SC European Union 2013 Annual Report. Ad Corten

Similar documents
The Hague, Kingdom of the Netherlands October 2016 SC The European Union Annual report

The fishery for jack mackerel in the Eastern Central Pacific by European trawlers in 2008 and 2009

SC5-Doc13. The European Annual Report. Irek Wojcik, Ad Corten

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc17 The European Union s Annual Report Wójcik I.

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

SWG JACK MACKEREL FISHERY IN CHILE

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc15 The Russian Federation s Annual Report

6th Meeting of the Scientific Committee. Puerto Varas, Chili 9-14 September 2018 SC6-JM04. Comparison of PFA self-sampling with EU observer data

1 st Meeting of the Scientific Committee

SC China s Annual report Part II: The Squid Jigging Fishery Gang Li, Xinjun Chen and Bilin Liu

Chile s 2013 CMM 1.01 Implementation Report

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc19 Peru s Annual Report, part I (SPRFMO Area) IMARPE PRODUCE

Shark catch characteristics by national longliner fleets in Madagascar

Small pelagic fishery and research in Albania

New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document 98/21. Not to be cited without permission of the authork) Malcolm Clark

IOTC 2013 WPB th Working Party on Billfish. La Réunion 18 th -22 nd September 2013

Status of Albacore Fishing by Malaysian Tuna Longliners in the Southwest of Indian Ocean. Effarina Mohd Faizal, Sallehudin Jamon & Samsudin Basir

REVIEW OF BIGEYE TUNA CATCH INCLUDING FISH SIZE BY JAPANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September SC6-Doc21 Chinese Taipei s Annual Report

TROPICAL TUNAS CAUGH BY THE MALAGASY LONGLINERS IN 2012

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Greater North Sea Ecoregion Published 30 September 2015

STATISTICS OF THE FRENCH PURSE SEINE FISHING FLEET TARGETING TROPICAL TUNAS IN THE INDIAN OCEAN ( )

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE Polish Research Report, by A. J. Paciorkowski Sea Fisheries Institute Gdynia Poland.

La Jolla, United States of America, October SC-01-INF-18_rev1. Data Submitted to the SPRFMO Secretariat. Secretariat

PHILIPPINE FISHERIES OBSERVER PROGRAMME

SC Chile s Annual report Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuicultura

Successful management of small pelagics within a large international region:

Fishing Ground and Abundance Distribution of Kawakawa (Euthynnus affinis) by Purse Seiner Fisheries along the Andaman Sea Coast of Thailand, 2016

FISHING ACTIVITY: SEABED TRAWLING

People from FFL: Fróði B. Skúvadal (Cruise leader) and Mourits Mohr Joensen (Technician)

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF BLUE AND MAKO SHARKS BYCATCH AND CPUE OF TAIWANESE LONGLINE FISHERY IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN

Saithe (Pollachius virens) in subareas 4 and 6, and in Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

INDONESIA SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA FISHERIES 1. A National Report Year Prepared by

Best Practice Guidance for Assessing the Financial Performance of Fishing Gear: Industry-led gear trials

Sampling of Frigate tuna (FRI: Auxis thazard) as byproducts of purse seiners at the port of Antsiranana-Madagascar ( )

Neritic Tuna Catch, Species composition and monthly average landings in Sri Lankan Tuna Gillnet Fishery operate within EEZ

SC-02-JM-12. Report of the 5 th workshop on diagnosis of the status of the South Pacific Jack mackerel fishery in Peru SNP Scientific Committee

SMALL BOAT TUNA LONGLINE FISHERY NORTH-WEST COAST OF SRI LANKA R. Maldeniya

ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea ecoregions Published 30 June 2016

Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24 32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea) *

WORKING GROUP TO REVIEW STOCK ASSESSMENTS 8 TH MEETING

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Advice June 2012

Sharks caught in Mozambican waters. Barbara Palha de Sousa

Oregon's Sardine Fishery 2006 Summary

NFR 17. New Zealand Tuna Fisheries in 2002 and SCTB17 Working Paper. Terese Kendrick 1, Talbot Murray 2 and Susan Jane Baird 3

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Stock Annex: Greater silver smelt (Argentina silus) in divisions 5.b and 6.a (Faroes grounds and west of Scotland)

11th Meeting of the Science Working Group. Lima, Peru, October SWG-11-12a. New Zealand SPRFMO Observer Implementation Report for 2011

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

NATIONAL REPORT 1 INDONESIA SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA FISHERIES. prepared by

IOTC 2015 WPEB11 45 Rev_1

Small pelagic fish market in the south of Sicily: socioeconomic linkages between catch volume and local consumption

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Extract from the project Dynamic Mapping of North Sea Spawning - the KINO Report 2016 Statoil contract no

3.4 Stock Summaries Advice June 2011

Overview of tuna fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, including economic conditions 2015 (WCPFC-SC /GN WP-1)

Serial No. N6173 NAFO SCR Doc. 13/020 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 2013

The Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector in LITHUANIA

Critical The status of the southern bluefin tuna (SBT) stock is at a critical stage resulting in a reduction in the global SBT catch in 2010/2011.

SA2 + Div. 3K Redfish

YELLOWFIN TUNA (Thunnus albacares)

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions (Baltic Sea)

What you need to know about juvenile tunas in the Philippines:

5th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Shanghai, China, September 2017

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

Fishing mortality in relation to highest yield. Fishing mortality in relation to agreed target

Herring in the North Sea, Exploitation and Conservation. Presentation by Dr Beatriz A. Roel

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL - JANUARY 1998

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 2002

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

Report of the Working Group on Widely Distributed

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a Council Regulation

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

IPHC Regulatory Area 2A Directed Commercial Pacific Halibut Fishery Sample Vessel Fishing Period Limit Options for Longer Fishing Periods

5. purse seines 3 000

Undulate ray (Raja undulata) in divisions 8.a b (northern and central Bay of Biscay)

L 198/8 Official Journal of the European Union

ICES advice on fishing opportunities

Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in subareas 1 8 and 14, and in Division 9.a (the Northeast Atlantic and adjacent waters)

DRAFT. A minor change in the estimation of length composition data of Japanese troll fisheries. November 2015 ISC/15/PBFWG-2/03

How illegal discarding. failing EU fisheries. and citizens. How illegal discarding in. fisheries and citizens. Executive summary

Boarfish (Capros aper) in subareas 6 8 (Celtic Seas, English Channel, and Bay of Biscay)

SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING - JUNE An Assessment of the Cod Stock in NAFO Division 3M. A. Vazquez

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

FISHERIES CO-OPERATION ICELAND AND NORWAY WITH. Presented by Philip Rodgers ERINSHORE ECONOMICS

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW AUTHOR: SECRETARIAT. LAST UPDATE: Jan. 25, Overview. 1.1 What is ICCAT? Introduction

OCEAN2012 Fish Dependence Day - UK

FEDERAL FISHERIES AGENCY FEDERAL STATE BUDGETARY RESEARCH INSTITUTION SAKHALIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES AND OCEANOGRAPHY.

Evaluating Potential Fishery Effects of Changes to Other Species Management

Please note: The present advice replaces the advice given in June 2017 for catches in 2018.

A8-0377/

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 January 2017 (OR. en)

Evaluation of fisheries dependent information in European waters 5-9 September 2016, Gavirate

Transcription:

1 st Meeting of the Scientific Committee La Jolla, United States of America, 21-27 October 213 European Union 213 Annual Report Ad Corten

National report of the European Union to the 213 SPRFMO Science Committee. Ad Corten Consultant to the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Table of contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 A short overview of the fishery by EU trawlers in the southern Pacific... 2 3 Catch, effort and CPUE in the PFA fleet... 2 3.1.1 Catches and catch composition... 2 3.1.2 Effort and catch per unit of effort (cpue)... 3 4 Fisheries data collection and research activities in the PFA fleet... 4 4.1 Collection of haul-by-haul information from the vessels in the PFA fleet... 5 4.2 Data collection by observers on the PFA fleet... 7 4.3 Biological sampling of catches by the PFA fleet... 7 4.3.1 Sampling of jack mackerel... 8 4.3.2 Observations on other species... 8 1 Introduction After a year of complete absence of EU trawlers from the South Pacific, one vessel returned to the area in 213. This was the Lithuanian flagged KL 855 "Margiris" which arrived from Australia, after having crossed the whole of the southern Pacific on its way to the fishing grounds. The Margiris started to fish by the end of April, and it was still in the area at the time of writing of this report (September 213). This report presents the results of fishing operations and observer data for 213 that had been received at that time. Although the results of the Margiris in 213 are still preliminary, it is interesting to consider these data since they probably represent one of the few pieces of information on the development of the jack mackerel stock in the open Pacific in 213. Because of the low fishing effort in 213, coverage by scientific observers was very limited. SPRFMO sampling requirements specify that a minimum of 1% of all hauls should be sampled by scientific observers. After the first observer had been on board from 7 April 26 May, the ship owner considered that he had fulfilled his obligations with respect to the 1% observer coverage. Hence no 1

National report European Union 213 overview of EU fishery in Pacific scientific observers were deployed for the rest of the season. Fortunately the crew of the vessel continued to take length measurements of the catch after the departure of the observer. In this way, the evolution of the mean length of the fish could be followed until September. 2 A short overview of the fishery by EU trawlers in the southern Pacific The fishery for jack mackerel by the European Union (EU) started in 25 by a single vessel working for 3 months in the second half of the year. The next year, the same vessel returned and worked for the whole season (March October). Following the positive results of this season, the number of vessels increased to six in the following three years (27 29). All these vessels belonged to the Pelagic Freezertrawler Association (PFA), a consortium of European pelagic ship owners based in the Netherlands. In addition to the PFA vessels, some vessels from a Polish ship owners started to work in the area from 29 onwards. Starting from 21, the number of vessels was reduced as a result of declining catches. The number of EU vessels by year and by country is presented in Table 1. year EU countries involved and number of vessels 25 Netherlands (1) 26 Netherlands (1) 27 Germany (3), Lithuania (1), Netherlands (2) 28 Germany (3), Lithuania (1), Netherlands (2) 29 Germany (3), Poland (3), Lithuania (1), Netherlands (2) 21 Germany (3), Poland (3), Lithuania (1), Netherlands (1) 211 Germany (1), Netherlands (1), Poland (1) 213 Lithuania (1) Table 1. EU pelagic trawlers in the Pacific in 25 213. The vessels involved in this fishery are large pelagic trawlers, operating pelagic trawls that are fished mainly during the night. The vessels work in the international waters outside the Chilean EEZ. Fishing operations extend in the open Pacific to about. Over the period 28-211, there was a progressive shortening of the fishing season. In 21, catches sharply declined in comparison to the previous year, and in 211 the fishery was a complete failure. In 212 not a single EU vessel went to the Pacific. In 213 one vessel returned to the Pacific, but catches were very small. 3 Catch, effort and CPUE in the PFA fleet 3.1.1 Catches and catch composition The fishery by PFA vessels in the Pacific is aimed at jack mackerel (Trachrus murphyi). Other species make up only a small fraction of the total catch, as is shown in Table 2. 2

National report European Union 213 Catches, effort and CPUE year total catch in species composition in percentages tons Trachurus murphyi Scomber Brama other species japonicus australis 29 91336 95.3 4.3.4. 21 3483 97.2 1.9.6.3 211 181 98.3.2 1.3.2 213 729 98.3.4.5.8 Table 2. Total catches and species composition of PFA fleet in 29 213. Based on landing data provided by ship owners (25-211) and trawl station lists obtained directly from the vessel (213). Data for 213 are still incomplete. The species composition of the catch in 213 was comparable to that in 211, with a very strong dominance of jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi). The Pacific bream (Brama australis) that occupied the second place in 211, was found in lower numbers in 213. Over the period 25 213, catches declined sharply, and there was a progressive shortening of the fishing season (Figure 1) 3 25 2 15 1 5 28 29 21 211 213 mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct Figure 1. Monthly catches of jack mackerel by PFA vessels in 25-213. Data for 213 based on catches reported by vessel. 3.1.2 Effort and catch per unit of effort (cpue) The development of the cpue for jack mackerel in the PFA fleet is presented in Table 3. The figures show the decline in cpue since the first year in which the fishery operated during the whole season (26). In 213 the cpue was slightly higher than in 211, but still very low in comparison to earlier years. 3

National report European Union 213 Catches, effort and CPUE year number of fishing days catch jack mackerel PFA fleet in tons catch per day in tons 25 44 6187 141 26 19 33766 31 27 41 123523 38 28 423 18174 256 29 436 91336 29 21 274 3482 124 211 32 163 57 213 65 5276 81 Table 3. Catch and effort in the PFA fleet. Values with for 213 are based on trawl station lists provided by the vessels. Figure 2 illustrates the progressive shortening of the fishing season, and the concomitant decrease in cpue over the years 27 211. 6 catch / day (tons) 5 4 3 2 1 mar apr may jun jul aug sep 27 28 29 21 211 213 Figure 2. Monthly CPUE of jack mackerel in the PFA fleet in 213 compared to previous years 4 Fisheries data collection and research activities in the PFA fleet Two independent programs of data collection were carried out in 213: the collection of haul-by-haul information directly from the vessels, and an observer program aimed at obtaining detailed biological information on catches and discards. Both programs were organized by the Dutch consultant agency CMR. Funding was provided by the Dutch ship owners association PFA. The details of these programs are briefly presented below. 4

National report European Union 213 Data collection and research 4.1 Collection of haul-by-haul information from the vessels in the PFA fleet Trawlers are requested to provide detailed information for each individual haul. A simple spreadsheet is used to record the information at sea. The information requested in this spreadsheet corresponded to the data demands of the SPRFMO Data and Information Working Group. The size of the individual catches is estimated by visual inspection of the amount of fish in the net or in the tanks into which the catch is pumped. Usually, the captains tend to under-estimate the amount of catch at first sight. As a result, the sum of individual catches provided by the captains is often lower than the landing data for the entire trip provide by the ship owner. However, no attempt is made to correct the tow-by-tow information afterwards, and the estimates for individual catches are the figures provided directly by the captains. The tow-by tow information from individual vessels provides a picture of the geographical distribution of the fishery. The results of the fishery in 213 are compared to previous years in Figure 3a-d. Since there was only one PFA vessel in the Pacific in 213, the results in terms of spatial distribution are limited. It is interesting to note though, that the fishery did not shift westward in the course of the season as it did in previous years, but remained just outside the Chilean EEZ throughout the season. The vessel searched for a while further to the west, together with some none-eu vessels, but there were no signs of any fish beyond 82 W. Also during its voyage from Australia to the eastern South Pacific in April, the vessel did not see any traces of fish in the western area. 9 3 S 3 S 4 S 4 S 5 S 5 S 9 Figure 3a. Catch distribution by month of the EU fleet in 29. Red = April, orange = May, yellow = June, green = July, light blue = August, dark blue = September, purple = October. Size of squares is proportional to catches. Positions may be inaccurate due to errors in data transmission and analysis. 5

National report European Union 213 Data collection and research 9 3 S 3 S 4 S 4 S 5 S 5 S 9 Figure 3b. Catch distribution by month of the PFA fleet in 21. Colour code is the same as in Figure 3a. 9 3 S 3 S 4 S 4 S 5 S 5 S 9 Figure 3c. Catch distribution by month of the PFA fleet in 211. Colour code is the same as in Figure 3a. 6

National report European Union 213 Data collection and research 9 3 S 3 S 4 S 4 S 5 S 5 S 9 Figure 3d. Catch distribution by month of the PFA fleet in 213. Colour code is the same as in Figure 3a. 4.2 Data collection by observers on the PFA fleet In accordance with the recommendation of the SPRFMO Data and Information Working Group, this program attempts to obtain at least 1% coverage of all hauls made by the fleet. For this purpose, one observer worked on board the "Margiris" in April-May. After he left the ship on the 26 th of May, the crew continued to take length measurements of jack mackerel. year period schip observer days with observations 213 7 April 26 May KL 855 Margiris Co de Klerk 16 Table 4. Observer mission in 213 The observer collected data on species composition of catches, length composition, and biological characteristics such as sex and maturity stage, food composition, stomach fullness and fat content. In addition he monitored discards and incidental by-catches of large species. 4.3 Biological sampling of catches by the PFA fleet Biological sampling was conducted on the main species taken in the fishery. These included Trachurus murphyi, Scomber japonicus and Brama australis. In this report, only length data for jack mackerel (T. murphyi) are presented. 7

National report European Union 213 Data collection and research 4.3.1 Sampling of jack mackerel Like in 211, the number of length measurements by the observer (2727) was low, due to the limited time he spent on board and also the low catches of jack mackerel. After the observer left the ship in May, the crew measured another 187 jack mackerel in June August. year number of jack mackerel measured 28 28 25 29 15 744 21 1 54 211 2 194 213 2 727 Table 5. Number of jack mackerel measured by scientific observers A comparison with the length distributions in previous years (Figure 4) shows that the cohort born in 27 has now become the main component of the catch. These fish had a modal size of 35 cm (fork length) in 213. The older fish that used to dominate the catches until 211 have now largely disappeared. The length distribution for 213 also shows a small signs of younger year-classes with modal lengths at 19 and 27 cm. However, these year-classes are not comparable in abundance with year-class 27 when it first showed up in 21. 4.3.2 Observations on other species Table 6 presents the 1 most abundant species in the catches that were sampled by observers in 211 and 213. In 213, the fishery was again extremely mono-specific, with 98% of the catch consisting of jack mackerel. The second place held by Brama brama in 211 was now taken over by the Black Fathead (Cubiceps baxteri). The chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), which was fairly abundant prior to 211, remained scarce as in 211. 1 principal species in catch 211 1 principal species in catch 213 species weight in catch % species weight in catch % Trachurus murphyi 83921 98.259 Trachurus murphyi 89293 98.332 Brama australis 1826 1.28 Cubiceps baxteri 5413.5961 Scomber japonicus 181.213 Brama australis 4727.526 Allothunnus fallai 1598.189 Scomber japonicus 385.419 Tilapiokaras ssp 251.3 Allothunnus fallai 557.613 Cubiceps baxteri 86.1 Xiphia gladius 3.33 Schedophilus huttoni 61.7 Myctophideae 126.139 Centrolophus niger 39.5 Schedophilus huttoni 19.12 Thunnus albacares 3.4 Isurus oxyrhinchus 6.66 Tetragonurus cuvieri 1.1 Thunnus obesus 26.29 Table 6. Species composition (in kg and %) of sampled catches by PFA vessels in 211 and 213 8

National report European Union 213 Data collection and research 3 2 27 1 3 2 28 1 3 2 29 1 3 2 21 1 3 2 211 1 3 2 213 1 Figure 4. Percentage length composition of jack mackerel in PFA catches in 27 213. Length measured as in fork length. 9