Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

Similar documents
2017 Pavement Management Services Pavement Condition Report Salt Lake City, UT

Pavement Management Program

VDOT s Pavement Management Program. Presented by: Tanveer Chowdhury Maintenance Division, VDOT March 05, 2010

City of West Des Moines PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Keeping good roads good

Tacoma Streets 101. City of Tacoma - Citizen Neighborhood Street Improvement and Safety Task Force

Pavement Management Report. City Council Meeting of May 21, 2013

Performance of Ultra-Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC) Surface Treatment on US-169 Princeton, Minnesota. Transportation Research

2018 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (September 2015)

Driving Indiana s Economic Growth

The City of Port Moody 2013 Paved Road Network Condition Assessment

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (March 27, 2003)

DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STRATEGY FOR NATIONAL ROADS IN QUEENSLAND

Non-State Federal Aid Highways. Pavement Condition Ratings. H e r k i m e r a n d O n e i d a C o u n t i e s

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

City of Davis Pavement Management Program

Use of Performance Metrics on The Pennsylvania Turnpike. Pamela Hatalowich, Penn Turnpike Commission Paul Wilke, Applied Research Associates, Inc.

Executive Summary. Introduction

land transport road assets

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION. Asphalt Update. Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

Lake Waterford Community Association Meeting. November 15, 2016

Appendix B Existing ADOT Data Parameters

land transport road assets

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

REAL WORLD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS

C ITY OF B EDFORD H EIGHTS

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Pavement Evaluation of the Nairobi Eastern By-Pass Road

Bids MAY 24, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $7,500,000.00)

Department of Internal Affairs Mandatory Non-Financial Performance Measures 2013 Roads and Footpaths

City of Lakewood. Public Works Transportation. Transportation Division Current and Future Projects Division Manager: Weston Ott, P.E.

City of Coquitlam. Pavement Management Technology. Profile/GPS/Videolog Vehicle. Pavement Management System. SUBSURFACE PROFILING - Road Radar

Case Studies Using Falling Weight Deflectometer Data with Mechanistic Empirical Design and Analysis

2014 Street and Utility Improvement Project. Feasibility Report January 28, 2014

Project Update May 2018

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

Paving for Progress Municipal Streets Seminar

SECTION 5: PEER CITY REVIEW

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Streets Presentation. Public Works Department. Jill Mercurio, P.E. City Engineer November 19, 2013

APPENDIX D COST SUMMARY TABLES

TOWN OF SHUTESBURY PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY SCENARIO 2

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

City* State* ZIP Code*

I-64 BATTLEFIELD BLVD: PERFORMANCE MEETS EXPECTATION

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Smoothing Out the Bumpy Road Ahead

Atwood Avenue Fair Oaks Avenue Cottage Grove Road

Available online at ScienceDirect. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016 )

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

Incorporating Sidewalks into Transportation Asset Management. Presentation by Alan S. Kercher, P.E. Kercher Engineering, Inc.

Utah Department of Transportation Division of Asset Management taking care of what we have

MnROAD Mainline IRI Data and Lane Ride Quality MnROAD Lessons Learned December 2006

Board of Supervisors February 27, 2017

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

Optimising Gravel Road Maintenance Strategies. Presenter: Gerrie van Zyl

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Kentucky Transportation Center

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

Building Great Neighbourhoods BONNIE DOON

2016 FACT SHEET ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS. Engineering Street Operations net 2016 budget is $5,199,900 WHAT IS ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS?

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION East 19 th St, Harper to O Connell Thursday, March 29, :00 PM City Commission Room, City Hall, 6 E.

SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE BID ADVERTISEMENT FOR OLIVE AVENUE CLASS 2 BIKE LANES HSIP, CIP PROJECT NO

50 Year Roads: Don't Accept Anything Less

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

LOOP 360 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

***PROJECT NO AWARDED TO E.S. WAGNER VIA RESOLUTION NO ON JANUARY 19, 2016***

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Bids DECEMBER 21, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $4,700,000.00)

City Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Program

Pavement Management 2011 Status Report

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017

YAVAPAI COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

City of Memphis. To: John E. Cameron, PE City Engineer. From: Kyle Wagenschutz. Cc: Manny Belen, Randall Tatum. Date: November 5, 2015

SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT PHASE TWO

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Why We do Preventive Maintenance

CSAH 101 Preliminary Design

Southeaster Pavement Preservation Partnership 2010 Update Welcome to Tennessee. Michael J. Doran, P.E. Maintenance Division

ADA Retrofits Triggered by Paving: What, When, and Why

Engineering - Bicycle and Pedestrian

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Tack Coat Specifications, Materials, and Construction Practices

Concrete Pavements ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN INTERSECTIONS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (PCCP)

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

General Design Factors

Advanced Construction Techniques. Concrete Pavements ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION OF URBAN INTERSECTIONS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (PCCP)

Purpose and Need Report. Appendix B. Purpose and Need Report

Transcription:

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT February 12, 2015

What is Pavement Management? At a Network Level: Pavement management refers to a systematic process of maintaining, upgrading and operating a network of pavements and involves three major components: the pavement life cycle, the costs associated with this life cycle and pavement management systems.

What is Pavement Management? What this means is.. We are going to gather performance data on our roads on a regular interval and use that information to: 1. Determine the effectiveness of construction and maintenance techniques 2. Determine the best fix and the timing of that fix 3. Determine how best to allocate funds either at a system level or for an individual segment of road 4. Have a tool to predict future performance and budgetary needs

City Level Pavement Management Why is Pavement Management different for a City? Geography and geology is better defined Fewer variables to address Field evaluations and surveys are often more inclusive Owner has better knowledge of the system Range of construction activities and maintenance techniques is often limited Enterprise Asset Management System for all Pavements, Roads, Trails and Parking lots

City Level Pavement Management Why is Pavement Management a needed tool for a City? Provides a fact based tool to support decisions Provides a database for maintaining historical information on construction, maintenance cost and performance Provides budgets, forecasts and needs It can define the what if scenarios for engineers and councils Can support the decision to assess or not Accountability to City Council and residents

Field Distress Surveys Each distress type is weighted and have severity levels of low, moderate or high Bituminous Concrete AC Block Cracking PCC Corner Breaks AC Fatigue Cracking PCC Durability Cracking AC Linear Cracking PCC Linear Cracking AC Patching PCC Faulting AC Bumps and Sags PCC Blow Ups/Buckling AC Potholes PCC Patching AC Raveling PCC Joint Seal Damage AC Edge Cracking PCC Divided Slab AC Rutting PCC Scaling

Overall Condition Index (OCI) OCI = 97.01 OCI = 85.78 OCI = 76.47 OCI = 43.09 OCI = 7.15

Overall Condition Index (OCI)

City Level Pavement Management City of Lakeville, Minnesota Population 58,562 A suburb 23 miles south of downtown Minneapolis in Dakota County in the State of Minnesota Area: 37.83 sq. miles (97.98 km²) 262 lane miles of roadway 104 miles of trails 37 municipal parking lots

Lakeville A Pavement Management Case Study Pavement Management Overview Existing Pavement Conditions Current Pavement Management Philosophy Proposed Pavement Management Philosophy Planned Improvements Surrounding Pavement Management Programs 20 Year Budgeting Scenarios 205th Street

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Low Linear Cracking = 448 ft Ipava Avenue: OCI Range 90-100, Actual OCI = 97.01

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Low Linear Cracking = 768 ft 205th Street : OCI Range 60-90, Actual OCI = 85.78

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Low Block Cracking = 12220 sq ft Low Linear Cracking = 650 sq ft Low Patching = 560 sq ft 210th Street: OCI Range 60-90, Actual OCI = 76.47

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Low Block Cracking = 9886 sq ft Low Alligator Cracking = 224 sq ft Moderate Patching = 9 sq ft Jonquil Avenue: OCI Range 60-90, Actual OCI = 65.78

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Moderate Block Cracking = 32611 sq ft Low Alligator Cracking = 1680 sq ft High Alligator Cracking = 105 sq ft Low Patching = 44 sq ft Moderate Patching = 25410 sq ft 165th Street : OCI Range 35 60, Actual OCI = 43.09

Existing Pavement Conditions Segment Distresses: Moderate Block Cracking = 9795 sq ft Moderate Alligator Cracking = 8815 sq ft High Alligator Cracking = 979 sq ft Moderate Patching = 109 sq ft High Patching = 260 sq ft Iceland Trail: OCI Range 0 35, Actual OCI = 7.15

Existing Pavement Conditions

Existing Pavement Conditions NETWORK OCI RATINGS OCI Range % Roadway 0-35 11.4% 35-60 13.4% 60-90 29.0% 90-100 46.2% NETWORK OCI RATINGS OCI Range % Roadway Length (Miles) 0 10 0.6% 1.2 10 20 1.2% 2.7 20 30 8.1% 18.5 30 40 5.9% 13.3 40 50 5.4% 12.0 50 60 7.3% 16.6 60 70 7.2% 16.5 70-80 13.1% 30.0 80 90 12.9% 29.6 90-100 38.3% 109.8 NETWORK AGE Age % Roadway 0 5 6.9% 5 10 16.7% 10 15 22.3% 15 20 11.1% 20 25 16.3% 25 30 6.8% 30 35 5.8% 35-40 6.5% 40 45 1.9% 45 50+ 5.8%

Existing Pavement Conditions

Current Pavement Management Program Goal NETWORK OCI RATING Network Rating Proposed Goal Current Lakeville Recommend 75 77.04 Eagan 75 Approx: 80 Rosemount 75 Collector 60 Local 77.38* * Weighted Average of Collector and Local Roadways

Lakeville Pavement Management Philosophy Ratings are recommended to be completed every 3 years Street ratings to be based on COE Rating System: Individual street segments are given a pavement rating on a scale of 0-100 based on the recorded data 0-35: Reclamation/Reconstruction 36-60: Mill & Overlay / Patch / Repair 61-90: Seal Coat / Crack Seal / Routine Maintenance 90-100: Do Nothing / Minimal Maintenance Maintain higher network OCI on collector roadways

Proposed Pavement Management Philosophy Local Roadways Pavement condition and not schedule should determine maintenance activities Modify crack seal and seal coat schedule Complete overlay on local roadways

Pavement Management Concerns Cartegraph reports should be used as a tool to make decisions, not as your decision maker Pavement Distress and OCI values are only part of a truly effective pavement management system Outcomes are only as good and reliable as the data used to populate them. Quality of data is critical!

Lakeville - 20 Year Budgeting Scenarios

General What If Scenarios? What if I increase my annual budget, how does that affect my OCI? What would it cost to maintain my current average OCI? What if I continue my current budget for the next 5 years and then increase the budget 10% going forward, how will that affect my OCI? What if I spent more money on preventive maintenance? What if I used a different PG Grade of Asphalt? What if I change my typical pavement section? What if I put in a concrete road vs bituminous? What if I stopped doing preventive maintenance? What if I do nothing?

General Pavement Management Recommendations Rate every segment a minimum of once every three years. In critical stages of a pavements life, monitor roads more closely Incorporate pavement forensics into the pavement management process Include past construction history and typical section information in the database

General Pavement Management Recommendations Increase pavement data collection to include: Roadway section including: Pavement thickness and type Asphalt binder type Subgrade Materials Traffic Volumes Curb and Gutter Trails/Sidewalk Future Prediction Model Optimization Performance Curves Pavement Section Bituminous Binder Performance

Trail and Sidewalk Pavement Management Trail and Sidewalk Pavement Management

Lakeville - Trail and Sidewalk Pavement Management Summary Existing trail and sidewalk conditions Current trail pavement management practices Budget recommendations Proposed modification to program practices East Lake

Trail and Sidewalk Pavement Management Overview Factors that influence OCI value: Trail or sidewalk design/typical section Type, number and severity of pavement distresses Maintenance Structures Location Age Faulting Events Ipava Avenue and 167th Street

Lakeville - Trail Classification Major: Trail segments with high usage Minor: Trail segments with lower usage Park / Greenway / Connector: Located within parks or public areas Other: Aggregate Surfaced Trails

Lakeville Trail and Sidewalk Summary Trail and sidewalk pavement management is a dynamic system, should be re-evaluated every 3 years Policy decisions are required to establish the network condition goals Recommend to revise pavement management practices Existing funding is not adequate to maintain the existing network condition An annual budget of a minimum of $164,500 would be recommended

What Do We Do? Link GIS data to Cartegraph Establish Roadway Design Segments Perform Field Distress Surveys Budget Models Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Develop CIPs Analyze Data/Generate Reports Feasibility Studies Identify New Preventative Maintenance Techniques Pavement Performance Prediction Models Remaining Service Life Evaluations Pavement Coring/Pavement Forensics

Pavement Forensics

Questions?