Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the

Similar documents
[FWS R1 ES 2015 N076; FXES FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Bull Trout Recovery Plan Implementation

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES FF09E42000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Greater Yellowstone

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES C6-178-FF09E42000]

Western native Trout Status report

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Southern White Rhino

[FWS R6 ES 2017 N031; FF06E FXES111606C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Enhancement of Survival Permit

[Docket No. FWS-HQ-ES ; FF09E FXES111609C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Candidate

[FWS R5 ES 2015 N021; FXES FF05E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for the Gulf

[FWS R8 ES 2017 N084; FF08EVEN00 FXFR SSO0] Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report for the Southern Sea Otter

August 2, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Bull trout ESA litigation update

[NPS-IMR-GRSA-24169; PPWONRADE2, PMP00EI05.YP0000] Ungulate Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Great

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Five Species

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on Petitions to Delist

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition to

Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National Wildlife

ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CO; Availability of Record of

145 FERC 62,070 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; ; ABC Code: C6] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of the Regulation that

107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A300000] Draft Environmental Assessment; Dallas Zoo Management; Dallas, Texas

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Amendment to

UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION [RC0ZCUPCA0, 155R0680R1, RR ]

James River National Wildlife Refuge, Prince George County, VA; Final. Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for

Via Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested

David K. Hering and Mark W. Buktenica, Crater Lake National Park

Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force

Montana Natural Heritage Program 1515 East Sixth Ave., Helena, Montana (406)

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

2. PROPOSED RULES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17

Klamath Lake Bull Trout

Press Release New Bilateral Agreement May 22, 2008


[FWS HQ MB 2018 N052; FXMB123109WEBB0 167 FF09M25100; OMB. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of

Proposed Terrestrial Critical Habitat for the Northwest Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

[FWS R4 R 2015 N236]; [FXRS S3 167 FF04R02000] Theodore Roosevelt and Holt Collier National Wildlife Refuges, Mississippi Final

September 4, Update on Columbia basin Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Planning

May 7, Ryan Zinke, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1840 C Street, N.W. Washington, D.C

Tahoe National Forest; Placer County, California; Squaw Valley to Alpine Meadows. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

[FWS R6 ES 2015 N103; FXES FF06E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Permit Applications

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Implementation Toolkit

Hatchery Reform and our Pacific Region National Fish Hatcheries. Presented by Doug Olson

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2010 ANNUAL REPORT

[Docket No. FWS R7 NWRS ; FF07R00000 FXRS Obligation

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition to List 11

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Submission on summary of the Draft Convention on Biological Diversity National Report

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 52-7 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 7. Exhibit 7

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Status of Endangered Species At Act Determinations ti and. the Southeast. Southeast Region

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

[Docket No. FWS HQ MB ; FF09M FXMB123209EAGL0L2] Eagle Permits; Removal of Regulations Extending Maximum Permit Duration of

APPENDIX Region 6 Inland Area Contingency Plan Compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act

Reporting and Recovery Planning and Implementation for Endangered Species

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;

Fish at the table and in the river: Nearing a quarter-century in the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program

June 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Stacy Horton, Policy Analyst, Washington. SUBJECT: Final 2012 Hatchery Fin Clip Report

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

AOGA Educational Seminar

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact

United States Department of the Interior

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Alberta Conservation Association 2013/14 Project Summary Report

After 40 years of protection, Yellowstone grizzly bears are off the list

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Environmental Law and Policy Salzman & Thompson

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

RIN 1018 AY21. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Lesser Prairie-Chicken as a

General Regulations for Areas Administered by the National Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service

United States Department of the Interior

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Robert Williams, Field Supervisor

Fisheries Management Plan

U.S. 1, 1999, 30, 2001 JANUARY

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

[LLMTM03000-L ET X1109AF; MTM 82330] Notice of Proposed Withdrawal Extension and Notice of Public Meeting; Montana

July 11, Mr. Mike King Executive Director Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 718 Denver, CO 80203

Re: Comments on 90-Day Finding on Petitions to Delist the Gray Wolf in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and the Western Great Lakes

Preliminary submission of information relevant to the status review of the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) (NOAA-NMFS )

[FWS R1 ES 2017 N151; FXES FF01E00000] U.S. Endangered Species; Receipt of Recovery Permit Applications

Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Management

ADDENDUM I TO AMENDMENT 3 OF THE INTERSTATE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Transcription:

This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/30/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-24670, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4310 55 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS R1 ES 2015 N151] [FXES11130100000 156 FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States Population of Bull Trout AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of document availability. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of the final Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States Population of Bull Trout, including six final recovery unit implementation plans, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The recovery plan includes specific goals, 1

objectives, and criteria that should be met in order to consider removing the species from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the recovery plan is available at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html and http://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html. Copies of the recovery plan are also available by request from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Room 368, Boise, ID 83709; telephone (208) 378 5345. Printed copies of the recovery plan will be available for distribution approximately 4 to 6 weeks after publication of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Carrier, State Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, at the above Boise address; telephone (208) 378 5243. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1 800 877 8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In November 1999, all populations of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) within the coterminous United States were listed as a threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; Act) (64 FR 58910; November 1, 1999). This final listing added bull trout in the Coastal Puget 2

Sound populations (Olympic Peninsula and Puget Sound regions) and Saint Mary Belly River populations (east of the Continental Divide in Montana) to the previous listing of three distinct population segments of bull trout in the Columbia River, Klamath River, and Jarbidge River basins (63 FR 31647, June 10, 1998; 64 FR 17110, April 8, 1999). Recovery of endangered and threatened animals and plants is a primary goal of our endangered species program. To help guide the recovery effort, we prepare recovery plans for most listed species. Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for conservation of the species, establish criteria for downlisting or delisting, and estimate time and cost for implementing recovery measures. Section 4(f) of the Act requires that public notice, and an opportunity for public review and comment, be provided during recovery plan development. For the coterminous population of bull trout, three separate draft bull trout recovery plans were completed in 2002 and 2004. The 2002 draft recovery plan (USFWS 2002) addressed bull trout populations within the Columbia, St. Mary Belly, and Klamath River basins and included individual chapters for 24 separate recovery units. In 2004, draft recovery plans were developed for the Coastal Puget Sound drainages in western Washington, including two recovery unit chapters (USFWS 2004a), and for the Jarbidge River in Nevada (USFWS 2004b). These draft recovery plans were not finalized, but they have served to identify recovery actions across the range of the species, and provide the framework for implementing numerous recovery actions by our partner agencies, local working groups, and others with an interest in bull trout conservation. A revised draft recovery plan, addressing the overall recovery strategy for bull trout throughout its range in the coterminous United States, was made available for public comment from 3

September 4 through December 3, 2014 (79 FR 52741). Subsequently, from June 4 through July 20, 2015 (80 FR 31916), we made available for public comment our proposed modifications to the recovery criteria, as well as six associated draft recovery unit implementation plans (RUIPs), supplemental recovery planning documents which describe more detailed site-specific conservation actions and implementation schedules for each of the six recovery units (Coastal, Klamath, Mid-Columbia, Columbia Headwaters, Upper Snake, and St. Mary). We considered information we received from public comments and peer reviewers in our preparation of the final recovery plan. Updated information was incorporated into the final recovery plan and the six final RUIPs as appropriate, and substantive issues and comments, together with our responses, are summarized in appendices. Comments relating to overall recovery strategy and criteria are addressed in an appendix to the final recovery plan, while those comments specific to individual recovery units are addressed in appendices to each RUIP. Recovery Plan Components The primary recovery strategy for bull trout in the coterminous United States that we describe in the recovery plan is to: (1) conserve bull trout so that they are geographically widespread across representative habitats and demographically stable in six recovery units; (2) effectively manage and ameliorate the primary threats in each of six recovery units at the core area scale such that bull trout are not likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future; (3) build upon the numerous and ongoing conservation actions implemented on behalf of bull trout since their listing in 1999, and 4

improve our understanding of how various threat factors potentially affect the species; (4) use that information to work cooperatively with our partners to design, fund, prioritize, and implement effective conservation actions in those areas that offer the greatest longterm benefit to sustain bull trout and where recovery can be achieved; and (5) apply adaptive management principles to implementing the bull trout recovery program to incorporate new information. Bull trout population status is stable or increasing in some core areas. However, in developing this recovery plan, we also acknowledge that despite our best conservation efforts, it is possible that some existing bull trout core areas may become extirpated due to various factors, including the effects of small populations and isolation. Our current approach to developing recovery criteria and necessary recovery actions for bull trout is intended to ensure adequate conservation of genetic diversity, life history features, and broad geographical representation of bull trout populations while acknowledging some local extirpations may occur. We may initiate an assessment of whether recovery has been achieved and delisting is warranted when the recovery criteria below have been met in each recovery unit. Alternatively, if recovery criteria are met in an individual recovery unit, we may initiate an assessment of whether it is possible to designate that recovery unit as a distinct population segment and if delisting of that distinct population segment would be warranted. For the Coastal, Mid-Columbia, and Upper Snake Recovery Units, the recovery criteria provide that primary threats must be managed effectively in at least 75 percent of all core areas, representing 75 percent or more of bull trout local populations within each 5

of these three recovery units. For the Columbia Headwaters Recovery Unit, the recovery criteria provide that primary threats must be managed effectively in at least 75 percent of complex core areas and at least 75 percent of simple core areas, representing 75 percent or more of bull trout local populations within the recovery unit. For the Klamath and St. Mary Recovery Units, the recovery criteria provide that all primary threats must be managed effectively in all existing core areas, representing all existing local populations. In addition, because 9 of the 17 known local populations in the Klamath Recovery Unit have been extirpated and others are significantly imperiled and require active management, we believe that the geographic distribution of bull trout within this recovery unit needs to be substantially expanded before it can be considered to have met recovery goals. To achieve recovery, we seek to add seven additional local populations distributed among the three core areas (two in the Upper Klamath Lake core area, three in the Sycan core area, and two in the Upper Sprague core area). In recovery units where shared foraging/migratory/overwintering (FMO) habitat outside core areas has been identified, connectivity and habitat in these shared FMO areas should be maintained in a condition sufficient for regular bull trout use and successful dispersal among the connecting core areas for those core areas to meet the criterion. If threats are effectively managed at these thresholds, we expect that bull trout populations will respond accordingly and reflect the biodiversity principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation. Specifically, achieving the recovery criteria in each recovery unit would result in geographically widespread and demographically stable local bull trout populations within the range of natural variation, with their essential cold water habitats connected to allow their diverse life history forms to persist into the foreseeable 6

future; therefore, the species would be brought to the point where the protections of the Act are no longer necessary. Authority The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: September 3, 2015. Robyn Thorson Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 7

[FR Doc. 2015-24670 Filed: 9/29/2015 08:45 am; Publication Date: 9/30/2015] 8