I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

Similar documents
I-25 South Gap Project Monument to Castle Rock

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

MnPASS System Today and the Future

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Highway 17 Transportation Improvement Study

Measuring the Distribution and Costs of Congestion. Tim Lomax Texas Transportation Institute

Welcome. The Brooklin Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan are collectively referred to as the Brooklin Study.

Maryland State Highway Mobility Report. Morteza Tadayon

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

US 1 Express Lanes Public Kick-Off Meeting

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Alternatives Public Workshop

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

YELLOWHEAD TRAIL / 149 STREET INTERCHANGE

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

Executive Summary June 2015

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

Base Information. 1. Project Title State Highway 7 Preliminary & Environmental Engineering

Alberta Highway 881. Corridor Management Plan. Session Forum 1 - Highways. Tri-Party Transportation Conference Moving Alberta Into the Future

EXISTING (2006) CONDITIONS

Corridor Studies. LA 415 and LA 73

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

I-66 Corridor Improvements Route 15 to I-495. November 2014

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Public Information Meeting

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study Phase III

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

What are Managed Lanes?

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Public Information Meeting. Warren County Pathway Corridor Project September 27, 2018

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Introduction...pg. 1. Study Area...pg. 1. Study Purpose and Need...pg. 2. Study Coordination and Development... pg. 3. Public Involvement...pg.

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Traffic Congestion in Houston. Presented by Bill King

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

State Road & Tollway Authority Georgia 400 Demolition Project Frequently Asked Questions

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED SECTIONS OF US 19

Click to edit Master title style

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Congestion Management Report

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Metro!Denver!MTD!Governance!Committee! October!23,!2013!!9:00!AM!to!10:00!AM! Denver!Regional!Council!of!Governments!

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Design Challenges and Solutions. IBTTA Maintenance and Roadway Operations Workshop June 25, 2018

395 Express Lanes Extension

Route 29 Solutions Projects

ITEM 2.3 South of Fraser Rapid Transit Surrey-Langley technology decision. That the Mayors Council on Regional Transportation receive this report.

Roadways. Roadways III.

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

Preliminary Review of the T-REX Southeast Corridor Highway and Light Rail Transit Project

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Transcription:

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council June 20, 2017

An Important Corridor to Colorado Links the state s two major metropolitan areas and communities between Is critical to the state s economic and business development Near-term relief is needed, supported by long-term vision

Planning and Environmental Linkages Study Planning and Environmental Linkages or PEL is a process that combines federal requirements for transportation planning and environmental clearances Will help CDOT Define and prioritize projects in the corridor Determine project costs, funding, financing, and delivery options Engage with local corridor communities, regional travelers, and other interested stakeholders Identify significant environmental constraints and support efficient transition through project delivery

Study Limits Limits of potential physical improvements: Northern terminus at C470/E470 Interchange Southern terminus at CR 105/Monument Operational study area extends farther south

PEL Study Segments: Monument to C470

Why are Improvements Needed? SAFETY A high number of crashes occur on the corridor. The mix of users and travel speeds, along with difficult passing conditions and limited recovery areas, present special challenges. Higher than expected crashes occur due to weather, wildlife conflicts, and darkness. RELIABILITY Travel times in the corridor are highly variable; unexpected and unreasonably long traffic delays are increasingly common, and delays are getting worse, particularly on weekends. MOBILITY Physical conditions in the corridor hamper mobility. With no reasonable alternate routes or other reliable travel options, drivers have little option but to be struck in traffic in congested conditions. Maneuvering in the corridor is challenging due to the mix of vehicles and varying operating speeds, lack of passing opportunities, steady uphill grades, and narrow shoulders and medians that do not provide adequate recovery space for disabled vehicles.

Traffic Characteristics Delays are increasing 2016 was worse than 2015 First months of 2017 show similar increase in volumes and delays above 2016 Urban and rural segments operate differently North is more typical of commuting patterns Highest volumes weekday AM and PM peaks South (Gap) has roughly equal split of NB and SB traffic no peak direction Daily volumes are very similar weekdays and weekends Summer volumes are notably higher Delays are most prevalent in the Gap and are more pronounced on weekends in the SB direction

Types of Alternative Elements Corridorwide Travel lanes and shoulders Transit bus operations, new bus, new rail Alternate routes and frontage roads Operational improvements Variable speed limits Truck operations and restrictions Incident management plans & event coordination Driver information, VMS, cell phone alerts Segment-by-Segment Elements For instance, wildlife crossings in Gap or queue warning in Denver South

Express Lanes A set of lanes where operational strategies are proactively implemented and managed in response to changing conditions. An Express Lane is a tolled lane and is a Managed Lane, but Managed Lanes are not limited to tolling. Express Lanes Offer additional travel choices Always provided in combination with general purpose lanes

Colorado s Operating and Planned Express Lanes Express Lanes recommended and being implemented for all major capacity projects over past few years US 36, I-25 North, I-70 Mountain Corridor, C-470, Central I-70

Express Lanes recommended because they provide two key benefits Reliable travel times and supplemental revenue 5 6

Transit Elements High Speed Rail Interregional Connectivity Study recommendations for rail along Front Range Bustang Expand/enhance existing service Provide transit priority (Express Lane or Bus on Shoulder; Bus Rapid Transit)

Interregional Connectivity Study ICS Front Range Fort Collins, Denver, Colorado Springs, Pueblo Advance Guideway System (AGS) Mountain corridor to Eagle County Airport CDOT Division of Transit and Rail studied and recommended High Speed Rail along the I-25 corridor.

Interregional Connectivity Study Recommended Operating Segment: Colorado Springs to South Suburban Station 39 miles $3.6 billion construction estimate 7 million annual ridership $52 million annual operating expenses $84 million annual revenue

Project Development Schedule Gap project ready for construction by mid-2019 CDOT commitment to be shovel ready On schedule pending funding Planning and Environmental Linkages Study Complete May 2018 Vision and implementation plan for entire corridor Traffic Analysis and Roadway Design Conceptual engineering May 2018 Preliminary engineering (30% plans) end of 2018 Environmental Assessment Focused on construction project in the Gap Complete end of 2018

SB 267 Approved by the Legislature this session Authorizes lease-purchase of state buildings beginning as soon as July 1, 2018 $1.8 billion of the proceeds to CDOT Over a four-year period to fund transportation projects 20-year period to pay back that loan At least 25% of the proceeds to rural counties At least 10% of the proceeds go to transit projects Downpayment on CDOT s $20B + needs statewide

Process for Selecting Projects for SB 267 Transportation Commission will consider selection criteria over the summer Project list may not be finalized until next June/July or later Stakeholders have several ways to provide input into SB 267 project selection process TPR and MPO meetings CDOT Regions will solicit input from local governments, particularly through MPOs and TPRs Transportation Commission and State Transportation Advisory Committee meetings

Project Coordination Executive Oversight Committee (EOC) Project Management Team (PMT) Technical Working Group (TWG) Steering Committee (SC) Stakeholder Focus Groups Public Meetings Facebook Live Telephone Town Halls Events 4 Project website: ww.codot.gov/projects/i25cosden

Visit the project website: https://www.codot.gov/projects/i25cosden Sign up for corridor travel alerts: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/codot/subscriber /new?pop=t&qsp=1851 THANK YOU! 19