010 of Census Oakland's Summary Departent File 3of Workers 16 years and over INTRODUCTION 3 BART fact WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER Information Technology, GIS Unit B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF ACS 1 Year Estimates 2005-2016 US Department of Commerce. Cartographic Boundary Workers 16 years and over DEFINING THE ZONES 4 Census Tract Boundaries 2016 Bureau of Census TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Shapefiles - Census Tracts for California BICYCLE COMMUTER AND City of Oakland's Departent of BICYCLIST TO BART, BICYCLE MODE Water Features Information Technology, GIS Unit SHARE BY CENSUS TRACT, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK FOR 11-19 Bicycle Commuters City 2000 of Census Oakland's Summary Departent File 3of Workers 16 years and over BICYCLING BASIC TO WORK FACTS AND TO 5 Area WORKERS 16 YEARS AND OVER Information Technology, GIS Unit BART, BICYCLISTS TO BART BY Population ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Total Population STATION Workers and Bicycle B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF ACS 2012-2016 Year Estimates Workers 16 years and over Commuters B08006 TRANSPORTATION SEX OF WORKERS TO BY WORK MEANS OF Bicycle Commuters ACS 2005-2009 5 Year Estimates Workers 16 years and over TRANSPORTATION TO WORK MTC Communities of Concern 2018 COMMUNITIES OF CONCERN 7 All COC Topics derived from 2012-2016 ACS 5 Year B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF Bicycle Commuters ACS 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates Workers 16 years and over Estimates TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Population 1998 ACS 2012-2016 BART Station 5 Year Profile Estimates Survey B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Base: Home Total origins Population only, systemwide Bicycle to BART Commuters Minority ACS 2012-2016 (weekdays) 5 Year Estimates B03002 HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE Total estimate Population 2008 BART Station Profile Survey C17002 RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL IN Base: Population Home For origins Whom only, Povery systemwide Bicycle to Status Low-Income BART Commuters ACS 2012-2016 (weekdays) 5 Year Estimates THE PAST 12 MONTHS is Determined estimate 2015 BART Station Profile Survey B1605 NATIVITY BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Base: Home origins only, systemwide Bicycle to BART Commuters Limited English Speakers ACS 2012-2016 (weekdays) 5 Year Estimates BY ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH FOR THE Population estimate 5 Years and Older City of Oakland's Departent of POPULATION 5 YEARS AND OVER BART Station/BART routes Zero Vehicle Households Information ACS 2012-2016 Technology, 5 Year Estimates GIS Unit B08201 HOUSEHOLD SIZE BY VEHICLES AVAILABLE Households Seniors Over 75 ACS City 2012-2016 of Oakland's 5 Year Departent Estimates of BART Locations B01001 SEX BY AGE Total Population Information Technology, GIS Unit Civilian Noninstitutionalized People with a Disability ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates C18108 AGE BY NUMBER OF DISABILITIES US Department of Commerce. Cartographic Boundary Population Census Tract Boundaries 2016 Bureau of Census B11004 Shapefiles FAMILY -TYPE Census BY Tracts PRESENCE for California AND AGE OF Single Parent Families ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates Families City of Oakland's Departent of RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS Water Features Information Technology, GIS Unit B25070 GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF Cost Burdened Renters ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates Renter-occupied housing units City of Oakland's Departent of HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS STREET SLOPE 21-22 Average size Street of Slope household and B25010 AVERAGE Analyzed HOUSEHOLD by Eric Tucker Information SIZE OF OCCUPIED Occupied housing units (Oakland city, ACS 2012-2016 Technology, 5 Year Estimates GIS Unit rented household City of Oakland's Departent of HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE California) Average Streets size of 1 Layer parent family Information ACS 2012-2016 Technology, 5 Year Estimates GIS Unit S1101 HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES B19013 B08006 MEDIAN SEX HOUSEHOLD OF WORKERS INCOME BY MEANS IN THE OF PAST Households for Alameda County ADDITIONAL DISTANCE TO SOCIOECONOMICS DOWNTOWN 23 8 Median Bicycle Household Commuters Income ACS 2012-2016 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates 12 MONTHS (IN 2016 INFLATION-ADJUSTED Workers 16 years and over TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Tracts US Department of Commerce. DOLLARS) Cartographic Boundary Population, Census Tract Age, Boundaries Race, and 2016 Bureau of Census ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates DP05 ACS Shapefiles DEMOGRAPHIC - Census Tracts AND HOUSING for California ESTIMATES Ethnicity City of Oakland's Departent of PROXIMITY TO BART 24-25 BART Locations Information Technology, GIS Unit US Department of Commerce. Cartographic Boundary Census Tract Boundaries 2016 Bureau of Census Shapefiles - Census Tracts for California B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF Bicycle Commuter Mode Share ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates Workers 16 years and over TRANSPORTATION TO WORK 39

SOURCES Page Page Page Topic Source Table/Other Info Universe Page Number Topic Source Table/Other Info Universe Number City of Oakland's Departent of PAVEMENT QUALITY 26 Pavement Condition Index City of Oakland's Departent of Analyzed by David Lok Cover 1 Streets Information Technology, GIS Unit Information Technology, GIS Unit City City of of Oakland's Oakland's Departent Departent of of INTRODUCTION 3 BART Bikeways fact Updated as of January 2018 Information Information Technology, Technology, GIS GIS Unit Unit DEFINING THE ZONES 4 Census Tract Streets Boundaries City of Oakland's Departent of US Department of Commerce. Cartographic Boundary Information 2016 Bureau Technology, of Census GIS Unit Shapefiles - Census Tracts for California Adjoining Water City Features Streets City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit EXISTING AND BASIC PROPOSED FACTS BIKEWAY 5 Area City of Oakland's Departent of 27-28 Bikeways NETWORKS Information Technology, GIS Unit Updated as of January 2018 Population ACS City 2012-2016 of Oakland's 5 Year Departent Estimates of B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Total Population Adjoining Workers City and Bikeways Bicycle Information B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF ACS 2012-2016 Technology, 5 Year Estimates GIS Unit Workers 16 years and over Commuters City of Oakland's Departent of TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Streets MTC Information Communities Technology, of Concern GIS Unit 2018 COMMUNITIES OF CONCERN 7 All COC Topics derived from 2012-2016 ACS 5 Year City of Oakland's Departent of BICYCLE PARKING 29 Bicycle Parking Estimates Updated as of January 2018 Information Technology, GIS Unit Population ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B01003 TOTAL POPULATION Total Population City of Oakland's Departent of Bikeways Minority ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B03002 HISPANIC Updated OR as LATINO of January ORIGIN 2018 BY RACE Total Population Information Technology, GIS Unit C17002 RATIO OF INCOME TO POVERTY LEVEL IN Population For Whom Povery Status Low-Income ACS City 2012-2016 of Oakland's 5 Year Departent Estimates of Adjoining City Bikeways THE PAST 12 MONTHS is Determined Information Technology, GIS Unit B1605 NATIVITY BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Limited English Speakers BY B08006 ABILITY SEX TO OF SPEAK WORKERS ENGLISH BY MEANS FOR THE OF Bicycle Commuters ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates POPULATION TRANSPORTATION 5 YEARS TO AND WORK OVER Population Workers 16 5 Years years and and Older over Zero Vehicle Households ACS Transportation 2012-2016 5 Injury Year Mapping Estimates B08201 HOUSEHOLD SIZE BY VEHICLES AVAILABLE Households Seniors Over 75 System ACS 2012-2016 (TIMS), Safe 5 Year Transportation Estimates B01001 SEX BY AGE Total Population BICYCLIST-INVOLVED CRASHES 32-36 Crashes Research and Education January 1, 2012- December 31, 2016 SWITRS Civilian Party Noninstitutionalized Type: 4 - Bicyclist People with a Disability ACS Center, 2012-2016 University 5 Year of California, Estimates C18108 AGE BY NUMBER OF DISABILITIES Population Berkeley. 2018 B11004 FAMILY TYPE BY PRESENCE AND AGE OF Single Parent Families ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates Families Cyclist Race/Ethnicity 2018 Bike Plan Update Survey RELATED CHILDREN December, UNDER 2017 18 YEARS Oakland Sample Population Oakland Cost Burdened Population Renters Age ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates B25070 DP05 ACS GROSS DEMOGRAPHIC RENT AS A PERCENTAGE AND HOUSING OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME ESTIMATES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Renter-occupied Total Oakland housing Population units Average size of household and B25010 AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE OF OCCUPIED Occupied housing units (Oakland city, ACS 2012-2016 Year Estimates B08006 SEX OF WORKERS BY MEANS OF Bicycle rented Commuter householdsex ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE Workers California) 16 years and over TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Average size of 1 parent family ACS 2012-2016 5 Year Estimates S1101 HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES BASIC FACTS (ACS 2010-2014) 42 Population ACS 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates B19013 MEDIAN B01003 HOUSEHOLD TOTAL POPULATION INCOME IN THE PAST Total Population Households for Alameda County ADDITIONAL SOCIOECONOMICS 8 Median Workers Household and Bicycle Income ACS 2012-2016 Year Estimates 12 B08006 MONTHS SEX (IN OF 2016 WORKERS INFLATION-ADJUSTED BY MEANS OF ACS 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates Workers 16 Tracts years and over Commuters TRANSPORTATION DOLLARS) TO WORK Population, Age, Race, and ACS 2012-2016 Year Estimates DP05 B19013 ACS MEDIAN DEMOGRAPHIC HOUSEHOLD ADDITIONAL SOCIOECONOMICS AND INCOME HOUSING IN ESTIMATES THE PAST 43 Median Household Ethnicity Households for Alameda County Income ACS 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates 12 MONTHS (IN 2014 INFLATION-ADJUSTED (ACS 2010-2014) Tracts DOLLARS) Population, Age, Race, and Ethnicity PAVEMENT QUALITY 26 Pavement Condition Index ACS 2010-2014 5 Year Estimates City of Oakland's Departent of Information Technology, GIS Unit DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES Analyzed by David Lok 40

END NOTES Overall This report was initiated by Eric Tucker and completed by Noel Pond-Danchik in the Bicycle & Pedestrian Program of the City of Oakland s Department of Transportation. Many of the numbers in the charts have been rounded to the nearest tenth or whole number for ease of reading. Many of the numbers in this document are based on American Community Survey Estimates based on samples of the population and have some margin of error. INTRODUCTION The fact about BART was determined by the percentage of BART stations in the zones with the most BART access (Downtown / West Oakland, North Oakland / Adams Point, and Eastlake / Fruitvale) out of all BART stations in Oakland (seven out of eight) and the land area of those three zones with the most BART access (34%). DEFINING THE ZONES The zones used in this analysis are those used in the City s 2017 Pedestrian Plan except that the Pedestrian Plan analyzed Downtown and West Oakland as separate zones. While the American Community Survey (ACS) Bicycle Commuter data is the best available data for bicycling rates, it should be noted that bicycle commuter data far from represents who is actually biking in an area because it omits bicyclists with destinations other than work (errands, recreation) as well as unemployed bicyclists, undocumented or unreported bicyclists, children, etc. Also, it omits most commute trips that include bicycling to BART because the BART trip is selected as the primary commute mode. BASIC FACTS Zone areas do not include East Bay Regional Parks which are property of the Park District. The Percent Bicycle Commuters category refers to the percentage of people who commute to work by bicycle out of the total number of workers. The Female Bicycle Commuters category refers to the percentage of all bicycle commuters who are female. The Male Bicycle Commuters category refers to the percentage of all bicycle commuters who are male. COMMUNITIES OF CONCERN The Total Disadvantaged Population Score was calculated by counting the sum of people who fall into each category and dividing by the total population then normalizing the scores on a 0-1 scale. One difference between Oakland s and the MTC s methods of calculating Communities of Concern is that Oakland chose to count people every time a factor applied. Therefore, for example, a person who fell into three categories would have been counted thrice. For more info on how the numbers were computed, see the Methodology tab in: \\oakland\pwa\transportation\bike-ped_program\projects\planning\zone- Analysis\Noel_Data_and_tables_working\data_statistics_9_zones.xlsx The number of people in the Single Parent Family category was estimated by multiplying the number of single parent families by the average size of a single parent family in Oakland (3.55). The number of people in the Cost-Burdened Renter category was estimated by multiplying the number of cost-burdened households by the average size of a rented household in Oakland (2.44). The Low, Medium, and High levels of concern categories were chosen based off the Total Disadvantaged Population Score using the classification Natural Breaks in ArcMap. The Minority column refers to the percentage of people who are a racial or ethnic minority out of the total population. Low Income refers to the percentage of the population who had incomes under 200% of the Federal Poverty Level out of the population for whom poverty status is determined. Limited English Speakers refers to the percentage of people who speak English not at all or not well out of the total population. People in Zero Vehicle Households refers to the percentage of people living in a zero-vehicle household out of the total population. Seniors Over 75 refers to the percentage of people who are over 75 out of the total population. People with a Disability refers to the percentage of people with a disability out of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population. People in Single-Parent Families refers to the percentage of people living in a single parent family out of the total population. Cost-Burdened Renters refers to the percentage of people living in a rent burdened household in the past twelve months out of the total population. Rent burdened is determined as a household s gross rent equaling 50 percent or more of their household income. ADDITIONAL SOCIOECONOMICS Median household income is shown in 2016 inflation-adjusted dollars. The sum of the racial categories equals more than 100% because Hispanic is an ethnic, not racial, category. COMMUTER BICYCLING The 1990 and 2000 data points came from responses to the US Census and are not estimated. The 2005 through 2016 points are taken from the ACS 1-Year Estimates. BICYCLE COMMUTERS AND BICYCLISTS TO BART Each dot represents the home location of one commuter or one bicyclist to BART. The home locations of bicyclists to BART and number of bicyclists who arrived at each station are taken from the results of two BART Customer Satisfaction Surveys. Whatever respondents entered as their home location was translated to census tracts. As such, the results may not capture the entire picture, especially for the Coliseum/Airport zone which is only one census tract. The dots do not represent exact home locations but are randomly scattered within the home census tract of each commuter. The BART Survey captured home-based trips to BART, so bicyclists were counted more than once if they biked from their home to a BART station more than once in one day. 41

END NOTES BICYCLE MODE SHARE BY CENSUS TRACT 0-1% Bicycle Mode Share is omitted in the graph, creating a smaller scale for the Y-axis to emphasize the number of census tracts where bicycle mode share is greater than one percent. BICYCLING TO WORK AND TO BART AND BICYCLISTS TO BART BY STATION The home locations of bike to BART commuters and number of bicyclists who arrived at each station by bicycle are taken from the results of two BART Customer Satisfaction Surveys. Whatever respondents entered as their home location and is then translated to census tracts. As such, the results may not capture the entire picture, especially for the Coliseum/Airport zone which is only one census tract. This also explains discrepancies between the Bicycling to Work and to BART graph and the Bicyclists to BART by Station graphs. The survey captured home-based trips to BART, so bicyclists were counted more than once if they biked from their home to a BART station more than once in one day. BICYCLISTS TO BART MODE SHARE BY STATION The bicycle mode share refers to the percentage of people who accessed BART by bicycle out of the total number of people who access BART. STREET SLOPE Some individual street segments in the flatlands have anomalous slopes. This may be caused by embankments, bridges, and other aerial structures like elevated BART tracks that are captured in the topographic data. STREET SLOPE (Table and Graph) The 0-1% Maximum Slope of Street Segment Percent was omitted from the graph creating a smaller scale for the Y-axis because so much of the city s roadway falls into the 0-1% maximum slope category. This was done to emphasize the zones where the maximum slope is greater than one percent. Oakland s street network is broken up into small street segments. Each street segment has an associated maximum slope. The numbers in the graph and table were derived by finding the average of the maximum slopes of all the street segments in a zone, weighted by the length of the segment. In the table and graph, each roadway segment that crosses a zone boundary was associated with the zone containing the majority of its length. The maximum, rather than the average, slope of street segments was used because the maximum slope is what is most noticeable to a bicyclist and because average slope hides ups and downs within a segment. The numbers in the Slope Weighted by Segment Length row of the table are the maximum slopes of all the segments in a zone averaged by the segments lengths. DISTANCE TO DOWNTOWN Distances to Downtown were measured from the intersection of 14 th St and Broadway. The distance measured from Downtown is the distance to the zone centroid. PROXIMITY TO BART The Bike Commuter Mode Share represents ACS 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates PAVEMENT QUALITY The mean PCIs are calculated by weighting each segment by its length. The mean PCI by Existing and Proposed bikeways only includes on-street bikeways; there is no PCI data for off-street bikeways (i.e., bicycle paths). For the mean PCI for Existing Bikeways and mean PCI for Proposed Bikeways, roadway segments that crossed a zone boundary were associated with the zone containing the majority of its length. EXISTING BIKEWAY NETWORK and PROPOSED BIKEWAY NETWORK The Bikeway Network types are explained as such: Bike Paths (Class 1) are paved rights-of-way completely separated from streets. These paths are typically shared with pedestrians and often called mixed-use paths. Bike Lanes (Class 2) are on-street facilities designated for bicyclists using stripes and stencils. Bike lanes may include buffer striping to provide greater separation between bicyclists and parked or moving vehicles. Bike Routes (Class 3) are streets designated for bicycle travel and shared with motor vehicles. While the only required treatment is signage, streets are designated as bike routes because they are suitable for sharing with motor vehicles and provide better connectivity than other streets. Arterial Bike Routes (Class 3A) are installed on arterial streets where bike lanes are not feasible, and parallel streets do not provide adequate connectivity. These streets may be designed to promote shared use with lower posted speed limits (preferably 25 mph), shared lane bicycle markings ( sharrows ), and signage. Bike Boulevards (Class 3B) are bike routes on residential streets that prioritize through trips for bicyclists. Traffic calming is included as needed to discourage drivers from using the boulevard as a through route. Oakland's Bike Boulevards are marked with shared lane bicycle markings (aka sharrows ) and signage. Protected Bike Lanes (Class 4), also known as cycle tracks, provide space that is exclusively for bicyclists and separated from motor vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes, and sidewalks. Parked cars, curbs, bollards, or planter boxes provide physical separation between bicyclists and moving cars. Where on-street parking is allowed, it is placed between the bikeway and the travel lanes (rather than between the bikeway and the sidewalk, as is typical for Class 2 bike lanes). Miles are counted as centerline miles, not lane miles. Bike lanes on one side of the street only and protected bike lanes are both counted in the Bike Lanes category in the chart. Due to rounding, not all sums of the bike network mileage by type exactly equal total existing bikeway mileage. 42

END NOTES BICYCLE PARKING Bicycle parking data is updated as of January 2018. Bike Parking Spaces refers to the number of spaces available for bikes. For instance, one standalone bike rack would provide two parking spaces. All Crash Data All crash data includes only reported, fatal or injury-related bicyclist-involved crashes (no property damage only crashes) from 2012 to 2016. The term crashes refers only to crashes in such category. The demographic data (race, age, and sex) always refer to the bicyclist no matter who was at fault for the collision. The crash data was taken from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) website by querying between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 for the city of Oakland and choosing Party Type under Party factors and selecting 4 Bicyclist. The Collisions and Parties data was then downloaded, and the Collision data was mapped in ArcMap using x and y coordinates and joined to the Parties data. The data without x and y coordinates was analyzed separately. BICYCLIST-INVOLVED CRASHES BY SEVERITY The number of crashes is not a good indicator of the relative safety of an area because it doesn t account for how many people are biking in that area. For that reason, crashes per 100 bicycle commuters per year is shown, but commuter data underreports who is actually biking in an area. (See Defining the Zones. ) The Crashes per 100 Bicycle Commuters per Year Category was determined by dividing the total number of reported fatal or injury related crashes in 2012-2016 by five to get a one-year average, then dividing by the estimated number of bicycle commuters from the 2012-2016 ACS data, and multiplying by 100 to represent 100 bicycle commuters. BICYCLIST-INVOLVED CRASHES BY RACE & ETHNICITY The Biked for Any Reason in the Past Month category was determined from the results of the Oakland Bike Plan Update Web Survey of Residents of Oakland, California (2017) based on a representative sample size of 800 interviews. The percentages in the table were determined by dividing the number of people who marked that they had biked in the past month and fell into one of the categories: Asian, Black, Hispanic, or White and divided it by the sum of all the people who marked that they had biked in the past month and fell any of the race/ethnicity categories previously listed. The intention is that this category be used as a source of comparison to see who is biking versus who is involved in injury related, reported crashes. BICYCLIST-INVOLVED CRASHES BY AGE The youngest and oldest bicyclist involved in a fatal or injury related crash were 5 and 81 respectively. The age categories align with ACS age categories. The Percent of the Oakland Population row represents the percentage of the population of Oakland who are that age not necessarily the percentage of people who bike who are that age. The Female-to-Male-Involved Crashes and Female-to-Male Bicycle Commuter categories refer to simplified ratios of the number of female to male bicyclists involved in crashes and female to male commuters respectively. These numbers were rounded. The two columns were intended as a source of comparison between who is involved in injury related, reported crashes versus who is bicycle commuting. BICYCLIST-INVOLVED CRASHES BY SEX The bike commuter ratios use 2012-2016 ACS data but it should be noted that bicycle commuter data underreports who is actually biking in an area. See Defining the Zones. The crash ratios were determined by dividing the total number of crashes across the five-year period by five to get the average number of crashes per year and dividing that by the number of commuters in that zone. The numbers were then rounded into ratios for ease of reading. The Female Bicycle Commuters category refers to the percentage of all bicycle commuters who are female. The Male Bicycle Commuters category refers to the percentage of all bicycle commuters who are male. OLDER DATA FOR COMPARISON The data on the Basic Facts and Additional Socioeconomics slides mimics the format of the earlier slides with the same names using earlier data (ACS 2010-2014). These were included as a means of comparison between the two timeframes. 43

Zone Analysis For Bicycle Planning OLDER DATA FOR COMPARISON

BASIC FACTS (ACS 2010 2014) Zone Area (Square Miles) Population Population per Square Mile Number of Workers Number of Bike Commuters Percent Female Bike Commuters Percent Male Bike Commuters Bike Commute Percent Bike Commuters per Square Mile Central East Oakland 7.8 96,018 12,310 34,624 310 18% 82% 0.9% 40 Coliseum / Airport 6.2 4,037 651 1,437 23 35% 65% 1.6% 4 Downtown / West Oakland 7.4 46,655 6,305 20,179 791 38% 62% 3.9% 107 East Oakland Hills 10.3 30,586 2,970 14,047 33 34% 66% 0.2% 3 Eastlake / Fruitvale 5.8 96,418 16,624 42,158 1,018 33% 67% 2.4% 176 Glenview / Redwood Heights 3.7 32,168 8,694 16,363 241 23% 77% 1.5% 65 North Oakland Hills 8.8 23,587 2,680 12,332 94 78% 22% 0.8% 11 North Oakland / Adams Point 5.6 76,770 13,709 44,833 2,899 39% 61% 6.5% 518 Citywide 55.6 406,239 7,306 185,973 5,409 36% 64% 2.9% 97 45

ADDITIONAL SOCIOECONOMICS (ACS 2010 2014) Zone Median Household Income Under 18 Asian Black / African American Hispanic / Latino Non-Hispanic White Other Race Central East Oakland $39,993 30% 6% 36% 48% 7% 4% Coliseum / Airport $47,805 33% 5% 37% 49% 4% 6% Downtown / West Oakland $36,281 16% 24% 34% 14% 22% 5% East Oakland Hills $84,877 20% 10% 41% 14% 28% 7% Eastlake / Fruitvale $41,450 22% 30% 19% 34% 13% 5% Glenview / Redwood Heights $96,906 20% 17% 14% 11% 50% 7% North Oakland Hills $146,484 19% 14% 5% 6% 68% 7% North Oakland / Adams Point $77,634 12% 13% 21% 11% 49% 6% Citywide $54,618 21% 16% 26% 26% 27% 6% 46