TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Similar documents
WELCOME. to the meeting for the. Westside Avenue Action Plan Gateway to Revitalization

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

SNCC Demographic Trends

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

3.9 Recreational Trails and Natural Areas

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Route 7 Corridor Study

Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Peterborough Council on Aging

Project Description Form 6V

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

3.0 Future Conditions

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

TRANSPORTATION & ACCESS

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

HYATTSVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. City Council Update March 19, 2018

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bicycle Lanes Planning, Design, Funding South Mountain Partnership Trails Workshop Roy Gothie PennDOT Statewide Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

AGENDA ITEM G-2 Public Works

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Appendix T-2: Transportation Facilities Inventory

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Ajax: The Road to Complete Streets

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

West Village Mobility & Integration

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Bridge and Bike / Pedestrian SAWG (#15)

INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Safe Routes to School Action Plan Aberdeen, Idaho

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

Provo City Transportation Master Plan

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

STUDY PROCESS & SCHEDULE

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. October 8, 2015

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

APPENDIX M FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PORTION OF THE VISION 2050 PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS MILWAUKEE URBANIZED AREA INTRODUCTION

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Transcription:

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY ROADWAY SYSTEM There are approximately 40 miles of roadways in Manitou Springs. For planning purposes, roadways are typically assigned a functional classification which defines the role of the roadway in the community. Roadway classifications for Manitou Springs were assigned using Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Teller-El Paso County 911 (E- 911) datasets. Functional Classifications Each of the City s four roadway classifications is described below and identified on the Functional Roadway Classification map. Expressways. US Highway 24 is the only roadway classified as an expressway in Manitou Springs. It is characterized by its separated directional travel lanes, limited access via on- and off-ramps, and a primary focus on mobility. The only full interchange within the City is at the east end of Manitou Avenue where it travels under US Highway 24; however, US Highway 24 may be accessed via Serpentine Drive and Washington Avenue Bypass, as well. Arterials. Manitou Avenue is the only roadway classified as an arterial in Manitou Springs. It provides connections to US Highway 24 and accommodates the City s highest traffic volumes. Collectors. The primary role of collector streets is to gather traffic from local streets and funnel it onto arterials. Examples include: El Paso Boulevard, Crystal Hills Boulevard, and Ruxton Avenue. Local. Roadways in this category are not intended for long distance travel, and are typically designed to discourage through traffic. In Manitou Springs, these streets provide a high level of access to the City s residential areas. Examples include Lovers Lane and Prospect Place. Funding and Maintenance Maintenance and funding for roadways in Manitou Springs is primarily the responsibility of the Street Division of the City s Public Services Department. CDOT maintains and manages Manitou Avenue and US Highway 24. Traffic Forecasts Regional traffic is forecast to grow at a faster rate than traffic in the Manitou Springs area. The Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG) estimates that total travel volume in the region will increase by 50% by 2040, compared to about 20% on US Highway 24 and 10-15% on Manitou Avenue. However, fluctuations in traffic and congestion due to tourism and special events will continue to influence travel volumes, with highest volumes during the summer.

Seasonal Variation: US Highway 24 Historical data from a CDOT continuous counter along US Highway 24 at Green Mountain Falls shows that between 2003-2014, average daily traffic in July is consistently about 40% higher than in January. Although traffic volumes along US Highway 24 corridor fluctuated somewhat during the same time period, summer traffic volumes increased between 2014 and 2016. Manitou Avenue Traffic volumes along Manitou Avenue have remained relatively steady over the past 10-12 years. One-day summer counts in 2014 were comparable to counts in 2004. Congestion Management The City has taken actions to manage traffic volume and congestion, including: initiating a year-round shuttle service; modifying the Mountain Metro route from Colorado Springs; and instituting a Residential Parking Program to help balance competing demands for onstreet parking in Englemann Canyon and downtown. TRAFFIC & CONGESTION 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 US HIGHWAY 24 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (SEASONAL 2003-2015) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 January Manitou Avenue. by CDOT one-day counts in the 2014summer peak season show that overall traffic volumes of 15,000 vehicles per day (vpd) near Beckers Lane; 18,000 west of US Highway 24; 14,000 vpd at Deer Path Avenue; 11,000 at Ruxton Avenue; and 4,000 vpd at Cave of the Winds Road. Although Manitou Avenue traffic volumes are within the intended capacity of a two-lane roadway with a center left turn lane, parallel parking maneuvers and heavy pedestrian activity at crossings between Pawnee and Ruxton Avenue add to congestion in the corridor, particularly in the downtown. July Source: CDOT On-Line Transportation System MANITOU AVE. SUMMER AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (2004-2014) East of US 24 Under US 24 East of Deer Path East of Ruxton 2014 2010 2007 2004 Note: Data not available for all years in all locations Source: CDOT On-Line Transportation System

Ruxton Avenue. As with US Highway 24 and Manitou Avenue, traffic volumes along Ruxton Avenue are much higher during the summer. As shown below, average traffic on Ruxton is about 6,000 vehicles per day (vpd) in the summer and about 3,000 vpd during the off-season. 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 RUXTON AVE. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (SEASONAL 2014-2015) Weekday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Average Vehicles Incline Closed (2014) Off-season (Dec. 2015) Summer (July 2015) Source: Ruxton Avenue Use and Impact Study (2015) COMMUTING PATTERNS Number of Commuters: Over 88% of employed residents commute out of the City for work. 82% of workers employed in the City do not live in Manitou Springs, and commute from other locations. 225 individuals both live and work in Manitou Springs. Ruxton Avenue Several popular tourist attractions the Pikes Peak Cog Railway, Manitou Incline, and Barr and Intemann trails, in particular are accessed from Ruxton Avenue. Recent traffic counts show Ruxton Avenue carries about 6,000 vehicles per day during the summer and about 75% of this traffic is generated by corridor attractions. Off-season weekday counts taken while the Incline was closed in 2014 indicate average daily traffic on Ruxton was about 1,300 vpd. Ongoing efforts are needed to manage parking and traffic within the corridor and reduce impacts on area residents such as by encouraging and/or requiring shuttle usage to corridor destinations. Commuting Patterns Most commuters traveling to Manitou Springs come from areas east the City. About 75% of commuting trips are less than 10 miles, indicating that many commuters are likely traveling from Colorado Springs. Around 14% of commuting trips are over 50 miles. Source: US Census Bureau, LEHD 2014

Method of Travel to Work The mode split for Manitou Springs residents (which reflects how residents commute to work) shows that the majority of residents commute by car, truck, or van. However, the percentage of County residents in this category ishigher. Manitou Springs had a higher percentage of residents who walked to work, although no residents commuted by bicycle in 2014. Travel Times to Work In 2014, it took an average of 21.1 minutes for a Manitou Springs resident to commute to their place of work. This is a slight increase from 2010, when the average time was 20.4 minutes. As the region s population continues to grow, it is likely that commute times will increase. Transit Facilities In 2015, the City of Manitou purchased the Tajine Alami/Hiawatha Gardens site for a combined parking and transit facility. Opportunities for the reuse of the existing building and longer-term opportunities for the site are currently being explored. MODE SPLIT, 2014 Manitou Springs El Paso County Car, Truck or Van 80.8% 87.7% Transit 1.3% 0.8% Walked 8.2% 4.1% Bicycle 0.0% 0.5% Worked at Home 9.4% 5.8% Taxicab, motorcycle or other means 0.4% 1.2% PUBLIC TRANSIT Mountain Metro: In 2013, Mountain Metro began a seasonal shuttle service in Manitou Springs between May and September, and year-round service began in May 2016. Routes servicing Manitou Springs include: Route 3 (year-round) Service begins in Downtown Colorado Springs and ends at Hiawatha Gardens (10 Old Man s Trail) where passengers can transfer to Route 33 and Route 36. Adult fare costs $1.75. Route 33 (year-round) Service begins at Hiawatha Gardens and travels west on Manitou Avenue to the Ruxton Ave roundabout, up Ruxton Avenue to the Incline/Cog Railway, and returns to Hiawatha Gardens. This route operates with a reduced schedule during the offseason. Travel on this route is free. Route 36 (seasonal) Service begins at El Paso Boulevard near Beckers Lane, travels west on Manitou Avenue to the Ruxton roundabout, then returns along Manitou Avenue, turning north onto Garden of the Gods road, then east on El Paso Boulevard to Beckers Lane. This route is seasonal and only operates between May and September. Travel on this route is free. PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE NETWORK Source: US Census Creek Walk Trail: The Creek Walk Trail is an off-street multiuse trail along Fountain Creek that provides a regional connection to the Midland Trail in the eastern part of the City. The trail is incomplete to the west, which limits its functionality as a transportation route, although is still serves as a recreational amenity. Opportunities to complete missing segments of the trail are being explored. Funding to complete additional phases has been committed through the regional transportation improvement program..

Walkability: The downtown area is highly walkable, with wide sidewalks, bulb-outs at intersections, and multiple crosswalks. Other City streets are not as walkable. Many residential streets do not have sidewalks, and the steep grade and condition can make them difficult to navigate on foot. PARKING The City s public parking system has 817 spaces, including on-street parking (449 spaces) and off-street lots (488 spaces). More than half of these parking spaces are located in the downtown. Revenue USD Location $200,000 $180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 CITY-MANAGED PARKING INVENTORY No. of Spaces Rate Time Limits Canon Lot 43 $1.00 for first 4 hours, N/A Wichita Lot 85 $5.00 for the day N/A Smischny Lot 41 N/A Prospect Lot 41 Permit Required N/A Barr Trail Lot 40 $20 per day, reservation only 24 hrs., 7 days a week Hiawatha Gardens 120 Free N/A Downtown: Manitou Ave, Canon Ave/Park Ave, 1 st block of Ruxton (2 hour limit) 237 $1 each for first 3 hours, $2 each for hours 4-6, $3 each for over 6 hours 7 am to 8 pm summer, 7 am to 5 pm winter Ruxton Ave Parking 131 $10 per hour 8 am to 4 pm, M-F TOTAL 738 CITY REVENUES FROM PARKING FEES, 2015 Transit Ridership Between May and December 2016, ridership on Shuttle Route 33 reached 130,327. Ridership on Route 36 reached 35,999 between May and September 2016. Transit Funding While regular transit services are provided by Mountain Metro (which receives funding from the Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority), the City of Manitou Springs pays Mountain Metro to operate the City s free shuttle services (Routes 33 and 36). Providing this service cost the City around $260,000 in 2015 and is expected to increase in 2017. Seasonal Parking Patterns Based on 2015 parking revenue data, parking demand peaks between May and September, with the highest demand in July. Parking revenues are two to three times higher during the peak season than the off season. Source: City of Manitou Springs

Parking Authority Board (PAB): The PAB was established in 2009 to make recommendations regarding the acquisition, funding, construction and operation of parking facilities within the City. The mission of the PAB is to recommend the development of parking management solutions and improvements for business, residential, visitor and recreational users. Residential Parking Program (RPP): The goal of the RPP is to increase the amount of on-street parking available to residents and their guests, while balancing the needs of others who desire to park along the street. The RPP has been implemented along Ruxton Avenue and residential streets adjacent to downtown. Parking Management: Standard Parking (SP+) Municipal Services provides parking management services for the City. SP+ manages on-street parking; paid public parking lots in the downtown; the residential permit program; and issues parking tickets and collects fees. The program has helped to promote parking turnover in the downtown. The City is continuing to address issues such as: balancing parking concerns from neighborhoods and downtown businesses and residents; identifying approaches to increase parking inventory; and implementing systems to improve wayfinding and provide real-time parking information.

PLANNED FUNDED FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS A range of transportation improvements are planned in the City to improve the condition of existing facilities; add new facilities; eliminate gaps; and improve mobility. Project Name Canon and Park Avenue Pedestrian and Drainage Improvements CreekWalk Trail - Phases III through VII E. Manitou Avenue Pedestrian and Drainage Improvements 2015 Costs $ 3.3 million $ 2.1 million $ 2.4 million Historic Bridges Repair and Restoration $ 200,000 Manitou Avenue: West End Pedestrian and Drainage Improvements Manitou Springs Citywide Sidewalks, Drainage and Utility Improvements Manitou Springs Transit Shuttle and Surface or Structure Parking $ 5.0 million $ 1.2 million $ 650,000 Ruxton Ave. Pedestrian and Drainage Improvements $ 750,000 W. Colorado Ave. Reconstruction: 31st St. to US 24 $ 12.2 million* *Multi-jurisdictional project Westside Avenue Action Plan: In the summer of 2012, the City of Manitou Springs, along with El Paso County, Colorado Springs and CDOT, began the Westside Avenue Action Plan (WAAP). The WAAP brought together stakeholders in each community to envision improvements to Colorado Avenue/ Manitou Avenue between 31 st Street and the US 24 interchange in Manitou Springs. The study resulted in recommendations to remove one travel lane in each direction in order to create center turn lanes, sidewalks and bike lanes throughout the entire corridor. (www.westsideavenueactionplan.com) WAAP Improvements: It is anticipated that construction on the Manitou Springs portion of the WAAP project will start in January 2017. Improvements include new pavement; new stormwater management system; sidewalks; undergrounding of overhead electric lines; a realignment of Fountain Creek; bike lanes; a grade separated crossing for the Midland trail at Fountain Creek; street lighting and a pedestrian overpass north of Columbia Street. It is expected that these improvements will help spur redevelopment in the City s URA.

LOCAL AND REGIONAL PARTNERS Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG) Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority Metropolitan Parking District Mountain Metro Transit/City of Colorado Springs Parking Authority Board RELATED PLANS & STUDIES Moving Forward 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (2014) Pikes Peak Area Council of Government. Parking Plan Progress Report (2011) City of Manitou Springs Residential Parking Advisory Panel Report (2008) City of Manitou Springs Parking Management Study (2007) City of Manitou Springs Manitou Avenue Master Plan (1998) City of Manitou Springs Ruxton Avenue Corridor Use and Impact Study (2015) SUPPORTING MAPS Functional Roadway Classification Transit Routes and Parking Transit Routes and Parking (Downtown) Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities SOURCES CDOT US Census Bureau LEHD US Census Bureau American Community Survey (2010-2014) City of Manitou Springs