Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Similar documents
11 CHECKLISTS Master Checklists All Stages CHECKLIST 1 FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT

Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

CHECKLIST 4: PRE-OPENING STAGE AUDIT

CHECKLIST 5: ROADWORK TRAFFIC SCHEME AUDIT

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

The Safe System Approach

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Safety Barrier System Acceptance Conditions SMART Steel Crash Cushion

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines Appendix 5B Accessway standards and guidelines

General Design Factors

To position power poles a safe distance from the road to minimise the likelihood of being accidentally hit by vehicles.

11.2 Detailed Checklists CHECKLIST 1: FEASIBILITY STAGE AUDIT. 1.1 General topics Scope of project; function; traffic mix

SMART STEEL CRASH CUSHION

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

16.1 Introduction Pedestrian. signage strategies

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Grade-separation for cyclists includes cycling bridges and cycling tunnels, specially built for cyclists and possibly co-used by pedestrians.

Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

Design Overview. Section 4 Standard Plans for Design. Pedestrian Access Routes. Pedestrian Access Routes. Overview. Cross Slope

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. Module 3 Curb Ramps & Blended Transitions

Appendix A Guiding Principles for Cycling Safety in Work Zones

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

CHECKLIST 3: DETAILED DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Guide to Road Design Part 3: Geometric Design Session I 18 October 2016

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

NOT TO SCALE PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DETAILS CURB DETAILS DATE: MARCH 2013 FILE NAME: CURB.DWG

Determining Minimum Sightlines at Grade Crossings: A Guide for Road Authorities and Railway Companies

H8 Signs, Supports and Poles

10 SHERFORD Town Code

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

6. BREENS/GARDINERS/HAREWOOD INTERSECTION - SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

AN INTRODUCTION TO ROADSIDE HAZARD MANAGEMENT

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Driveway Design Criteria

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

CHAPTER 5: GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING ELEMENTS

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

Rhebogue Neighbourhood Greenway. Road Safety Audit Stage 2

Geometric designs for Safe Highways. Dr. Manoj M. Asst. Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Delhi

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

West Midlands Cycle Design Guidance Cycling and the Midland Metro

Off-road Trails. Guidance

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Post impact trajectory of vehicles at rural intersections

ROAD SAFETY AUDIT REPORT STAGE 3 DETAILED DESIGN STAGE ROAD SAFETY AUDIT ROAD NETWORK FOR THE PROPOSED FIRST ESTATE SUBDIVISION

Traffic calming regulations (Scotland)

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

SECTION 12 ROAD MARKINGS AND DELINEATION

NMT SAFE STUDY APPROACH

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Access Management Standards

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERSECTIONS

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

ROAD SAFETY AROUND SCHOOLS Audit Checklists. Prepared for the Road Safety Council s

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS. Transportation Improvements: Santa s Village Road (MR15) Public Meeting

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Considerations in the Review and Approval of a Driveway in Your Jurisdiction

Traffic Management Guidelines for Structure Rehabilitation Projects

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Geometric Design Tables

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

A5.1 Permitted activities

18.1 Introduction Maintaining pedestrian-related Problems arising in the long term. infrastructure

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

TASRAIL STANDARD - FENCING

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Shared Use Path Design

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

What Is a Complete Street?

Transcription:

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This document is meant to provide a review of available reference documents for determining appropriate fencing requirements for cycleway paths and shared use paths. This review is intended to assist and inform the operators/ designers of such infrastructure. 1.2 The severity of the hazards, and likelihood of the hazard manifesting, for the cyclist will be a function of many variables taken together, including The gradient of the path. The terrain and obstacles either side of the path. The frequency and acuteness of changes in direction of the path. Terminations in the path with other paths, stairs, bridges and roads. The eye sight distance of the cyclists and pedestrians. The levels of lighting along the path during the day and night. The width, camber and surface finish and quality on the path. The water drainage characteristics of the path surface. The quantity of users and the various purposes of use. The level of safety signage for users of the path. 1.3 Based on our review we can offer a number of fencing specifications from which an operator/ designer can select (subject to site and application specific circumstances) to achieve an outcome that will meet such standards and regulations. This is intended to ensure that all involved parties: the supplier and purchaser / owner / operator of the fenced area, meet their respective duties of care. 2.0 SCOPE 2.1 Safety fencing along paths for use by cyclists alone and shared use paths with pedestrians. 3.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 3.1 Austroads document AGRD06A 09 Guide to Road Design Part 6A-Pedestrian and Cyclist Paths (2009) ( Part 6A ). 3.2 More recently a related guideline has been released Part 6B: Roadside Environment (2010). ( Part 6B ) 3.3 Austroads document AP-11.14 99 Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14- Bicycles (1999) ( Part 14 ). Superceded by Part 6A. 3.4 There is also an overview document Cycling Aspects of Austroads Guides (2009). We suggest it is preferable to refer to Part 6A. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 1 of 10

4.0 DEFINITIONS Partial Barrier Fence: A fence provided to reduce the likelihood of access to a slope or fall which due to the height of the fall, the existence of obstacles or grade of the batter, could result in injury. Full Barrier Fence: A fence provided to generally prevent access to a slope or fall which due to the height of the fall, the existence of obstacles or grade of the batter, could result in injury 5.0 SUMMARY 5.1 Our summary of the guidelines in Part 6A and Part 14 in respect of safety fencing is as follows: 5.1.1 On flat terrain allow a lateral clearance of 1 metre (0.5m absolute min.) from the edge of the path. On high speed paths the clearance should be considerably greater. 5.1.2 Where there is a hazard beside the path a barrier should be considered. 5.1.3 Where a vertical drop or a steep batter exists beside the path a barrier should be considered. 5.1.4 Safety fencing should be at least 300mm from the edge of the path. to avoid catching the pedals of cyclists. 5.1.5 Where a safety barrier or other objects located within 1.0 m of the path(s) of cyclists it should be free of sharp edges, exposed elements or corners so as to minimise the risk of injury to cyclists in the event of the feature/ object being struck by a bicycle. It should be designed to minimise the potential for bicycle handle bars or pedals to become caught in the feature should an errant bicycle collide with it. 5.1.6 Where there is a vertical fall: 0.25-2metre, that less than 5m from the path, a partial barrier is required Greater than 2 metre, that is less than 5m from the path, a full barrier is required 5.1.7 Where there is a batter slope (without obstacles) with a fall of 1 metres: over 1 to 3 metres, that is less than 5m from the path, a partial barrier is required over less than 1 metre (i.e. 45 degrees), that is less than 5 metres from the path, a full barrier is required 5.1.8 Where there is a batter slope (with obstacles) with a fall of 1 metres: over 3-4 metres, that is less than 5m from the path, a partial barrier is required over less than 3 metres, that is less than 5 metre from the path, a full barrier is required 5.1.9 A fence of 1200mm high should only be used where the severity of the hazard is considered to be low. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 2 of 10

5.1.10 A higher fence should be considered where the fence is protecting path users from a very sever hazard. 5.1.11 Fencing to be light in colour to increase visibility at night. (Part 6A 10.1) 5.1.12 Refer APPENDIX C BICYCLE SAFETY AUDIT CHECKLIST from Part 6A. 6.0 EXTRACTS FROM PART 6A 6.1 The introduction to 6A states: The Guide to Road Design Part 6A: Pedestrian and Cyclist Paths provides guidance for road designers and other practitioners on the design of paths for safe and efficient walking and cycling. The guide provides a brief introduction to planning and the need for a path, describes the types of path and covers the requirements of path users. However, the main focus of Part 6A is the geometric design of paths and related facilities such as intersections between paths, and terminal treatments. Detailed guidance is provided on path location, alignment, width, clearances, crossfall, drainage and sight distance requirements. The location and design of paths may be influenced by a range of aspects that need to be considered and facilities that need to be accommodated within roadsides. In particular, designers should refer to the Guide to Road Design: Part 6: Roadside Design, Safety and Barriers Part 6B: Roadside Environment. The design of pedestrian and cyclist paths may also be influenced by design considerations and requirements covered in other parts of the Guide to Road Design. In addition, road designers should also refer to relevant parts of the Austroads Guide to Traffic Management in relation to traffic management devices and requirements that may need to be accommodated within a roadside or may otherwise influence the design. Section 7.7 Clearances, Batters and Need for Fences Section 7.7.1 Clearances (Underlining below is our emphasis.) The following guidelines should be applied for clearances between the cyclist operating spaces and potential hazards beside paths: Where both the areas beside the path and the path alignment are both relatively flat a lateral clearance of at least 1.0 m (0.5 m absolute minimum) should be provided between the edge of any path for cycling and any obstacle, which if struck may result in cyclists losing control or being injured. However, on high-speed paths it is most desirable to have a clearance considerably greater than 1.0 metre. Where it is considered that a hazard beside the path has attributes that could cause serious injury to cyclists (e.g. sharp surfaces such as the rear side of the posts and rails of steel W-beam road safety barrier), designers should assess the risk of cyclists losing control on the particular section of path, and consider either increasing the lateral clearance or shielding cyclists from the hazard. Depending on the situation a rub rail behind the posts or a cyclist fence near the edge of the path could be provided. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 3 of 10

Where a vertical drop or a steep batter exists or must be provided adjacent to the path the guidance in Section 7.7.2 (see extract below) should be applied. Obstacles beside paths include bushes, culvert end walls, trees and large rocks used in landscaping. Provided the design and end treatments are appropriate, or where extenuating circumstances exist, a lesser clearance may be acceptable for fences and other obstacles that have smooth features and are aligned parallel to the path (0.3 m absolute minimum). Bluedog commentary 1. In instance where the gap between the path and a hazard does not comply with either of the above 3 points, we recommend the responsible party install a safety fence based on a site specific hazard assessment (severity of hazard and likelihood of occurrence). 2. A safety fence should be 300mm from the edge of the path. This is consistent with the Part 14. 7.7.2 Batters and Fences General The installation of a fence at the side of a path used by cyclists is desirable where: there is a steep batter or large vertical drop located in close proximity to the path the path is adjacent to an arterial road and it is necessary to restrict cyclist access to the road a bridge or culvert exists on a path a hazard exists adjacent to a particular bicycle facility cyclists are likely to be blazing a separate trail at an intersection between paths or around a path terminal. Steep batter or vertical drop (Underlining below is our emphasis.) Figure 7.4 provides a specific recommendation for the provision of a fence on a path in close proximity to a steep batter or vertical drop. In addition to those referred to in the figure, other circumstances may exist where it may be desirable to erect fences even if provision is not required by the figure (e.g. a curving path alignment, located in the vicinity of batters or a drop-off, bridges). A fence barrier may be appropriate where a path is located adjacent to a watercourse or lake. A full barrier fence would be appropriate where a vertical fall to water occurs within 5 m of a path. Figure 7.4 highlights the circumstances in which either a partial barrier fence (refer to Figure 7.5), or a full barrier fence (refer to Figure 7.6) or equivalent form of protection should be used. These barriers are intended to prevent access to a slope or to a fall away from a path or other riding surface, where injury might otherwise be expected in the event of a cyclist riding inadvertently off the line of a path. Examples of these fences are provided in the Guide to Road Design Part 6B: Roadside Environment (Austroads 2009g). Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 4 of 10

The recommended height for fences (desirable 1.4 m and minimum 1.2 m) is illustrated in Figure 7.5 and Figure 7.6. The minimum height of 1.2 m should be used only where the severity of the hazard is considered to be low. A higher fence (e.g. 1.6 m) may be considered where the fence is protecting path users from a very sever hazard (e.g. high vertical drop from a structure to a body of water or rocks). Similar or even more stringent measures may be required adjacent to roads. Where a batter or fall is located in close proximity to a road, designers should have regard for the requirements of Figure 7.4, particularly where no kerb exists at the edge of a road. However, the actual measures required should be decided upon with consideration of all road users and of the particular circumstances. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 5 of 10

7.0 EXTRACTS FROM PART 14 7.1 Although Part 14 has been superceded we believe the following extracts are pertinent although they are not necessarily picked up in Part 6A: 7.6.2. Fences and Batters As a key design objective of fences constructed in close proximity to bicycle lane or path facilities, cyclists (and their bicycles) should be able to brush against fences at speed and not be injured or `caught' as a result. Where it is proposed to use fences or similar structures in association with bicycle lane or path facilities, the following factors should also be considered: the various fence elements (posts, railings etc.) should be designed to minimise the possibility of cyclists snagging their handlebars or pedals on the barrier; Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 6 of 10

care needs to be exercised in the choice of fences to avoid those that would give rise to spearing injuries if struck (by any vehicle). In particular, the proximity of fences to roads will have a bearing on this aspect; the ends of fences should be at least 1 metre away from the riding surface, but may taper closer to the edge of the path if necessary (refer Figure 7-18). They should also be appropriately delineated by signs and reflective tape, and preferably be of a light colour the width of paths and lanes should account for the presence of fences (see sect. 6.3.5 for further details on clearances); fence railing likely to have (or develop) burrs, splinters, sharp or rough edges or surfaces should be avoided. In general steel fences are preferred; The following fence types should not be used within 1 metre of bicycle routes, and preferably would be located further away: Treated pine log - these are often constructed with exposed ends and are invariably too low to be used adjacent to bicycle routes; Chain mesh - these may catch pedals, have exposed elements in some instances and have been responsible for spearing injuries; and Post and wire - these have exposed elements. Pedestrian fencing, preferably set back at least 450 mm from the line of kerb, should be installed on the footway of the bridge to separate the cyclists from the motor vehicles in the adjacent traffic lane. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 7 of 10

8.0 EXTRACTS FROM PART 14 8.1 Although Part 14 has been superceded we believe the following extracts are pertinent although they are not necessarily picked up in Part 6A: 4.1.6 Fences Where practicable, paths for pedestrians and cyclists should be provided within the road reservation and located outside the security fence in order to prevent encroachment onto the road. Options for the location of the fences are shown in Figure 4.3 Pedestrian fences Pedestrian barriers and fences are used along roads or at pedestrian facilities where there is a serious hazard adjacent to the road or facility. Typical hazards may include a high-speed road or railway, a steep drop-off or excavation, large open drains or deep water. Hazardous areas also include locations where there is an unacceptable number (or risk) of crashes involving pedestrians crossing the road and the approaches to signalised intersections and pedestrian crossings. Where it is proposed to use fences or similar structures in association with a path provided for pedestrians and/or cyclists they should: be high enough to discourage pedestrians from climbing over the top be located and of a height and construction that will not obstruct sight lines between motor vehicle drivers and path users or between motor vehicle drivers, remembering that children often use paths not have horizontal rails that could spear a vehicle, other road users or pedestrians (e.g. post and rail fencing constructed of galvanised pipe or timber) not have horizontal fence rails that can act as a ladder for children Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 8 of 10

not have gaps wide enough (in a full barrier fence) to enable children to climb through the fence be finished with no sharp edges or protrusions which could be a danger to those who use the railing for support or guidance; in some situations finishing the fencing or barrier in a colour contrasting to its surroundings is appropriate to assist its identification by people with impaired vision not have protrusions that could snag cyclists or the pedals of cycles as they pass not be constructed of material (particularly fence railings) likely to have (or develop) burrs, splinters, sharp or rough edges or surfaces. In general steel fences are preferred. Where fencing with horizontal rails cannot be avoided, it should be constructed so that: the fence is not located within the desirable clear zone appropriate to the road in question if this is practicable if the fence must be located within the desirable clear zone, the rail height above the ground should not exceed 300 mm the fence does not obstruct the necessary sight distances at entrances and intersections. Barriers and fences, etc., placed for the purpose of protecting, controlling or guiding pedestrians should also be designed so that they are safe and appropriate for cyclists. Fences for cyclists The installation of a fence at the side of a path used by cyclists is desirable where: there is a steep batter or large fall located in close proximity to the path the path is adjacent to an arterial road and it is necessary to separate cyclists from motor vehicles a bridge or culvert exists on a path a hazard exists adjacent to a particular bicycle facility cyclists desire lines of travel may mean that they choose a different path at an intersection, between paths or around a path terminal. Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 9 of 10

9.0 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 We recommended terminations of the safety fence be splayed away from the path to a minimum of 1 metre off the path. 9.2 We believe it is preferable to have any safety fence 1 metre from the edge of the path rather than 300mm indicated in Part 6A. 9.3 Consideration should be given to: Crowd loadings that might be applied to the fence. The fence acting as a barrier to bodies of water in which case it may be appropriate for the fence to be equivalent to pool safe so that children cannot climb through the fence nor get under the fence. The fence acting as a barrier for pedestrians to hazards in which case it may be appropriate for the fence to be higher in order to make scaling more difficult, avoiding horizontal rails that can be used as climb points 10.0 COMPLIANT FENCING OFFERED BY BLUEDOG FENCES AUSTRALIA 10.1 We have considered the relevant guidelines and on this basis developed our cycleway safety fencing range. 10.2 Bluedog recommends that the operator of the path select the panel type and height that best suits the site specific considerations, to ensure the fence complies with the more general functional requirements of the guidelines. 10.3 Site specific considerations might include, but not be limited to: the intensity of use, proximity to motor vehicle traffic; the terrain and landscape adjacent to the path. 10.4 In addition to the operator determining the design requirements of the fence panels, there are also specific installation requirements that should be adhered to if the installed fence is to meet the relevant regulations and standards. 11.0 DISCLAIMER While BLUEDOG FENCES AUSTRALIA, has sought to apply all due care and diligence in making this appraisal, BLUEDOG FENCES AUSTRALIA takes no responsibility for decisions based upon this advice, and recommends that any interested party seeks legal and / or professional advice. Copyright 2012 by Bluedog Fences Australia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored by any process for any purpose, without written permission from the publisher Requirements for Cycleway.docx Page 10 of 10